Why is it that we give such credibility to the students/faculty/alumni of "elite" universities such as Ivy League schools and UC Berkeley? Don't we understand that they are in the same business of self-promotion as the Kardashians? At most, these universities can claim the top 1% or 10% of high school students they admit are still in the same 1% or 10% when they graduate. Is this such a great accomplishment?
In reality grades, activities and ethnicity play determining roles in who is admitted. Grades are largely determined by dedicated memorization and desire to please one's instructor. Activities are often arranged by parents for the purpose of resume building, not social responsibility. Ethnicity is applied in the same way as a disability. Does this selection process really produce the best and the brightest?
The fact is that these individuals generally do best within organizations where credentials and pedigrees are most valued. Outside of this world, intelligence, ingenuity and perseverance are the true ingredients of success.
In reality grades, activities and ethnicity play determining roles in who is admitted. Grades are largely determined by dedicated memorization and desire to please one's instructor. Activities are often arranged by parents for the purpose of resume building, not social responsibility. Ethnicity is applied in the same way as a disability. Does this selection process really produce the best and the brightest?
The fact is that these individuals generally do best within organizations where credentials and pedigrees are most valued. Outside of this world, intelligence, ingenuity and perseverance are the true ingredients of success.