The reputation of the American army

[rupol2000]

It is painful to watch how even the Americans themselves are now wiping their feet about the American army. The Americans themselves produce videos where they represent the American army as a kindergarten, where transgender people and barbies serve. Personally, I think the American army is close to an ideal, European armies, and even more so the massive armies of third countries, these are not armies at all, they are not professionals, they just march and clean up the barracks, this is something like ordinary prisons.
But in the end, with this approach, sooner or later, the US army will really die, because propaganda is a powerful political tool. America needs to show the world what it is really capable of.
Let them arrange a competition. I am sure that not a single soldier of any army will be able to compete with the American marine corps. Show who the fuck is the boss, otherwise you will fuck up even with a good army. They laugh at you.

 

[Silver Cat]

What about Russian Army transgenders

and barbies?

 

[rupol2000]

What about Russian Army transgenders

Russia is full of real homosexuals in the army. But officials do not advertise it, and they are right in this sense.
They create an image

By the way, in the first video, the girl disguised herself as a man, there, according to the plot, it is assumed that she deceived the leadership. The hussars were patriarchal, they did not take women into the army

 

[rupol2000]

Formally, in russia, homosexuals should not be enlisted in the army, this was a way to get away from duty, but as a rule it did not work.
Even if someone says that he is a homosexual, they say that not believe in it, because there are always problems with the plan for completing army units , many try to find a way not to serve, so they took not only homosexuals, but even invalids.
at least it was before, I don’t know how it is now.

 

[rupol2000]

As for the times of World War II, then yes, women were taken there. These were mainly non-combat personnel, but there were also combat units, apparently from volunteers.
It was the leftist government of the Bolsheviks, so they didn't care about tradition.

Many women are still on military records, but they do not do military service, they are just in reserve in case of war. They are mainly health workers.

 

[Silver Cat]

Russia is full of real homosexuals in the army. But officials do not advertise it, and they are right in this sense.
They create an image

May be. But some times they make hints:
"A white bouquet of parachutes", "a soaring dome of rainbow peace", etc..

By the way, in the first video, the girl disguised herself as a man, there, according to the plot, it is assumed that she deceived the leadership. The hussars were patriarchal, they did not take women into the army

Really? What about Company of Amazons, which wasn't, of course, a hussars regiment, but just a hussars company of an infantry regiment?

And yes, I very doubt, that Her Imperial Majesty, Catherine II, really cared about senses of Male Chauvinist Pigs.

 

[Silver Cat]

As for the times of World War II, then yes, women were taken there. These were mainly non-combat personnel, but there were also combat units, apparently from volunteers.
It was the leftist government of the Bolsheviks, so they didn't care about tradition.

Many women are still on military records, but they do not do military service, they are just in reserve in case of war. They are mainly health workers.

There have been no real war for more than seventy years, but women in Russia (including former Ukraine) take part in local conflicts.

 

[rupol2000]

There have been no real war for more than seventy years, but women in Russia (including former Ukraine) take part in local conflicts.

This is militia or unofficial mercenaries. Russia has never officially sent troops into the territory of Ukraine.

 

[rupol2000]

Really?

Absolutely

hat about Company of Amazons

Now any rabble is passed off as hussars, this topic is inconvenient for them.
Nobody recruited anyone as a hussar, this is a separate ethnic group originating from the Hazars.
This was an elite heavy cavalry, a feminist could not even lift a hussar's spear.

Exclusively clan aristocracy of Eastern Europe

 

[Silver Cat]

Absolutely

Now any rabble is passed off as hussars, this topic is inconvenient for them.
Nobody recruited anyone as a hussar, this is a separate ethnic group originating from the Hazars.
This was an elite heavy cavalry, a feminist could not even lift a hussar's spear.

Exclusively clan aristocracy of Eastern Europe

Hussar - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Heavy cavalry after invention of firearms? Sounds funny.

And yes, Hussars of Medieval Serbia, Hussars in the mid 18th century, and Hussars of Napoleonic Wars were three pretty different groups.
--------------
Russia relied on its native cossacks along with kalmyks and other nomads to provide irregular light cavalry until the mid 18th century. In 1707, Apostol Kigetsch, a Wallachian nobleman serving Russian Emperor Peter the Great, was given the task to form a khorugv ("banner" or "squadron") of 300 men to serve on the Ottoman-Russian border. The squadron consisted of Christians from Hungary, Serbia, Moldavia, and Wallachia.[37] In 1711, prior to the Pruth campaign, 6 regiments (4 khorugv's each) of hussars were formed, mainly from Wallachia. Two other 'khorugv', for guerilla warfare, were formed, one Polish and one Serbian, to battle the Ottomans. In 1723, Peter the Great formed a Hussar regiment exclusively from Serbian light cavalry serving in the Austrian army. On 14 October 1741, during the regency of Grand Duchess Anna Leopoldovna, four Hussar regiments, a Serbian (Serbskiy), a Moldavian (Moldavskiy), a Hungarian (Vengerskiy) and a Georgian (Gruzinskiy) were authorized.[37]

After the Russo-Turkish War (1735–39), these Hussar regiments were converted to regular service, voluntarily enlisted and not conscripted as the rest of the Russian army. They were on a level between regular and irregular cavalry. Hussars were recruited only from the nation indicated by the regiment's name, i.e., these regiments were national units in Russian service; all troops (including officers) were national, and commands were given in the respective languages. Each regiment was supposed to have a fixed organization of 10 companies, each of about 100 men, but these regiments were recruited from different sources, so they were less than the indicated strength.

By 1741 the foreign hussars in Russian service had disbanded and reliance for light cavalry functions was again placed on the indigenous Cossack irregulars. In that year new hussar regiments were raised, now drawn from Orthodox Christian communities along the Turkish frontier. The newly raised Russian hussar units had increased to 12 regiments by the Seven Years' War. During the 1750s Serbian and Slovakian Orthodox communities and refugees, plus Poles and Hungarians, provided non-Russian recruits for the expanding hussars who evolved into a semi-regular corps of frontier light horse.[38] In 1759–60, three more Hussar regiments, were raised, the Yellow (Želtiy), the Macedonian (Makedonskiy) and the Bulgarian (Bolgarskiy).
------------

 

[Silver Cat]

This is militia or unofficial mercenaries. Russia has never officially sent troops into the territory of Ukraine.

Actually they are People Militia of DPR. A level between irregular and regular units, as hussars were.

 

[rupol2000]

Heavy cavalry after invention of firearms?

Firearms were primitive and required many people to create large fronts

 

[rupol2000]

and Hussars of Napoleonic

The hussars were in the area of Austro-Hungarian influence. Napoleon mainly used the infantry assembled from the rabble

 

[rupol2000]

A level between irregular and regular units, as hussars were.

No, hussars were high-class warriors, they had no equal at that time, the highest military aristocracy

 

[rupol2000]

Spears were used in the 20th century.

 

[Silver Cat]

Firearms were primitive and required many people to create large fronts

When exactly?
In thirteen century?

In seventeen century?

In twentieth century?

 

[rupol2000]

When exactly?
In thirteen century?

Up to 2WW

 

[Dayton3]

It is painful to watch how even the Americans themselves are now wiping their feet about the American army. The Americans themselves produce videos where they represent the American army as a kindergarten, where transgender people and barbies serve. Personally, I think the American army is close to an ideal, European armies, and even more so the massive armies of third countries, these are not armies at all, they are not professionals, they just march and clean up the barracks, this is something like ordinary prisons.
But in the end, with this approach, sooner or later, the US army will really die, because propaganda is a powerful political tool. America needs to show the world what it is really capable of.
Let them arrange a competition. I am sure that not a single soldier of any army will be able to compete with the American marine corps. Show who the fuck is the boss, otherwise you will fuck up even with a good army. They laugh at you.

You started out talking about the American Army but finished up talking about the U.S. Marine Corps.

They are not the same. So make up your mind.

 

[Confederate Soldier]

Russia is full of real homosexuals in the army. But officials do not advertise it, and they are right in this sense.
They create an image

By the way, in the first video, the girl disguised herself as a man, there, according to the plot, it is assumed that she deceived the leadership. The hussars were patriarchal, they did not take women into the army

Don't forget that in the American Civil War, there were many accounts of women dressing as men to join the army. They must have been some ugly heifers, but it's the patriotism that counts.

 

[whitehall]

"Wiping their feet about the American Army"??? Bad translations in foreign posts originating in some Russian chat room aren't worth arguing.