The United States now accepts over one million legal immigrants each year

barryqwalsh

Gold Member
Sep 30, 2014
3,397
252
140
That is why CCN believes the U.S. needs a time-out on mass-immigration perhaps more than anything else. An all-inclusive cap on legal immigration would dramatically cut down on both current immigration and future chain migration. It would give the U.S. time to stabilize the population, to address the problems created by over-stressed city infrastructures and poverty, and to shape an environmental policy to protect strained natural resources. A moratorium would lend time for new immigrants and poor citizens alike to attain greater opportunities through higher wages and better educational opportunities.


WHY A 100,000 LIMIT ON IMMIGRATION IS REALISTIC AND NECESSARY
 
Secretary Hilary Clinton, like President Obama and President GW Bush, is yet another amnesty candidate.

I don't know the a future President Trump would be able to stabilise the ship, let alone turn it around. There are powerful lobbies who want large-scale immigration.


But with a President Hilary Clinton, it will be amnesty by stealth with executive orders, as with President Obama.
 
That is why CCN believes the U.S. needs a time-out on mass-immigration perhaps more than anything else. An all-inclusive cap on legal immigration would dramatically cut down on both current immigration and future chain migration. It would give the U.S. time to stabilize the population, to address the problems created by over-stressed city infrastructures and poverty, and to shape an environmental policy to protect strained natural resources. A moratorium would lend time for new immigrants and poor citizens alike to attain greater opportunities through higher wages and better educational opportunities.


WHY A 100,000 LIMIT ON IMMIGRATION IS REALISTIC AND NECESSARY



I thought you were British.
 
That is why CCN believes the U.S. needs a time-out on mass-immigration perhaps more than anything else. An all-inclusive cap on legal immigration would dramatically cut down on both current immigration and future chain migration. It would give the U.S. time to stabilize the population, to address the problems created by over-stressed city infrastructures and poverty, and to shape an environmental policy to protect strained natural resources. A moratorium would lend time for new immigrants and poor citizens alike to attain greater opportunities through higher wages and better educational opportunities.


WHY A 100,000 LIMIT ON IMMIGRATION IS REALISTIC AND NECESSARY



I thought you were British.
British smithish!
 
That is why CCN believes the U.S. needs a time-out on mass-immigration perhaps more than anything else. An all-inclusive cap on legal immigration would dramatically cut down on both current immigration and future chain migration. It would give the U.S. time to stabilize the population, to address the problems created by over-stressed city infrastructures and poverty, and to shape an environmental policy to protect strained natural resources. A moratorium would lend time for new immigrants and poor citizens alike to attain greater opportunities through higher wages and better educational opportunities.


WHY A 100,000 LIMIT ON IMMIGRATION IS REALISTIC AND NECESSARY



I thought you were British.
British smithish!


What is your nationality?
 

Forum List

Back
Top