The Trayvon hoax: The perfect example of what happens wh

fake-news-2.jpg



Time and again we see the msm demonstrate that it is not about the truth which they avoid like the paguel...is is not even about the news....what they are all about is propaganda ....spewing propaganda 24-7

(Natural News) An investigative journalist is supposed to be someone who digs deep, sometimes working for years to expose the truth about a single crime that’s been committed, corruption that has gone undiscovered, fraud that has left people destitute, and so on.

Also known as watchdog journalism, the investigative journalist shines a light on what others have gone to great lengths to hide. The goal of this type of journalism? To trigger change, reveal what has been hidden, and get to the truth of what really happened in any given situation.

While the mainstream media focuses on simply reporting the news, investigative journalists work hard to get to the truth behind some of those stories – or at least that’s what they’re supposed to do.

In recent years, however, it seems as though investigative journalists – like many in the mainstream media – have either become incredibly lazy or are actively working to spread misinformation. Either way, the real truth about many of the stories we are fed on the news just never gets exposed anymore.

A perfect example of this is the tragic death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African American high school student who was shot to death by neighborhood watch coordinator, George Zimmerman. The media portrayed the incident as a racially motivated killing, never stopping to check the true facts of the case. Everybody took sides, and racial strife on a scale not seen in decades resulted.


The Trayvon hoax: The perfect example of what happens when investigative journalists don't do their jobs
The author makes the claim, and you regurgitate it. Yet not one example of "the media" insisting this was a racially motivate killing appears anywhere in the article or in your post. Repeating a claim is not actually support of it.
NBC edited the 911 tape to make Zimmerman look like a racist.


Exactly....they did apologize for doing that.
 
fake-news-2.jpg



Time and again we see the msm demonstrate that it is not about the truth which they avoid like the paguel...is is not even about the news....what they are all about is propaganda ....spewing propaganda 24-7

(Natural News) An investigative journalist is supposed to be someone who digs deep, sometimes working for years to expose the truth about a single crime that’s been committed, corruption that has gone undiscovered, fraud that has left people destitute, and so on.

Also known as watchdog journalism, the investigative journalist shines a light on what others have gone to great lengths to hide. The goal of this type of journalism? To trigger change, reveal what has been hidden, and get to the truth of what really happened in any given situation.

While the mainstream media focuses on simply reporting the news, investigative journalists work hard to get to the truth behind some of those stories – or at least that’s what they’re supposed to do.

In recent years, however, it seems as though investigative journalists – like many in the mainstream media – have either become incredibly lazy or are actively working to spread misinformation. Either way, the real truth about many of the stories we are fed on the news just never gets exposed anymore.

A perfect example of this is the tragic death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African American high school student who was shot to death by neighborhood watch coordinator, George Zimmerman. The media portrayed the incident as a racially motivated killing, never stopping to check the true facts of the case. Everybody took sides, and racial strife on a scale not seen in decades resulted.


The Trayvon hoax: The perfect example of what happens when investigative journalists don't do their jobs

Zimmerman's life SHOULD have been destroyed. In fact, he rightfully should be in prison for life. (He's had several unrelated brushes with the law since this case.) He executed a young man for going out on a drizzly night to buy a drink and a snack to eat while watching an NBA game on TV. The dispatcher told him it was unnecessary for him to follow the lad. And now he has the gall to sue the parents of the victim of his crime for 100 million dollars, adding insult to injury!

He was attacked, and shot in self defense.
Nothing else that happened to Zimmerman before or since, matters.
Doesn't matter what the dispatcher said. Me following you, doesn't give you a right to attack me.
 
fake-news-2.jpg



Time and again we see the msm demonstrate that it is not about the truth which they avoid like the paguel...is is not even about the news....what they are all about is propaganda ....spewing propaganda 24-7

(Natural News) An investigative journalist is supposed to be someone who digs deep, sometimes working for years to expose the truth about a single crime that’s been committed, corruption that has gone undiscovered, fraud that has left people destitute, and so on.

Also known as watchdog journalism, the investigative journalist shines a light on what others have gone to great lengths to hide. The goal of this type of journalism? To trigger change, reveal what has been hidden, and get to the truth of what really happened in any given situation.

While the mainstream media focuses on simply reporting the news, investigative journalists work hard to get to the truth behind some of those stories – or at least that’s what they’re supposed to do.

In recent years, however, it seems as though investigative journalists – like many in the mainstream media – have either become incredibly lazy or are actively working to spread misinformation. Either way, the real truth about many of the stories we are fed on the news just never gets exposed anymore.

A perfect example of this is the tragic death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African American high school student who was shot to death by neighborhood watch coordinator, George Zimmerman. The media portrayed the incident as a racially motivated killing, never stopping to check the true facts of the case. Everybody took sides, and racial strife on a scale not seen in decades resulted.


The Trayvon hoax: The perfect example of what happens when investigative journalists don't do their jobs
The author makes the claim, and you regurgitate it. Yet not one example of "the media" insisting this was a racially motivate killing appears anywhere in the article or in your post. Repeating a claim is not actually support of it.
NBC edited the 911 tape to make Zimmerman look like a racist.

The News vs. The Newsroom: Yes, NBC Did Alter George Zimmerman's 911 Call
 
Self-defense is not a crime.

Exactly, Martin confronted Zimmerman in self-defense. He thought Zimmerman was out to kill him. And he was right.
That’s a champion in stupid responses.

Name-calling is always a clear indication one is losing a debate. Be specific--why I am I wrong?



Martin was witnessed sitting on Zimmerman's torso, beating him while h screamed for help.


Your siding with the criminal thug, based on race, makes you the racist.

Martin witnessed that slimy Zimmerman stalking him. He didn't know him from a hole in the wall. He was probably thinking "I'm gonna kill this ****** before he kills me."

It all come down to one simple truth: But for the fact that Zimmerman followed Martin for no good reason, Martin would not be dead right now.

Zimmerman had a very good reason to follow Trayvon or any other suspicious person in the neighborhood and especially so since he was a neighborhood watchman.

You also need to look up the legal definition of stalking since you obviously have no idea what it is....get back with us after you do that.
 
fake-news-2.jpg



Time and again we see the msm demonstrate that it is not about the truth which they avoid like the paguel...is is not even about the news....what they are all about is propaganda ....spewing propaganda 24-7

(Natural News) An investigative journalist is supposed to be someone who digs deep, sometimes working for years to expose the truth about a single crime that’s been committed, corruption that has gone undiscovered, fraud that has left people destitute, and so on.

Also known as watchdog journalism, the investigative journalist shines a light on what others have gone to great lengths to hide. The goal of this type of journalism? To trigger change, reveal what has been hidden, and get to the truth of what really happened in any given situation.

While the mainstream media focuses on simply reporting the news, investigative journalists work hard to get to the truth behind some of those stories – or at least that’s what they’re supposed to do.

In recent years, however, it seems as though investigative journalists – like many in the mainstream media – have either become incredibly lazy or are actively working to spread misinformation. Either way, the real truth about many of the stories we are fed on the news just never gets exposed anymore.

A perfect example of this is the tragic death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African American high school student who was shot to death by neighborhood watch coordinator, George Zimmerman. The media portrayed the incident as a racially motivated killing, never stopping to check the true facts of the case. Everybody took sides, and racial strife on a scale not seen in decades resulted.


The Trayvon hoax: The perfect example of what happens when investigative journalists don't do their jobs

Zimmerman's life SHOULD have been destroyed. In fact, he rightfully should be in prison for life. (He's had several unrelated brushes with the law since this case.) He executed a young man for going out on a drizzly night to buy a drink and a snack to eat while watching an NBA game on TV. The dispatcher told him it was unnecessary for him to follow the lad. And now he has the gall to sue the parents of the victim of his crime for 100 million dollars, adding insult to injury!
Self-defense is not a crime.

A lot of liberals think white folks have no right to defend themselves from Negroid Thugs.
Or even half highspanics.
 
fake-news-2.jpg



Time and again we see the msm demonstrate that it is not about the truth which they avoid like the paguel...is is not even about the news....what they are all about is propaganda ....spewing propaganda 24-7

(Natural News) An investigative journalist is supposed to be someone who digs deep, sometimes working for years to expose the truth about a single crime that’s been committed, corruption that has gone undiscovered, fraud that has left people destitute, and so on.

Also known as watchdog journalism, the investigative journalist shines a light on what others have gone to great lengths to hide. The goal of this type of journalism? To trigger change, reveal what has been hidden, and get to the truth of what really happened in any given situation.

While the mainstream media focuses on simply reporting the news, investigative journalists work hard to get to the truth behind some of those stories – or at least that’s what they’re supposed to do.

In recent years, however, it seems as though investigative journalists – like many in the mainstream media – have either become incredibly lazy or are actively working to spread misinformation. Either way, the real truth about many of the stories we are fed on the news just never gets exposed anymore.

A perfect example of this is the tragic death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African American high school student who was shot to death by neighborhood watch coordinator, George Zimmerman. The media portrayed the incident as a racially motivated killing, never stopping to check the true facts of the case. Everybody took sides, and racial strife on a scale not seen in decades resulted.


The Trayvon hoax: The perfect example of what happens when investigative journalists don't do their jobs

Zimmerman's life SHOULD have been destroyed. In fact, he rightfully should be in prison for life. (He's had several unrelated brushes with the law since this case.) He executed a young man for going out on a drizzly night to buy a drink and a snack to eat while watching an NBA game on TV. The dispatcher told him it was unnecessary for him to follow the lad. And now he has the gall to sue the parents of the victim of his crime for 100 million dollars, adding insult to injury!

He was attacked, and shot in self defense.
Nothing else that happened to Zimmerman before or since, matters.
Doesn't matter what the dispatcher said. Me following you, doesn't give you a right to attack me.

Exactly.....what a lot of the libbies do not know is that Trayvon had took off running....had completely eluded George on that dark and rainy night....had in fact run home ....but.....he did not stay home. In fact he went back to confront George...and sucker punched George whilst George was trying to call 911 again to report that Trayvon had returned.

 
fake-news-2.jpg



Time and again we see the msm demonstrate that it is not about the truth which they avoid like the paguel...is is not even about the news....what they are all about is propaganda ....spewing propaganda 24-7

(Natural News) An investigative journalist is supposed to be someone who digs deep, sometimes working for years to expose the truth about a single crime that’s been committed, corruption that has gone undiscovered, fraud that has left people destitute, and so on.

Also known as watchdog journalism, the investigative journalist shines a light on what others have gone to great lengths to hide. The goal of this type of journalism? To trigger change, reveal what has been hidden, and get to the truth of what really happened in any given situation.

While the mainstream media focuses on simply reporting the news, investigative journalists work hard to get to the truth behind some of those stories – or at least that’s what they’re supposed to do.

In recent years, however, it seems as though investigative journalists – like many in the mainstream media – have either become incredibly lazy or are actively working to spread misinformation. Either way, the real truth about many of the stories we are fed on the news just never gets exposed anymore.

A perfect example of this is the tragic death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African American high school student who was shot to death by neighborhood watch coordinator, George Zimmerman. The media portrayed the incident as a racially motivated killing, never stopping to check the true facts of the case. Everybody took sides, and racial strife on a scale not seen in decades resulted.


The Trayvon hoax: The perfect example of what happens when investigative journalists don't do their jobs

Zimmerman's life SHOULD have been destroyed. In fact, he rightfully should be in prison for life. (He's had several unrelated brushes with the law since this case.) He executed a young man for going out on a drizzly night to buy a drink and a snack to eat while watching an NBA game on TV. The dispatcher told him it was unnecessary for him to follow the lad. And now he has the gall to sue the parents of the victim of his crime for 100 million dollars, adding insult to injury!

He was attacked, and shot in self defense.
Nothing else that happened to Zimmerman before or since, matters.
Doesn't matter what the dispatcher said. Me following you, doesn't give you a right to attack me.

Exactly.....what a lot of the libbies do not know is that Trayvon had took off running....had completely eluded George on that dark and rainy night....had in fact run home ....but.....he did not stay home. In fact he went back to confront George...and sucker punched George whilst George was trying to call 911 again to report that Trayvon had returned.



Yeah, and he was smashing head against the pavement.

Trayvon was a thug. Trayvon was a criminal. Zimmerman was a guy tired of good people being abused by the criminals.

As far as I'm concerned, and ever even semi-decent human being is concerned, Trayvon got what he rightfully and morally deserved, and society is better off for it. We need hundreds of Trayvons. Thousand even.
 
fake-news-2.jpg



Time and again we see the msm demonstrate that it is not about the truth which they avoid like the paguel...is is not even about the news....what they are all about is propaganda ....spewing propaganda 24-7

(Natural News) An investigative journalist is supposed to be someone who digs deep, sometimes working for years to expose the truth about a single crime that’s been committed, corruption that has gone undiscovered, fraud that has left people destitute, and so on.

Also known as watchdog journalism, the investigative journalist shines a light on what others have gone to great lengths to hide. The goal of this type of journalism? To trigger change, reveal what has been hidden, and get to the truth of what really happened in any given situation.

While the mainstream media focuses on simply reporting the news, investigative journalists work hard to get to the truth behind some of those stories – or at least that’s what they’re supposed to do.

In recent years, however, it seems as though investigative journalists – like many in the mainstream media – have either become incredibly lazy or are actively working to spread misinformation. Either way, the real truth about many of the stories we are fed on the news just never gets exposed anymore.

A perfect example of this is the tragic death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African American high school student who was shot to death by neighborhood watch coordinator, George Zimmerman. The media portrayed the incident as a racially motivated killing, never stopping to check the true facts of the case. Everybody took sides, and racial strife on a scale not seen in decades resulted.


The Trayvon hoax: The perfect example of what happens when investigative journalists don't do their jobs
The author makes the claim, and you regurgitate it. Yet not one example of "the media" insisting this was a racially motivate killing appears anywhere in the article or in your post. Repeating a claim is not actually support of it.
NBC edited the 911 tape to make Zimmerman look like a racist.


Exactly....they did apologize for doing that.
It's a little late after you already did what you wanted to do. They should've lost their license over it. They meant to do it to make Zimmerman sound like a racist.
 
fake-news-2.jpg



Time and again we see the msm demonstrate that it is not about the truth which they avoid like the paguel...is is not even about the news....what they are all about is propaganda ....spewing propaganda 24-7

(Natural News) An investigative journalist is supposed to be someone who digs deep, sometimes working for years to expose the truth about a single crime that’s been committed, corruption that has gone undiscovered, fraud that has left people destitute, and so on.

Also known as watchdog journalism, the investigative journalist shines a light on what others have gone to great lengths to hide. The goal of this type of journalism? To trigger change, reveal what has been hidden, and get to the truth of what really happened in any given situation.

While the mainstream media focuses on simply reporting the news, investigative journalists work hard to get to the truth behind some of those stories – or at least that’s what they’re supposed to do.

In recent years, however, it seems as though investigative journalists – like many in the mainstream media – have either become incredibly lazy or are actively working to spread misinformation. Either way, the real truth about many of the stories we are fed on the news just never gets exposed anymore.

A perfect example of this is the tragic death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African American high school student who was shot to death by neighborhood watch coordinator, George Zimmerman. The media portrayed the incident as a racially motivated killing, never stopping to check the true facts of the case. Everybody took sides, and racial strife on a scale not seen in decades resulted.


The Trayvon hoax: The perfect example of what happens when investigative journalists don't do their jobs

Zimmerman's life SHOULD have been destroyed. In fact, he rightfully should be in prison for life. (He's had several unrelated brushes with the law since this case.) He executed a young man for going out on a drizzly night to buy a drink and a snack to eat while watching an NBA game on TV. The dispatcher told him it was unnecessary for him to follow the lad. And now he has the gall to sue the parents of the victim of his crime for 100 million dollars, adding insult to injury!

He was attacked, and shot in self defense.
Nothing else that happened to Zimmerman before or since, matters.
Doesn't matter what the dispatcher said. Me following you, doesn't give you a right to attack me.

Exactly.....what a lot of the libbies do not know is that Trayvon had took off running....had completely eluded George on that dark and rainy night....had in fact run home ....but.....he did not stay home. In fact he went back to confront George...and sucker punched George whilst George was trying to call 911 again to report that Trayvon had returned.



Yeah, and he was smashing head against the pavement.

Trayvon was a thug. Trayvon was a criminal. Zimmerman was a guy tired of good people being abused by the criminals.

As far as I'm concerned, and ever even semi-decent human being is concerned, Trayvon got what he rightfully and morally deserved, and society is better off for it. We need hundreds of Trayvons. Thousand even.


I think you meant to say we need thousands of Zimmermans. G-d forbid. He's not exactly a model citizen. Do you know he's had a couple of brushes with the law since then, completely unrelated to Martin? I've never had a brush with the law, and neither have most law-abiding citizens.

As for Martin, he was a teen. People's brains don't even develop fully until they're 25. If I see someone seemingly following me at night, and that's happened, I immediately get scared for my life. Martin probably felt scared for his, and if he saw the gun that Zimmerman was carrying, then in his mind he was fighting for his life against an armed man.
 
fake-news-2.jpg



Time and again we see the msm demonstrate that it is not about the truth which they avoid like the paguel...is is not even about the news....what they are all about is propaganda ....spewing propaganda 24-7

(Natural News) An investigative journalist is supposed to be someone who digs deep, sometimes working for years to expose the truth about a single crime that’s been committed, corruption that has gone undiscovered, fraud that has left people destitute, and so on.

Also known as watchdog journalism, the investigative journalist shines a light on what others have gone to great lengths to hide. The goal of this type of journalism? To trigger change, reveal what has been hidden, and get to the truth of what really happened in any given situation.

While the mainstream media focuses on simply reporting the news, investigative journalists work hard to get to the truth behind some of those stories – or at least that’s what they’re supposed to do.

In recent years, however, it seems as though investigative journalists – like many in the mainstream media – have either become incredibly lazy or are actively working to spread misinformation. Either way, the real truth about many of the stories we are fed on the news just never gets exposed anymore.

A perfect example of this is the tragic death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African American high school student who was shot to death by neighborhood watch coordinator, George Zimmerman. The media portrayed the incident as a racially motivated killing, never stopping to check the true facts of the case. Everybody took sides, and racial strife on a scale not seen in decades resulted.


The Trayvon hoax: The perfect example of what happens when investigative journalists don't do their jobs

Zimmerman's life SHOULD have been destroyed. In fact, he rightfully should be in prison for life. (He's had several unrelated brushes with the law since this case.) He executed a young man for going out on a drizzly night to buy a drink and a snack to eat while watching an NBA game on TV. The dispatcher told him it was unnecessary for him to follow the lad. And now he has the gall to sue the parents of the victim of his crime for 100 million dollars, adding insult to injury!

He was attacked, and shot in self defense.
Nothing else that happened to Zimmerman before or since, matters.
Doesn't matter what the dispatcher said. Me following you, doesn't give you a right to attack me.

Exactly.....what a lot of the libbies do not know is that Trayvon had took off running....had completely eluded George on that dark and rainy night....had in fact run home ....but.....he did not stay home. In fact he went back to confront George...and sucker punched George whilst George was trying to call 911 again to report that Trayvon had returned.



Yeah, and he was smashing head against the pavement.

Trayvon was a thug. Trayvon was a criminal. Zimmerman was a guy tired of good people being abused by the criminals.

As far as I'm concerned, and ever even semi-decent human being is concerned, Trayvon got what he rightfully and morally deserved, and society is better off for it. We need hundreds of Trayvons. Thousand even.


I think you meant to say we need thousands of Zimmermans. G-d forbid. He's not exactly a model citizen. Do you know he's had a couple of brushes with the law since then, completely unrelated to Martin? I've never had a brush with the law, and neither have most law-abiding citizens.

As for Martin, he was a teen. People's brains don't even develop fully until they're 25. If I see someone seemingly following me at night, and that's happened, I immediately get scared for my life. Martin probably felt scared for his, and if he saw the gun that Zimmerman was carrying, then in his mind he was fighting for his life against an armed man.


You obviously do not understand the concept of "concealed carry".
 
Self-defense is not a crime.

Exactly, Martin confronted Zimmerman in self-defense. He thought Zimmerman was out to kill him. And he was right.
That’s a champion in stupid responses.

Name-calling is always a clear indication one is losing a debate. Be specific--why I am I wrong?



Martin was witnessed sitting on Zimmerman's torso, beating him while h screamed for help.


Your siding with the criminal thug, based on race, makes you the racist.

Martin witnessed that slimy Zimmerman stalking him. He didn't know him from a hole in the wall. He was probably thinking "I'm gonna kill this ****** before he kills me."

It all come down to one simple truth: But for the fact that Zimmerman followed Martin for no good reason, Martin would not be dead right now.

Bullshit. No good reason? You aren't even trying to be honest.
 
fake-news-2.jpg



Time and again we see the msm demonstrate that it is not about the truth which they avoid like the paguel...is is not even about the news....what they are all about is propaganda ....spewing propaganda 24-7

(Natural News) An investigative journalist is supposed to be someone who digs deep, sometimes working for years to expose the truth about a single crime that’s been committed, corruption that has gone undiscovered, fraud that has left people destitute, and so on.

Also known as watchdog journalism, the investigative journalist shines a light on what others have gone to great lengths to hide. The goal of this type of journalism? To trigger change, reveal what has been hidden, and get to the truth of what really happened in any given situation.

While the mainstream media focuses on simply reporting the news, investigative journalists work hard to get to the truth behind some of those stories – or at least that’s what they’re supposed to do.

In recent years, however, it seems as though investigative journalists – like many in the mainstream media – have either become incredibly lazy or are actively working to spread misinformation. Either way, the real truth about many of the stories we are fed on the news just never gets exposed anymore.

A perfect example of this is the tragic death of 17-year-old Trayvon Martin, an unarmed African American high school student who was shot to death by neighborhood watch coordinator, George Zimmerman. The media portrayed the incident as a racially motivated killing, never stopping to check the true facts of the case. Everybody took sides, and racial strife on a scale not seen in decades resulted.


The Trayvon hoax: The perfect example of what happens when investigative journalists don't do their jobs

Zimmerman's life SHOULD have been destroyed. In fact, he rightfully should be in prison for life. (He's had several unrelated brushes with the law since this case.) He executed a young man for going out on a drizzly night to buy a drink and a snack to eat while watching an NBA game on TV. The dispatcher told him it was unnecessary for him to follow the lad. And now he has the gall to sue the parents of the victim of his crime for 100 million dollars, adding insult to injury!

He was attacked, and shot in self defense.
Nothing else that happened to Zimmerman before or since, matters.
Doesn't matter what the dispatcher said. Me following you, doesn't give you a right to attack me.

Exactly.....what a lot of the libbies do not know is that Trayvon had took off running....had completely eluded George on that dark and rainy night....had in fact run home ....but.....he did not stay home. In fact he went back to confront George...and sucker punched George whilst George was trying to call 911 again to report that Trayvon had returned.



Yeah, and he was smashing head against the pavement.

Trayvon was a thug. Trayvon was a criminal. Zimmerman was a guy tired of good people being abused by the criminals.

As far as I'm concerned, and ever even semi-decent human being is concerned, Trayvon got what he rightfully and morally deserved, and society is better off for it. We need hundreds of Trayvons. Thousand even.


I think you meant to say we need thousands of Zimmermans. G-d forbid. He's not exactly a model citizen. Do you know he's had a couple of brushes with the law since then, completely unrelated to Martin? I've never had a brush with the law, and neither have most law-abiding citizens.

As for Martin, he was a teen. People's brains don't even develop fully until they're 25. If I see someone seemingly following me at night, and that's happened, I immediately get scared for my life. Martin probably felt scared for his, and if he saw the gun that Zimmerman was carrying, then in his mind he was fighting for his life against an armed man.


Probably this probably dat...you do have a fertile imagination on which you fallaciously base your biased opinion...only that and nothing more.

Anyhow Trayvon never saw the gun until Z managed to get it out and shoot him whilst being pinned to the ground by Trayvon

You should have watched the trial....maybe you do not understand how justice woiks in America...as in there is a trial and all the evidence is presented and debated on and the jury using all that issues a verdict. duh
 
The Z affair pops up from time to time on this board and invariably all the stoopids come out of the woodwork to demonstrate just how stooooopid dey are. hehheh

I brought it up this time in order to identify some more liberal stoopids in order to put them on ignore. hehheh
 
Zimmerman's life SHOULD have been destroyed. In fact, he rightfully should be in prison for life. (He's had several unrelated brushes with the law since this case.) He executed a young man for going out on a drizzly night to buy a drink and a snack to eat while watching an NBA game on TV. The dispatcher told him it was unnecessary for him to follow the lad. And now he has the gall to sue the parents of the victim of his crime for 100 million dollars, adding insult to injury!

He was attacked, and shot in self defense.
Nothing else that happened to Zimmerman before or since, matters.
Doesn't matter what the dispatcher said. Me following you, doesn't give you a right to attack me.

Exactly.....what a lot of the libbies do not know is that Trayvon had took off running....had completely eluded George on that dark and rainy night....had in fact run home ....but.....he did not stay home. In fact he went back to confront George...and sucker punched George whilst George was trying to call 911 again to report that Trayvon had returned.



Yeah, and he was smashing head against the pavement.

Trayvon was a thug. Trayvon was a criminal. Zimmerman was a guy tired of good people being abused by the criminals.

As far as I'm concerned, and ever even semi-decent human being is concerned, Trayvon got what he rightfully and morally deserved, and society is better off for it. We need hundreds of Trayvons. Thousand even.


I think you meant to say we need thousands of Zimmermans. G-d forbid. He's not exactly a model citizen. Do you know he's had a couple of brushes with the law since then, completely unrelated to Martin? I've never had a brush with the law, and neither have most law-abiding citizens.

As for Martin, he was a teen. People's brains don't even develop fully until they're 25. If I see someone seemingly following me at night, and that's happened, I immediately get scared for my life. Martin probably felt scared for his, and if he saw the gun that Zimmerman was carrying, then in his mind he was fighting for his life against an armed man.


Probably this probably dat...you do have a fertile imagination on which you fallaciously base your biased opinion...only that and nothing more.

Anyhow Trayvon never saw the gun until Z managed to get it out and shoot him whilst being pinned to the ground by Trayvon

You should have watched the trial....maybe you do not understand how justice woiks in America...as in there is a trial and all the evidence is presented and debated on and the jury using all that issues a verdict. duh


I don't know what Martin did or did not see because I don't have his eyes. As for juries, they bend over backwards to be fair, to the point of absurdity.

I don't take issue with police officers shooting criminals, who are in the midst of committing a crime. I do take issue with declaring getting a snack on a drizzly night to be a crime, when it isn't. Or declaring looking at a neighbor's window to be a crime, when it isn't.

If Zimmerman was so zealous, he should've become an actual police officer. Instead he was a nosy busybody, who was following someone down alleys. If someone did that to me, my defenses would immediately go up. I hate busybodies who don't mind their own business. I once picked up a newspaper on the street that I figured was ownerless. This self-righteous whackjob followed me down 2 or 3 streets, then confronted me about the 1 dollar paper, saying it could belong to someone. The whole thing almost got physical, and this was in broad daylight, in front of a crowd of ppl at a bus-stop. So I could definitely see how something like what happened to Martin got out of hand, on a drizzly dark alley.
 
The Z affair pops up from time to time on this board and invariably all the stoopids come out of the woodwork to demonstrate just how stooooopid dey are. hehheh

I brought it up this time in order to identify some more liberal stoopids in order to put them on ignore. hehheh

Putting someone on Ignore is a cowardly act.
 
15th post
He was attacked, and shot in self defense.
Nothing else that happened to Zimmerman before or since, matters.
Doesn't matter what the dispatcher said. Me following you, doesn't give you a right to attack me.

Exactly.....what a lot of the libbies do not know is that Trayvon had took off running....had completely eluded George on that dark and rainy night....had in fact run home ....but.....he did not stay home. In fact he went back to confront George...and sucker punched George whilst George was trying to call 911 again to report that Trayvon had returned.



Yeah, and he was smashing head against the pavement.

Trayvon was a thug. Trayvon was a criminal. Zimmerman was a guy tired of good people being abused by the criminals.

As far as I'm concerned, and ever even semi-decent human being is concerned, Trayvon got what he rightfully and morally deserved, and society is better off for it. We need hundreds of Trayvons. Thousand even.


I think you meant to say we need thousands of Zimmermans. G-d forbid. He's not exactly a model citizen. Do you know he's had a couple of brushes with the law since then, completely unrelated to Martin? I've never had a brush with the law, and neither have most law-abiding citizens.

As for Martin, he was a teen. People's brains don't even develop fully until they're 25. If I see someone seemingly following me at night, and that's happened, I immediately get scared for my life. Martin probably felt scared for his, and if he saw the gun that Zimmerman was carrying, then in his mind he was fighting for his life against an armed man.


Probably this probably dat...you do have a fertile imagination on which you fallaciously base your biased opinion...only that and nothing more.

Anyhow Trayvon never saw the gun until Z managed to get it out and shoot him whilst being pinned to the ground by Trayvon

You should have watched the trial....maybe you do not understand how justice woiks in America...as in there is a trial and all the evidence is presented and debated on and the jury using all that issues a verdict. duh


I don't know what Martin did or did not see because I don't have his eyes. As for juries, they bend over backwards to be fair, to the point of absurdity.

I don't take issue with police officers shooting criminals, who are in the midst of committing a crime. I do take issue with declaring getting a snack on a drizzly night to be a crime, when it isn't. Or declaring looking at a neighbor's window to be a crime, when it isn't.

If Zimmerman was so zealous, he should've become an actual police officer. Instead he was a nosy busybody, who was following someone down alleys. If someone did that to me, my defenses would immediately go up. I hate busybodies who don't mind their own business. I once picked up a newspaper on the street that I figured was ownerless. This self-righteous whackjob followed me down 2 or 3 streets, then confronted me about the 1 dollar paper, saying it could belong to someone. The whole thing almost got physical, and this was in broad daylight, in front of a crowd of ppl at a bus-stop. So I could definitely see how something like what happened to Martin got out of hand, on a drizzly dark alley.

If someone stalked me I’d contact police. If someone jumped me and was beating me and I had a gun, I’d shoot.
Your opinion and mine can only be based on evidence and not what we wish. Based on evidence, Zimmerman acted in self defense. Case closed.
According to your reasoning, Zimmerman would be justified in shooting just because he was intimidated by a young black male in a hoodie.
 
Bullshit. No good reason? You aren't even trying to be honest.
Have you noticed how here on U.S. Message Board when a black person posts a story about someone alleging racial discrimination there are a core group of people who show up on the thread trolling it with every reason under the sun why the act allegedly was not racially motivated and that there is no proof that it was racially motivated (see as an example A black man in Michigan tried to deposit checks at his bank. The manager called police)

By the same token (no pun intended) I have observed all of the stated reasons why this same core group believes that Zimmerman had any valid legal reason to follow Martin which does not involve profiling, particularly of a racial nature. I've also seen the various attempts to reinterpret both the Florida stalking statutes as well as the statute which indicates that a person can not claim self-defense if they are the aggressor in an altercation.

On top of all of this, Zimmerman was not in compliance with the Neighborhood Watch regulations which didn't allow their members to carry weapons while engaging in Neighborhood Watch duties, that their role is to report what they deem suspicious activity but not to engage the "suspect" nor was in compliance with the admonishment presented on the Florida Department of Agriculture reminding people who have obtained a concealed carry permit that it is ONLY a permit to conceal carry a weapon and that the holder needs to be knowledgeable of the circumstances in which they can use deadly force for self-defense.

Lastly, if anyone watched the video where the police detective had Zimmerman walk them through what happened that night, it was clear that they were coaching him and pointing out the weaknesses in his "narrative" presumably so that he could correct them before having to defend himself in a court of law.

I've encountered plenty of individuals who for whatever reason don't have a criminal record, but once you start looking into their contact with law enforcement, what their ex significant others have to say about them in divorce proceedings, etc. a pattern often begins to emerge. Zimmerman has had multiple instances of violence against others including a law enforcement officer, but all of his crap always seems to get cleaned up.

People make mistakes, they often misinterpret situations, do the wrong thing or just totally screw up, but the thing about Zimmerman that cements my feelings for him is the fact that he stated that if he had the opportunity to do everything over again knowing now what he didn't know then - that Martin was a teen, that he was not "high" (not that that is any of his damn business) and that he was not armed - he still would have killed hiim.

Major asshole and hopefully one day he'll reap what he has sown.
 
Bullshit. No good reason? You aren't even trying to be honest.
Have you noticed how here on U.S. Message Board when a black person posts a story about someone alleging racial discrimination there are a core group of people who show up on the thread trolling it with every reason under the sun why the act allegedly was not racially motivated and that there is no proof that it was racially motivated (see as an example A black man in Michigan tried to deposit checks at his bank. The manager called police)

By the same token (no pun intended) I have observed all of the stated reasons why this same core group believes that Zimmerman had any valid legal reason to follow Martin which does not involve profiling, particularly of a racial nature. I've also seen the various attempts to reinterpret both the Florida stalking statutes as well as the statute which indicates that a person can not claim self-defense if they are the aggressor in an altercation.

On top of all of this, Zimmerman was not in compliance with the Neighborhood Watch regulations which didn't allow their members to carry weapons while engaging in Neighborhood Watch duties, that their role is to report what they deem suspicious activity but not to engage the "suspect" nor was in compliance with the admonishment presented on the Florida Department of Agriculture reminding people who have obtained a concealed carry permit that it is ONLY a permit to conceal carry a weapon and that the holder needs to be knowledgeable of the circumstances in which they can use deadly force for self-defense.

Lastly, if anyone watched the video where the police detective had Zimmerman walk them through what happened that night, it was clear that they were coaching him and pointing out the weaknesses in his "narrative" presumably so that he could correct them before having to defend himself in a court of law.

I've encountered plenty of individuals who for whatever reason don't have a criminal record, but once you start looking into their contact with law enforcement, what their ex significant others have to say about them in divorce proceedings, etc. a pattern often begins to emerge. Zimmerman has had multiple instances of violence against others including a law enforcement officer, but all of his crap always seems to get cleaned up.

People make mistakes, they often misinterpret situations, do the wrong thing or just totally screw up, but the thing about Zimmerman that cements my feelings for him is the fact that he stated that if he had the opportunity to do everything over again knowing now what he didn't know then - that Martin was a teen, that he was not "high" (not that that is any of his damn business) and that he was not armed - he still would have killed hiim.

Major asshole and hopefully one day he'll reap what he has sown.

The Florida Department of Agriculture?

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Press sees story about somebody named 'Zimmerman' in an altercation with a 'hapless innocent black yoof', and thinks it has the Greatest White Defendant Evar; with a name like 'Zimmerman he's bound to be some blonde blue-eyed neo-nazi n stuff, right? Instead, they got George, and the poor hapless innocent Trayvon was a thug trying to murder him by slamming his head on concrete, but they decided to go with their narrative anyway, show these uppity proles who's the boss and railroad him into prison. When they failed, they have been having endless tantrums over their inability to railroad the guy.

The only mystery left is what Trayvon had to ditch when he ran off and then came back to murder Zimmerman; Burglary tools? Something he shoplifted?

Zimmerman's 'crime' was defending himself against a black thug, and that can't be tolerated by left wing racists.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom