The Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game in Georgia's runoff

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,714
Reaction score
7,026
Points
1,130
Actually, the lack of evidence is a strong indication that fraud has not taken place.
Not when it comes to mail-in ballot fraud, e.g., the evidence [ballot envelope] is separated from the ballot when counting and there is no way to reconnect the envelope to the ballot.

JWK
What mail ballot fraud?
Mail-in ballot fraud. Are you on drugs?

JWK
What mail-in ballot fraud are you referring to?
 
OP
J

johnwk

Gold Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
2,294
Reaction score
626
Points
130
Actually, the lack of evidence is a strong indication that fraud has not taken place.
Not when it comes to mail-in ballot fraud, e.g., the evidence [ballot envelope] is separated from the ballot when counting and there is no way to reconnect the envelope to the ballot.

JWK
What mail ballot fraud?
Mail-in ballot fraud. Are you on drugs?

JWK
What mail-in ballot fraud are you referring to?
So, you now confirm you have not been paying attention.

:rolleyes:

JWK
 

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,714
Reaction score
7,026
Points
1,130
Actually, the lack of evidence is a strong indication that fraud has not taken place.
Not when it comes to mail-in ballot fraud, e.g., the evidence [ballot envelope] is separated from the ballot when counting and there is no way to reconnect the envelope to the ballot.

JWK
What mail ballot fraud?
Mail-in ballot fraud. Are you on drugs?

JWK
What mail-in ballot fraud are you referring to?
So, you now confirm you have not been paying attention.

:rolleyes:

JWK
I confirm that you can't establish Abrams commited any crime any more than you can mail in voter fraud.

So is that it? Imagination, backed by jack shit?
 
OP
J

johnwk

Gold Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
2,294
Reaction score
626
Points
130
Actually, the lack of evidence is a strong indication that fraud has not taken place.
Not when it comes to mail-in ballot fraud, e.g., the evidence [ballot envelope] is separated from the ballot when counting and there is no way to reconnect the envelope to the ballot.

JWK
What mail ballot fraud?
Mail-in ballot fraud. Are you on drugs?

JWK
What mail-in ballot fraud are you referring to?
So, you now confirm you have not been paying attention.

:rolleyes:

JWK
I confirm that you
No. You confirmed you have not been paying attention.

:poke:
 

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,714
Reaction score
7,026
Points
1,130
Actually, the lack of evidence is a strong indication that fraud has not taken place.
Not when it comes to mail-in ballot fraud, e.g., the evidence [ballot envelope] is separated from the ballot when counting and there is no way to reconnect the envelope to the ballot.

JWK
What mail ballot fraud?
Mail-in ballot fraud. Are you on drugs?

JWK
What mail-in ballot fraud are you referring to?
So, you now confirm you have not been paying attention.

:rolleyes:

JWK
I confirm that you
No. You confirmed you have not been paying attention.

:poke:
Oh, I have. There's just nothing to back your claims. Even you can't present anything that establishes any crime by Abrams. Or any mail-in voter fraud.
 

Anathema

Crotchety Olde Man
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
14,807
Reaction score
2,325
Points
290
Location
The Olden Days
You have now put your finger on what the real fight is about! Defending our Constitution and the rule of law from revolutionaries who wish to impose their personal sense of fairness, reasonableness, or justice as the rule of law.
Very true. Unfortunately that horse left the barn 160 years ago with the Lincoln Administration decimating the Constitutional separation of Federal and State powers.
 

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,714
Reaction score
7,026
Points
1,130
You have now put your finger on what the real fight is about! Defending our Constitution and the rule of law from revolutionaries who wish to impose their personal sense of fairness, reasonableness, or justice as the rule of law.
Very true. Unfortunately that horse left the barn 160 years ago with the Lincoln Administration decimating the Constitutional separation of Federal and State powers.
Imaginary violations and delusional 'fraud' claims don't defend the constitution.

As for 'state power', its Trump attempting to disenfrancise 7 million voters in the State of Pennsylvania. Weilding the power delegated to them by the State Legislatures.
 

Anathema

Crotchety Olde Man
Joined
Apr 30, 2014
Messages
14,807
Reaction score
2,325
Points
290
Location
The Olden Days
As for 'state power', its Trump attempting to disenfrancise 7 million voters in the State of Pennsylvania. Weilding the power delegated to them by the State Legislatures.
As I said... we’ve been in an extra-Constitutional state of existence since 1861. No administration since then has done anything to fix it. Most have simply worsened the situation.

Given my Authoritarian preferences I’d disenfranchise probably 85-90% of American voters, so I’m not the best choice to answer your Pennsylvania question.
 

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,714
Reaction score
7,026
Points
1,130
As for 'state power', its Trump attempting to disenfrancise 7 million voters in the State of Pennsylvania. Weilding the power delegated to them by the State Legislatures.
As I said... we’ve been in an extra-Constitutional state of existence since 1861. No administration since then has done anything to fix it. Most have simply worsened the situation.
There's nothing extra-constitutional about a legislature selecting the vote of their state citizens to determine how a state's electors are appointed.

Its a power the States are granted by the constitution.

And a power Trump unsuccessfully attempted to strip from the states.

Given my Authoritarian preferences I’d disenfranchise probably 85-90% of American voters, so I’m not the best choice to answer your Pennsylvania question.
You're not alone. Many conservatives follow your lead on authoritarianism.
 
OP
J

johnwk

Gold Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
2,294
Reaction score
626
Points
130
Oh, I have. There's just nothing to back your claims. Even you can't present anything that establishes any crime by Abrams. Or any mail-in voter fraud.
See? I knew you weren't paying attention. Now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

:poke:

JWK

Our socialist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
 
OP
J

johnwk

Gold Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
2,294
Reaction score
626
Points
130
You have now put your finger on what the real fight is about! Defending our Constitution and the rule of law from revolutionaries who wish to impose their personal sense of fairness, reasonableness, or justice as the rule of law.
Very true. Unfortunately that horse left the barn 160 years ago with the Lincoln Administration decimating the Constitutional separation of Federal and State powers.
Well, is it not time to do our best to salvage our Constitution, and work to enforce its text as it was understood and agreed to during our Constitution's framing and ratification process?

JWK


"If the Constitution was ratified under the belief, sedulously propagated on all sides that such protection was afforded, would it not now be a fraud upon the whole people to give a different construction to its powers?"___ Justice Story
 

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,714
Reaction score
7,026
Points
1,130
Oh, I have. There's just nothing to back your claims. Even you can't present anything that establishes any crime by Abrams. Or any mail-in voter fraud.
See? I knew you weren't paying attention. Now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

:poke:

JWK

Our socialist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
So now there's no "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game"?

It clearly doesn't take much to run you off your own OP.
 
OP
J

johnwk

Gold Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
2,294
Reaction score
626
Points
130
Oh, I have. There's just nothing to back your claims. Even you can't present anything that establishes any crime by Abrams. Or any mail-in voter fraud.
See? I knew you weren't paying attention. Now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

:poke:

JWK

Our socialist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
So now there's no "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game"?

It clearly doesn't take much to run you off your own OP.
:rolleyes:

You made a claim, now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

JWK

We need to start call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
 

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,714
Reaction score
7,026
Points
1,130
Oh, I have. There's just nothing to back your claims. Even you can't present anything that establishes any crime by Abrams. Or any mail-in voter fraud.
See? I knew you weren't paying attention. Now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

:poke:

JWK

Our socialist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
So now there's no "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game"?

It clearly doesn't take much to run you off your own OP.
:rolleyes:

You made a claim, now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

JWK

We need to start call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
You're really not paying attention, are you?

I already did. Your OP's title is part of the OP.

So much for "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game".

I accept your concession.
 
OP
J

johnwk

Gold Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
2,294
Reaction score
626
Points
130
Oh, I have. There's just nothing to back your claims. Even you can't present anything that establishes any crime by Abrams. Or any mail-in voter fraud.
See? I knew you weren't paying attention. Now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

:poke:

JWK

Our socialist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
So now there's no "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game"?

It clearly doesn't take much to run you off your own OP.
:rolleyes:

You made a claim, now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

JWK

We need to start call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
You're really not paying attention, are you?

I already did. Your OP's title is part of the OP.

So much for "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game".

I accept your concession.
:rolleyes:
Yes, my OP's title is part of the OP.

The title does not accuse Abrams of participating in a crime.

You made a claim, now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

JWK

The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.
 

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,714
Reaction score
7,026
Points
1,130
Oh, I have. There's just nothing to back your claims. Even you can't present anything that establishes any crime by Abrams. Or any mail-in voter fraud.
See? I knew you weren't paying attention. Now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

:poke:

JWK

Our socialist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
So now there's no "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game"?

It clearly doesn't take much to run you off your own OP.
:rolleyes:

You made a claim, now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

JWK

We need to start call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
You're really not paying attention, are you?

I already did. Your OP's title is part of the OP.

So much for "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game".

I accept your concession.
:rolleyes:
Yes, my OP's title is part of the OP.

The title does not accuse Abrams of participating in a crime.

You made a claim, now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

JWK

The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.
Then what 'Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game' were you referring to?

As you've been unable to establish ANYTHING illegal that Stacey Abrams did.

Keep running.
 

excalibur

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
2,161
Reaction score
3,248
Points
1,940
It is now known that thousands of ballots in Georgia used Mail Boxes, Etc. or similar places as their addresses. But Georgia law requires an actual address.
 
OP
J

johnwk

Gold Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
2,294
Reaction score
626
Points
130
Oh, I have. There's just nothing to back your claims. Even you can't present anything that establishes any crime by Abrams. Or any mail-in voter fraud.
See? I knew you weren't paying attention. Now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

:poke:

JWK

Our socialist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
So now there's no "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game"?

It clearly doesn't take much to run you off your own OP.
:rolleyes:

You made a claim, now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

JWK

We need to start call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
You're really not paying attention, are you?

I already did. Your OP's title is part of the OP.

So much for "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game".

I accept your concession.
:rolleyes:
Yes, my OP's title is part of the OP.

The title does not accuse Abrams of participating in a crime.

You made a claim, now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

JWK

The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.
Then what 'Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game' were you referring to?
Like I said, you haven't been paying attention. Go to the OP and read.

:poke:

JWK

If Biden really cared about "poor working people", he would end the unconstitutional tax on their earned wages, and make up the difference with a tax on specifically selected articles of luxury, which the poor can only dream of enjoying, unlike Nancy Pelosi and her $25,000 refrigerators and $13.00 a pint ice cream
 

Skylar

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2014
Messages
39,714
Reaction score
7,026
Points
1,130
Oh, I have. There's just nothing to back your claims. Even you can't present anything that establishes any crime by Abrams. Or any mail-in voter fraud.
See? I knew you weren't paying attention. Now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

:poke:

JWK

Our socialist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
So now there's no "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game"?

It clearly doesn't take much to run you off your own OP.
:rolleyes:

You made a claim, now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

JWK

We need to start call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
You're really not paying attention, are you?

I already did. Your OP's title is part of the OP.

So much for "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game".

I accept your concession.
:rolleyes:
Yes, my OP's title is part of the OP.

The title does not accuse Abrams of participating in a crime.

You made a claim, now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

JWK

The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.
Then what 'Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game' were you referring to?
Like I said, you haven't been paying attention. Go to the OP and read.

:poke:

JWK

If Biden really cared about "poor working people", he would end the unconstitutional tax on their earned wages, and make up the difference with a tax on specifically selected articles of luxury, which the poor can only dream of enjoying, unlike Nancy Pelosi and her $25,000 refrigerators and $13.00 a pint ice cream
And your OP doesn't demonstrate any "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game". Or any illegal acts by Stacy Abrams at all.

Which might explain why you abandoned the title of your own OP.
 
OP
J

johnwk

Gold Member
Joined
May 24, 2009
Messages
2,294
Reaction score
626
Points
130
Oh, I have. There's just nothing to back your claims. Even you can't present anything that establishes any crime by Abrams. Or any mail-in voter fraud.
See? I knew you weren't paying attention. Now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

:poke:

JWK

Our socialist revolutionaries, which now control the Democrat Party Leadership, are known for accusing others of what they themselves are guilty of.
So now there's no "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game"?

It clearly doesn't take much to run you off your own OP.
:rolleyes:

You made a claim, now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

JWK

We need to start call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
You're really not paying attention, are you?

I already did. Your OP's title is part of the OP.

So much for "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game".

I accept your concession.
:rolleyes:
Yes, my OP's title is part of the OP.

The title does not accuse Abrams of participating in a crime.

You made a claim, now, go back to the OP and quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.

JWK

The Democrat Party’s Revolutionary Leadership detests people being left free to mutually agree in their contracts and associations.
Then what 'Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game' were you referring to?
Like I said, you haven't been paying attention. Go to the OP and read.

:poke:

JWK

If Biden really cared about "poor working people", he would end the unconstitutional tax on their earned wages, and make up the difference with a tax on specifically selected articles of luxury, which the poor can only dream of enjoying, unlike Nancy Pelosi and her $25,000 refrigerators and $13.00 a pint ice cream
And your OP doesn't demonstrate any "Stacey Abrams illegal ballot harvesting ground game". Or any illegal acts by Stacy Abrams at all.

Which might explain why you abandoned the title of your own OP.
Oh, but I have not abandoned the title, but you have failed to quote my "claims" accusing Abrams of a crime.
:poke:
JWK

We need to start call these scoundrels what they really are! They are not “democrats”, “progressives”, or “democrat” leaders. They are radical socialist revolutionaries, supported and defended by a Fifth Column Media and Yellow Journalists.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top