The real reason for face masks

If we had let this virus run its course, we would have had a few more deaths earlier in the infection cycle followed by its virtual elimination by the end of this summer as an all-encompassing public health concern.

That's true, but understated. The estimated deaths from a "herd immunity" strategy would have been around 10 millon Americans, or about 3% of the population


wrong. the mortality rate would not be any different than it is today, .08% and mostly old people with underlying serious medical issues. they are now claiming that 3 million americans have tested positive (less than 1% of the population) and thats if you believe the reported testing data which has been proven wrong many times already.
 
The real reason for face mask mandates is not to stop the spread of the Covid virus. Despite all of the BS regarding overloading our health care system, the real reason is to prolong the "pandemic" into the fall elections in order to affect the outcome. If we had let this virus run its course, we would have had a few more deaths earlier in the infection cycle followed by its virtual elimination by the end of this summer as an all-encompassing public health concern.

Instead, we have done everything we can to perpetuate the infection rate into the next flu season, thereby increasing the ultimate number of casualties from this crusade. This is completely contrary to any rational reasoning save one: DUMP TRUMP!
Sweden tried the herd immunity approach. It didn't work out very well



because none of the bullshit works, its a minor virus with a 99.8% survival rate. Shutting down the world's economy was utter stupidity, and it was done by China to save their crumbling economy.
98.8% ???? Stop lying!! Or is it the voices in your head telling you that ??
 
The real reason for face mask mandates is not to stop the spread of the Covid virus. Despite all of the BS regarding overloading our health care system, the real reason is to prolong the "pandemic" into the fall elections in order to affect the outcome. If we had let this virus run its course, we would have had a few more deaths earlier in the infection cycle followed by its virtual elimination by the end of this summer as an all-encompassing public health concern.

Instead, we have done everything we can to perpetuate the infection rate into the next flu season, thereby increasing the ultimate number of casualties from this crusade. This is completely contrary to any rational reasoning save one: DUMP TRUMP!
Sweden tried the herd immunity approach. It didn't work out very well



because none of the bullshit works, its a minor virus with a 99.8% survival rate. Shutting down the world's economy was utter stupidity, and it was done by China to save their crumbling economy.
98.8% ???? Stop lying!! Or is it the voices in your head telling you that ??

Well it's been said that 10 times the known amount have had covid. That would mean currently 54 million people have had it, but we still know the death rate and some of those weren't even covid 19 deaths and it's at about 175000. So divide the former into the latter you get about 99.9%. Or a death rate of .003%.

Thanks for playing.
 
If we had let this virus run its course, we would have had a few more deaths earlier in the infection cycle followed by its virtual elimination by the end of this summer as an all-encompassing public health concern.

That's true, but understated. The estimated deaths from a "herd immunity" strategy would have been around 10 millon Americans, or about 3% of the population

wrong. the mortality rate would not be any different than it is today, .08% and mostly old people with underlying serious medical issues. they are now claiming that 3 million americans have tested positive (less than 1% of the population) and thats if you believe the reported testing data which has been proven wrong many times already.
Your death rate is based on everybody who needs a respirator, gets one. If we shot for herd immunity we would have run out of respirators, and other medical resources, and death panels would be determining who was worth saving and who wasn't. Anybody with enough co-mobildity factors would have been set home to die, because the ICU's would have been filled beyond capacity.

The reason the death rats is what it is, was due to controlling the number of new cases, so they would not exceed available capacity.
 
Its a reminder...since very few of us know anyone who have gotten the virus the dems are desperate to keep it on our minds...
My son picks up several a week lately.
 
The real reason for face mask mandates is not to stop the spread of the Covid virus. Despite all of the BS regarding overloading our health care system, the real reason is to prolong the "pandemic" into the fall elections in order to affect the outcome. If we had let this virus run its course, we would have had a few more deaths earlier in the infection cycle followed by its virtual elimination by the end of this summer as an all-encompassing public health concern.

Instead, we have done everything we can to perpetuate the infection rate into the next flu season, thereby increasing the ultimate number of casualties from this crusade. This is completely contrary to any rational reasoning save one: DUMP TRUMP!
Sweden tried the herd immunity approach. It didn't work out very well



because none of the bullshit works, its a minor virus with a 99.8% survival rate. Shutting down the world's economy was utter stupidity, and it was done by China to save their crumbling economy.
98.8% ???? Stop lying!! Or is it the voices in your head telling you that ??

Well it's been said that 10 times the known amount have had covid. That would mean currently 54 million people have had it, but we still know the death rate and some of those weren't even covid 19 deaths and it's at about 175000. So divide the former into the latter you get about 99.9%. Or a death rate of .003%.

Thanks for playing.
"It's been said......"??? Brilliant documentation slick
 
The real reason for face mask mandates is not to stop the spread of the Covid virus. Despite all of the BS regarding overloading our health care system, the real reason is to prolong the "pandemic" into the fall elections in order to affect the outcome. If we had let this virus run its course, we would have had a few more deaths earlier in the infection cycle followed by its virtual elimination by the end of this summer as an all-encompassing public health concern.

Instead, we have done everything we can to perpetuate the infection rate into the next flu season, thereby increasing the ultimate number of casualties from this crusade. This is completely contrary to any rational reasoning save one: DUMP TRUMP!
Sweden tried the herd immunity approach. It didn't work out very well



because none of the bullshit works, its a minor virus with a 99.8% survival rate. Shutting down the world's economy was utter stupidity, and it was done by China to save their crumbling economy.
Does that tin hat also protect from cosmic rays?
 
Sweden tried the herd immunity approach. It didn't work out very well

Sweden embraced herd immunity, while the U.K. abandoned the idea — so why do they BOTH have high COVID-19 fatality rates?
[/QrUOTE]

Actually, it is working very well. Sweden's mistake was not protecting nursing home residents early enough, just like in New York City. Want to compare their stats?
Compare stats sure, bring it on. By the way, the herd immunity approach without a vaccine in unworkable because we now know that people can be re-infected. Try to keep up with current events.
 
The real reason for face mask mandates is not to stop the spread of the Covid virus. Despite all of the BS regarding overloading our health care system, the real reason is to prolong the "pandemic" into the fall elections in order to affect the outcome. If we had let this virus run its course, we would have had a few more deaths earlier in the infection cycle followed by its virtual elimination by the end of this summer as an all-encompassing public health concern.

Instead, we have done everything we can to perpetuate the infection rate into the next flu season, thereby increasing the ultimate number of casualties from this crusade. This is completely contrary to any rational reasoning save one: DUMP TRUMP!
My nomination for the Biggest Pile of Hor$e$hit of the Week. :auiqs.jpg:

Another kornspiracy kook coming out of the woodwork...
 
The real reason for face mask mandates is not to stop the spread of the Covid virus. Despite all of the BS regarding overloading our health care system, the real reason is to prolong the "pandemic" into the fall elections in order to affect the outcome. If we had let this virus run its course, we would have had a few more deaths earlier in the infection cycle followed by its virtual elimination by the end of this summer as an all-encompassing public health concern.

Instead, we have done everything we can to perpetuate the infection rate into the next flu season, thereby increasing the ultimate number of casualties from this crusade. This is completely contrary to any rational reasoning save one: DUMP TRUMP!


Link?
 
The real reason for face mask mandates is not to stop the spread of the Covid virus. Despite all of the BS regarding overloading our health care system, the real reason is to prolong the "pandemic" into the fall elections in order to affect the outcome. If we had let this virus run its course, we would have had a few more deaths earlier in the infection cycle followed by its virtual elimination by the end of this summer as an all-encompassing public health concern.

Instead, we have done everything we can to perpetuate the infection rate into the next flu season, thereby increasing the ultimate number of casualties from this crusade. This is completely contrary to any rational reasoning save one: DUMP TRUMP!
Sweden tried the herd immunity approach. It didn't work out very well



because none of the bullshit works, its a minor virus with a 99.8% survival rate. Shutting down the world's economy was utter stupidity, and it was done by China to save their crumbling economy.
98.8% ???? Stop lying!! Or is it the voices in your head telling you that ??


sorry, I left out a 9, 99.98% survival rate. thanks for the catch
 
Sweden tried the herd immunity approach. It didn't work out very well

Sweden embraced herd immunity, while the U.K. abandoned the idea — so why do they BOTH have high COVID-19 fatality rates?
[/QrUOTE]

Actually, it is working very well. Sweden's mistake was not protecting nursing home residents early enough, just like in New York City. Want to compare their stats?
Compare stats sure, bring it on. By the way, the herd immunity approach without a vaccine in unworkable because we now know that people can be re-infected. Try to keep up with current events.


continue to hide under your sofa, the rest of are going to continue living our lives.
 
The real reason for face mask mandates is not to stop the spread of the Covid virus. Despite all of the BS regarding overloading our health care system, the real reason is to prolong the "pandemic" into the fall elections in order to affect the outcome. If we had let this virus run its course, we would have had a few more deaths earlier in the infection cycle followed by its virtual elimination by the end of this summer as an all-encompassing public health concern.

Instead, we have done everything we can to perpetuate the infection rate into the next flu season, thereby increasing the ultimate number of casualties from this crusade. This is completely contrary to any rational reasoning save one: DUMP TRUMP!


Link?
 
The real reason for face mask mandates is not to stop the spread of the Covid virus. Despite all of the BS regarding overloading our health care system, the real reason is to prolong the "pandemic" into the fall elections in order to affect the outcome. If we had let this virus run its course, we would have had a few more deaths earlier in the infection cycle followed by its virtual elimination by the end of this summer as an all-encompassing public health concern.

Instead, we have done everything we can to perpetuate the infection rate into the next flu season, thereby increasing the ultimate number of casualties from this crusade. This is completely contrary to any rational reasoning save one: DUMP TRUMP!
Sweden tried the herd immunity approach. It didn't work out very well



because none of the bullshit works, its a minor virus with a 99.8% survival rate. Shutting down the world's economy was utter stupidity, and it was done by China to save their crumbling economy.
Does that tin hat also protect from cosmic rays?


seems like its you with the tinfoil hat, look up the stats from CDC, you might learn something.
 
Its a reminder...since very few of us know anyone who have gotten the virus the dems are desperate to keep it on our minds...
117693707-1565280246960220-3275615151318650090-n.jpg
 
The real reason for face mask mandates is not to stop the spread of the Covid virus. Despite all of the BS regarding overloading our health care system, the real reason is to prolong the "pandemic" into the fall elections in order to affect the outcome. If we had let this virus run its course, we would have had a few more deaths earlier in the infection cycle followed by its virtual elimination by the end of this summer as herd immunity set in.

Instead, we have done everything we can to perpetuate the infection rate into the next flu season, thereby increasing the ultimate number of casualties from this crusade. This is completely contrary to any rational reasoning save one: DUMP TRUMP!
The reason for the face masks is to not overwhelm the medical industry all at once with people who are sick. What's dumb is there are a lot of people, MOST PEOPLE, wouldn't even need to be hospitalized. They'll get a cold and move on with life.

Those who do get sick however... They either get the flu, that's what happened to me and a couple members of my family, or they die fuck'n horribly. Ever watch someone gasp for breath just to live? I have, my grandpa had a quarter of a lung for over half his life. His primary goal for over half his life was to breath. Putting him on oxygen didn't even do anything for him, because to give him enough to do anything, it would have burned his remaining lung. Did you know that? High concentrated oxygen is BAD FOR YOU. You have to dilute it with other gases or it'll fuck'n destroy your lungs.

He couldn't exercise... Hell, long conversations would wind him. He was still skinny as a rail... Why? Because chewing and swallowing food took time way from breathing.

If you're gonna die... I suggest you find another way to go about it.

This isn't directed toward the OP because they didn't really say anything against what I'm about to say... This is just my rant on the subject.

I'm PRO-CHOICE. What you do with your body is up to you. I don't believe I have the right to tell you what to do with your own body.

But don't be that asshole who makes fun of or demeans someone else for their choices on how they want to go about doing for their body. If they are wearing a mask obviously for medical reasons... Leave them alone. It's their choice.

PRO-CHOICE. If you don't feel I can tell you what you can or can't do with your body... Don't be a fuck'n hypocrite when you see someone without a mask. It's not your choice.
The need to prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed was manufactured panic treating worst case as most likely and no overwhelming at all so they quickly moved onto another repressive bullshit measure
 
The need to prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed was manufactured panic treating worst case as most likely and no overwhelming at all so they quickly moved onto another repressive bullshit measure
*blink*blink*

So... Because it didn't happen, that means it wasn't true? Seems like a .... Funny statement to make considering what happened in Italy.

Didn't happen here... Don't get me wrong. OF course... We took measures to assure it wouldn't... So... It didn't. o.0

Edit: Just because someone you aren't politically aligned with said it, doesn't mean it's wrong. Doesn't mean it's right either... Evidence suggests that it could absolutely overwhelm hospitals, because it DID overwhelm hospitals where they didn't take measures fast enough.

With that said... I believe we can open back up the economy now. It's time. Lets get on it, time to move on.
 
The need to prevent hospitals from being overwhelmed was manufactured panic treating worst case as most likely and no overwhelming at all so they quickly moved onto another repressive bullshit measure
*blink*blink*

So... Because it didn't happen, that means it wasn't true? Seems like a .... Funny statement to make considering what happened in Italy.

Didn't happen here... Don't get me wrong. OF course... We took measures to assure it wouldn't... So... It didn't. o.0
I would say that if it did not happen then the evidence is it was never there as opposed to prevented.
 

Forum List

Back
Top