The problem isn't really that we know there was fraud (though if you listen to the hearings held in multiple states, watch the footage of poll watchers being kicked out or votes appearing from beneath tables, and check the odd statistical anomalies such as bellweather counties being COMPLETELY wrong, you'd say we have a bit of evidence there).
The problem is that we have no proof the election wasn't fraudulent. Chain of custody hasn't been kept, poll watchers have been kicked out, audits have been denied, and everybody who wants to check it out and tighten up the security is mocked and called a nutjob.]
Every single thing you just pointed out has been adequately explained and debunked by Republican election officials, in courts of law. How are we supposed to take this seriously if you resort to trotting out old debunked tropes?
Does this sound familiar from the Philly lawsuit? “There’s a nonzero number of people in the room,” campaign lawyer Jerome Marcus replied, acknowledging that Trump representatives were indeed present despite the campaign’s messaging.
Here is a good summary.
EXPLAINER: Why poll watcher complaints don't amount to fraud
The AP is not a reputable source. I don't trust organizations that knowingly work alongside Hamas.
Furthermore, that article proves very very little.
I've seen the evidence of problems and of people being pushed out. The lack of investigation of that evidence gives me no confidence in the Republicans (who are by and large about a half notch better than the Democrats).
Which court of law? Most of these problems never saw the court. Some were denied on grounds of timeliness and standing- you can't sue before cause you haven't been hurt and you can't sue after because the court can't fix it.
Also, you only really addressed the poll watcher problem.
There was cheating in 2016 by the way, just less. One audit dropped I think 9000 of Clinton's votes before it was shut down.
If it helps, I think GA's red governor cheated too.
