So many ideas to address, so little time.
What would you call an organized authority that systematically has reduced the standing of the American student from 1st to about 20th in the industrialized world?
Never considered that the rest of the world may have caught up? You'll also want to delve deeper into the numbers and suss out the way other countries report their statistics. I can guarantee you that you won't see any mainstreamed special needs children or vocation tracked students as part of their stats.
Who cares about other taxes. We are talking solely about income tax here. EVERY working American should be paying SOMETHING in income tax.
Why? Non-smokers don't pay cigarette taxes. And why move all other taxes off budget, that have to be paid out of the same income? Are you seriously suggesting that the guy bringing home 7000 a year should be taxed at the same rate as the guy bringing in 250,000? Cause that is fiscally insane.
Not a Rush fan but those babies are reeeeaaally nasty.
OBAMA SNORTED COCAINE, did drugs.. Makes him what you accuse Rush of.
Rush railed against drug users in public.
"And so if people are violating the law by doing drugs, they ought to be accused and they ought to be convicted and they ought to be sent up."
"What this says to me, is that too many whites are getting away with drug use. Too many whites are getting away with drug sales. Too many whites are getting away with trafficking in this stuff. The answer to this disparity is not to start letting people out of jail because we're not putting others in jail who are breaking the law. The answer is to go out and find the ones who are getting away with it, convict them and send them up the river, too."
It's the hypocritical lack of personal responsibility that defines Limbaugh's drug use.
BILL CLINTON DODGED SERVING- Makes him no different from Rush and yet I'll bet you voted for Bubba and wet your underoo's every time he's on television, hmm? LMAO
Bubba was an actual student attending Oxford and Rush dropped out of SEMO. That's a significant difference.
Which is more effective in getting food to a poor person? A government agency staffed by thousands of overpaid civil service employees or a food bank at a church staffed by volunteers?
Churches are cheaper in the microcosm but the government agency is much more effective on a much vaster scale. Speak to any church in a predominately low income area and ask how many they turn away. Not the case with Uncle Sam.
Of course, I'm not saying all these programs suck. But, I am saying, that we do need a more competitive culture in America, and the Liberals sure aren't helping it. These programs encourage laziness within the common man.
The US is the third most competitive economy in the world, only eclipsed by Hong Kong and Singapore, which are essentially cities and not much of a comparison. These programs allow employers to pay a much lower wage for needed employees and are more about easing desperation than living fat off the taxpayer dime. Does this sound like living fat to you?
MO TANF Cash Benefit 1 child 234.00 per month, 60 more per month per additional family member
Food stamp benefit 350.00 per month for 1 child 60 more per month per additional family member
one annual payment of 135.00 against a utility
Medicaid
vs
Avg 2 bedroom rental in the area, 600.00/mo, if on public housing 75.00
avg utility bill 200.00/mo
medicaid co-pay 1.00-10.00
leaving 0 for toilet paper, shoes and clothing, soap, sheets, furniture, etc
And it's a 5 yr limit
I don't see it as much of an incentive.
Care is already rationed. Unfortunately, it is currently rationed on a price basis rather than a medical basis. There are a number of changes that are currently occurring that are hopeful, the nurse practitioner, the move to pay based on wellness instead of fee for service, the triumph of the anti-smoking faction, transportation safety improvements, etc. But denying maintenance healthcare to the chronically ill ensures that when they finally come in it will be catastrophic, expensive and accounted for by overcharging everyone else.
And yep, the GOP has no love for the wage earner. Much love for the businessman, but not so much his/her employees.