usmbguest5318
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #181
???? Hugh?Some on the alt-left are trying to make a case, that foreign policy with our exorbitantly expensive superpower, is not very Commercial.
OT:We have a Commerce Clause not a common offense clause nor general defense clause.
Okay....TY for the clarification.
I guess I senese, sort of, what you are getting toward. I don't fully understand where you're going with that reference, however, because the Commerce clause pertains to the regulation of exchange between the U.S. and its states and foreign nations. Is the Alt-Right truly trying to advance a case whereby that something about our foreign policy -- now or in the past -- violates that clause?
I realize those people can convolute pretty much whatever they want however they see fit, but surely even they are not so deluded as to take up the line such as the one you've suggested they are? They may be, for all I know. I don't any longer consume much that they have to say because each time I have, after looking more deeply into the matter, I consistently found they were were just spinning and weighing facts to fit their narrative rather than delivering a narrative based on the entirety of available facts and a rational, contextually germane weighting of them.
The Commerce Clause doesn't have a damn thing to do with the MOAB, our use of it or any other weaponry, or foreign policy.