The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
73,656
Reaction score
16,069
Points
2,220
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.

Well, playing games like letting people vote over a period of months, will undermine confidence in an election.


Maybe you should not have done that.
Yes.....it was outrageous how low level bureaucrats were allow to change our traditional way of voting....what it came down to was a illegal manipulation of the vote....now they want to censor anyone who talks about it......bull friggin shit.
Fraudulent election, documentation or shut the f**k up. Do you think the world is flat? Documentation or shut the f**k up. You say you are not a crazy nut case, Documentation or shut the f**k up
View attachment 445459
This assortment of nothing means nothing. The similar stats were thrown out by multiple courts. This is an embarrassing attempt of proof. The same as everything Trump's idiots have tried to put forward as proof of a fraudulent election. Trump's lap dog attorney general Barr even had to admit there was no evidence.
They weren’t even considered for fear of demmunist shakedown.
The conspicuous anomalies of this election are indisputable. Anyone who doesn’t admit that is a liar.
Absolutely bullshit. There is nothing statistically significant about the numbers shown. That is cherry picked, observational numbers.
If you code all variables, for every election, you could provide unique data, like that, for every Presidential race.
You are talking about what I do for a living.
You are an absolute dumbass like most Trump supporters.
You cannot cure stupid.
You’re a liar. The obvious abnormalities are unquestionable. Any honest person on either side would want that election audited. 60% of Biden voters used mail-in. The vast majority of mail-in should be those most vulnerable to the blue plague (over 70) and military. Both groups consistently republican. That would jibe with 32% trump votes being mail-in. That means that almost all of Biden mail-ins, which made up the majority of his votes, were not necessary. And mail-ins are the easiest to cheat. Judges refused to consider cheating, either because they’re leftists or they feared dem shakedown violence.
If you were honest you’d demand an audit. But you’re a democrat.
Oh please, if you are going to use analytics at least know what you are talking about. Observational analytics are useless. They cannot be used in court. That is why Trump lost every case. That is why his attorney general lap dog, Barr, said there was no evidence of any significant fraud on either side. Statistical evidence whether used in court, to make a business decision, or a medical decision needs to be proved to be statistically significant.
You are so fricking stupid. You do not know what you do not know.
In my real life I do not come in contact with people as stupid as you. It is interesting.
Let me tell you about statistical significance. My good deed for the day. Educate the uneducated.
Statistically significant means a result is unlikely due to chance. The p-value is the probability of obtaining the difference we saw from a sample (or a larger one) if there really isn't a difference for all users.
One more thing, dumbass, the p value should be less than .05 to be statistically significant. Dumb people who think they know things they do not are the worst dumb people.

YOu talk like you think Barr is a statistician.
Barr is a lawyer who knows what is permissible evidence in a court. Observational analytics are not permissible. Statistically significant analytics can be used in conjunction with other evidence.
The same applies for testing medical vaccines. Observational analytics mean little. Vaccines will be approved with statistically significant analytics. Our new technology that allows the proof of analytics is critical.
Somebody who has no idea what they are talking about and throws out observation analytics to prove a fraudulent election is a fraud or stupid or both.
Stupid is dangerous.

So, there was evidence of fraud. Do you think all evidence was found?
As Barr said "no evidence of wide spread fraud that could have effected the results of the election". Straight from the mouth of Trump's lap dog AG.

When you qualify a statement like that, you are admitting to the core claim.


Otherwise, he would just have said, "no evidence", without the qualifiers.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
74,256
Reaction score
14,078
Points
2,210
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.

Well, playing games like letting people vote over a period of months, will undermine confidence in an election.


Maybe you should not have done that.
Yes.....it was outrageous how low level bureaucrats were allow to change our traditional way of voting....what it came down to was a illegal manipulation of the vote....now they want to censor anyone who talks about it......bull friggin shit.
Fraudulent election, documentation or shut the f**k up. Do you think the world is flat? Documentation or shut the f**k up. You say you are not a crazy nut case, Documentation or shut the f**k up
View attachment 445459
This assortment of nothing means nothing. The similar stats were thrown out by multiple courts. This is an embarrassing attempt of proof. The same as everything Trump's idiots have tried to put forward as proof of a fraudulent election. Trump's lap dog attorney general Barr even had to admit there was no evidence.
They weren’t even considered for fear of demmunist shakedown.
The conspicuous anomalies of this election are indisputable. Anyone who doesn’t admit that is a liar.
Absolutely bullshit. There is nothing statistically significant about the numbers shown. That is cherry picked, observational numbers.
If you code all variables, for every election, you could provide unique data, like that, for every Presidential race.
You are talking about what I do for a living.
You are an absolute dumbass like most Trump supporters.
You cannot cure stupid.
You’re a liar. The obvious abnormalities are unquestionable. Any honest person on either side would want that election audited. 60% of Biden voters used mail-in. The vast majority of mail-in should be those most vulnerable to the blue plague (over 70) and military. Both groups consistently republican. That would jibe with 32% trump votes being mail-in. That means that almost all of Biden mail-ins, which made up the majority of his votes, were not necessary. And mail-ins are the easiest to cheat. Judges refused to consider cheating, either because they’re leftists or they feared dem shakedown violence.
If you were honest you’d demand an audit. But you’re a democrat.
Oh please, if you are going to use analytics at least know what you are talking about. Observational analytics are useless. They cannot be used in court. That is why Trump lost every case. That is why his attorney general lap dog, Barr, said there was no evidence of any significant fraud on either side. Statistical evidence whether used in court, to make a business decision, or a medical decision needs to be proved to be statistically significant.
You are so fricking stupid. You do not know what you do not know.
In my real life I do not come in contact with people as stupid as you. It is interesting.
Let me tell you about statistical significance. My good deed for the day. Educate the uneducated.
Statistically significant means a result is unlikely due to chance. The p-value is the probability of obtaining the difference we saw from a sample (or a larger one) if there really isn't a difference for all users.
One more thing, dumbass, the p value should be less than .05 to be statistically significant. Dumb people who think they know things they do not are the worst dumb people.

YOu talk like you think Barr is a statistician.
Barr is a lawyer who knows what is permissible evidence in a court. Observational analytics are not permissible. Statistically significant analytics can be used in conjunction with other evidence.
The same applies for testing medical vaccines. Observational analytics mean little. Vaccines will be approved with statistically significant analytics. Our new technology that allows the proof of analytics is critical.
Somebody who has no idea what they are talking about and throws out observation analytics to prove a fraudulent election is a fraud or stupid or both.
Stupid is dangerous.

So, there was evidence of fraud. Do you think all evidence was found?
Yes, there was evidence of fraud. Such as...


A supporter of President Donald Trump in Marple Township, Pennsylvania, has been charged with voting for the president under the name of his deceased mother, the Delaware County District Attorney announced Monday, becoming the third Republican to be prosecuted for voter fraud in the battleground state.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
74,256
Reaction score
14,078
Points
2,210
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election.
You have any citation to back that up? Or is this just one more thing you pulled out of your ass? And if this wasn't a rigged election, they why don't you prove it? If the MOUNTAINS of evidence were all "baseless," they why the mad rush to deny it and sweep it under the rug? Why the media blackout that having an illegal election that broke so many state laws and accepted and counted so many disqualified ballots from unverified sources was THE REAL CAUSE OF THE RIOT?

In other words, why the avoidance of noting the riot was caused by the Democrats? Had they not spent a YEAR undermining election laws to favor themselves to have an election that broke EVERY RULE in the Carter-Baker Commission that they HAD TO KNOW would raise millions of doubts and questions and objections then give the nation the finger, there never would have been any protest!

Questions remain unanswered to the American people pertaining to:
forged signatures,
ballot-box stuffing,
ballot harvesting,
paying for voting,
offering raffle prizes for voting,
voting in place of the deceased,
doctoring ballots,
voting twice,
not delivering opposition ballots,
destroying opposition ballots,
backdating ballots,
re-running ballots through counting machines,
restricting access of poll observers,
assaulting and threatening observers
advising voters at the voting booth,
‘finding’ stacks of ballots hours and days later,
feigning water main breaks to clear out voting precincts and then manipulate counting machines,
delivering truckloads of computer-generated ballots,
employing software susceptible to vote-switching,
and untold numbers other illegal and un-democratic schemes.

And in every case, done so as to benefit Biden's election.

The over-arching intent here in this "election" was to quash our constitutional right to vote in open and fair elections, to block the rightful, winning candidate from taking office, and to steal future elections at every level. All of these maneuvers, and others yet to be revealed in the aggregate, required central planning behind them.

We need a Special Prosecutor to ask:
  1. Who delivered thousands of ballots by truck?
  2. Who drove the trucks?
  3. Did anyone have to pay for the trucks and drivers?
  4. Who summoned the drivers, in the wee hours, and
  5. who coordinated the delivery and timing?
  6. Who instigated the ‘water main’ break, or the equivalent excuse, in Atlanta?
  7. Who informed postal officials to instruct their workers to backdate ballots?
  8. Who directed postal workers to doctor ballots?
  9. Who directed poll workers to discard or destroy outside envelopes for mail-in ballots?
  10. Where were the ballot mills located?
  11. Who printed thousands of ‘Biden votes,’ and delivered them in pristine condition – thus indicating that the ballots had never been mailed, and virtually had never been handled?
Without these matters being explored and resolved, there never will be any trust in Biden or our elections again by half the country if not more. No thinking person can review the available evidence and think there was nothing there --- all just a coincidence. I have first hand experience in politics and have seen the corruption even at the local level, and it just gets worse the higher up you go.

ALL OF THIS could be spared by simply having an independent counsel and review board study the evidence and PROVE IT IS ALL BASELESS and did NOT affect the outcome of the election. After all, democrats have told us elections are a SACRED TRUST and that every (legal, registered) vote MUST COUNT.

SO WHY DO THE DEMOCRATS FIGHT THIS if they are certain Biden really won?
Investigate your little heart out. I do not care. You will be proven to be the fool we all already know you are.
It's already proven.
 

justinacolmena

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
5,703
Reaction score
1,767
Points
210
Location
alaska, usa
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election.
No. That was the same Mob that stole the election and denied all evidence of fraud.
They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
No. That's Biden trying to take over the government. There's a very wicked, evil old man there, and it's not safe for patriots to remain in the area.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
73,656
Reaction score
16,069
Points
2,220
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.

Well, playing games like letting people vote over a period of months, will undermine confidence in an election.


Maybe you should not have done that.
Yes.....it was outrageous how low level bureaucrats were allow to change our traditional way of voting....what it came down to was a illegal manipulation of the vote....now they want to censor anyone who talks about it......bull friggin shit.
Fraudulent election, documentation or shut the f**k up. Do you think the world is flat? Documentation or shut the f**k up. You say you are not a crazy nut case, Documentation or shut the f**k up
View attachment 445459
This assortment of nothing means nothing. The similar stats were thrown out by multiple courts. This is an embarrassing attempt of proof. The same as everything Trump's idiots have tried to put forward as proof of a fraudulent election. Trump's lap dog attorney general Barr even had to admit there was no evidence.
They weren’t even considered for fear of demmunist shakedown.
The conspicuous anomalies of this election are indisputable. Anyone who doesn’t admit that is a liar.
Absolutely bullshit. There is nothing statistically significant about the numbers shown. That is cherry picked, observational numbers.
If you code all variables, for every election, you could provide unique data, like that, for every Presidential race.
You are talking about what I do for a living.
You are an absolute dumbass like most Trump supporters.
You cannot cure stupid.
You’re a liar. The obvious abnormalities are unquestionable. Any honest person on either side would want that election audited. 60% of Biden voters used mail-in. The vast majority of mail-in should be those most vulnerable to the blue plague (over 70) and military. Both groups consistently republican. That would jibe with 32% trump votes being mail-in. That means that almost all of Biden mail-ins, which made up the majority of his votes, were not necessary. And mail-ins are the easiest to cheat. Judges refused to consider cheating, either because they’re leftists or they feared dem shakedown violence.
If you were honest you’d demand an audit. But you’re a democrat.
Oh please, if you are going to use analytics at least know what you are talking about. Observational analytics are useless. They cannot be used in court. That is why Trump lost every case. That is why his attorney general lap dog, Barr, said there was no evidence of any significant fraud on either side. Statistical evidence whether used in court, to make a business decision, or a medical decision needs to be proved to be statistically significant.
You are so fricking stupid. You do not know what you do not know.
In my real life I do not come in contact with people as stupid as you. It is interesting.
Let me tell you about statistical significance. My good deed for the day. Educate the uneducated.
Statistically significant means a result is unlikely due to chance. The p-value is the probability of obtaining the difference we saw from a sample (or a larger one) if there really isn't a difference for all users.
One more thing, dumbass, the p value should be less than .05 to be statistically significant. Dumb people who think they know things they do not are the worst dumb people.

YOu talk like you think Barr is a statistician.
Barr is a lawyer who knows what is permissible evidence in a court. Observational analytics are not permissible. Statistically significant analytics can be used in conjunction with other evidence.
The same applies for testing medical vaccines. Observational analytics mean little. Vaccines will be approved with statistically significant analytics. Our new technology that allows the proof of analytics is critical.
Somebody who has no idea what they are talking about and throws out observation analytics to prove a fraudulent election is a fraud or stupid or both.
Stupid is dangerous.

So, there was evidence of fraud. Do you think all evidence was found?
Yes, there was evidence of fraud. Such as...

A supporter of President Donald Trump in Marple Township, Pennsylvania, has been charged with voting for the president under the name of his deceased mother, the Delaware County District Attorney announced Monday, becoming the third Republican to be prosecuted for voter fraud in the battleground state.

Remember my words, the next cycle of the ever escalating civil unrest.


You had a choice whether to try to dial it down, or to keep pouring hate and division into the system and you chose Violence and death.
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
74,256
Reaction score
14,078
Points
2,210
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.

Well, playing games like letting people vote over a period of months, will undermine confidence in an election.


Maybe you should not have done that.
Yes.....it was outrageous how low level bureaucrats were allow to change our traditional way of voting....what it came down to was a illegal manipulation of the vote....now they want to censor anyone who talks about it......bull friggin shit.
Fraudulent election, documentation or shut the f**k up. Do you think the world is flat? Documentation or shut the f**k up. You say you are not a crazy nut case, Documentation or shut the f**k up
View attachment 445459
This assortment of nothing means nothing. The similar stats were thrown out by multiple courts. This is an embarrassing attempt of proof. The same as everything Trump's idiots have tried to put forward as proof of a fraudulent election. Trump's lap dog attorney general Barr even had to admit there was no evidence.
They weren’t even considered for fear of demmunist shakedown.
The conspicuous anomalies of this election are indisputable. Anyone who doesn’t admit that is a liar.
Absolutely bullshit. There is nothing statistically significant about the numbers shown. That is cherry picked, observational numbers.
If you code all variables, for every election, you could provide unique data, like that, for every Presidential race.
You are talking about what I do for a living.
You are an absolute dumbass like most Trump supporters.
You cannot cure stupid.
You’re a liar. The obvious abnormalities are unquestionable. Any honest person on either side would want that election audited. 60% of Biden voters used mail-in. The vast majority of mail-in should be those most vulnerable to the blue plague (over 70) and military. Both groups consistently republican. That would jibe with 32% trump votes being mail-in. That means that almost all of Biden mail-ins, which made up the majority of his votes, were not necessary. And mail-ins are the easiest to cheat. Judges refused to consider cheating, either because they’re leftists or they feared dem shakedown violence.
If you were honest you’d demand an audit. But you’re a democrat.
Oh please, if you are going to use analytics at least know what you are talking about. Observational analytics are useless. They cannot be used in court. That is why Trump lost every case. That is why his attorney general lap dog, Barr, said there was no evidence of any significant fraud on either side. Statistical evidence whether used in court, to make a business decision, or a medical decision needs to be proved to be statistically significant.
You are so fricking stupid. You do not know what you do not know.
In my real life I do not come in contact with people as stupid as you. It is interesting.
Let me tell you about statistical significance. My good deed for the day. Educate the uneducated.
Statistically significant means a result is unlikely due to chance. The p-value is the probability of obtaining the difference we saw from a sample (or a larger one) if there really isn't a difference for all users.
One more thing, dumbass, the p value should be less than .05 to be statistically significant. Dumb people who think they know things they do not are the worst dumb people.

YOu talk like you think Barr is a statistician.
Barr is a lawyer who knows what is permissible evidence in a court. Observational analytics are not permissible. Statistically significant analytics can be used in conjunction with other evidence.
The same applies for testing medical vaccines. Observational analytics mean little. Vaccines will be approved with statistically significant analytics. Our new technology that allows the proof of analytics is critical.
Somebody who has no idea what they are talking about and throws out observation analytics to prove a fraudulent election is a fraud or stupid or both.
Stupid is dangerous.

So, there was evidence of fraud. Do you think all evidence was found?
Yes, there was evidence of fraud. Such as...

A supporter of President Donald Trump in Marple Township, Pennsylvania, has been charged with voting for the president under the name of his deceased mother, the Delaware County District Attorney announced Monday, becoming the third Republican to be prosecuted for voter fraud in the battleground state.

Remember my words, the next cycle of the ever escalating civil unrest.


You had a choice whether to try to dial it down, or to keep pouring hate and division into the system and you chose Violence and death.
 
OP
ElmerMudd

ElmerMudd

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
7,728
Reaction score
2,272
Points
215
Location
Northwest
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.

Well, playing games like letting people vote over a period of months, will undermine confidence in an election.


Maybe you should not have done that.
Yes.....it was outrageous how low level bureaucrats were allow to change our traditional way of voting....what it came down to was a illegal manipulation of the vote....now they want to censor anyone who talks about it......bull friggin shit.
Fraudulent election, documentation or shut the f**k up. Do you think the world is flat? Documentation or shut the f**k up. You say you are not a crazy nut case, Documentation or shut the f**k up
View attachment 445459
This assortment of nothing means nothing. The similar stats were thrown out by multiple courts. This is an embarrassing attempt of proof. The same as everything Trump's idiots have tried to put forward as proof of a fraudulent election. Trump's lap dog attorney general Barr even had to admit there was no evidence.
They weren’t even considered for fear of demmunist shakedown.
The conspicuous anomalies of this election are indisputable. Anyone who doesn’t admit that is a liar.
Absolutely bullshit. There is nothing statistically significant about the numbers shown. That is cherry picked, observational numbers.
If you code all variables, for every election, you could provide unique data, like that, for every Presidential race.
You are talking about what I do for a living.
You are an absolute dumbass like most Trump supporters.
You cannot cure stupid.
You’re a liar. The obvious abnormalities are unquestionable. Any honest person on either side would want that election audited. 60% of Biden voters used mail-in. The vast majority of mail-in should be those most vulnerable to the blue plague (over 70) and military. Both groups consistently republican. That would jibe with 32% trump votes being mail-in. That means that almost all of Biden mail-ins, which made up the majority of his votes, were not necessary. And mail-ins are the easiest to cheat. Judges refused to consider cheating, either because they’re leftists or they feared dem shakedown violence.
If you were honest you’d demand an audit. But you’re a democrat.
Oh please, if you are going to use analytics at least know what you are talking about. Observational analytics are useless. They cannot be used in court. That is why Trump lost every case. That is why his attorney general lap dog, Barr, said there was no evidence of any significant fraud on either side. Statistical evidence whether used in court, to make a business decision, or a medical decision needs to be proved to be statistically significant.
You are so fricking stupid. You do not know what you do not know.
In my real life I do not come in contact with people as stupid as you. It is interesting.
Let me tell you about statistical significance. My good deed for the day. Educate the uneducated.
Statistically significant means a result is unlikely due to chance. The p-value is the probability of obtaining the difference we saw from a sample (or a larger one) if there really isn't a difference for all users.
One more thing, dumbass, the p value should be less than .05 to be statistically significant. Dumb people who think they know things they do not are the worst dumb people.

YOu talk like you think Barr is a statistician.
Barr is a lawyer who knows what is permissible evidence in a court. Observational analytics are not permissible. Statistically significant analytics can be used in conjunction with other evidence.
The same applies for testing medical vaccines. Observational analytics mean little. Vaccines will be approved with statistically significant analytics. Our new technology that allows the proof of analytics is critical.
Somebody who has no idea what they are talking about and throws out observation analytics to prove a fraudulent election is a fraud or stupid or both.
Stupid is dangerous.

So, there was evidence of fraud. Do you think all evidence was found?
As Barr said "no evidence of wide spread fraud that could have effected the results of the election". Straight from the mouth of Trump's lap dog AG.
Trump’s lap dog was not trump’s lap dog. That was a Pravda concoction. Barr covered his own ass.
You are correct, Barr covered his own ass. He knew if he supported the lie that the election was fraudulent he could go to jail.
 
OP
ElmerMudd

ElmerMudd

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
7,728
Reaction score
2,272
Points
215
Location
Northwest
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.

Well, playing games like letting people vote over a period of months, will undermine confidence in an election.


Maybe you should not have done that.
Yes.....it was outrageous how low level bureaucrats were allow to change our traditional way of voting....what it came down to was a illegal manipulation of the vote....now they want to censor anyone who talks about it......bull friggin shit.
Fraudulent election, documentation or shut the f**k up. Do you think the world is flat? Documentation or shut the f**k up. You say you are not a crazy nut case, Documentation or shut the f**k up
View attachment 445459
This assortment of nothing means nothing. The similar stats were thrown out by multiple courts. This is an embarrassing attempt of proof. The same as everything Trump's idiots have tried to put forward as proof of a fraudulent election. Trump's lap dog attorney general Barr even had to admit there was no evidence.
They weren’t even considered for fear of demmunist shakedown.
The conspicuous anomalies of this election are indisputable. Anyone who doesn’t admit that is a liar.
Absolutely bullshit. There is nothing statistically significant about the numbers shown. That is cherry picked, observational numbers.
If you code all variables, for every election, you could provide unique data, like that, for every Presidential race.
You are talking about what I do for a living.
You are an absolute dumbass like most Trump supporters.
You cannot cure stupid.
You’re a liar. The obvious abnormalities are unquestionable. Any honest person on either side would want that election audited. 60% of Biden voters used mail-in. The vast majority of mail-in should be those most vulnerable to the blue plague (over 70) and military. Both groups consistently republican. That would jibe with 32% trump votes being mail-in. That means that almost all of Biden mail-ins, which made up the majority of his votes, were not necessary. And mail-ins are the easiest to cheat. Judges refused to consider cheating, either because they’re leftists or they feared dem shakedown violence.
If you were honest you’d demand an audit. But you’re a democrat.
Oh please, if you are going to use analytics at least know what you are talking about. Observational analytics are useless. They cannot be used in court. That is why Trump lost every case. That is why his attorney general lap dog, Barr, said there was no evidence of any significant fraud on either side. Statistical evidence whether used in court, to make a business decision, or a medical decision needs to be proved to be statistically significant.
You are so fricking stupid. You do not know what you do not know.
In my real life I do not come in contact with people as stupid as you. It is interesting.
Let me tell you about statistical significance. My good deed for the day. Educate the uneducated.
Statistically significant means a result is unlikely due to chance. The p-value is the probability of obtaining the difference we saw from a sample (or a larger one) if there really isn't a difference for all users.
One more thing, dumbass, the p value should be less than .05 to be statistically significant. Dumb people who think they know things they do not are the worst dumb people.

YOu talk like you think Barr is a statistician.
Barr is a lawyer who knows what is permissible evidence in a court. Observational analytics are not permissible. Statistically significant analytics can be used in conjunction with other evidence.
The same applies for testing medical vaccines. Observational analytics mean little. Vaccines will be approved with statistically significant analytics. Our new technology that allows the proof of analytics is critical.
Somebody who has no idea what they are talking about and throws out observation analytics to prove a fraudulent election is a fraud or stupid or both.
Stupid is dangerous.

So, there was evidence of fraud. Do you think all evidence was found?
As Barr said "no evidence of wide spread fraud that could have effected the results of the election". Straight from the mouth of Trump's lap dog AG.

When you qualify a statement like that, you are admitting to the core claim.


Otherwise, he would just have said, "no evidence", without the qualifiers.
Provide evidence and make the statement incorrect. No one has.
 
OP
ElmerMudd

ElmerMudd

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
7,728
Reaction score
2,272
Points
215
Location
Northwest
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.

Well, playing games like letting people vote over a period of months, will undermine confidence in an election.


Maybe you should not have done that.
Yes.....it was outrageous how low level bureaucrats were allow to change our traditional way of voting....what it came down to was a illegal manipulation of the vote....now they want to censor anyone who talks about it......bull friggin shit.
Fraudulent election, documentation or shut the f**k up. Do you think the world is flat? Documentation or shut the f**k up. You say you are not a crazy nut case, Documentation or shut the f**k up
View attachment 445459
This assortment of nothing means nothing. The similar stats were thrown out by multiple courts. This is an embarrassing attempt of proof. The same as everything Trump's idiots have tried to put forward as proof of a fraudulent election. Trump's lap dog attorney general Barr even had to admit there was no evidence.
They weren’t even considered for fear of demmunist shakedown.
The conspicuous anomalies of this election are indisputable. Anyone who doesn’t admit that is a liar.
Absolutely bullshit. There is nothing statistically significant about the numbers shown. That is cherry picked, observational numbers.
If you code all variables, for every election, you could provide unique data, like that, for every Presidential race.
You are talking about what I do for a living.
You are an absolute dumbass like most Trump supporters.
You cannot cure stupid.
You’re a liar. The obvious abnormalities are unquestionable. Any honest person on either side would want that election audited. 60% of Biden voters used mail-in. The vast majority of mail-in should be those most vulnerable to the blue plague (over 70) and military. Both groups consistently republican. That would jibe with 32% trump votes being mail-in. That means that almost all of Biden mail-ins, which made up the majority of his votes, were not necessary. And mail-ins are the easiest to cheat. Judges refused to consider cheating, either because they’re leftists or they feared dem shakedown violence.
If you were honest you’d demand an audit. But you’re a democrat.
Oh please, if you are going to use analytics at least know what you are talking about. Observational analytics are useless. They cannot be used in court. That is why Trump lost every case. That is why his attorney general lap dog, Barr, said there was no evidence of any significant fraud on either side. Statistical evidence whether used in court, to make a business decision, or a medical decision needs to be proved to be statistically significant.
You are so fricking stupid. You do not know what you do not know.
In my real life I do not come in contact with people as stupid as you. It is interesting.
Let me tell you about statistical significance. My good deed for the day. Educate the uneducated.
Statistically significant means a result is unlikely due to chance. The p-value is the probability of obtaining the difference we saw from a sample (or a larger one) if there really isn't a difference for all users.
One more thing, dumbass, the p value should be less than .05 to be statistically significant. Dumb people who think they know things they do not are the worst dumb people.

YOu talk like you think Barr is a statistician.
Barr is a lawyer who knows what is permissible evidence in a court. Observational analytics are not permissible. Statistically significant analytics can be used in conjunction with other evidence.
The same applies for testing medical vaccines. Observational analytics mean little. Vaccines will be approved with statistically significant analytics. Our new technology that allows the proof of analytics is critical.
Somebody who has no idea what they are talking about and throws out observation analytics to prove a fraudulent election is a fraud or stupid or both.
Stupid is dangerous.

So, there was evidence of fraud. Do you think all evidence was found?
Yes, there was evidence of fraud. Such as...

A supporter of President Donald Trump in Marple Township, Pennsylvania, has been charged with voting for the president under the name of his deceased mother, the Delaware County District Attorney announced Monday, becoming the third Republican to be prosecuted for voter fraud in the battleground state.

Remember my words, the next cycle of the ever escalating civil unrest.


You had a choice whether to try to dial it down, or to keep pouring hate and division into the system and you chose Violence and death.
The nation has chosen they have had enough of Trumpism. If it takes a civil war to rid the country of Trumpism, so be it. But it will not take a full civil war. The government and the vast majority of Americans want the bad aspects of Trumpism gone. Those who support Trumpism is declining daily. Many if not most Republicans want the negative aspects of Trumpism gone.
Trumpism will be driven underground if it survives.
 
OP
ElmerMudd

ElmerMudd

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
7,728
Reaction score
2,272
Points
215
Location
Northwest
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election.
No. That was the same Mob that stole the election and denied all evidence of fraud.
They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
No. That's Biden trying to take over the government. There's a very wicked, evil old man there, and it's not safe for patriots to remain in the area.
It must be absolute hell to be you. You are driven by paranoid, false conspiracies. You are wasting your life,
 

justinacolmena

Gold Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2017
Messages
5,703
Reaction score
1,767
Points
210
Location
alaska, usa
It must be absolute hell to be you. You are driven by paranoid, false conspiracies. You are wasting your life,
My life was never intended by my Creator for the leftist political cartoons, sodomy, and drugs you always seek to impose on me against my will. My life will not a waste, if I can make existence on earth a living hell for all liberals for as much as you desire to oppress us.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
73,656
Reaction score
16,069
Points
2,220
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.

Well, playing games like letting people vote over a period of months, will undermine confidence in an election.


Maybe you should not have done that.
Yes.....it was outrageous how low level bureaucrats were allow to change our traditional way of voting....what it came down to was a illegal manipulation of the vote....now they want to censor anyone who talks about it......bull friggin shit.
Fraudulent election, documentation or shut the f**k up. Do you think the world is flat? Documentation or shut the f**k up. You say you are not a crazy nut case, Documentation or shut the f**k up
View attachment 445459
This assortment of nothing means nothing. The similar stats were thrown out by multiple courts. This is an embarrassing attempt of proof. The same as everything Trump's idiots have tried to put forward as proof of a fraudulent election. Trump's lap dog attorney general Barr even had to admit there was no evidence.
They weren’t even considered for fear of demmunist shakedown.
The conspicuous anomalies of this election are indisputable. Anyone who doesn’t admit that is a liar.
Absolutely bullshit. There is nothing statistically significant about the numbers shown. That is cherry picked, observational numbers.
If you code all variables, for every election, you could provide unique data, like that, for every Presidential race.
You are talking about what I do for a living.
You are an absolute dumbass like most Trump supporters.
You cannot cure stupid.
You’re a liar. The obvious abnormalities are unquestionable. Any honest person on either side would want that election audited. 60% of Biden voters used mail-in. The vast majority of mail-in should be those most vulnerable to the blue plague (over 70) and military. Both groups consistently republican. That would jibe with 32% trump votes being mail-in. That means that almost all of Biden mail-ins, which made up the majority of his votes, were not necessary. And mail-ins are the easiest to cheat. Judges refused to consider cheating, either because they’re leftists or they feared dem shakedown violence.
If you were honest you’d demand an audit. But you’re a democrat.
Oh please, if you are going to use analytics at least know what you are talking about. Observational analytics are useless. They cannot be used in court. That is why Trump lost every case. That is why his attorney general lap dog, Barr, said there was no evidence of any significant fraud on either side. Statistical evidence whether used in court, to make a business decision, or a medical decision needs to be proved to be statistically significant.
You are so fricking stupid. You do not know what you do not know.
In my real life I do not come in contact with people as stupid as you. It is interesting.
Let me tell you about statistical significance. My good deed for the day. Educate the uneducated.
Statistically significant means a result is unlikely due to chance. The p-value is the probability of obtaining the difference we saw from a sample (or a larger one) if there really isn't a difference for all users.
One more thing, dumbass, the p value should be less than .05 to be statistically significant. Dumb people who think they know things they do not are the worst dumb people.

YOu talk like you think Barr is a statistician.
Barr is a lawyer who knows what is permissible evidence in a court. Observational analytics are not permissible. Statistically significant analytics can be used in conjunction with other evidence.
The same applies for testing medical vaccines. Observational analytics mean little. Vaccines will be approved with statistically significant analytics. Our new technology that allows the proof of analytics is critical.
Somebody who has no idea what they are talking about and throws out observation analytics to prove a fraudulent election is a fraud or stupid or both.
Stupid is dangerous.

So, there was evidence of fraud. Do you think all evidence was found?
Yes, there was evidence of fraud. Such as...

A supporter of President Donald Trump in Marple Township, Pennsylvania, has been charged with voting for the president under the name of his deceased mother, the Delaware County District Attorney announced Monday, becoming the third Republican to be prosecuted for voter fraud in the battleground state.

Remember my words, the next cycle of the ever escalating civil unrest.


You had a choice whether to try to dial it down, or to keep pouring hate and division into the system and you chose Violence and death.

Got it. I hope you enjoy the ever increasing political violence you have chosen.

And by "enjoy" I mean, "really, really, really, not enjoy".
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
73,656
Reaction score
16,069
Points
2,220
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.

Well, playing games like letting people vote over a period of months, will undermine confidence in an election.


Maybe you should not have done that.
Yes.....it was outrageous how low level bureaucrats were allow to change our traditional way of voting....what it came down to was a illegal manipulation of the vote....now they want to censor anyone who talks about it......bull friggin shit.
Fraudulent election, documentation or shut the f**k up. Do you think the world is flat? Documentation or shut the f**k up. You say you are not a crazy nut case, Documentation or shut the f**k up
View attachment 445459
This assortment of nothing means nothing. The similar stats were thrown out by multiple courts. This is an embarrassing attempt of proof. The same as everything Trump's idiots have tried to put forward as proof of a fraudulent election. Trump's lap dog attorney general Barr even had to admit there was no evidence.
They weren’t even considered for fear of demmunist shakedown.
The conspicuous anomalies of this election are indisputable. Anyone who doesn’t admit that is a liar.
Absolutely bullshit. There is nothing statistically significant about the numbers shown. That is cherry picked, observational numbers.
If you code all variables, for every election, you could provide unique data, like that, for every Presidential race.
You are talking about what I do for a living.
You are an absolute dumbass like most Trump supporters.
You cannot cure stupid.
You’re a liar. The obvious abnormalities are unquestionable. Any honest person on either side would want that election audited. 60% of Biden voters used mail-in. The vast majority of mail-in should be those most vulnerable to the blue plague (over 70) and military. Both groups consistently republican. That would jibe with 32% trump votes being mail-in. That means that almost all of Biden mail-ins, which made up the majority of his votes, were not necessary. And mail-ins are the easiest to cheat. Judges refused to consider cheating, either because they’re leftists or they feared dem shakedown violence.
If you were honest you’d demand an audit. But you’re a democrat.
Oh please, if you are going to use analytics at least know what you are talking about. Observational analytics are useless. They cannot be used in court. That is why Trump lost every case. That is why his attorney general lap dog, Barr, said there was no evidence of any significant fraud on either side. Statistical evidence whether used in court, to make a business decision, or a medical decision needs to be proved to be statistically significant.
You are so fricking stupid. You do not know what you do not know.
In my real life I do not come in contact with people as stupid as you. It is interesting.
Let me tell you about statistical significance. My good deed for the day. Educate the uneducated.
Statistically significant means a result is unlikely due to chance. The p-value is the probability of obtaining the difference we saw from a sample (or a larger one) if there really isn't a difference for all users.
One more thing, dumbass, the p value should be less than .05 to be statistically significant. Dumb people who think they know things they do not are the worst dumb people.

YOu talk like you think Barr is a statistician.
Barr is a lawyer who knows what is permissible evidence in a court. Observational analytics are not permissible. Statistically significant analytics can be used in conjunction with other evidence.
The same applies for testing medical vaccines. Observational analytics mean little. Vaccines will be approved with statistically significant analytics. Our new technology that allows the proof of analytics is critical.
Somebody who has no idea what they are talking about and throws out observation analytics to prove a fraudulent election is a fraud or stupid or both.
Stupid is dangerous.

So, there was evidence of fraud. Do you think all evidence was found?
As Barr said "no evidence of wide spread fraud that could have effected the results of the election". Straight from the mouth of Trump's lap dog AG.

When you qualify a statement like that, you are admitting to the core claim.


Otherwise, he would just have said, "no evidence", without the qualifiers.
Provide evidence and make the statement incorrect. No one has.

I'm not really in the position to do a real investigation.


I can point out the actual meaning of statements though, to disprove left spin.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
73,656
Reaction score
16,069
Points
2,220
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.

Well, playing games like letting people vote over a period of months, will undermine confidence in an election.


Maybe you should not have done that.
Yes.....it was outrageous how low level bureaucrats were allow to change our traditional way of voting....what it came down to was a illegal manipulation of the vote....now they want to censor anyone who talks about it......bull friggin shit.
Fraudulent election, documentation or shut the f**k up. Do you think the world is flat? Documentation or shut the f**k up. You say you are not a crazy nut case, Documentation or shut the f**k up
View attachment 445459
This assortment of nothing means nothing. The similar stats were thrown out by multiple courts. This is an embarrassing attempt of proof. The same as everything Trump's idiots have tried to put forward as proof of a fraudulent election. Trump's lap dog attorney general Barr even had to admit there was no evidence.
They weren’t even considered for fear of demmunist shakedown.
The conspicuous anomalies of this election are indisputable. Anyone who doesn’t admit that is a liar.
Absolutely bullshit. There is nothing statistically significant about the numbers shown. That is cherry picked, observational numbers.
If you code all variables, for every election, you could provide unique data, like that, for every Presidential race.
You are talking about what I do for a living.
You are an absolute dumbass like most Trump supporters.
You cannot cure stupid.
You’re a liar. The obvious abnormalities are unquestionable. Any honest person on either side would want that election audited. 60% of Biden voters used mail-in. The vast majority of mail-in should be those most vulnerable to the blue plague (over 70) and military. Both groups consistently republican. That would jibe with 32% trump votes being mail-in. That means that almost all of Biden mail-ins, which made up the majority of his votes, were not necessary. And mail-ins are the easiest to cheat. Judges refused to consider cheating, either because they’re leftists or they feared dem shakedown violence.
If you were honest you’d demand an audit. But you’re a democrat.
Oh please, if you are going to use analytics at least know what you are talking about. Observational analytics are useless. They cannot be used in court. That is why Trump lost every case. That is why his attorney general lap dog, Barr, said there was no evidence of any significant fraud on either side. Statistical evidence whether used in court, to make a business decision, or a medical decision needs to be proved to be statistically significant.
You are so fricking stupid. You do not know what you do not know.
In my real life I do not come in contact with people as stupid as you. It is interesting.
Let me tell you about statistical significance. My good deed for the day. Educate the uneducated.
Statistically significant means a result is unlikely due to chance. The p-value is the probability of obtaining the difference we saw from a sample (or a larger one) if there really isn't a difference for all users.
One more thing, dumbass, the p value should be less than .05 to be statistically significant. Dumb people who think they know things they do not are the worst dumb people.

YOu talk like you think Barr is a statistician.
Barr is a lawyer who knows what is permissible evidence in a court. Observational analytics are not permissible. Statistically significant analytics can be used in conjunction with other evidence.
The same applies for testing medical vaccines. Observational analytics mean little. Vaccines will be approved with statistically significant analytics. Our new technology that allows the proof of analytics is critical.
Somebody who has no idea what they are talking about and throws out observation analytics to prove a fraudulent election is a fraud or stupid or both.
Stupid is dangerous.

So, there was evidence of fraud. Do you think all evidence was found?
Yes, there was evidence of fraud. Such as...

A supporter of President Donald Trump in Marple Township, Pennsylvania, has been charged with voting for the president under the name of his deceased mother, the Delaware County District Attorney announced Monday, becoming the third Republican to be prosecuted for voter fraud in the battleground state.

Remember my words, the next cycle of the ever escalating civil unrest.


You had a choice whether to try to dial it down, or to keep pouring hate and division into the system and you chose Violence and death.
The nation has chosen they have had enough of Trumpism. If it takes a civil war to rid the country of Trumpism, so be it. But it will not take a full civil war. The government and the vast majority of Americans want the bad aspects of Trumpism gone. Those who support Trumpism is declining daily. Many if not most Republicans want the negative aspects of Trumpism gone.
Trumpism will be driven underground if it survives.

"Trumpism" is just the latest in the attempt for someone to speak out for Traditional Americans.

Trump might be retiring. We will always be here. As you continue to oppress and abuse us, you will only generate more and more backlash.


You people have made political violence and political prisoners normal in America.


That is almost certainly going to blow up in your face someday.


I hope you get what you deserve.
 
OP
ElmerMudd

ElmerMudd

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
7,728
Reaction score
2,272
Points
215
Location
Northwest
It must be absolute hell to be you. You are driven by paranoid, false conspiracies. You are wasting your life,
My life was never intended by my Creator for the leftist political cartoons, sodomy, and drugs you always seek to impose on me against my will. My life will not a waste, if I can make existence on earth a living hell for all liberals for as much as you desire to oppress us.
That post proves, further, you have a hellish life by most people's standards. Get help, man. You describe a hellish world. The world is a beautiful place with the right attitude.
 
OP
ElmerMudd

ElmerMudd

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
7,728
Reaction score
2,272
Points
215
Location
Northwest
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election.
.
I suspect the reason they felt this way was due to the recent fraudulent election.
Another person living a hellish life because of paranoia making them believe lies. The paranoid lies rule and ruin their lives. So many Trump supporters live in hell on earth based on believing crazy false conspiracy theories.
They look to reasons outside themselves for why they are miserable, like blaming liberals. But the cause of the misery is the person themselves. Anyone with a brain like theirs's will be miserable.
 
OP
ElmerMudd

ElmerMudd

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
7,728
Reaction score
2,272
Points
215
Location
Northwest
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.

Well, playing games like letting people vote over a period of months, will undermine confidence in an election.


Maybe you should not have done that.
Yes.....it was outrageous how low level bureaucrats were allow to change our traditional way of voting....what it came down to was a illegal manipulation of the vote....now they want to censor anyone who talks about it......bull friggin shit.
Fraudulent election, documentation or shut the f**k up. Do you think the world is flat? Documentation or shut the f**k up. You say you are not a crazy nut case, Documentation or shut the f**k up
View attachment 445459
This assortment of nothing means nothing. The similar stats were thrown out by multiple courts. This is an embarrassing attempt of proof. The same as everything Trump's idiots have tried to put forward as proof of a fraudulent election. Trump's lap dog attorney general Barr even had to admit there was no evidence.
They weren’t even considered for fear of demmunist shakedown.
The conspicuous anomalies of this election are indisputable. Anyone who doesn’t admit that is a liar.
Absolutely bullshit. There is nothing statistically significant about the numbers shown. That is cherry picked, observational numbers.
If you code all variables, for every election, you could provide unique data, like that, for every Presidential race.
You are talking about what I do for a living.
You are an absolute dumbass like most Trump supporters.
You cannot cure stupid.
You’re a liar. The obvious abnormalities are unquestionable. Any honest person on either side would want that election audited. 60% of Biden voters used mail-in. The vast majority of mail-in should be those most vulnerable to the blue plague (over 70) and military. Both groups consistently republican. That would jibe with 32% trump votes being mail-in. That means that almost all of Biden mail-ins, which made up the majority of his votes, were not necessary. And mail-ins are the easiest to cheat. Judges refused to consider cheating, either because they’re leftists or they feared dem shakedown violence.
If you were honest you’d demand an audit. But you’re a democrat.
Oh please, if you are going to use analytics at least know what you are talking about. Observational analytics are useless. They cannot be used in court. That is why Trump lost every case. That is why his attorney general lap dog, Barr, said there was no evidence of any significant fraud on either side. Statistical evidence whether used in court, to make a business decision, or a medical decision needs to be proved to be statistically significant.
You are so fricking stupid. You do not know what you do not know.
In my real life I do not come in contact with people as stupid as you. It is interesting.
Let me tell you about statistical significance. My good deed for the day. Educate the uneducated.
Statistically significant means a result is unlikely due to chance. The p-value is the probability of obtaining the difference we saw from a sample (or a larger one) if there really isn't a difference for all users.
One more thing, dumbass, the p value should be less than .05 to be statistically significant. Dumb people who think they know things they do not are the worst dumb people.

YOu talk like you think Barr is a statistician.
Barr is a lawyer who knows what is permissible evidence in a court. Observational analytics are not permissible. Statistically significant analytics can be used in conjunction with other evidence.
The same applies for testing medical vaccines. Observational analytics mean little. Vaccines will be approved with statistically significant analytics. Our new technology that allows the proof of analytics is critical.
Somebody who has no idea what they are talking about and throws out observation analytics to prove a fraudulent election is a fraud or stupid or both.
Stupid is dangerous.

So, there was evidence of fraud. Do you think all evidence was found?
Yes, there was evidence of fraud. Such as...

A supporter of President Donald Trump in Marple Township, Pennsylvania, has been charged with voting for the president under the name of his deceased mother, the Delaware County District Attorney announced Monday, becoming the third Republican to be prosecuted for voter fraud in the battleground state.

Remember my words, the next cycle of the ever escalating civil unrest.


You had a choice whether to try to dial it down, or to keep pouring hate and division into the system and you chose Violence and death.
The nation has chosen they have had enough of Trumpism. If it takes a civil war to rid the country of Trumpism, so be it. But it will not take a full civil war. The government and the vast majority of Americans want the bad aspects of Trumpism gone. Those who support Trumpism is declining daily. Many if not most Republicans want the negative aspects of Trumpism gone.
Trumpism will be driven underground if it survives.

"Trumpism" is just the latest in the attempt for someone to speak out for Traditional Americans.

Trump might be retiring. We will always be here. As you continue to oppress and abuse us, you will only generate more and more backlash.


You people have made political violence and political prisoners normal in America.


That is almost certainly going to blow up in your face someday.


I hope you get what you deserve.
Another person living a hellish life because of paranoia making them believe lies. The paranoid lies rule and ruin their lives. So many Trump supporters live in hell on earth based on believing crazy false conspiracy theories.
They look to reasons outside themselves for why they are miserable, like blaming liberals. But the cause of the misery is the person themselves. Anyone with a brain like theirs's will be miserable.
 

RealDave

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 28, 2016
Messages
26,321
Reaction score
3,418
Points
290
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.
So those people who stood up to Hilter taking over their country weren't PATRIOTS?
I look at Trump and his minions being similar to Hitler and his followers trying to take over the US.
Unlike Germany, US citizens and the established government including Republicans, Democrats and Independents will not let it happen. Nazi Germany is motivation to not allow Trumpism to take over our country.
Trumpism is going down. It will take a while but the power is on the side of those taking Trumpism down. The ultimate shit stain on US history and you are part of it.
If you compare Trump to Hitler than your knowledge of History is typical of a progressive twat loser.
He compared Trumpism with Nazism, not Trump to Hitler. And the similarity is the absolute blind devotion who will do anything for an insane ruler. We witnessed that on January 6th.
Still not an applicable comparison. That he left office just proves that and closes the case.

Nazis don't leave willingly.
You think Trump left willingly. The only reason Trump is gone is the US Constitution and the government it enables is stronger than Trump's evil and the German government in the 1930's.
Trump left willingly, and with far more dignity that your ilk deserved.
If you feel that is how a US President should turnover the office to a new President you are unamerican. We need to stomp the anti-American Trump supporters from doing more damage to our nation.
Thank goodness the vast majority who voted for him realize his actions after losing the election were unamerican.
The minions that hold on not realizing that is not how our democratic system changes leaders must be silenced and neutered.
You spend 4 years demonizing him and us, and you expected to be treated nicely?

Your posts call for us to be hounded and ostracized at best, put in camps and "re-educated" at worst.

Even in this post you call for "Stomping".
Marty defending the biggest liar President ever.
 

Correll

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 16, 2015
Messages
73,656
Reaction score
16,069
Points
2,220
The vast majority of those who took over the capitol felt there had been a fraudulent election. They felt as "patriots" they needed to take over congress and reverse the election and stop congress from declaring Biden President. They were trying to take over the government.
The majority of domestic terrorists come from this group. All individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory could go the way of other "patriots".
It is essential if, individuals who follow the conspiracy nonesense theory, hear of fellow conspiracy theorists planning domestic terrorism they turn them in.
Will those on this site who believe the election was fraudulent, will turn someone in if they threaten domestic terrorism?
To me, that is true patriotism; stopping sedition.

Well, playing games like letting people vote over a period of months, will undermine confidence in an election.


Maybe you should not have done that.
Yes.....it was outrageous how low level bureaucrats were allow to change our traditional way of voting....what it came down to was a illegal manipulation of the vote....now they want to censor anyone who talks about it......bull friggin shit.
Fraudulent election, documentation or shut the f**k up. Do you think the world is flat? Documentation or shut the f**k up. You say you are not a crazy nut case, Documentation or shut the f**k up
View attachment 445459
This assortment of nothing means nothing. The similar stats were thrown out by multiple courts. This is an embarrassing attempt of proof. The same as everything Trump's idiots have tried to put forward as proof of a fraudulent election. Trump's lap dog attorney general Barr even had to admit there was no evidence.
They weren’t even considered for fear of demmunist shakedown.
The conspicuous anomalies of this election are indisputable. Anyone who doesn’t admit that is a liar.
Absolutely bullshit. There is nothing statistically significant about the numbers shown. That is cherry picked, observational numbers.
If you code all variables, for every election, you could provide unique data, like that, for every Presidential race.
You are talking about what I do for a living.
You are an absolute dumbass like most Trump supporters.
You cannot cure stupid.
You’re a liar. The obvious abnormalities are unquestionable. Any honest person on either side would want that election audited. 60% of Biden voters used mail-in. The vast majority of mail-in should be those most vulnerable to the blue plague (over 70) and military. Both groups consistently republican. That would jibe with 32% trump votes being mail-in. That means that almost all of Biden mail-ins, which made up the majority of his votes, were not necessary. And mail-ins are the easiest to cheat. Judges refused to consider cheating, either because they’re leftists or they feared dem shakedown violence.
If you were honest you’d demand an audit. But you’re a democrat.
Oh please, if you are going to use analytics at least know what you are talking about. Observational analytics are useless. They cannot be used in court. That is why Trump lost every case. That is why his attorney general lap dog, Barr, said there was no evidence of any significant fraud on either side. Statistical evidence whether used in court, to make a business decision, or a medical decision needs to be proved to be statistically significant.
You are so fricking stupid. You do not know what you do not know.
In my real life I do not come in contact with people as stupid as you. It is interesting.
Let me tell you about statistical significance. My good deed for the day. Educate the uneducated.
Statistically significant means a result is unlikely due to chance. The p-value is the probability of obtaining the difference we saw from a sample (or a larger one) if there really isn't a difference for all users.
One more thing, dumbass, the p value should be less than .05 to be statistically significant. Dumb people who think they know things they do not are the worst dumb people.

YOu talk like you think Barr is a statistician.
Barr is a lawyer who knows what is permissible evidence in a court. Observational analytics are not permissible. Statistically significant analytics can be used in conjunction with other evidence.
The same applies for testing medical vaccines. Observational analytics mean little. Vaccines will be approved with statistically significant analytics. Our new technology that allows the proof of analytics is critical.
Somebody who has no idea what they are talking about and throws out observation analytics to prove a fraudulent election is a fraud or stupid or both.
Stupid is dangerous.

So, there was evidence of fraud. Do you think all evidence was found?
Yes, there was evidence of fraud. Such as...

A supporter of President Donald Trump in Marple Township, Pennsylvania, has been charged with voting for the president under the name of his deceased mother, the Delaware County District Attorney announced Monday, becoming the third Republican to be prosecuted for voter fraud in the battleground state.

Remember my words, the next cycle of the ever escalating civil unrest.


You had a choice whether to try to dial it down, or to keep pouring hate and division into the system and you chose Violence and death.
The nation has chosen they have had enough of Trumpism. If it takes a civil war to rid the country of Trumpism, so be it. But it will not take a full civil war. The government and the vast majority of Americans want the bad aspects of Trumpism gone. Those who support Trumpism is declining daily. Many if not most Republicans want the negative aspects of Trumpism gone.
Trumpism will be driven underground if it survives.

"Trumpism" is just the latest in the attempt for someone to speak out for Traditional Americans.

Trump might be retiring. We will always be here. As you continue to oppress and abuse us, you will only generate more and more backlash.


You people have made political violence and political prisoners normal in America.


That is almost certainly going to blow up in your face someday.


I hope you get what you deserve.
Another person living a hellish life because of paranoia making them believe lies. The paranoid lies rule and ruin their lives. So many Trump supporters live in hell on earth based on believing crazy false conspiracy theories.
They look to reasons outside themselves for why they are miserable, like blaming liberals. But the cause of the misery is the person themselves. Anyone with a brain like theirs's will be miserable.

The regular riots and street violence off the last 4 years, is not my "paranoia".

That you libs have been arresting people for defending themselves, or other minor crimes that would not lead to jail time, especially if done by a good lib,

is also not something that is just happening in my head.


My point stands.



That is almost certainly going to blow up in your face someday.


I hope you get what you deserve.
 

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top