historycisalpin
VIP Member
During naming with characters it wasn’t known that haplogroup I is virtual two nations. It divides in two parts, haplogroup I2 is widespread in Southern Europe and towards Caucasus, and haplogroup I1 is characteristic for Northern Europe and especially for Germanics. They are distinctly different in that haplogroup I1 sustains albinism in eyes and hairs, and I2-men don't appear un-dangerous in contrast to I1 and they are often darker in hair-color as I1. From haplogroup J Proto-Semitic’s differ in lesser distinctive faces. Noses look often inconspicuous and haven't the general propensity to form an out-growing bridge like haplogroup J that stands for an inner pursuit to body activity whereas the forward pointed nose stands, which have Indo-Europeans too, for an inner pursuit to change. Haplogroup J is identifiable in its pronounced risible muscles. Haplogroup I2-people haven't the friendlyness of haplogroup I1 even than haplogroup J2, look alsoat -->mythology.
The proto-Semitic branch according to isogg.org(2014). The European haplogroup I-branch is obvious better researched than Middle Eastern haplogroup J. Remarkably, in both groups one lives in a refugium, like I1 in Scandinavia and J1 in South Arabia, whereas the respective other , I2 and J2 spread far. Scandinavia is isolated from the south by the sea, South Arabia by the red sea and the Arabian desert.
Subclades of I1
Branches, or named subclades, of I1 changes the form in the course of research consistently shape and will be restructured in future. Before 2008 only four haplotypes were known. During the reorganization of the whole genealogical tree 2008 it was 9 and 2012 it grew up to 31 haplotypes. Semargl.me has over 90, of whom 32 at least more as 10 times were detected(status: 2014).
Apart from the rare I1b, I1a divides in three great subgroups, of whom I1a1 and I1a2 are Northern European. I’m not sure if both groups are distributed similar, or I1a1 is more in Fennoscandia. The proportions of individuals at Semargl.me was I1a1=5/I1a2=4. I had the idea the both subgroups are an indicator that Scandinavian lineage based on only two men. I1a3 is commonly stated as very rare and Eastern European. It is not a Germanic branch. I suppose it has gereater distribution in Middle East in Jordan. I1a3 could stem at least in parts from Jews and Christs from Middle East in Middle Ages.
The genetic diversity of haplogroup I1 is deemed to be lesser than of Scandinavian Indo-European haplogroup R. Hence it is commonly suggested haplogroup I1 divided later than haplogroup R. In another source I read the I1-tribe evolved from a very small group of people. Incest was the causation for deactivation of many genes that resulted first of all to depigmentation of skin and in Indo-Europeans and in Pre-Norse people to lightning of eye-color. Therefore Non-Africans and Albinos have more genes deactivated. What means it about percipience? For example I read Africans have a gene for flavour that is deactivated in non-Africans [citation not found].
div.sys_text_widget img.float-left{float:left;margin:10px 15px 10px 0;} div.sys_text_widget img.float-right{position:relative;margin:10px 0 10px 15px;} div.sys_text_widget img{margin:4px;} div.sys_text_widget { overflow: hidden; margin: 0; padding: 0; color: ; font: ; background-color: ; }
Haplogroup I1's highest frequencies are located in Scandinavia and at the west coast of Finland. Every third person in Fennoscandia is reportedly a sustainer of it. In Southern Germanics percentage downs low to 10%. That leads to the conclusion that Southern Germanics are a mix of the Prime-Germanic union and non-Germanics. In Scandinavia, the percentage of haplogroup I1 presents over 30% in Denmark and Iceland. The number varies in studies. On Faroe-Islands it amounts 25%[2]. Norway shows between 25% and 36%. Sweden constitutes the state with highest frequencies of haplogroup I1. Approximately 40% of men sustain the haplogroup. All European numbers projected, (and also from America and Australia) haplogroup I1 might be 50 million sustainers large. Probably it isn’t estimated high enough. It constitutes aside of the Semitic tribes of I2, J2 and J1 either the rarest or the second rarest after J1.
The proto-Semitic branch according to isogg.org(2014). The European haplogroup I-branch is obvious better researched than Middle Eastern haplogroup J. Remarkably, in both groups one lives in a refugium, like I1 in Scandinavia and J1 in South Arabia, whereas the respective other , I2 and J2 spread far. Scandinavia is isolated from the south by the sea, South Arabia by the red sea and the Arabian desert.
Subclades of I1
Branches, or named subclades, of I1 changes the form in the course of research consistently shape and will be restructured in future. Before 2008 only four haplotypes were known. During the reorganization of the whole genealogical tree 2008 it was 9 and 2012 it grew up to 31 haplotypes. Semargl.me has over 90, of whom 32 at least more as 10 times were detected(status: 2014).
Apart from the rare I1b, I1a divides in three great subgroups, of whom I1a1 and I1a2 are Northern European. I’m not sure if both groups are distributed similar, or I1a1 is more in Fennoscandia. The proportions of individuals at Semargl.me was I1a1=5/I1a2=4. I had the idea the both subgroups are an indicator that Scandinavian lineage based on only two men. I1a3 is commonly stated as very rare and Eastern European. It is not a Germanic branch. I suppose it has gereater distribution in Middle East in Jordan. I1a3 could stem at least in parts from Jews and Christs from Middle East in Middle Ages.
The genetic diversity of haplogroup I1 is deemed to be lesser than of Scandinavian Indo-European haplogroup R. Hence it is commonly suggested haplogroup I1 divided later than haplogroup R. In another source I read the I1-tribe evolved from a very small group of people. Incest was the causation for deactivation of many genes that resulted first of all to depigmentation of skin and in Indo-Europeans and in Pre-Norse people to lightning of eye-color. Therefore Non-Africans and Albinos have more genes deactivated. What means it about percipience? For example I read Africans have a gene for flavour that is deactivated in non-Africans [citation not found].
div.sys_text_widget img.float-left{float:left;margin:10px 15px 10px 0;} div.sys_text_widget img.float-right{position:relative;margin:10px 0 10px 15px;} div.sys_text_widget img{margin:4px;} div.sys_text_widget { overflow: hidden; margin: 0; padding: 0; color: ; font: ; background-color: ; }
Haplogroup I1's highest frequencies are located in Scandinavia and at the west coast of Finland. Every third person in Fennoscandia is reportedly a sustainer of it. In Southern Germanics percentage downs low to 10%. That leads to the conclusion that Southern Germanics are a mix of the Prime-Germanic union and non-Germanics. In Scandinavia, the percentage of haplogroup I1 presents over 30% in Denmark and Iceland. The number varies in studies. On Faroe-Islands it amounts 25%[2]. Norway shows between 25% and 36%. Sweden constitutes the state with highest frequencies of haplogroup I1. Approximately 40% of men sustain the haplogroup. All European numbers projected, (and also from America and Australia) haplogroup I1 might be 50 million sustainers large. Probably it isn’t estimated high enough. It constitutes aside of the Semitic tribes of I2, J2 and J1 either the rarest or the second rarest after J1.
