Why are you misstating the truth?
The fact is, nothing was taken way from a woman's right to choose.
The ruling is that someone can't be forced to pay for something they have religious objections to.
A woman who has no objection to any procedure can still get it. She just can't force someone else to pay for it.
This will transcend that, since it ascribes religious "rights" to corporate entities.
Although the Conservative judges are saying the decision is very narrow?
It's not.
There are no boundaries as to what a "corporate entity" can "feel" extreme about and no remedies to employees affected by these extreme corporate religious "feelings".
It's a big win for the Theocratic GOP.