Zone1 The Semites replaced the gods

newrebel

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2025
Messages
300
Reaction score
153
Points
143
Semitic scriptures, including Abrahamic literature, contain a huge number of forgeries, and we physically cannot list them all here.
Etymology and ancient mythology allow us to reveal this.

The most important thing is that they replaced the names of the gods, and this was a complete inversion. All the names that are associated with evil in the scriptures are heavenly gods, personifying good and the light principle. Devil - is literally a heavenly bull (Marduk). Dyaus Pitar - heavenly father, the same as the Roman Jupiter. This is from the root "dev", which meant light and sky for the Aryans.

Satan is Sat-Anu, the sun god. Lucifer means light-bearer. Hell is the sun, hence the sun god Helios.

it follows that the Semites were afraid of the sky and the sun.

The opposite is also true. The names of the Abrahamic god are mostly associated with snakes. "god", "bog" - these roots meant "snake". The name "yogava" has the same root as the Indian Yogis - evil sorcerers. Also in Slavic folklore, the evil old woman "yaga" is known.

The biography of Christ is a forgery of the myth of the Babylonian Marduk.

And so on.
 
Semitic scriptures, including Abrahamic literature, contain a huge number of forgeries, and we physically cannot list them all here.
Etymology and ancient mythology allow us to reveal this.

The most important thing is that they replaced the names of the gods, and this was a complete inversion. All the names that are associated with evil in the scriptures are heavenly gods, personifying good and the light principle. Devil - is literally a heavenly bull (Marduk). Dyaus Pitar - heavenly father, the same as the Roman Jupiter. This is from the root "dev", which meant light and sky for the Aryans.

Satan is Sat-Anu, the sun god. Lucifer means light-bearer. Hell is the sun, hence the sun god Helios.

it follows that the Semites were afraid of the sky and the sun.

The opposite is also true. The names of the Abrahamic god are mostly associated with snakes. "god", "bog" - these roots meant "snake". The name "yogava" has the same root as the Indian Yogis - evil sorcerers. Also in Slavic folklore, the evil old woman "yaga" is known.

The biography of Christ is a forgery of the myth of the Babylonian Marduk.

And so on.
The annoying part is how you cant prove a single claim in this OP, yet here you are proclaiming it as if its a fact, even though you werent alive during those times and you dont have the faintest ******* idea what those people thought. Your thoughts on religion are worth less than an ounce of dogshit. :dunno:
 
The annoying part is how you cant prove a single claim in this OP, yet here you are proclaiming it as if its a fact, even though you werent alive during those times and you dont have the faintest ******* idea what those people thought. Your thoughts on religion are worth less than an ounce of dogshit. :dunno:
This is not for illiterate fools. All these ancient roots are well known in linguistics, everything has already been proven. You can write everything down in letters and give a thousand more proofs.
 
This is not for illiterate fools. All these ancient roots are well known in linguistics, everything has already been proven. You can write everything down in letters and give a thousand more proofs.
I find the claims of ancient ignorant superstitious men to be unconvincing. Lets be honest, those people were stupid as ****. :laugh:
 
Semitic scriptures, including Abrahamic literature, contain a huge number of forgeries, and we physically cannot list them all here.
Etymology and ancient mythology allow us to reveal this.

The most important thing is that they replaced the names of the gods, and this was a complete inversion. All the names that are associated with evil in the scriptures are heavenly gods, personifying good and the light principle. Devil - is literally a heavenly bull (Marduk). Dyaus Pitar - heavenly father, the same as the Roman Jupiter. This is from the root "dev", which meant light and sky for the Aryans.

Satan is Sat-Anu, the sun god. Lucifer means light-bearer. Hell is the sun, hence the sun god Helios.

it follows that the Semites were afraid of the sky and the sun.

The opposite is also true. The names of the Abrahamic god are mostly associated with snakes. "god", "bog" - these roots meant "snake". The name "yogava" has the same root as the Indian Yogis - evil sorcerers. Also in Slavic folklore, the evil old woman "yaga" is known.

The biography of Christ is a forgery of the myth of the Babylonian Marduk.

And so on.
Seek counseling and get back on your meds.
 
I find the claims of ancient ignorant superstitious men to be unconvincing. Lets be honest, those people were stupid as ****. :laugh:
Let's be honest, the Abrahamic religions were written in slave empires, for slaves who couldn't even read and were immersed in complete obscurantism. They were the stupidest people in the world. But this has nothing to do with etymology and religious studies.
 
Let's be honest, the Abrahamic religions were written in slave empires, for slaves who couldn't even read and were immersed in complete obscurantism. They were the stupidest people in the world. But this has nothing to do with etymology and religious studies.
Do you believe all behaviors lead to equal outcomes?
 
Semitic scriptures, including Abrahamic literature, contain a huge number of forgeries, and we physically cannot list them all here.
Etymology and ancient mythology allow us to reveal this.

The most important thing is that they replaced the names of the gods, and this was a complete inversion. All the names that are associated with evil in the scriptures are heavenly gods, personifying good and the light principle. Devil - is literally a heavenly bull (Marduk). Dyaus Pitar - heavenly father, the same as the Roman Jupiter. This is from the root "dev", which meant light and sky for the Aryans.

Satan is Sat-Anu, the sun god. Lucifer means light-bearer. Hell is the sun, hence the sun god Helios.

it follows that the Semites were afraid of the sky and the sun.

The opposite is also true. The names of the Abrahamic god are mostly associated with snakes. "god", "bog" - these roots meant "snake". The name "yogava" has the same root as the Indian Yogis - evil sorcerers. Also in Slavic folklore, the evil old woman "yaga" is known.

The biography of Christ is a forgery of the myth of the Babylonian Marduk.

And so on.
Don't Be Confused by Nazi Etymology

Yahweh is pronounced practically the same way the Romans actually pronounced Jove. It means, "Go! Run for Your Lives." In Greek it is the wandering goddess, Io. They all represent a prehistoric Mongol invasion that made the Caucasians scatter into a wide area from India to Ireland.

Abraham was born in Sumeria, which was Aryan. The Jews speak a Semitic language only because they were enslaved by a Semite tribe. The contradictory passages about Ishmael, the founder of the Semites, prove that.

"Helios" is also related to Allah. The Arab desert savages were so low-IQ they couldn't even think of the existence of a Higher Being.
 
This is not for illiterate fools. All these ancient roots are well known in linguistics, everything has already been proven.
Literate Fools Deserve No Respect, Either

Academic etymologists aren't even intelligent enough to figure out the obvious original meaning of dog. It means "pointer" and must be related to Latin digitus, "finger," and Greek paradigm, which is an underlying theme pointed to as explaining an essays controlling factor.

You're wallowing in the sediment of "settled science."
 
in slavic it pronaunsed "yogova" and "iegova".
Abraham was born in Sumeria, which was Aryan. The Jews speak a Semitic language only because they were enslaved by a Semite tribe.
Nothing of the sort. The origin of the Sumerians has not been established, but their language was not Indo-Aryan. Sumer is roughly the same as Babylon. The Babylonian religion is identical to the Indo-Aryan, their god Marduk is Indra. This was probably the influence of the Sabirs or Medes. Babylon fought in alliance with Media. The Jews and the Semites in general were hostile to Babylon. And Abrahamism appeared several thousand years later, it has no direct relation to this. The Jews are most likely descendants of the Ishkuza people, these are the Scythians. But they are related to the Semites on the maternal line.
 
Semitic scriptures, including Abrahamic literature, contain a huge number of forgeries, and we physically cannot list them all here.
Etymology and ancient mythology allow us to reveal this.

The most important thing is that they replaced the names of the gods, and this was a complete inversion. All the names that are associated with evil in the scriptures are heavenly gods, personifying good and the light principle. Devil - is literally a heavenly bull (Marduk). Dyaus Pitar - heavenly father, the same as the Roman Jupiter. This is from the root "dev", which meant light and sky for the Aryans.

Satan is Sat-Anu, the sun god. Lucifer means light-bearer. Hell is the sun, hence the sun god Helios.

it follows that the Semites were afraid of the sky and the sun.

The opposite is also true. The names of the Abrahamic god are mostly associated with snakes. "god", "bog" - these roots meant "snake". The name "yogava" has the same root as the Indian Yogis - evil sorcerers. Also in Slavic folklore, the evil old woman "yaga" is known.

The biography of Christ is a forgery of the myth of the Babylonian Marduk.

And so on.
In keeping with forum rules, when stating something as fact, you, the thread starter, must provide links to support the claims made. Provide links!
 
Literate Fools Deserve No Respect, Either

Academic etymologists aren't even intelligent enough to figure out the obvious original meaning of dog. It means "pointer" and must be related to Latin digitus, "finger," and Greek paradigm, which is an underlying theme pointed to as explaining an essays controlling factor.

You're wallowing in the sediment of "settled science."
Most likely they are trying to hide something. The dog was considered evil spirits, a guide to hell, a partner of Horus, servant of Hades. Idioms with dogs are also inconvenient for them, because they are abusive and offensive in all "Indo-European" languages, this does not fit with German imperialism, the Germans idolize the dog as a model servant and slave, aggressively impose dog breeding.
 
In keeping with forum rules, when stating something as fact, you, the thread starter, must provide links to support the claims made. Provide links!

 
in slavic it pronaunsed "yogova" and "iegova".

Nothing of the sort. The origin of the Sumerians has not been established, but their language was not Indo-Aryan. Sumer is roughly the same as Babylon. The Babylonian religion is identical to the Indo-Aryan, their god Marduk is Indra. This was probably the influence of the Sabirs or Medes. Babylon fought in alliance with Media. The Jews and the Semites in general were hostile to Babylon. And Abrahamism appeared several thousand years later, it has no direct relation to this. The Jews are most likely descendants of the Ishkuza people, these are the Scythians. But they are related to the Semites on the maternal line.
Do you believe all behaviors lead to equal outcomes?
 
15th post
in slavic it pronaunsed "yogova" and "iegova".

Nothing of the sort. The origin of the Sumerians has not been established, but their language was not Indo-Aryan. Sumer is roughly the same as Babylon. The Babylonian religion is identical to the Indo-Aryan, their god Marduk is Indra. This was probably the influence of the Sabirs or Medes. Babylon fought in alliance with Media. The Jews and the Semites in general were hostile to Babylon. And Abrahamism appeared several thousand years later, it has no direct relation to this. The Jews are most likely descendants of the Ishkuza people, these are the Scythians. But they are related to the Semites on the maternal line.
What We're Told Doesn't Add Up. Do the Math.

The primary consideration about origins should be that the Jews aren't anything at all like the Semites, who are Neanderthal hybrids.

Another question that is never asked is why would any tribe settle down in the desert. None did. They were driven there as bandits on the run from civilization. Same goes for the jungles, mountains, islands, and tundra.
 
This is not for illiterate fools. All these ancient roots are well known in linguistics, everything has already been proven. You can write everything down in letters and give a thousand more proofs.
Counterfiets before the facts.
 
Let's be honest, the Abrahamic religions were written in slave empires, for slaves who couldn't even read and were immersed in complete obscurantism. They were the stupidest people in the world. But this has nothing to do with etymology and religious studies.
sure?
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom