The truth is feminism has destroyed the family and poisoned women against

In the past fewer younger people were having sex. Guys understood that there were a few guys that were getting a lot of it and understood that. They also understood that they weren't attractive to the gals that were putting out. It was the accepted status quo.

Today, half or more of guys and gals are having sex, and while I don't know the effect on the gals that aren't is I think this has a profound effect on the guys that aren't. It's one thing to be among the 90 percent that aren't having sex and being among the 30 or 40 percent that aren't.
 
In the past fewer younger people were having sex. Guys understood that there were a few guys that were getting a lot of it and understood that. They also understood that they weren't attractive to the gals that were putting out. It was the accepted status quo.

Today, half or more of guys and gals are having sex, and while I don't know the effect on the gals that aren't is I think this has a profound effect on the guys that aren't. It's one thing to be among the 90 percent that aren't having sex and being among the 30 or 40 percent that aren't.

Yeah, and passing out condoms at school didn't reduce the number of young people willing to entertain the idea of having sex at a younger age. Although that's not probably all the problem in a nutshell, and societal changes were probably influenced by everything from the explosion of the internet to a general degradation personal responsibility as a factor, and self-esteem replaced a harder stance of accountability for one's failures.
 
Today's 'liberated' woman has lots of problems unknown to women of the past.



The solution? Marriage and motherhood. Who knew?

I have many older female friends. None of them tell me how great things were for them, or for their mothers. Women of the past hid problems, and men like you thought they were happy. It's time those like you stopped lying about the past. Women at that time were not happy. If everything were as you said, there would have been no women's liberation movement. You're a man, so you really cannot speak to how women felt at that time. Furthermore, you are a white man, and in those days white men ruled everything and were pretty much oblivious to how others were feeling. Women weren't allowed to do a lot of things and denied opportunities in a lot of areas. That was not freedom, it was male fascism. No matter how many links you post to try supporting a return to fascism, nobody is going back to that.
 
It wasn't feminism, although feminism did benefit from the consequences of President Johnson's Great Society. In 1960 around 4.7% of the babies born in the US were born to unwed mothers. Nowadays, that number has climbed to over 40% of babies born today. The numbers become more staggering, if you filter for ethnic or socioeconomic factures. Children raised by single mothers are 5 times more likely to remain in poverty, get arrested, or fail to complete high school.

However, blaming the women for men not being men could be expected. At least you are willing to admit that the men got whipped by a bunch of women and gave up, rather than the government built the mess we are in and will never fix it.
Johnson's Great Society had nothing to do with the rise of unwed births. The sexual revolution did. The government is the reason for whatever perceived damage is perceived by those on the right.
 
Threads like this is why I started a thread about not letting people who were children in the 1950's tell us about how great things were. Because they were children playing with toys, they did not see everything that went on. And even if they wre born in the 1940's they were pre-teens or teenagers and did not have to concern themselves with adult responsibilities. So all this talk about how terrible feminism is are based on the opinion of people who were children at that time. They did nt know how things were for adults. And their moms probably did not share with them how she really felt about sitting at home all day.
 
Threads like this is why I started a thread about not letting people who were children in the 1950's tell us about how great things were. Because they were children playing with toys, they did not see everything that went on. And even if they wre born in the 1940's they were pre-teens or teenagers and did not have to concern themselves with adult responsibilities. So all this talk about how terrible feminism is are based on the opinion of people who were children at that time. They did nt know how things were for adults. And their moms probably did not share with them how she really felt about sitting at home all day.
You're missing the point. Back then women didn't have mental breakdowns because they didn't like their situation. They were mentally stronger than women today.

Do you believe all (white) men are happy with their lives?

 
Johnson's Great Society had nothing to do with the rise of unwed births. The sexual revolution did. The government is the reason for whatever perceived damage is perceived by those on the right.

You can tell yourself whatever you would like to believe but the percentage doubled in less than 10 years after the Great Society was implemented. However, I said it was due to a lack of personal responsibility and desire for accountability. It is kind of interesting you think the sexual revolution is the reason men abandoned the children they were making though.
 
Johnson's Great Society had nothing to do with the rise of unwed births. The sexual revolution did. The government is the reason for whatever perceived damage is perceived by those on the right.
The problem is that for your totally equal utopia others must pay for it. This is not a TV program or theatrical movie. The good news is when the nation gets poor enough, those involved will receive the karma deserved. We won't be able to pay people off for the deaths anymore and we will be like most other nations as revenge takes hold. You won't listen though. We just cancelled the new u.s. naval frigate program for the navy as something that was supposed to be cheaper to build got of course,......wait for it.....wait for it... expensive. We will ack to where survival becomes paramount to everything. And the pecking order will go to that also.
 
In the past fewer younger people were having sex. Guys understood that there were a few guys that were getting a lot of it and understood that. They also understood that they weren't attractive to the gals that were putting out. It was the accepted status quo.

Today, half or more of guys and gals are having sex, and while I don't know the effect on the gals that aren't is I think this has a profound effect on the guys that aren't. It's one thing to be among the 90 percent that aren't having sex and being among the 30 or 40 percent that aren't.
This is false.

Sexual activity in young people is in decline and virginity rates for both genders in the age range 18-29 has steadily bern increasing over the decades.
 
This is false.

Sexual activity in young people is in decline and virginity rates for both genders in the age range 18-29 has steadily bern increasing over the decades.
I don't think any decline is really significant.

 
Bullshit. Women seeking divorces is a good thing. It allows them to pursue self-actualization rather than be confined to worthless marriages and husbands.

Children don't need two people in the home, and they'd be better off without a father in the home if he's an incompetent asshole. All the more reason not to have children to begin with, if anything.


That has nothing to do with feminism. That is based on dated laws which presume that women are biologically more able to care for children.


Nope. If anything, abolish the legal institution of marriage entirely. and simply allow people to choose their partners as they see fit and work out property and custody disputes on their own.


Nope. Such a thing is entirely antithetical to our rights and freedoms. We don't want some incompetent dolt having children to begin with, let alone raising them.

I'd suggest instead that we mandate early-term abortion for a segment of the population. It would encourage people to be productive instead of wasting their time having kids that society doesn't need or want.


Nope. We should repeal the 1st Amendment and make feminism the state religion.


Ah, another uneducated dolt who refers to the "West", a concept that he knows nothing about.


Then just abort the kids and there will be no dad to speak of. Problem solved.


That's the dumbest thing I've literally ever heard.


The "family" is an outdated and worthless institution and it deserves to die off. Any primate with functioning sex organs can biologically produce a family, even if they have no qualifications to raise them whatsoever.

We'd be best off just abolishing the family unit and having children raised by the state. It might in sure that a modicum of competency is applied to the equation.
Misandry ^^^^
 
15th post
And stupid. And full of clearly known falsehoods.


The data on how children do so much worse with only ONE parent, could fill a bus. Maybe more.

FOr one limited example of how that post was nonsense.
Agreed. So people are still having kids at an adequate rate. There is zzNO issue here. Fake news.
 
She needs to explain why a woman marries an incompetent asshole then blames all men for her stupidity
You need to explain all the whining by you incompetent white men about everything.
 
You need to explain all the whining by you incompetent white men about everything.
Im not wining in fact everything you post is a whine
Its racism bahaha
1767627509920.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom