The quaint notion of checks and balances.

[berg80]

There were NOT rejected for lack of evidence.

They absolutely were.

As reported by Reuters here , state and federal judges - some appointed by Trump - dismissed more than 50 lawsuits brought by Trump or his allies alleging election fraud and other irregularities.

Independent experts, governors and state election officials from both parties say there was no evidence of widespread fraud.
According to the Washington Post here , instead of alleging “widespread fraud or election-changing conspiracy” the lawsuits pushed by Trump’s team and allies focused on smaller complaints, which were largely dismissed by judges due to a lack of evidence. “The Republicans did not provide evidence to back up their assertions — just speculation, rumors or hearsay.”

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-courts-have-dismissed-multiple-lawsuits-of-alleged-electoral-fraud-p-idUSKBN2AF1FQ/

 

[berg80]

The only thing that CAN be done about the 2020 election is to learn what underhanded machinations were employed

None. Though I understand your need to distance yourself from the truth.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election.

Barr’s comments, in an interview with the The Associated Press, contradict the concerted effort by Trump, his boss, to subvert the results of last month’s voting and block President-elect Joe Biden from taking his place in the White House.

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S.

apnews.com

 

[martybegan]

I've grown tired of your obsession with penises. Ignored.

You can't retort with reality because it would upset the alphabet people who are your primary supporters.

 

[Rawley]

Nothing Trump could do will result in removal from office by impeachment so effectively there is no check on his behavior after his Court's ruling on Monday.

Sucks when your cult leader bet his entire re-election bid on paper thin lawfare theories.

 

[Darkwind]

None. Though I understand your need to distance yourself from the truth.

WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S. Justice Department has uncovered no evidence of widespread voter fraud that could change the outcome of the 2020 election.

Barr’s comments, in an interview with the The Associated Press, contradict the concerted effort by Trump, his boss, to subvert the results of last month’s voting and block President-elect Joe Biden from taking his place in the White House.

Barr told the AP that U.S. attorneys and FBI agents have been working to follow up specific complaints and information they’ve received, but “to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”

Disputing Trump, Barr says no widespread election fraud

WASHINGTON (AP) — Disputing President Donald Trump’s persistent, baseless claims, Attorney General William Barr declared Tuesday the U.S.

apnews.com

The same Bill Barr you denigate as a liar.

Besides, we are not discussing the AG, but the fact that the Courts never once had a look at the evidence.

After that, the left just put their fingers in their ears and went, "nawnawnawnaw" .

Like children, you didn't then, and you don't now, what to look at, see, hear, or consider that there were improprieties in that last elections. The very improprieties you people would scream at the top of your lungs should it have ever happened to a Democrat candidate.

Now of course, that same 81 million voters of Trumps you want to toss aside have become the millions of voters for Biden in the primary because ole Joe has embarrassed the left and they will just replace him without regard to the people who did cast votes for him.

At any rate, as I said at the beginning, there is nothing you will listen to, period. So why even bother to ask?

Never mind, I know why. You think its a winning argument while the rest of us just point and laugh at the question.

 

[Frankenstein]

What lie?

1-7

 

[AntonToo]

Besides, we are not discussing the AG, but the fact that the Courts never once had a look at the evidence.

Who told you this lie? A number of cases were dismissed on the merits.

Here is a prominent sample:

On Nov 27, 2020 a federal appeals court rejected a Trump campaign proposal to block Biden from being declared the winner of Pennsylvania. ( here ). At the time, Stephanos Bibas, on behalf of the three-judge panel wrote: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so." It added: “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-courts-have-dismissed-multiple-lawsuits-of-alleged-electoral-fraud-p-idUSKBN2AF1FQ/

 

[Frankenstein]

Your presumptive candidate for the presidency is an incompetent felon. Deal with it.

You do realize that isn't true there is an appeal and will be overturned this only gave you a sound bite!

 

[Frankenstein]

What lie?

“Donald Trump wants to ban abortion nationwide.” However, this is categorically false, as Trump has said nothing of the sort. He actually said the exact opposite as recently as this week, as detailed in a New York Times article. He repeated it on Wednesday while campaigning in Georgia.


The former president was asked whether he would sign a national abortion ban if he won reelection and such a ban hypothetically passed Congress. Trump replied, “No.”

 

[berg80]

Sucks when your cult leader bet his entire re-election bid on paper thin lawfare theories.

Your cult leader bet his entire candidacy on the hope Repubs on the bench would agree to be complicit in the delaying tactics he so desperately sought.
And, it goes without saying, the willingness of The Following to ignore a criminal conviction, civil liability for rape, 3 outstanding criminal indictments voted on by grand juries, and on and on.

 

[Frankenstein]

Your cult leader bet his entire candidacy on the hope Repubs on the bench would agree to be complicit in the delaying tactics he so desperately sought.
And, it goes without saying, the willingness of The Following to ignore a criminal conviction, civil liability for rape, 3 outstanding criminal indictments voted on by grand juries, and on and on.

Nope, no rape, not only wasn't he convicted for that, the assault never happened. Biden did rape his daughter in the shower though! Nice role model

 

[Rawley]

Your cult leader bet his entire candidacy on the hope Repubs on the bench would agree to be complicit in the delaying tactics he so desperately sought.

Is that the smoke your masters are currently blowing up your ass? Did they also tell you it was your savior Smith that demanded the SC expedite consideration of his petition? That the SC agreed to expedite it. And they did expedite it. Other than, sure, the SC is engaged in delaying tactics.

And, it goes without saying, the willingness of The Following to ignore a criminal conviction, civil liability for rape, 3 outstanding criminal indictments voted on by grand juries, and on and on.

We particularly like the rape one. Big, big fans of rape. Particularly ones department stores, in the middle of the day, in the middle of Manhattan, 30 years ago.

 

[berg80]

Who told you this lie?

As you can tell, he uses right wing media sources that have filled his head with disinformation.

 

[berg80]

Is that the smoke your masters are currently blowing up your ass?

It's objective reality.

 

[Rawley]

It's objective reality.

LOL Smith demanded the SC expedite consideration of his petition. USSC agreed to expedite it. USSC expedited it.

But in your "reality" the USSC is engaged in delaying tactics.

What color is the sky in your "reality"?

 

[berg80]

LOL Smith demanded the SC expedite consideration of his petition. USSC agreed to expedite it. USSC expedited it.

Honestly, you need to reconsider where you are getting your information. You are being lied to.

CNN —
The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request by special counsel Jack Smith to fast-track arguments on whether Donald Trump has any immunity from federal prosecution for alleged crimes he committed while in office – a move that will likely delay his trial.

The court did not explain its reasoning and there were no noted dissents.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/22/politics/supreme-court-trump-immunity-jack-smith/index.html

UNITED STATES V. TRUMP, DONALD J. The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is denied.

DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

 

[Rawley]

Honestly, you need to reconsider where you are getting your information. You are being lied to.

CNN —
The Supreme Court on Friday rejected a request by special counsel Jack Smith to fast-track arguments on whether Donald Trump has any immunity from federal prosecution for alleged crimes he committed while in office – a move that will likely delay his trial.

The court did not explain its reasoning and there were no noted dissents.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/12/22/politics/supreme-court-trump-immunity-jack-smith/index.html

UNITED STATES V. TRUMP, DONALD J. The petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment is denied.

DocumentCloud

www.documentcloud.org

LOL CNN

They didn't have to agree to take up this case until next year. That would have put the DC case on hold an additional year. On Smith's request, they took the unusual step of agreeing to hear this case this year.

 

[22lcidw]

I was referring to the entire belief system of Repubs built on a construct of lies. Lies about the election, about Trump's presidency, about Biden, about the environment, virtually everything you believe in is based on a lie.

Progs have had carte blanche. You did this to yourselves and to the people that want no part of you. As you feel about the Deplorables. And yet Trump will put out an olive branch to you unlike what the progs have done. Progs will run roughshod until the end of course. I can only imagine the time between the election and the January inauguration what shenanigans Progs will ignite.

 

[Darkwind]

Who told you this lie? A number of cases were dismissed on the merits.

Here is a prominent sample:

On Nov 27, 2020 a federal appeals court rejected a Trump campaign proposal to block Biden from being declared the winner of Pennsylvania. ( here ). At the time, Stephanos Bibas, on behalf of the three-judge panel wrote: “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so." It added: “Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

https://www.reuters.com/article/world/fact-check-courts-have-dismissed-multiple-lawsuits-of-alleged-electoral-fraud-p-idUSKBN2AF1FQ/

Thank you for making My case for Me.

 

[Darkwind]

You do realize that isn't true there is an appeal and will be overturned this only gave you a sound bite!

Even WHEN it is overturned, they will continue to use the term "convicted felon" because that was the entire purpose of the sham charges and trial.