The Troops are concerned about gays serving openly.

Totally not true.

1 in 4 girls are sexually abused BEFORE they reach 18....and that is NOT by homosexuals, my friend....

links

I will be glad to:
The National Center for Victims of Crime - Library/Document Viewer

This was an interesting article Bod. Unfortunately it doesn't support your premise.

However I've included links in this reply that will take you to articles that clearly illustrate how gays use positions of power to prey on vulnerable children, teens, and adults. Gay predators are found in the clergy, and in lay/ professional career tracks. every socioeconomic group.

Gays in positions of power are gifted in the art of manipulating or threatening their victims, using aggression or employing a combination of these tactics. Imagine what will happen in the military when openly serving gay officers, and NCO's use their positions to intimidate, and manipulate subordinates.

Openly serving gays will not contribute to combat readiness, and they will seriously erode a units esprit de corps.

Alabama Confidential: Gay (and Lesbian) Sexual Predators in Positions of Trust in Alabama

http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2633

Tennessee Considers Banning Teaching Homosexuality in Elementary Schools - FoxNews.com

Some of our most infamous serial killers were gay. Jeffrey Dahmer, Andrew Cunanan, John Wayne Gacy, were homosexuals. :up:
 
I see Yo Turd.........now you're into demonizing the gays.

Worked for Hitler when he wanted rid of the Jews, and it's also used against homosexuals in Uganda (thanks to C Street), where they prosecute them and kill them.

Are you saying they're right?
 
Last edited:

This was an interesting article Bod. Unfortunately it doesn't support your premise.

However I've included links in this reply that will take you to articles that clearly illustrate how gays use positions of power to prey on vulnerable children, teens, and adults. Gay predators are found in the clergy, and in lay/ professional career tracks. every socioeconomic group.

Gays in positions of power are gifted in the art of manipulating or threatening their victims, using aggression or employing a combination of these tactics. Imagine what will happen in the military when openly serving gay officers, and NCO's use their positions to intimidate, and manipulate subordinates.

Openly serving gays will not contribute to combat readiness, and they will seriously erode a units esprit de corps.

Alabama Confidential: Gay (and Lesbian) Sexual Predators in Positions of Trust in Alabama

http://strata-sphere.com/blog/index.php/archives/2633

Tennessee Considers Banning Teaching Homosexuality in Elementary Schools - FoxNews.com

Some of our most infamous serial killers were gay. Jeffrey Dahmer, Andrew Cunanan, John Wayne Gacy, were homosexuals. :up:

See just what i told her and she never responded. She knows she's beat here
 
I see Yo Turd.........now you're into demonizing the gays.

Worked for Hitler when he wanted rid of the Jews, and it's also used against homosexuals in Uganda (thanks to C Street), where they prosecute them and kill them.

Are you saying they're right?

is this in code or something? :confused: i mean it wasn't actually meant to be a legible scentence was it?
 
i call bullshit. you ain't nothin but a hound dog :lol:

BBA UGA
MBA Georgia State University
Agency Owner Private Detective Agency since 1982

So are you like dog the bounty hunter?

When I was young and dumb I did bond forfeitures.
There are old private investigators and there are bold private investigators.
There are NO old and bold private investigators.
Dog has a lot more $$$ than me but I am better looking.:lol:
 
I see Yo Turd.........now you're into demonizing the gays.

Worked for Hitler when he wanted rid of the Jews, and it's also used against homosexuals in Uganda (thanks to C Street), where they prosecute them and kill them.

Are you saying they're right?


Good morning gaybikersailor. I see that your deviant mind has worked itself into an incoherent lather. As usual you add nothing substantive to the discussion. I presented verifiable fact. You countered with an unsupported rant. Would it surprise you to know that you haven't furthered your cause.

GBS, it is commonly held knowledge that history can't be spun to favor one group over another. With history the facts, and events are what they are. You seem most angered over the fact that historically gays have a very dismal track record.

It is undeniable fact that gays whether they be in the clergy, health care, legal profession, or lay occupations, et al, stalk and prey on the most vulnerable in our society. Taking all of that into advisement how can you expect the heterosexual community to be enthusiastic about accepting gays into the military?

History really would lead us to conclude that gay officers, and NCO's would prey on their subordinates. How can that contribute to a units esprit de corps, and combat readiness? :up:
 
Things are changing fast in America. It is now OK for Gays to serve openly in the military. I suppose GIs are also allowed to have Gay spouses. This also means that many a GI will choose to marry a Transgendered Person. There is no disgrace, it is all allowed now.

But the latest out of California is; they are now protesting against the US Military for not allowing Transgenders to openly serve.

This will make for a rather coloful military someday:

Can you imagine having a flamboyant Three Star General in Drag leading our troops into battle someday? I bet that would scare the enemy!

After all, I am sure there are many a good soldier who are desperately trapped in the body of the wrong gender.

Do we really want to deprive our country of their service?
 
Last edited:
Things are changing fast in America. It is now OK for Gays to serve openly in the military. I suppose GIs are also allowed to have Gay spouses. This also means that many a GI will choose to marry a Transgendered Person. There is no disgrace, it is all allowed now.

But the latest out of California is, they are now protesting against the US Military for not allowing Transgenders to openly serve. This will make for a rather coloful military someday.

Can you imagine having a flamboyant Three Star General in Drag leading our troops into battle someday? I bet that would scare the enmy!

After all, I am sure there are many a good soldier who are helplessly trapped in the body of the wrong gender.

Do we want to deprive our country of their service?

Its going to happen, transgenders will be able to serve openly in the Military in less than 20 years.
 
I see Yo Turd.........now you're into demonizing the gays.

Worked for Hitler when he wanted rid of the Jews, and it's also used against homosexuals in Uganda (thanks to C Street), where they prosecute them and kill them.

Are you saying they're right?


Good morning gaybikersailor. I see that your deviant mind has worked itself into an incoherent lather. As usual you add nothing substantive to the discussion. I presented verifiable fact. You countered with an unsupported rant. Would it surprise you to know that you haven't furthered your cause.

GBS, it is commonly held knowledge that history can't be spun to favor one group over another. With history the facts, and events are what they are. You seem most angered over the fact that historically gays have a very dismal track record.

It is undeniable fact that gays whether they be in the clergy, health care, legal profession, or lay occupations, et al, stalk and prey on the most vulnerable in our society. Taking all of that into advisement how can you expect the heterosexual community to be enthusiastic about accepting gays into the military?

History really would lead us to conclude that gay officers, and NCO's would prey on their subordinates. How can that contribute to a units esprit de corps, and combat readiness? :up:

you were actually able to make sense out of that mess?
 
BBA UGA
MBA Georgia State University
Agency Owner Private Detective Agency since 1982

So are you like dog the bounty hunter?

When I was young and dumb I did bond forfeitures.
There are old private investigators and there are bold private investigators.
There are NO old and bold private investigators.
Dog has a lot more $$$ than me but I am better looking.:lol:

but is your wife as *coughs* hot as his :eusa_whistle:
 
Things are changing fast in America. It is now OK for Gays to serve openly in the military. I suppose GIs are also allowed to have Gay spouses. This also means that many a GI will choose to marry a Transgendered Person. There is no disgrace, it is all allowed now.

But the latest out of California is; they are now protesting against the US Military for not allowing Transgenders to openly serve.

This will make for a rather coloful military someday:

Can you imagine having a flamboyant Three Star General in Drag leading our troops into battle someday? I bet that would scare the enemy!

After all, I am sure there are many a good soldier who are desperately trapped in the body of the wrong gender.

Do we really want to deprive our country of their service?

Who said the Vietnamese ARVN was the only military to have a General Tran?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QYv4EUV_dD0&feature=related]YouTube - Sweet Transexual´s Transilvania travesti[/ame]
 
When I was young and dumb I did bond forfeitures.
There are old private investigators and there are bold private investigators.
There are NO old and bold private investigators.
Dog has a lot more $$$ than me but I am better looking.:lol:

but is your wife as *coughs* hot as his :eusa_whistle:

Wife?
I thought she was Dog the Bounty Hunter.

lmao! sorry dude, i'm out of reps, but that one was totally repable :lol:
 
I see Yo Turd.........now you're into demonizing the gays.

Worked for Hitler when he wanted rid of the Jews, and it's also used against homosexuals in Uganda (thanks to C Street), where they prosecute them and kill them.

Are you saying they're right?


Good morning gaybikersailor. I see that your deviant mind has worked itself into an incoherent lather. As usual you add nothing substantive to the discussion. I presented verifiable fact. You countered with an unsupported rant. Would it surprise you to know that you haven't furthered your cause.

GBS, it is commonly held knowledge that history can't be spun to favor one group over another. With history the facts, and events are what they are. You seem most angered over the fact that historically gays have a very dismal track record.

It is undeniable fact that gays whether they be in the clergy, health care, legal profession, or lay occupations, et al, stalk and prey on the most vulnerable in our society. Taking all of that into advisement how can you expect the heterosexual community to be enthusiastic about accepting gays into the military?

History really would lead us to conclude that gay officers, and NCO's would prey on their subordinates. How can that contribute to a units esprit de corps, and combat readiness? :up:

Hey stupid.........what about straight soldiers hitting on chicks that are below their rank? It's called sexual harassment and isn't allowed in the military, because if it occurs, it is quashed quite quickly.

Dunno what kind of unprofessional rejects you served with, but every unit I've been stationed with was pretty good about making sure we followed the UCMJ.

And, there you go again...........demonizing all gays and painting them with one broad brush when in reality you don't know shit about which you speak. When (if actually) you served, did you know of any gays? If so, did you speak with them, or just throw them over the side and commit murder?

Face it Yo Turd, you're just a bigoted hack.
 
I see Yo Turd.........now you're into demonizing the gays.

Worked for Hitler when he wanted rid of the Jews, and it's also used against homosexuals in Uganda (thanks to C Street), where they prosecute them and kill them.

Are you saying they're right?


Good morning gaybikersailor. I see that your deviant mind has worked itself into an incoherent lather. As usual you add nothing substantive to the discussion. I presented verifiable fact. You countered with an unsupported rant. Would it surprise you to know that you haven't furthered your cause.

GBS, it is commonly held knowledge that history can't be spun to favor one group over another. With history the facts, and events are what they are. You seem most angered over the fact that historically gays have a very dismal track record.

It is undeniable fact that gays whether they be in the clergy, health care, legal profession, or lay occupations, et al, stalk and prey on the most vulnerable in our society. Taking all of that into advisement how can you expect the heterosexual community to be enthusiastic about accepting gays into the military?

History really would lead us to conclude that gay officers, and NCO's would prey on their subordinates. How can that contribute to a units esprit de corps, and combat readiness? :up:

Hey stupid.........what about straight soldiers hitting on chicks that are below their rank? It's called sexual harassment and isn't allowed in the military, because if it occurs, it is quashed quite quickly.Dunno what kind of unprofessional rejects you served with, but every unit I've been stationed with was pretty good about making sure we followed the UCMJ.

And, there you go again...........demonizing all gays and painting them with one broad brush when in reality you don't know shit about which you speak. When (if actually) you served, did you know of any gays? If so, did you speak with them, or just throw them over the side and commit murder?

Face it Yo Turd, you're just a bigoted hack.

I don't know bro I made out with my former section commander at Vandenberg Air Force Base, she was a 1st Lieutenant and I was a Staff Sergeant, she never said anything about it, I also dated a hot looking chick from El Salvadar who was a E-4, nothing really came of that though, I think the Military really gets pissed if you are in the same chain of command though.
 
15th post
Good morning gaybikersailor. I see that your deviant mind has worked itself into an incoherent lather. As usual you add nothing substantive to the discussion. I presented verifiable fact. You countered with an unsupported rant. Would it surprise you to know that you haven't furthered your cause.

GBS, it is commonly held knowledge that history can't be spun to favor one group over another. With history the facts, and events are what they are. You seem most angered over the fact that historically gays have a very dismal track record.

It is undeniable fact that gays whether they be in the clergy, health care, legal profession, or lay occupations, et al, stalk and prey on the most vulnerable in our society. Taking all of that into advisement how can you expect the heterosexual community to be enthusiastic about accepting gays into the military?

History really would lead us to conclude that gay officers, and NCO's would prey on their subordinates. How can that contribute to a units esprit de corps, and combat readiness? :up:

Hey stupid.........what about straight soldiers hitting on chicks that are below their rank? It's called sexual harassment and isn't allowed in the military, because if it occurs, it is quashed quite quickly.Dunno what kind of unprofessional rejects you served with, but every unit I've been stationed with was pretty good about making sure we followed the UCMJ.

And, there you go again...........demonizing all gays and painting them with one broad brush when in reality you don't know shit about which you speak. When (if actually) you served, did you know of any gays? If so, did you speak with them, or just throw them over the side and commit murder?

Face it Yo Turd, you're just a bigoted hack.

I don't know bro I made out with my former section commander at Vandenberg Air Force Base, she was a 1st Lieutenant and I was a Staff Sergeant, she never said anything about it, I also dated a hot looking chick from El Salvadar who was a E-4, nothing really came of that though, I think the Military really gets pissed if you are in the same chain of command though.

In the Navy, fraternizaton between enlisted and officer was strictly enforced. Only exception that I saw to that was a mustang LT who used to be a 1st Class and got selected for officer program. He was married at the time, and his wife was a 2nd Class when he got his bars. They told him that he couldn't fraternize with his wife any more and he told them to shove it because he wasn't getting divorced. Only person I ever saw in my life who was authorized a green active duty ID, and a peach colored dependent ID that said she was an LT's wife.

Me? When I first got to the Naval War College at Newport RI, I got into this telephone singles service. One of the women that I called, shit.......we hit it off immediately and were having a really good conversation until I asked what she did for a living. My heart sank when she said she was a JAG LCDR at the base. At the time, I was a 2nd Class. I then told her thanks very much for the conversation, but according to Navy regs, we weren't allowed to date. It was too bad, because I did see her on the base, and man was she good looking.

Like I said, I don't know what kind of unprofessional rejects Yo Turd ever served with (if at all), but it sounds to me like they were more of a reserve outfit rather than full blown active duty.
 
Hey stupid.........what about straight soldiers hitting on chicks that are below their rank? It's called sexual harassment and isn't allowed in the military, because if it occurs, it is quashed quite quickly.Dunno what kind of unprofessional rejects you served with, but every unit I've been stationed with was pretty good about making sure we followed the UCMJ.

And, there you go again...........demonizing all gays and painting them with one broad brush when in reality you don't know shit about which you speak. When (if actually) you served, did you know of any gays? If so, did you speak with them, or just throw them over the side and commit murder?

Face it Yo Turd, you're just a bigoted hack.

I don't know bro I made out with my former section commander at Vandenberg Air Force Base, she was a 1st Lieutenant and I was a Staff Sergeant, she never said anything about it, I also dated a hot looking chick from El Salvadar who was a E-4, nothing really came of that though, I think the Military really gets pissed if you are in the same chain of command though.

In the Navy, fraternizaton between enlisted and officer was strictly enforced. Only exception that I saw to that was a mustang LT who used to be a 1st Class and got selected for officer program. He was married at the time, and his wife was a 2nd Class when he got his bars. They told him that he couldn't fraternize with his wife any more and he told them to shove it because he wasn't getting divorced. Only person I ever saw in my life who was authorized a green active duty ID, and a peach colored dependent ID that said she was an LT's wife.

Me? When I first got to the Naval War College at Newport RI, I got into this telephone singles service. One of the women that I called, shit.......we hit it off immediately and were having a really good conversation until I asked what she did for a living. My heart sank when she said she was a JAG LCDR at the base. At the time, I was a 2nd Class. I then told her thanks very much for the conversation, but according to Navy regs, we weren't allowed to date. It was too bad, because I did see her on the base, and man was she good looking.

Like I said, I don't know what kind of unprofessional rejects Yo Turd ever served with (if at all), but it sounds to me like they were more of a reserve outfit rather than full blown active duty.

it will be interesting to see what happens when an enlisted gay and an officer start to get it on.
 
I don't know bro I made out with my former section commander at Vandenberg Air Force Base, she was a 1st Lieutenant and I was a Staff Sergeant, she never said anything about it, I also dated a hot looking chick from El Salvadar who was a E-4, nothing really came of that though, I think the Military really gets pissed if you are in the same chain of command though.

In the Navy, fraternizaton between enlisted and officer was strictly enforced. Only exception that I saw to that was a mustang LT who used to be a 1st Class and got selected for officer program. He was married at the time, and his wife was a 2nd Class when he got his bars. They told him that he couldn't fraternize with his wife any more and he told them to shove it because he wasn't getting divorced. Only person I ever saw in my life who was authorized a green active duty ID, and a peach colored dependent ID that said she was an LT's wife.

Me? When I first got to the Naval War College at Newport RI, I got into this telephone singles service. One of the women that I called, shit.......we hit it off immediately and were having a really good conversation until I asked what she did for a living. My heart sank when she said she was a JAG LCDR at the base. At the time, I was a 2nd Class. I then told her thanks very much for the conversation, but according to Navy regs, we weren't allowed to date. It was too bad, because I did see her on the base, and man was she good looking.

Like I said, I don't know what kind of unprofessional rejects Yo Turd ever served with (if at all), but it sounds to me like they were more of a reserve outfit rather than full blown active duty.

it will be interesting to see what happens when an enlisted gay and an officer start to get it on.

Hey stupid.......what part of NO FRATERNIZING between officer and enlisted do you not get?
 
In the Navy, fraternizaton between enlisted and officer was strictly enforced. Only exception that I saw to that was a mustang LT who used to be a 1st Class and got selected for officer program. He was married at the time, and his wife was a 2nd Class when he got his bars. They told him that he couldn't fraternize with his wife any more and he told them to shove it because he wasn't getting divorced. Only person I ever saw in my life who was authorized a green active duty ID, and a peach colored dependent ID that said she was an LT's wife.

Me? When I first got to the Naval War College at Newport RI, I got into this telephone singles service. One of the women that I called, shit.......we hit it off immediately and were having a really good conversation until I asked what she did for a living. My heart sank when she said she was a JAG LCDR at the base. At the time, I was a 2nd Class. I then told her thanks very much for the conversation, but according to Navy regs, we weren't allowed to date. It was too bad, because I did see her on the base, and man was she good looking.

Like I said, I don't know what kind of unprofessional rejects Yo Turd ever served with (if at all), but it sounds to me like they were more of a reserve outfit rather than full blown active duty.

it will be interesting to see what happens when an enlisted gay and an officer start to get it on.

Hey stupid.......what part of NO FRATERNIZING between officer and enlisted do you not get?

yea, we'll see how that plays out.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom