The Supreme Court’s Rejection of Sanctuary City Case Is a ‘Major Setback’ for the Trump Administration

[berg80]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

 

[whitehall]

The Court chickened out on sanctuary cities and a gun rights issues because the Trump administration was right and the Court was afraid to deal with it. Maybe they will get back to work after Trump's next inauguration.

 

[Bush92]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

Another nail in the coffin for U.S. sovereignty. The communist will win the Cold War yet.

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening....

 

[Mac-7]

I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen

Which would be a good thing

two can play this game

 

[Bush92]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

Well I guess muncipalities had better pass ordinances for a zero tolerance policy on illegal aliens and start weeding them out if the High Court can't have the backbone enough to deal with it. Looks like it's up to local government now. Screw the Supremacy Clause.

 

[anynameyouwish]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening....

" I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening.... "


so.....california......

which sends MORE $ to the government than ALL the red states combined!

would not receive ANY of ITS OWN MONEY back....

instead CALIFORNIA money would go to red states that already PAY LESS TO the federal government then they get back........

so.....explain to me again how SOCIALISM is really really bad!

 

[idb]

The Court chickened out on sanctuary cities and a gun rights issues because the Trump administration was right and the Court was afraid to deal with it. Maybe they will get back to work after Trump's next inauguration.

Well...that makes sense.

 

[BrokeLoser]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

Translation:
"We love our illegal wetbacks, you can't stop us from protecting our illegal wetbacks, we must continue encouraging illegal wetbacks to fuck over real Americans."

This ladies and gentlemen is how you got Mr Trump shoved down your filthy throats. Thank Leftist Loons like berg80 for Donny T.

 

[excalibur]

I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening....

A Second Circuit ruling has allowed that.

Sanctuary States, City Lose Appeal on Federal Grant Cuts

Reversing a sweeping injunction, the Second Circuit gave the Justice Department a green light Wednesday to withhold funding from New York City and seven states in retaliation for their sanctuary policies on immigration.

www.courthousenews.com

 

[excalibur]

When does all the winning start? ...

Here:

Sanctuary States, City Lose Appeal on Federal Grant Cuts

Reversing a sweeping injunction, the Second Circuit gave the Justice Department a green light Wednesday to withhold funding from New York City and seven states in retaliation for their sanctuary policies on immigration.

www.courthousenews.com

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening....

" I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening.... "


so.....california......

which sends MORE $ to the government than ALL the red states combined!

would not receive ANY of ITS OWN MONEY back....

instead CALIFORNIA money would go to red states that already PAY LESS TO the federal government then they get back........

so.....explain to me again how SOCIALISM is really really bad!

Dont be such a liar,it makes everything else you say questionable.

 

[Bush92]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening....

" I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening.... "


so.....california......

which sends MORE $ to the government than ALL the red states combined!

would not receive ANY of ITS OWN MONEY back....

instead CALIFORNIA money would go to red states that already PAY LESS TO the federal government then they get back........

so.....explain to me again how SOCIALISM is really really bad!

California, whose businesses send money to the federal government and those same businesses are leaving that high tax state as quickly as possible, are putting a dent in California economy. Military bases in Cali...and they are multitude, should get $$$, "sanctuary cities" can rot faster then they are now.

 

[Hossfly]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

The SCOTUS ruling won't affect ICE when they track down the illegals and ship them home.

 

[BrokeLoser]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening....

" I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening.... "


so.....california......

which sends MORE $ to the government than ALL the red states combined!

would not receive ANY of ITS OWN MONEY back....

instead CALIFORNIA money would go to red states that already PAY LESS TO the federal government then they get back........

so.....explain to me again how SOCIALISM is really really bad!

California, whose businesses send money to the federal government and those same businesses are leaving that high tax state as quickly as possible, are putting a dent in California economy. Military bases in Cali...and they are multitude, should get $$$, "sanctuary cities" can rot faster then they are now.

Legitimate Californians are fed up with foreigners and the foreign influence....They hate feeling like foreigners on American soil. They miss the days when they could communicate in english with everybody in line at the bank, when nearly everybody was like-minded and shared similar interests.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening....

" I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening.... "


so.....california......

which sends MORE $ to the government than ALL the red states combined!

would not receive ANY of ITS OWN MONEY back....

instead CALIFORNIA money would go to red states that already PAY LESS TO the federal government then they get back........

so.....explain to me again how SOCIALISM is really really bad!

California, whose businesses send money to the federal government and those same businesses are leaving that high tax state as quickly as possible, are putting a dent in California economy. Military bases in Cali...and they are multitude, should get $$$, "sanctuary cities" can rot faster then they are now.

Legitimate Californians are fed up with foreigners and the foreign influence....They hate feeling like foreigners on American soil. They miss the days when they could communicate in english with everybody in line at the bank, when nearly everybody was like-minded and shared similar interests.

Yep...same thing here in Texas.
A guy down the hall from me at the hospital put it nicely when he shouted....Why the hell do none of these nurses look like they're from Texas!!!!

 

[anynameyouwish]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening....

" I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening.... "


so.....california......

which sends MORE $ to the government than ALL the red states combined!

would not receive ANY of ITS OWN MONEY back....

instead CALIFORNIA money would go to red states that already PAY LESS TO the federal government then they get back........

so.....explain to me again how SOCIALISM is really really bad!

California, whose businesses send money to the federal government and those same businesses are leaving that high tax state as quickly as possible, are putting a dent in California economy. Military bases in Cali...and they are multitude, should get $$$, "sanctuary cities" can rot faster then they are now.

Legitimate Californians are fed up with foreigners and the foreign influence....They hate feeling like foreigners on American soil. They miss the days when they could communicate in english with everybody in line at the bank, when nearly everybody was like-minded and shared similar interests.

Yep...same thing here in Texas.
A guy down the hall from me at the hospital put it nicely when he shouted....Why the hell do none of these nurses look like they're from Texas!!!!

" Why the hell do none of these nurses look like they're from Texas!!!! "

they weren't holding a beer?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening....

" I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening.... "


so.....california......

which sends MORE $ to the government than ALL the red states combined!

would not receive ANY of ITS OWN MONEY back....

instead CALIFORNIA money would go to red states that already PAY LESS TO the federal government then they get back........

so.....explain to me again how SOCIALISM is really really bad!

California, whose businesses send money to the federal government and those same businesses are leaving that high tax state as quickly as possible, are putting a dent in California economy. Military bases in Cali...and they are multitude, should get $$$, "sanctuary cities" can rot faster then they are now.

Legitimate Californians are fed up with foreigners and the foreign influence....They hate feeling like foreigners on American soil. They miss the days when they could communicate in english with everybody in line at the bank, when nearly everybody was like-minded and shared similar interests.

Yep...same thing here in Texas.
A guy down the hall from me at the hospital put it nicely when he shouted....Why the hell do none of these nurses look like they're from Texas!!!!

" Why the hell do none of these nurses look like they're from Texas!!!! "

they weren't holding a beer?

Nah...they weren't packing.

 

[anynameyouwish]

When does all the winning start?

"The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation. While the decision is likely to be overshadowed by the Court’s watershed civil rights ruling granting gay, lesbian, and transgender workers protection from discrimination under Title VII, attorneys said the Court’s denial is a stinging loss for the president and the latest in a continuing trend of federal court losses over sanctuary city laws.

By refusing to hear the Justice Department’s appeal, the justices left in place a lower court decision which left intact a series of laws designed to limit state officials’ cooperation with federal immigration enforcement authorities. Only staunchly conservative Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito voted in favor of hearing the appeal. "

Supreme Court Rejects Trump’s Sanctuary City Challenge | Law & Crime

The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected the Trump administration’s request for the justices to hear arguments in a legal challenge to California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation.

lawandcrime.com

I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening....

" I think that also means that if the President wants to stop federal funds going to that state, that can happen, which means all those welfare pukes are going to rise up and start rioting and burning stuff...Oops, that already is happening.... "


so.....california......

which sends MORE $ to the government than ALL the red states combined!

would not receive ANY of ITS OWN MONEY back....

instead CALIFORNIA money would go to red states that already PAY LESS TO the federal government then they get back........

so.....explain to me again how SOCIALISM is really really bad!

California, whose businesses send money to the federal government and those same businesses are leaving that high tax state as quickly as possible, are putting a dent in California economy. Military bases in Cali...and they are multitude, should get $$$, "sanctuary cities" can rot faster then they are now.

Legitimate Californians are fed up with foreigners and the foreign influence....They hate feeling like foreigners on American soil. They miss the days when they could communicate in english with everybody in line at the bank, when nearly everybody was like-minded and shared similar interests.

Yep...same thing here in Texas.
A guy down the hall from me at the hospital put it nicely when he shouted....Why the hell do none of these nurses look like they're from Texas!!!!

" Why the hell do none of these nurses look like they're from Texas!!!! "

they weren't holding a beer?

Nah...they weren't packing.

I was in texas for a BIG antique show...

they ALL had beers!

never saw that before....

in new england beers in public are frowned upon.

 

[justinacolmena]

California’s “sanctuary city” laws, which protect undocumented immigrants from deportation

There's such a thing as Nueva Generación, which has nothing to do with Cártel de Jalisco. It is strange, because there is a message from whites to other whites, encoded in the Spanish language — there's a New Age dating from the Reformation of northern Europe and the Renaissance of southern Europe — Novus Ordo Seclorum of the Founding Fathers.

In the way of thinking of Nueva Generación, the Supreme Court of the United States, in its present state or incarnation, is old.

When something is said to be "old" by Nueva Generación, it is destined for damnation and destruction because it is in violation of the Scriptural precept that like as Christ was raised up from the dead, even so should we also walk in newness of life.

But the new man, and the new order of the ages, are progressively forced into bondage, choked and throttled almost to death by the old man in court, under color of law.