The real difference between Republicans and Democrats

[EvilCat Breath]

Difference? Democrats are disease carrying vermin spreading plague.

 

[woodwork201]

No. I know Democrats are scumbags who ignore facts. The only thing they care about is political power. If you have a jury that's over half black, then it's guaranteed to vote for the indictment of Republicans.

I assume you're talking about grandjuries, where a 50%+anything vote yields the indictment, then I don't think that works based on race alone. But if you have a jury that's over half-stupid in a Democratic area, or half-Democrat in any area, in other words a jury who do not have half of a brain between them all, a jury that simply does as ordered by their Democrat masters, then you'd be exactly correct - like you said about scumbags ignoring facts.

You have a winning argument when you leave race out of it and make it about stupidity and/or about politics.

 

[woodwork201]

So, don’t paraphrase, post the actual quote.

also, you’re talking about politicians. They aren’t “real Americans”. They are the political class who want, above all else, money and power. Of course they are going to spend money like there is no tomorrow…that’s how Washington works.

If you want to see real America, go into the rural areas and suburbs, where people of all walks of life want to just live their lives and are not really concerned about politics.

Those may not be "real Americans" but they are "real Republicans". We keep calling them RINOs but that's not accurate. They are real Republicans. It is people like me, and I think maybe you if you'd quit defending the Republicans so blindly, that are Republican In Name Only. I am registered Republican and I vote Republican mostly but, considering that people like McConnell and McCarthy, and Johnson, and Graham, and Paul Ryan, etc., are, in fact, real Republicans and considering that I am not them and don't agree with them about virtually anything at all, then it is me that is the RINO and I'm damn proud of that. In fact, I'd be damn ashamed to be considered a real Republican.

 

[TruthNotBS]

The Democrat Regime is actively working to destroy the US. Republicans are trying to save it.

How are Democrats "actively working to destroy the US"? Be specific.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Repubs want a small federal government with a limited role that adheres to the cotus,

Who the hell told you this lie?

 

[woodwork201]

How are Democrats "actively working to destroy the US"? Be specific.

And how are Republicans actively working to save it? I'd like him to answer that, as well.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Depends what you mean by "Live as they please?" I live in California or any Blue state...
1. I would like to continue driving a gas vehicle: Can't, Democrat imposed government regulations
2. I would like to cook on a gas stove: Can't, Democrat imposed government regulations
3. I would like to be able to afford air conditioning during hot days: Can't, too expensive
4. Go to a public bathroom with only people of the same sex as I am: Can't, Woke government and private regulations
5. Speak my own opinions freely at a Blue University: Can't, hateful administration, teachers and students
6. I'm an unborn baby who wants to enter into earthly life: Can't, mean mommy who hates me
7. Help my children put up a lemonade stand on the street corner: Can't, Democrat imposed laws and regulations
8. As a white person, attend a Christmas Party in a Democrat run city: Can't, I'm white
9. Disagree with reparations for anyone of color: Can't, deemed racist by only Democrats
10. Own a gun: Can't, Democrats want full ban on all guns
11. I want to set up a manger scene on government property: Can't, Democrats are religious bigots
12. I would like to walk in a park or on a sidewalk without stepping in human poop: Can't, Democrat laws in cities
13. I would like low inflation and interest rates: Can't, Biden and the Democrats create high inflation and high interest rates.
14. I would like to pay less taxes on my hard work income: Can't, Democrats laws on taxation creates higher taxes.

Oh, I could go on and on. Democrats take away rights by increasing regulations. It's been this way for decades.

To let you know where I'm coming from when I critique your list of objections. I'm a socially conservative, non-Marxist socialist and American nationalist. Another term that describes my political stance on the issues is "National Socialism", which is often portrayed as "evil fascism" because we essentially have the same views on the economy and the state as Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler. I agree with a few of the points you made, however, I question the following:

6. I'm an unborn baby who wants to enter into earthly life: Can't, mean mommy who hates me.

Women don't necessarily choose to abort their pregnancies due to "hating" their "unborn baby". It's also debatable whether an embryo or undeveloped fetus should be granted the status of a "baby", at that early stage of its development. I would argue that it's a potential baby that is in the process of actualizing itself into a true, actual baby, even before it's born (early in the pregnancy it's the woman who is the actual human being, not what is attached to her uterus in her womb).

During the process of gestation life within a woman's womb becomes a baby (unborn/prenatal baby), but such a status should require fetus viability or a certain level of development. Identifying a mere zygote, embryo, or unviable, undeveloped fetus as a full-fledged baby devalues actual babies and the life and needs of the woman who is pregnant.

The Bible, a religious sacred text that many American conservatives and pro-life advocates revere and claim as their main source of moral guidance and authority, doesn't classify an underdeveloped fetus as a baby or human being:

Exo 21:21-25 Notwithstanding, if he continues a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money. (22) If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. (23) And if any mischief follows, then thou shalt give life for life, (24) Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, (25) Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.

The fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25).

Essentially what you just read above states that if a man assaults a pregnant woman and she miscarries, the assailant will pay a fine. According to all Jewish, rabbinic commentators the "loss of fruit" implies the death of the fetus, not an "early birth" where the baby survives. According to the text, if the woman dies as a result of the assault the offender will be executed for committing homocide. The death of the fetus isn't considered a capital crime, hence the offending party simply pays a fine.

Read these biblical studies for more information:

Loading…

www.etsjets.org

Loading…

tmcdaniel.palmerseminary.edu

According to Jewish law, a fetus doesn't have the same status as a human being or the woman that carries it:

A Fetus Is Not an Independent Life: Abortion in the Talmud - TheTorah.com

The rabbis distinguish four stages in the fetus’ development towards personhood. For the duration of the pregnancy, until the commencement of active labor “a fetus is like its mother’s thigh” (עוּבָּר יֶרֶךְ אִמוֹ). | Dr. Ronit Irshai

www.thetorah.com

Consider the following:

• The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit, causes her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31). How is this "pro-life"?

• "And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire." Leviticus 21:9 . In ancient times one of the ways that was used to identify a woman who was having premarital sex was through pregnancy. Essentially, the so-called "harlot" daughter of a Levite priest was burned alive while pregnant. This is "pro-life"?

• The tribal deity of the Jews (i.e. YHWH) enumerated his punishments for disobedience, including "cursed shall be the fruit of your womb" and "you will eat the fruit of your womb," directly contradicting sanctity-of-life claims (Deuteronomy 28:18,53). This isn't "pro-life".

• Elisha's prophecy for soon-to-be King Hazael said he would attack the Israelites, burn their cities, crush the heads of their babies, and rip open their pregnant women (2 Kings 8:12). Pro-life?

Space permits only a small sampling of biblical, divine commandments or threats to kill children:

Numbers 31:17: Now therefore kill every male among the little ones.
Deuteronomy 2:34: utterly destroyed the men and the women and the little ones.
Deuteronomy 28:53: And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters.
I Samuel 15 slay both man and woman, infant and suckling.
2 Kings 8:12: dash their children, and rip up their women with child.
2 Kings 15:16: all the women therein that were with child he ripped up.
Isaiah 13:16: Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled and their wives ravished.
Isaiah 13:18: They shall have no pity on the fruit of the womb; their eyes shall not spare children.
Lamentations 2 Shall the women eat their fruit, and children.
Ezekiel 9:6: Slay utterly old and young, both maids and little children.
Hosea 9 give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts.
Hosea 13:16: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.

There's no "pro-life" in the above examples but rather sadistic "pro-death".

Moreover, how do you figure that it's correct and consistent for American conservatives to be so averse to mask mandates in the middle of a deadly nationwide pandemic because supposedly the government doesn't have the right to force anyone to wear a mask on their face (i.e. their body) even in crowded public venues, AND YET, be in favor of the heavy hand of government forcing women to maintain a zygote, embryo or undeveloped fetus attached to their uteruses (i.e. their bodies) for nine months (with all of the pains, health risks and expenses involved)?

You have sovereignty over your face (your body) when it comes to government mask mandates in the middle of a deadly, nationwide pandemic, but women don't have sovereignty over their uteruses and wombs, early in their pregnancies? You don't see the inconsistency in that? Are you ready to bear the burden of supporting a pregnant single woman when she loses her job as a result of her pregnancy and can't support herself? Do you expect all unmarried women in our highly sexualized, secular culture to behave like nuns or the Virgin Mary before they're married?

Do you believe present economic and social conditions, the current climate in the area of employment and marriage options is the same as in the 1950s, during the baby-boom era? It's not.

Being pro-life, do you support developing and maintaining a national infrastructure to help single mothers properly raise their children, or are you in favor of defunding government programs that help impoverished mothers raise their children (e.g. food stamps, housing assistance, Medicaid, job training/education, school lunch programs, school supplies.etc). Being generous in this respect significantly reduces abortion rates. If single women feel confident in their ability to raise the life that's in their wombs, they're less likely to abort their pregnancies.

Lastly, do you believe this is "pro-life":

Forcing single women of limited means to remain pregnant for nine months and give birth to children whom they don't want or can properly raise leads to an increase in crime and homelessness:

​

The streets are littered with the broken lives of people raised in single-parent homes and the foster care system. Is it pro-life to force women through the use of government authority to remain pregnant and give birth to children they don't want or cannot raise? No, it's not pro-life. It creates more death and destruction, than allowing women sovereignty over their wombs. Women should have the right to abort their pregnancies before the fetus becomes viable, mitigating the injurious social repercussions of unwanted pregnancies and births.

8. As a white person, attend a Christmas Party in a Democrat run city: Can't, I'm white

Why?

10. Own a gun: Can't, Democrats want full ban on all guns

Not all Democrats want a full ban on guns. Most want a ban on combat rifles but that doesn't constitute all Dems wanting a full ban on all guns. I'm for the Second Amendment and support the ownership of combat rifles and ammunition by law-abiding American citizens and legal residents.

12. I would like to walk in a park or on a sidewalk without stepping in human poop: Can't, Democrat laws in cities

Both Dems and Repubs are responsible for the homeless problem. The way to solve it is by forcing (adjudicating) homeless drug addicts into rehab and once they're clean and sober, they should be housed in a basic apartment and enrolled in a life-recovery program under the care of counselors, medical staff, case-workers/social workers, in a housing-unit that contains all of these services and programs. They would be tested for drugs and alcohol periodically, unannounced and if they fail their tests, they will be forced back into rehab and in extreme cases where the person continues to offend they're institutionalized in a psychiatric ward.

Drug dealers should also be charged with a capital crime, hence if convicted they should be sentenced to life in prison without parole or death. Substance abuse however should be decriminalized and treated as a medical condition.

14. I would like to pay less taxes on my hard work income: Can't, Democrats laws on taxation creates higher taxes.

Both Dems and Repubs create economies that increase the cost of living and taxes. None of these parties serve the interests of working-class people.

 

[BrokeLoser]

How are Democrats "actively working to destroy the US"? Be specific.

I’ll play along….
By begging tens of millions of Mexico’s filth to invade our nation
By denigrating the moral order that made America the exceptional nation it was
Lets start there.

And how are Republicans actively working to save it? I'd like him to answer that, as well.

I’ll play along….
By preventing tens of millions of Mexico’s filth from invading our nation
By championing the moral order that made America the exceptional nation it was
Lets start there.

 

[MarathonMike]

How are Democrats "actively working to destroy the US"? Be specific.

Destruction of our Presidential election process using a phony definition of "insurrection", Destruction of our border control and immigration process, destruction of the Free Press in lieu of State Controlled propaganda. That's a few I could list more, now do you understand?

 

[Cougarbear]

To let you know where I'm coming from when I critique your list of objections. I'm a socially conservative, non-Marxist socialist and American nationalist. Another term that describes my political stance on the issues is "National Socialism", which is often portrayed as "evil fascism" because we essentially have the same views on the economy and the state as Benito Mussolini and Adolf Hitler. I agree with a few of the points you made, however, I question the following:



Women don't necessarily choose to abort their pregnancies due to "hating" their "unborn baby". It's also debatable whether an embryo or undeveloped fetus should be granted the status of a "baby", at that early stage of its development. I would argue that it's a potential baby that is in the process of actualizing itself into a true, actual baby, even before it's born (early in the pregnancy it's the woman who is the actual human being, not what is attached to her uterus in her womb).

During the process of gestation life within a woman's womb becomes a baby (unborn/prenatal baby), but such a status should require fetus viability or a certain level of development. Identifying a mere zygote, embryo, or unviable, undeveloped fetus as a full-fledged baby devalues actual babies and the life and needs of the woman who is pregnant.

The Bible, a religious sacred text that many American conservatives and pro-life advocates revere and claim as their main source of moral guidance and authority, doesn't classify an underdeveloped fetus as a baby or human being:

Exo 21:21-25 Notwithstanding, if he continues a day or two, he shall not be punished: for he is his money. (22) If men strive, and hurt a woman with child, so that her fruit depart from her, and yet no mischief follow: he shall be surely punished, according as the woman's husband will lay upon him; and he shall pay as the judges determine. (23) And if any mischief follows, then thou shalt give life for life, (24) Eye for eye, tooth for tooth, hand for hand, foot for foot, (25) Burning for burning, wound for wound, stripe for stripe.

The fetus warrants financial compensation only (to her husband), suggesting that the fetus is property, not a person (Exodus 21:22-25).

Essentially what you just read above states that if a man assaults a pregnant woman and she miscarries, the assailant will pay a fine. According to all Jewish, rabbinic commentators the "loss of fruit" implies the death of the fetus, not an "early birth" where the baby survives. According to the text, if the woman dies as a result of the assault the offender will be executed for committing homocide. The death of the fetus isn't considered a capital crime, hence the offending party simply pays a fine.

Read these biblical studies for more information:

Loading…

www.etsjets.org

Loading…

tmcdaniel.palmerseminary.edu

According to Jewish law, a fetus doesn't have the same status as a human being or the woman that carries it:

A Fetus Is Not an Independent Life: Abortion in the Talmud - TheTorah.com

The rabbis distinguish four stages in the fetus’ development towards personhood. For the duration of the pregnancy, until the commencement of active labor “a fetus is like its mother’s thigh” (עוּבָּר יֶרֶךְ אִמוֹ). | Dr. Ronit Irshai

www.thetorah.com

Consider the following:

• The gruesome priestly purity test to which a wife accused of adultery must submit, causes her to abort the fetus if she is guilty, indicating that the fetus does not possess a right to life (Numbers 5:11-31). How is this "pro-life"?

• "And the daughter of any priest, if she profane herself by playing the whore, she profaneth her father: she shall be burnt with fire." Leviticus 21:9 . In ancient times one of the ways that was used to identify a woman who was having premarital sex was through pregnancy. Essentially, the so-called "harlot" daughter of a Levite priest was burned alive while pregnant. This is "pro-life"?

• The tribal deity of the Jews (i.e. YHWH) enumerated his punishments for disobedience, including "cursed shall be the fruit of your womb" and "you will eat the fruit of your womb," directly contradicting sanctity-of-life claims (Deuteronomy 28:18,53). This isn't "pro-life".

• Elisha's prophecy for soon-to-be King Hazael said he would attack the Israelites, burn their cities, crush the heads of their babies, and rip open their pregnant women (2 Kings 8:12). Pro-life?

Space permits only a small sampling of biblical, divine commandments or threats to kill children:

Numbers 31:17: Now therefore kill every male among the little ones.
Deuteronomy 2:34: utterly destroyed the men and the women and the little ones.
Deuteronomy 28:53: And thou shalt eat the fruit of thine own body, the flesh of thy sons and of thy daughters.
I Samuel 15 slay both man and woman, infant and suckling.
2 Kings 8:12: dash their children, and rip up their women with child.
2 Kings 15:16: all the women therein that were with child he ripped up.
Isaiah 13:16: Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled and their wives ravished.
Isaiah 13:18: They shall have no pity on the fruit of the womb; their eyes shall not spare children.
Lamentations 2 Shall the women eat their fruit, and children.
Ezekiel 9:6: Slay utterly old and young, both maids and little children.
Hosea 9 give them a miscarrying womb and dry breasts.
Hosea 13:16: their infants shall be dashed in pieces, and their women with child shall be ripped up.

There's no "pro-life" in the above examples but rather sadistic "pro-death".

Moreover, how do you figure that it's correct and consistent for American conservatives to be so averse to mask mandates in the middle of a deadly nationwide pandemic because supposedly the government doesn't have the right to force anyone to wear a mask on their face (i.e. their body) even in crowded public venues, AND YET, be in favor of the heavy hand of government forcing women to maintain a zygote, embryo or undeveloped fetus attached to their uteruses (i.e. their bodies) for nine months (with all of the pains, health risks and expenses involved)?

You have sovereignty over your face (your body) when it comes to government mask mandates in the middle of a deadly, nationwide pandemic, but women don't have sovereignty over their uteruses and wombs, early in their pregnancies? You don't see the inconsistency in that? Are you ready to bear the burden of supporting a pregnant single woman when she loses her job as a result of her pregnancy and can't support herself? Do you expect all unmarried women in our highly sexualized, secular culture to behave like nuns or the Virgin Mary before they're married?

Do you believe present economic and social conditions, the current climate in the area of employment and marriage options is the same as in the 1950s, during the baby-boom era? It's not.

Being pro-life, do you support developing and maintaining a national infrastructure to help single mothers properly raise their children, or are you in favor of defunding government programs that help impoverished mothers raise their children (e.g. food stamps, housing assistance, Medicaid, job training/education, school lunch programs, school supplies.etc). Being generous in this respect significantly reduces abortion rates. If single women feel confident in their ability to raise the life that's in their wombs, they're less likely to abort their pregnancies.

Lastly, do you believe this is "pro-life":

View attachment 877647

View attachment 877648​

Forcing single women of limited means to remain pregnant for nine months and give birth to children whom they don't want or can properly raise leads to an increase in crime and homelessness:

​

The streets are littered with the broken lives of people raised in single-parent homes and the foster care system. Is it pro-life to force women through the use of government authority to remain pregnant and give birth to children they don't want or cannot raise? No, it's not pro-life. It creates more death and destruction, than allowing women sovereignty over their wombs. Women should have the right to abort their pregnancies before the fetus becomes viable, mitigating the injurious social repercussions of unwanted pregnancies and births.



Why?



Not all Democrats want a full ban on guns. Most want a ban on combat rifles but that doesn't constitute all Dems wanting a full ban on all guns. I'm for the Second Amendment and support the ownership of combat rifles and ammunition by law-abiding American citizens and legal residents.



Both Dems and Repubs are responsible for the homeless problem. The way to solve it is by forcing (adjudicating) homeless drug addicts into rehab and once they're clean and sober, they should be housed in a basic apartment and enrolled in a life-recovery program under the care of counselors, medical staff, case-workers/social workers, in a housing-unit that contains all of these services and programs. They would be tested for drugs and alcohol periodically, unannounced and if they fail their tests, they will be forced back into rehab and in extreme cases where the person continues to offend they're institutionalized in a psychiatric ward.

Drug dealers should also be charged with a capital crime, hence if convicted they should be sentenced to life in prison without parole or death. Substance abuse however should be decriminalized and treated as a medical condition.



Both Dems and Repubs create economies that increase the cost of living and taxes. None of these parties serve the interests of working-class people.

As to the concept of the right to life of unborn babies, you do know that Christ brought a new covenant to us, the people. And today, we have more line upon line, precept upon precept with present day prophets and apostles who have increased the meaning of the NT including the sanctity of life in the womb. What happened in the OT is dark, but necessary for the people living in a dark period of time, most of the time. Why do you judge people that lived under different laws and commandments than you do?

Dems who say they don't want a full ban actually do. They may say smooth things but they are far darker in their hearts made this way. They start with assault rifles but will not end there. Look what is happening with Light.

Republicans are not responsible for the homeless problem of today. Democrats are.

Democrats are responsible for all the violence in the streets. They way they won't put people in jail when they need to be separated from the other crazy's in the world. And, to get them to use more drugs by Democrats is sick and keeps them down and out. More drugs means more crime.

 

[TruthNotBS]

As to the concept of the right to life of unborn babies, you do know that Christ brought a new covenant to us, the people. And today, we have more line upon line, precept upon precept with present day prophets and apostles who have increased the meaning of the NT including the sanctity of life in the womb. What happened in the OT is dark, but necessary for the people living in a dark period of time, most of the time. Why do you judge people that lived under different laws and commandments than you do?

Dems who say they don't want a full ban actually do. They may say smooth things but they are far darker in their hearts made this way. They start with assault rifles but will not end there. Look what is happening with Light.

Republicans are not responsible for the homeless problem of today. Democrats are.

Democrats are responsible for all the violence in the streets. They way they won't put people in jail when they need to be separated from the other crazy's in the world. And, to get them to use more drugs by Democrats is sick and keeps them down and out. More drugs means more crime.

What would justify the ripping of pregnant women's wombs and the wholesale slaughter of infants? Nothing. You're claiming that the Jewish tribal deity is your "God" and "pro-life" yet ordered the massacre of children. The irony.

Republicans are the ones who eliminated the Housing First Program, a federally supported program to house the homeless in Utah. This program was adopted and implemented by the Utah State Government for over five years and it dramatically reduced homelessness. The Republicans in 2018 or 2019 considered it "too socialist" and eliminated it, and homelessness now is back to how it was before the Housing First program. Republicans defund programs that serve the homeless, helping them get back on their feet.

Repubs kick out the homeless from their cities and towns and also are more prone to incarcerate them, and this leads to more homeless people in liberal-run cities that are friendlier to the homeless and provide them with basic social services.

 

[Cougarbear]

What would justify the ripping of pregnant women's wombs and the wholesale slaughter of infants? Nothing. You're claiming that the Jewish tribal deity is your "God" and "pro-life" yet ordered the massacre of children. The irony.

Republicans are the ones who eliminated the Housing First Program, a federally supported program to house the homeless in Utah. This program was adopted and implemented by the Utah State Government for over five years and it dramatically reduced homelessness. The Republicans in 2018 or 2019 considered it "too socialist" and eliminated it, and homelessness now is back to how it was before the Housing First program. Republicans defund programs that serve the homeless, helping them get back on their feet.

Repubs kick out the homeless from their cities and towns and also are more prone to incarcerate them, and this leads to more homeless people in liberal-run cities that are friendlier to the homeless and provide them with basic social services.

At the expense of the law abiding people who now have to walk through piles of crap on the ground and suffer violence by the homeless. Only large Democrat run cities have severe homeless problems. Why is that? Why does Chicago have the murder rate so high? Democrats are the scourge of our constitutional republic. Are Republicans perfect? No. They are way better than Democrats.

 

[Cougarbear]

What would justify the ripping of pregnant women's wombs and the wholesale slaughter of infants? Nothing. You're claiming that the Jewish tribal deity is your "God" and "pro-life" yet ordered the massacre of children. The irony.

Republicans are the ones who eliminated the Housing First Program, a federally supported program to house the homeless in Utah. This program was adopted and implemented by the Utah State Government for over five years and it dramatically reduced homelessness. The Republicans in 2018 or 2019 considered it "too socialist" and eliminated it, and homelessness now is back to how it was before the Housing First program. Republicans defund programs that serve the homeless, helping them get back on their feet.

Repubs kick out the homeless from their cities and towns and also are more prone to incarcerate them, and this leads to more homeless people in liberal-run cities that are friendlier to the homeless and provide them with basic social services.

Again, that was what was expect OT times. The people were way more accepting bloodshed until they became further away from the evils of Egypt. Line upon line they got rid of the evil. The laws were for those who came up out of Egypt. Eventually, they came to the point of being given the law of Christ to further evolve into moral people. That includes today with the sanctity of the unborn and marriage between a man and a woman.

 

[BrokeLoser]

What would justify the ripping of pregnant women's wombs and the wholesale slaughter of infants? Nothing. You're claiming that the Jewish tribal deity is your "God" and "pro-life" yet ordered the massacre of children. The irony.

Republicans are the ones who eliminated the Housing First Program, a federally supported program to house the homeless in Utah. This program was adopted and implemented by the Utah State Government for over five years and it dramatically reduced homelessness. The Republicans in 2018 or 2019 considered it "too socialist" and eliminated it, and homelessness now is back to how it was before the Housing First program. Republicans defund programs that serve the homeless, helping them get back on their feet.

Repubs kick out the homeless from their cities and towns and also are more prone to incarcerate them, and this leads to more homeless people in liberal-run cities that are friendlier to the homeless and provide them with basic social services.

More retarded lying bullshit from the NotSoChristianMan….Democrats ‘help’ the homeless by begging tens of millions of illegal wetbacks to invade America and destroy blue collar trade wages, to take menial shit jobs from bottom feeders and to suck up valuable social service resources. Democrats ‘help’ the homeless by importing them fentanyl from Mexico. Democrat policy NEVER actually helps any faction of people….their policy simply makes people feel good about their degeneracy…that’s all. Have Blacks improved one iota since they’ve been on the Democrat Plantation?

 

[TruthNotBS]

More retarded lying bullshit from the NotSoChristianMan….Democrats ‘help’ the homeless by begging tens of millions of illegal wetbacks to invade America and destroy blue collar trade wages, to take menial shit jobs from bottom feeders and to suck up valuable social service resources. Democrats ‘help’ the homeless by importing them fentanyl from Mexico. Democrat policy NEVER actually helps any faction of people….their policy simply makes people feel good about their degeneracy…that’s all. Have Blacks improved one iota since they’ve been on the Democrat Plantation?

More retarded lying bullshit from the NotSoChristianMan….Democrats ‘help’ the homeless by begging tens of millions of illegal wetbacks to invade America and destroy blue-collar trade wages, to take menial shit jobs from bottom feeders, and to suck up valuable social service resources.

Republicans contribute to the conditions in Latin America that motivate these "Wetbacks" to come here. The American ruling class loves their cheap labor both in Latin America and here in the United States. That contributes to the illegal immigration problem. You also ignore the fact that Republicans defund government programs that serve the homeless, the poor, and the working class in general.

Ironically Republican Zionists and Jew worshipers like you ignore the fact that most of the leaders of the effort to secularize and de-homogenize America are atheistic Jews, including religious Zionist Jews as well. Jews hate white European Christian culture and they do everything they can to defile and eliminate it.

Democrats ‘help’ the homeless by importing them fentanyl from Mexico. Democrat policy NEVER actually helps any faction of people….their policy simply makes people feel good about their degeneracy…that’s all. Have Blacks improved one iota since they’ve been on the Democrat Plantation?

The solution to the problems you're mentioning isn't found in the Republican or Democratic parties, they're the source of the corruption and confusion.

 

[IM2]

The only ignorant one is you. Pathetically too! Yes, Democrats are the only ones pushing for the elimination of fossil fuels forcing everyone to drive electrical cars only by 2035.

Boston mayor under fire for ‘no whites’ Christmas party for city’s ‘Electeds of Color’

An aide to the mayor of Boston mistakenly sent out an invite for Wu’s “Electeds of Color Holiday Party” to all members of the Boston City Council.

nypost.com

IDIOT!

Biden caused Inflation by changing everything Trump had put in place that had prices of gasoline down low. The cost of gasoline is what drove inflation up you knucklehead! To ship goods and services, gasoline is needed. Price jacks up! Way to go Brandon!!! Covid did some problems but mostly because of Democrats and Biden's shutdowns.

No, whites have had no reparations for slavery or for anything. Blacks have enjoyed high usage of welfare mostly paid by whites as well. No white that I know of today has enslaved blacks. And, the only blacks who have been in slavery over the last 70 years is blacks in large Democrat run cities and run now mostly by other Uncle Tom Blacks.

The planet is telling us to stop using fossil fuel and the governments of this country owe blacks reparations. Reparations are not only for slavery and the government programs that helped whites that blacks were excluded from had black tax dollars as a part of them. Today blacks pay taxes and don't get back what we put in. And then while whites are getting bank loans with money blacks put in banks that blacks can't get, they then get tiffs and tax abatements using tax money blacks put in the pot. So you realy need to study the situation before you hit the post reply button.

 

[IM2]

More retarded lying bullshit from the NotSoChristianMan….Democrats ‘help’ the homeless by begging tens of millions of illegal wetbacks to invade America and destroy blue collar trade wages, to take menial shit jobs from bottom feeders and to suck up valuable social service resources. Democrats ‘help’ the homeless by importing them fentanyl from Mexico. Democrat policy NEVER actually helps any faction of people….their policy simply makes people feel good about their degeneracy…that’s all. Have Blacks improved one iota since they’ve been on the Democrat Plantation?

BS.

 

[IM2]

Clueless Marxist...

Wrong.

 

[Cougarbear]

The planet is telling us to stop using fossil fuel and the governments of this country owe blacks reparations. Reparations are not only for slavery and the government programs that helped whites that blacks were excluded from had black tax dollars as a part of them. Today blacks pay taxes and don't get back what we put in. And then while whites are getting bank loans with money blacks put in banks that blacks can't get, they then get tiffs and tax abatements using tax money blacks put in the pot. So you realy need to study the situation before you hit the post reply button.

The planet isn’t telling us anything. It’s commie science that is twisting the information to line up with their nonsense.
Your tax complaint is rediculous in this world. No matter the color of your skin getting a loan is only about the numbers. You can get loans online without human interaction. The area that blacks in black communities can find difficulty is with property and commercial insurance. That’s because of high crime rates in black communities. And to get any loan you have to have insurance. All lenders have companies that will do it. So, once again, you are racebaiting. When will blacks judge others by the content of their character and not the color of their skin. Oh ye hypocrites.

 

[Cougarbear]

Wrong.

Not the slightest. Marxists can go to hell. Rob from the rich to give to themselves and kill the poor.