The Trump Train (Hillary Got Schlonged Again) Victory Lap!!!

Trump reduced debt by $100 Billion 1st two months in office. Obama increased the debt by $400 Billion 1st two months in office. #POTUS #MAGA
We were still operating under Bush's budget during Obama's first two months in office. Just like we were still operating under Obama's budget during Trump's first two months in office.





Agreed, which is what makes trumps accomplishment even more outstanding, and it truly shows what a terrible POTUS obummer was, that he didn't even try to save the American people money.
Pretty rightarded given the abysmal economic conditions Obama took over. :cuckoo:

Yea, I hear we were on the verge of Great Depression II. :lmao:
We may never know if that was true or not, but it was unquestionably, the worst economy since the Great Depression.

Unquestionably? So, the 70's never happened?
 
We were still operating under Bush's budget during Obama's first two months in office. Just like we were still operating under Obama's budget during Trump's first two months in office.





Agreed, which is what makes trumps accomplishment even more outstanding, and it truly shows what a terrible POTUS obummer was, that he didn't even try to save the American people money.
Pretty rightarded given the abysmal economic conditions Obama took over. :cuckoo:

Yea, I hear we were on the verge of Great Depression II. :lmao:
We may never know if that was true or not, but it was unquestionably, the worst economy since the Great Depression.

Unquestionably? So, the 70's never happened?





LOL! These kids don't know a damned thing do they?
 
We were still operating under Bush's budget during Obama's first two months in office. Just like we were still operating under Obama's budget during Trump's first two months in office.





Agreed, which is what makes trumps accomplishment even more outstanding, and it truly shows what a terrible POTUS obummer was, that he didn't even try to save the American people money.
Pretty rightarded given the abysmal economic conditions Obama took over. :cuckoo:






And then did very little to correct. His was the worst "recovery" in the history of recovery's.
More rightardness. :eusa_doh:

In reality, within weeks of being in office, he passed one of the biggest stimulus bills in U.S. history to keep the economy afloat until the private sector could stand on its own again.





Aaaaaand... it did nothing of the sort. It was, like him, an abject failure.
It actually did. The economy stopped imploding.
 
Agreed, which is what makes trumps accomplishment even more outstanding, and it truly shows what a terrible POTUS obummer was, that he didn't even try to save the American people money.
Pretty rightarded given the abysmal economic conditions Obama took over. :cuckoo:






And then did very little to correct. His was the worst "recovery" in the history of recovery's.
More rightardness. :eusa_doh:

In reality, within weeks of being in office, he passed one of the biggest stimulus bills in U.S. history to keep the economy afloat until the private sector could stand on its own again.





Aaaaaand... it did nothing of the sort. It was, like him, an abject failure.
It actually did. The economy stopped imploding.

Did you even live in the 70's?
 
Agreed, which is what makes trumps accomplishment even more outstanding, and it truly shows what a terrible POTUS obummer was, that he didn't even try to save the American people money.
Pretty rightarded given the abysmal economic conditions Obama took over. :cuckoo:






And then did very little to correct. His was the worst "recovery" in the history of recovery's.
More rightardness. :eusa_doh:

In reality, within weeks of being in office, he passed one of the biggest stimulus bills in U.S. history to keep the economy afloat until the private sector could stand on its own again.





Aaaaaand... it did nothing of the sort. It was, like him, an abject failure.
It actually did. The economy stopped imploding.






Yes, it did. But not because of his stimulus which gave tons of money to his union friends, but very little actually went into the economy. Yet again you fall into the trap of only listening to what they claim but not actually following up on what they did. And the main reason why the economy stopped imploding was twofold, first it had pretty much hit the bottom, and secondly the news outlets finally stopped reporting every negative thing they could. It is arguably the media's fault that the economy tanked as it did. They single handedly drove the economy to the brink with their propaganda.
 
We were still operating under Bush's budget during Obama's first two months in office. Just like we were still operating under Obama's budget during Trump's first two months in office.





Agreed, which is what makes trumps accomplishment even more outstanding, and it truly shows what a terrible POTUS obummer was, that he didn't even try to save the American people money.
Pretty rightarded given the abysmal economic conditions Obama took over. :cuckoo:

Yea, I hear we were on the verge of Great Depression II. :lmao:
We may never know if that was true or not, but it was unquestionably, the worst economy since the Great Depression.

Unquestionably? So, the 70's never happened?
:cuckoo:

There was no downturn in the economy in the 70's anywhere near as bad as the Great Recession.

1973-Q3: 5,412
1975-Q1: 5,292

2007-Q3: 14,939
2009-Q1: 14,356

1970's recession: -2.2%
2000's recession: -3.9%

GDP


10/1973: 77,606,000
03/1975: 76,649,000

1970's recession ...... 957,000 jobs lost (-1.2%)
2000's recession ... 7,294,000 jobs lost (-5.3%)

Employed
 
Pretty rightarded given the abysmal economic conditions Obama took over. :cuckoo:






And then did very little to correct. His was the worst "recovery" in the history of recovery's.
More rightardness. :eusa_doh:

In reality, within weeks of being in office, he passed one of the biggest stimulus bills in U.S. history to keep the economy afloat until the private sector could stand on its own again.





Aaaaaand... it did nothing of the sort. It was, like him, an abject failure.
It actually did. The economy stopped imploding.






Yes, it did. But not because of his stimulus which gave tons of money to his union friends, but very little actually went into the economy. Yet again you fall into the trap of only listening to what they claim but not actually following up on what they did. And the main reason why the economy stopped imploding was twofold, first it had pretty much hit the bottom, and secondly the news outlets finally stopped reporting every negative thing they could. It is arguably the media's fault that the economy tanked as it did. They single handedly drove the economy to the brink with their propaganda.
You're too stupid to bother with. A huge chunk of the stimulus came in the form of tax breaks. That's not his union friends.And there's no evidence the economy just so happen to hit rock bottom. In fact, by some measurements, the worst of the recession came after his stimulus was passed. March of 2009 was when the most jobs were lost (823K), when the stock market bottomed out (Dow: 6594; NASDAQ: 1269; S&P500: 676)...

... which turned around after Obama's stimulus went into effect.
 
And then did very little to correct. His was the worst "recovery" in the history of recovery's.
More rightardness. :eusa_doh:

In reality, within weeks of being in office, he passed one of the biggest stimulus bills in U.S. history to keep the economy afloat until the private sector could stand on its own again.





Aaaaaand... it did nothing of the sort. It was, like him, an abject failure.
It actually did. The economy stopped imploding.






Yes, it did. But not because of his stimulus which gave tons of money to his union friends, but very little actually went into the economy. Yet again you fall into the trap of only listening to what they claim but not actually following up on what they did. And the main reason why the economy stopped imploding was twofold, first it had pretty much hit the bottom, and secondly the news outlets finally stopped reporting every negative thing they could. It is arguably the media's fault that the economy tanked as it did. They single handedly drove the economy to the brink with their propaganda.
You're too stupid to bother with. A huge chunk of the stimulus came in the form of tax breaks. That's not his union friends.And there's no evidence the economy just so happen to hit rock bottom. In fact, by some measurements, the worst of the recession came after his stimulus was passed. March of 2009 was when the most jobs were lost (823K), when the stock market bottomed out (Dow: 6594; NASDAQ: 1269; S&P500: 676)...

... which turned around after Obama's stimulus went into effect.






Tax breaks for what? Exactly? The facts are the stimulus, like everything obummer said, was a lie. And yes, you're too stupid to understand the real facts.
 
More rightardness. :eusa_doh:

In reality, within weeks of being in office, he passed one of the biggest stimulus bills in U.S. history to keep the economy afloat until the private sector could stand on its own again.





Aaaaaand... it did nothing of the sort. It was, like him, an abject failure.
It actually did. The economy stopped imploding.






Yes, it did. But not because of his stimulus which gave tons of money to his union friends, but very little actually went into the economy. Yet again you fall into the trap of only listening to what they claim but not actually following up on what they did. And the main reason why the economy stopped imploding was twofold, first it had pretty much hit the bottom, and secondly the news outlets finally stopped reporting every negative thing they could. It is arguably the media's fault that the economy tanked as it did. They single handedly drove the economy to the brink with their propaganda.
You're too stupid to bother with. A huge chunk of the stimulus came in the form of tax breaks. That's not his union friends.And there's no evidence the economy just so happen to hit rock bottom. In fact, by some measurements, the worst of the recession came after his stimulus was passed. March of 2009 was when the most jobs were lost (823K), when the stock market bottomed out (Dow: 6594; NASDAQ: 1269; S&P500: 676)...

... which turned around after Obama's stimulus went into effect.






Tax breaks for what? Exactly? The facts are the stimulus, like everything obummer said, was a lie. And yes, you're too stupid to understand the real facts.
Seriously? A conservative questioning the economic value of tax breaks??

LOLOL

You'll say anything, even if it stabs your own position in the back, to prop up your failed position.
 
Aaaaaand... it did nothing of the sort. It was, like him, an abject failure.
It actually did. The economy stopped imploding.






Yes, it did. But not because of his stimulus which gave tons of money to his union friends, but very little actually went into the economy. Yet again you fall into the trap of only listening to what they claim but not actually following up on what they did. And the main reason why the economy stopped imploding was twofold, first it had pretty much hit the bottom, and secondly the news outlets finally stopped reporting every negative thing they could. It is arguably the media's fault that the economy tanked as it did. They single handedly drove the economy to the brink with their propaganda.
You're too stupid to bother with. A huge chunk of the stimulus came in the form of tax breaks. That's not his union friends.And there's no evidence the economy just so happen to hit rock bottom. In fact, by some measurements, the worst of the recession came after his stimulus was passed. March of 2009 was when the most jobs were lost (823K), when the stock market bottomed out (Dow: 6594; NASDAQ: 1269; S&P500: 676)...

... which turned around after Obama's stimulus went into effect.






Tax breaks for what? Exactly? The facts are the stimulus, like everything obummer said, was a lie. And yes, you're too stupid to understand the real facts.
Seriously? A conservative questioning the economic value of tax breaks??

LOLOL

You'll say anything, even if it stabs your own position in the back, to prop up your failed position.







Why dodge the question? C'mon junior, answer the question.
 
Pretty rightarded given the abysmal economic conditions Obama took over. :cuckoo:






And then did very little to correct. His was the worst "recovery" in the history of recovery's.
More rightardness. :eusa_doh:

In reality, within weeks of being in office, he passed one of the biggest stimulus bills in U.S. history to keep the economy afloat until the private sector could stand on its own again.





Aaaaaand... it did nothing of the sort. It was, like him, an abject failure.
It actually did. The economy stopped imploding.

Did you even live in the 70's?
1870's?
 
Agreed, which is what makes trumps accomplishment even more outstanding, and it truly shows what a terrible POTUS obummer was, that he didn't even try to save the American people money.
Pretty rightarded given the abysmal economic conditions Obama took over. :cuckoo:

Yea, I hear we were on the verge of Great Depression II. :lmao:
We may never know if that was true or not, but it was unquestionably, the worst economy since the Great Depression.

Unquestionably? So, the 70's never happened?
:cuckoo:

There was no downturn in the economy in the 70's anywhere near as bad as the Great Recession.

1973-Q3: 5,412
1975-Q1: 5,292

2007-Q3: 14,939
2009-Q1: 14,356

1970's recession: -2.2%
2000's recession: -3.9%

GDP


10/1973: 77,606,000
03/1975: 76,649,000

1970's recession ...... 957,000 jobs lost (-1.2%)
2000's recession ... 7,294,000 jobs lost (-5.3%)

Employed

"Great Recession"

:lmao: That ole marketing ploy.
 
It actually did. The economy stopped imploding.






Yes, it did. But not because of his stimulus which gave tons of money to his union friends, but very little actually went into the economy. Yet again you fall into the trap of only listening to what they claim but not actually following up on what they did. And the main reason why the economy stopped imploding was twofold, first it had pretty much hit the bottom, and secondly the news outlets finally stopped reporting every negative thing they could. It is arguably the media's fault that the economy tanked as it did. They single handedly drove the economy to the brink with their propaganda.
You're too stupid to bother with. A huge chunk of the stimulus came in the form of tax breaks. That's not his union friends.And there's no evidence the economy just so happen to hit rock bottom. In fact, by some measurements, the worst of the recession came after his stimulus was passed. March of 2009 was when the most jobs were lost (823K), when the stock market bottomed out (Dow: 6594; NASDAQ: 1269; S&P500: 676)...

... which turned around after Obama's stimulus went into effect.






Tax breaks for what? Exactly? The facts are the stimulus, like everything obummer said, was a lie. And yes, you're too stupid to understand the real facts.
Seriously? A conservative questioning the economic value of tax breaks??

LOLOL

You'll say anything, even if it stabs your own position in the back, to prop up your failed position.







Why dodge the question? C'mon junior, answer the question.
You've already destroyed your own position, questioning tax breaks' effect on the economy. Apparently, you think they only help if it's a Republican passing them.
icon_rolleyes.gif


Your lunacy aside...

ARRA had three spending categories. It cut taxes by $288 billion. It spent $224 billion in extended unemployment benefits, education and health care. It created jobs by allocating $275 billion in federal contracts, grants, and loans.

[...]

Obama's tax rebates were supposed to encourage consumer spending, but many experts doubted it. Why? The rebates showed up as less tax withholding. Unlike the Bush tax cuts, workers did not receive checks. As a result, most people weren't aware they got a tax rebate.

The Stimulus for Small Business helped create jobs, increased lending from the SBA and community banks and reduced capital gains taxes for small business investors. The aid helped, but many states were so underwater that their losses outweighed the federal assistance.

The public works construction was probably the most well-publicized. Signs were posted wherever stimulus money was used to construct roads or public buildings. It was estimated to retain or add 3 million jobs, many of which were sorely needed in the construction industry.

Did Obama's Stimulus Plan Work?
 
Pretty rightarded given the abysmal economic conditions Obama took over. :cuckoo:

Yea, I hear we were on the verge of Great Depression II. :lmao:
We may never know if that was true or not, but it was unquestionably, the worst economy since the Great Depression.

Unquestionably? So, the 70's never happened?
:cuckoo:

There was no downturn in the economy in the 70's anywhere near as bad as the Great Recession.

1973-Q3: 5,412
1975-Q1: 5,292

2007-Q3: 14,939
2009-Q1: 14,356

1970's recession: -2.2%
2000's recession: -3.9%

GDP


10/1973: 77,606,000
03/1975: 76,649,000

1970's recession ...... 957,000 jobs lost (-1.2%)
2000's recession ... 7,294,000 jobs lost (-5.3%)

Employed

"Great Recession"

:lmao: That ole marketing ploy.
^^^ What a mindless protest looks like.

At any rate, it was called the Great Recession because it was the worst since the Great Depression. That's not a conspiracy, that's based on the numbers I posted, which roughly doubled the depth of the 1970's recession to which you referred. Hell, even rightwinged Fox News calls it the "Great Recession."

US households owe record amount, topping pre-recession peak
 
Yea, I hear we were on the verge of Great Depression II. :lmao:
We may never know if that was true or not, but it was unquestionably, the worst economy since the Great Depression.

Unquestionably? So, the 70's never happened?
:cuckoo:

There was no downturn in the economy in the 70's anywhere near as bad as the Great Recession.

1973-Q3: 5,412
1975-Q1: 5,292

2007-Q3: 14,939
2009-Q1: 14,356

1970's recession: -2.2%
2000's recession: -3.9%

GDP


10/1973: 77,606,000
03/1975: 76,649,000

1970's recession ...... 957,000 jobs lost (-1.2%)
2000's recession ... 7,294,000 jobs lost (-5.3%)

Employed

"Great Recession"

:lmao: That ole marketing ploy.
^^^ What a mindless protest looks like.

At any rate, it was called the Great Recession because it was the worst since the Great Depression. That's not a conspiracy, that's based on the numbers I posted, which roughly doubled the depth of the 1970's recession to which you referred. Hell, even rightwinged Fox News calls it the "Great Recession."

US households owe record amount, topping pre-recession peak
Taxes to not make the country great… The opposite is true. LOL
 
Some of us have celebrated on the various r/t threads like the election results thread. But now, it's time for a more proper celebration. America said not to that satanic, felonious, murdering marauder Hillary Rodham Clinton. And as the goon underclass throws their tantrums, we are but validated as we seek to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

We exposed the system, including the media for the hacks they are; and we overcame a rigged system to send CROOKED HILLARY packing.





poor little loser.,

you don't even realize what an ignorant misogynist twit you sound like, do you?

wacko
 
Some of us have celebrated on the various r/t threads like the election results thread. But now, it's time for a more proper celebration. America said not to that satanic, felonious, murdering marauder Hillary Rodham Clinton. And as the goon underclass throws their tantrums, we are but validated as we seek to MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN!

We exposed the system, including the media for the hacks they are; and we overcame a rigged system to send CROOKED HILLARY packing.





poor little loser.,

you don't even realize what an ignorant misogynist twit you sound like, do you?

wacko

Says someone drinks the koolaid from the Hildabeasts colostomy bag.... lol
 

Forum List

Back
Top