The time for dancing on the head of a pin is no more.

The question is……How are they declared to be violent criminals?
They are illegal aliens, because they have no documents showing that they are legally in the country. That is the justification for deporting them.

That they are violent criminals is why Trump prioritized deporting them.DHS has the expertise to recognize the more violent of the illegal aliens. Exactly how they make that determination is a question you should ask them.

No proof is required for that prioritization, because as Tom Homan has said over and over before and after the election, illegal aliens don't get a pass if they are caught while DHS is pursuing the most violent ones.
Are they entitled to Due Process?
No more than the millions of illegal aliens that Biden and Obama bragged about deporting.

Many of them have failed to show up for court dates, so they have refused due process.
 
Last edited:
I've noticed a pattern by the left of abusing their authority, and when they lose power, they prevent a duly elected president from carrying out his duties.

I think it's clear we aren't dealing with Americans. We're dealing with Domestic Terrorists. I don't care if they call themselves Democrats. They're still terrorists, and every one of them needs to answer for their support of these terrorist acts.
How dare you call trump's 2025 agenda "duties". You will find out soon enough.
 
The unelected judges decide if the president is following the law.

That's how it's always been.
No. What they're doing is trying to stand in the way of the POTUS to keep him from fixing the mess that Biden made.

No judge has the right to write laws from the bench. That's congress's job.
 
Criminal records in their home countries.
The admin is required to give due process to the deportees. If they are possession of criminal records from their home countries why not produce them in a hearing like the ones Boasberg has already held?
 
No. What they're doing is trying to stand in the way of the POTUS to keep him from fixing the mess that Biden made.

No judge has the right to write laws from the bench. That's congress's job.
A federal judge in Washington edged closer on Thursday to holding the Trump administration in contempt for possibly having violated an order he issued last weekend pausing the deportation of scores of Venezuelan immigrants under a rarely invoked wartime statute.

In an angrily written order, the judge, James E. Boasberg, told the administration to explain to him by Tuesday why officials had not violated his instructions when they allowed two flights of immigrants to continue on to El Salvador even after he directed the planes to return to the United States.

Judge Boasberg also called out efforts by the Justice Department to repeatedly stonewall his attempts to get information about the timing of the flights.

“The government again evaded its obligations,” he wrote, adding that the Justice Department’s most recent filing about the flights was “woefully insufficient.”


Boasberg should already have found the admin in contempt.
 
How Trump Is Trying to Consolidate Power Over Courts, Congress and More

President Trump called for one federal judge seeking basic information about his deportation efforts to be impeached amid mounting concern about a constitutional showdown. Another judge found that Mr. Trump’s efforts to shut down a federal agency probably violated the Constitution and stripped Congress of its authority. The president was accused of overstepping his executive authority yet again in firing two Democratic commissioners from an independent trade commission. And that was just Tuesday.
Nearly two months into his second term, Mr. Trump is trying to consolidate control over the courts, Congress and even, in some ways, American society and culture.

His expansive interpretation of presidential power has become the defining characteristic of his second term, an aggressive effort across multiple fronts to assert executive authority to reshape the government, drive policy in new directions and root out what he and his supporters see as a deeply embedded liberal bias.

“We’ve never seen a president so comprehensively attempt to arrogate and consolidate so much of the other branches’ power, let alone to do so in the first two months of his presidency,” said Stephen Vladeck, a professor at Georgetown University Law Center.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/03/20/...date-power-over-courts-congress-and-more.html

Opinions may differ as to whether a prez inherently has the powers trump is claiming for himself. Or whether a prez should have those powers. But the debate over whether he IS seeking them has ended by virtue of his actions. Call it dictatorial, call it autocratic, call it what you will, trump is actively in pursuit of executive power that flies in the face of the Founder's intentions for co-equal branches of government. If successful it will fundamentally change America.
Call it anti constitutionalism.
 
The admin is required to give due process to the deportees. If they are possession of criminal records from their home countries why not produce them in a hearing like the ones Boasberg has already held?

Editing my post when you reply is cowardly and dishonest.
 
A federal judge in Washington edged closer on Thursday to holding the Trump administration in contempt for possibly having violated an order he issued last weekend pausing the deportation of scores of Venezuelan immigrants under a rarely invoked wartime statute.

In an angrily written order, the judge, James E. Boasberg, told the administration to explain to him by Tuesday why officials had not violated his instructions when they allowed two flights of immigrants to continue on to El Salvador even after he directed the planes to return to the United States.

Judge Boasberg also called out efforts by the Justice Department to repeatedly stonewall his attempts to get information about the timing of the flights.

“The government again evaded its obligations,” he wrote, adding that the Justice Department’s most recent filing about the flights was “woefully insufficient.”


Boasberg should already have found the admin in contempt.
Good luck with that.

That SOB is going to only end up draw attention to himself, and I don't believe Biden pardoned him for the shit he did as a FISA judge.
 
Not really. Obama and Biden ignored rulings by judges before. They went ahead and did what they wanted. To a Democrat the law is just a tool to use against their opposition.
BS. If Obama and Biden was doing what Trump is you right wingers would have impeached them both and Obama would have been voted out by the Republican senate. Then you right-wing scabs would have run your mouths about how the block president was the worst criminal of all time, along with your standard white racist garbage opinions abut black culture.
 
Good luck with that.

That SOB is going to only end up draw attention to himself, and I don't believe Biden pardoned him for the shit he did as a FISA judge.
That judge has violated no laws. The courts are going to stop trump.
 
I've noticed a pattern by the left of abusing their authority, and when they lose power, they prevent a duly elected president from carrying out his duties.

I think it's clear we aren't dealing with Americans. We're dealing with Domestic Terrorists. I don't care if they call themselves Democrats. They're still terrorists, and every one of them needs to answer for their support of these terrorist acts.
You have seen no such pattern.
 
Back
Top Bottom