lantern2814
Diamond Member
- Jul 17, 2018
- 15,389
- 12,591
- 2,290
Go fuck yourself you triggered homo. Step out into traffic,
The utter asinine claim that none of Biden's $6 billion to the terror state of Iran did not go to attack Israel.
- Thread starter DigitalDrifter
- Start date
lantern2814
Diamond Member
- Jul 17, 2018
- 15,389
- 12,591
- 2,290
^^^ Pure projection from a libturd terrorist lover.
Arlette
Diamond Member
- Jul 6, 2023
- 15,623
- 10,553
- 2,138
Prove it
lantern2814
Diamond Member
- Jul 17, 2018
- 15,389
- 12,591
- 2,290
Now show any Trump supporters beheading children like the terrorists you and the assholes thanking you support you fat pig.
Lakhota
Diamond Member
1) United States Freezes Iranian Funds
The Washington Post is reporting that the United States has entered into an agreement to keep the previously unfrozen Iranian funds (6 billion dollars worth) frozen and to prevent Iran from gaining access to this money. This money became the subject of public scrutiny as many on both sides of the aisle called for the United States to freeze these humanitarian funds following the attacks in Israel. Additionally, this money was used by many Republicans to spread misinformation for their own political benefit. Not a penny of this money was accessed by Iran and none of the money could have been used to fund terror. Instead, the money was unfrozen as a part of a hostage swap weeks ago and was earmarked for humanitarian assistance only. However, with this move, Iran will no longer have access to the funds.
Last edited:
tyroneweaver
Diamond Member
probably is a asinine claim. closer to 50-80 billion
7 billion from iraq
3 billion from international monetary fund
2 billion from japan
7 billion in south korean banks
and who knows how many billion Mally sent over there under obama and biden
Suspicion surrounds ex-Iran envoy Rob Malley after Israel attack: ‘Worst State Department scandal’
“Rob Malley deserves extensive scrutiny — yesterday, today and tomorrow,” Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) told The Post after officers of Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps pla…
nypost.com
When did the Senate ratify this alleged treaty? Oh right, you have no clue what you are talking about. You would be wise to just shut up and stay away.
g5000
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2011
- 132,386
- 76,304
- 2,605
Well, this sure didn't age well!
Winco
Diamond Member
- Nov 1, 2019
- 25,386
- 18,500
- 2,290
trump has 'dumbed down' the (R) to the level of trump's vocabulary.
A vocabulary that is............Very small and very limited.
Oh Dear Lord.........
Let me translate.......for the trump cult supporter.....
trump has an audience that is "intellectually undemanding".
A vocabulary that is............Very small and very limited.
Oh Dear Lord.........
Let me translate.......for the trump cult supporter.....
trump has an audience that is "intellectually undemanding".
Lakhota
Diamond Member
JoeB131
Diamond Member
Actually, that is EXACTLY what we should have done. The Shah murdered tens of thousands of Iranians, tortured people, oppressed people, squandered the wealth of the country on lavish palaces and celebrations for himself. He actually needed to answer to his own people for his crimes.
Instead, we took him in, and Iranians had a legitimate fear we were going to do what we did in 1953- put the guy back into power by force.
It wasn't Trump's money to give. We were returning assets that rightfully belonged to Iran. Iran also returned assets that rightfully belonged to the west. The idea is to normalize relations, not isolate Iran and drive it into a camp with Russia and China.
The only country that ever used a nuke was our own. Against a country that had already been defeated and was desperately seeking a peaceful settlement.
The point was, the Iran treaty had inspectors on site verifying Iran was not building nukes. Trump tanked that deal, and frankly, if I were Iran's leaders, I would be making a nuke right now.
- Apr 11, 2023
- 46,912
- 22,451
- 2,488
We should have let the Shah be handled by his own people.
- Thread starter
- #153
Well, this sure didn't age well!
Oh really, why?
BluesLegend
Diamond Member
Biden: Not one penny of the $6B I gave to Iran will fund terrorism...but I'm re-freezing it because it may fund terrorism.
Tom Paine 1949
Diamond Member
- Mar 15, 2020
- 5,407
- 4,513
- 1,938
This OP is pure petty “macho posturing” by Republicans. The biggest failure in U.S. policy under either Administration toward Iran in recent years came with the unilateral revocation by the Trump Administration of the international JCPOA accords — which resulted in the collapse & destruction of the “reformist” political wing of the power elite in the Iranian “Islamic Republic” — which had been supported and elected by a majority of the Iranian people.
The assassination of Soleimani and Iraqi militiamen and leaders who had invited him into that country, the return of extreme Mullah oppression in Iran, the subsequent exhaustion of the politically leaderless but huge popular protests against the Muslim morality police … followed our rejection of the JCPOA almost inevitably.
This sort of idiotic domestic “macho posturing” — by politicians in both parties — makes intelligent foreign impossible in the Middle East and toward Iran. Many politicians in both parties capitulated to the extreme rightwing Netanyahu government and to what was in fact idiotic self-defeating Zionist pressure on both major American parties.
None of this is to excuse the Iranian Mullah regime or the barbaric Palestinian Hamas attack on Israeli civilians.
While the long-term & complex “Palestinian Question” was likely not fully resolvable through diplomatic pressure from the U.S.even with a better U.S. policy, in my opinion the U.S.-Iran confrontation, now some 55 years old, could have and should have been dramatically ameliorated with a wiser U.S. approach.
The assassination of Soleimani and Iraqi militiamen and leaders who had invited him into that country, the return of extreme Mullah oppression in Iran, the subsequent exhaustion of the politically leaderless but huge popular protests against the Muslim morality police … followed our rejection of the JCPOA almost inevitably.
This sort of idiotic domestic “macho posturing” — by politicians in both parties — makes intelligent foreign impossible in the Middle East and toward Iran. Many politicians in both parties capitulated to the extreme rightwing Netanyahu government and to what was in fact idiotic self-defeating Zionist pressure on both major American parties.
None of this is to excuse the Iranian Mullah regime or the barbaric Palestinian Hamas attack on Israeli civilians.
While the long-term & complex “Palestinian Question” was likely not fully resolvable through diplomatic pressure from the U.S.even with a better U.S. policy, in my opinion the U.S.-Iran confrontation, now some 55 years old, could have and should have been dramatically ameliorated with a wiser U.S. approach.
Rambunctious
Diamond Member
- Jan 19, 2010
- 79,067
- 77,949
- 3,605
You don't give money to terrorist's even if its their money fool... because they use it to kill people... that's why it was taken from them to keep them from doing harm in the world.... its like the entire left has forgotten 9-11....
JoeB131
Diamond Member
Iran is a sovereign state, and they have a right to their own assets. International courts have ruled repeatedly that money should be returned.
Rambunctious
Diamond Member
- Jan 19, 2010
- 79,067
- 77,949
- 3,605
Iran is a terrorist state... they terrorize their own population and they fund the killing of innocent people around the world... so go for it and jump on their side.... at your own peril....
Lakhota
Diamond Member
1) United States Freezes Iranian Funds
The Washington Post is reporting that the United States has entered into an agreement to keep the previously unfrozen Iranian funds (6 billion dollars worth) frozen and to prevent Iran from gaining access to this money. This money became the subject of public scrutiny as many on both sides of the aisle called for the United States to freeze these humanitarian funds following the attacks in Israel. Additionally, this money was used by many Republicans to spread misinformation for their own political benefit. Not a penny of this money was accessed by Iran and none of the money could have been used to fund terror. Instead, the money was unfrozen as a part of a hostage swap weeks ago and was earmarked for humanitarian assistance only. However, with this move, Iran will no longer have access to the funds.
https://www.meidastouch.com/news/israel-at-war-everything-you-need-to-know-as-we-enter-day-6
The Washington Post is reporting that the United States has entered into an agreement to keep the previously unfrozen Iranian funds (6 billion dollars worth) frozen and to prevent Iran from gaining access to this money. This money became the subject of public scrutiny as many on both sides of the aisle called for the United States to freeze these humanitarian funds following the attacks in Israel. Additionally, this money was used by many Republicans to spread misinformation for their own political benefit. Not a penny of this money was accessed by Iran and none of the money could have been used to fund terror. Instead, the money was unfrozen as a part of a hostage swap weeks ago and was earmarked for humanitarian assistance only. However, with this move, Iran will no longer have access to the funds.
https://www.meidastouch.com/news/israel-at-war-everything-you-need-to-know-as-we-enter-day-6
AntonToo
Diamond Member
- Jun 13, 2016
- 35,435
- 10,869
- 1,410
Wtf? When did it become Biden's?
International Court ruled that frozen Iranian money belong to....wait for it.....Iran. Not Biden.
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
-
-
Dems have ‘scrambled around’ since this ‘iceberg moment’: Lara Trump- Started by Robert W
- Replies: 1
-
