The rate of rejected mail in ballots 30 times lower this year than in 2016 in PA.

[ColonelAngus]

This seems to be statistically reaonable.

Partial tally of rejected Pa. mail ballots raises questions, as observers await final data

A historically average rate of rejected mail-in ballots in this year's election in the state could significantly erode Joe Biden's lead over President Trump.

justthenews.com

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

This seems to be statistically reaonable.

Partial tally of rejected Pa. mail ballots raises questions, as observers await final data

A historically average rate of rejected mail-in ballots in this year's election in the state could significantly erode Joe Biden's lead over President Trump.

justthenews.com

And here you are crying and bitching about it. Why? Because the numbers aren't breaking in your candidates favor.
Remind me again who won PA in 2016?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

This seems to be statistically reaonable.

Partial tally of rejected Pa. mail ballots raises questions, as observers await final data

A historically average rate of rejected mail-in ballots in this year's election in the state could significantly erode Joe Biden's lead over President Trump.

justthenews.com

Greatest voter fraud operation ever!

 

[Rogue AI]

Liberals want us to believe that millions of first time mail in voters made fewer mistakes? That very unlikely, almost statistically impossible.

 

[ReinyDays]

Greatest voter fraud operation ever!

No way ... what about all the operations we never learned about? ... the perfect crime is the crime no one learns about ...