Zone1 The Politicization of Major Catastrophes: Texas Floods

Billy_Bob

Diamond Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
30,893
Reaction score
20,706
Points
1,945
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
It is one thing to politicize an event after the fact, but to do so before the event and the politicization costs hundreds of lives should make you furious..

Its been reported that the Austin Fire Chief refused to pre-position swift water rescue teams when they were asked for by NWS/NOAA as they saw the flood potential grow. This pre-positioning would have warned people in low lying and dangerous areas PRIOR TO THE FLOOD.

The Fire fighters Union is furious now as they claim the fire chief did it for political reasons.

The accusation
What they're saying:
On Monday, July 7, AFA posted to Facebook:

"It brings the Austin Firefighters no pleasure to report to the community that the Austin Fire Chief DENIED the deployment of Austin firefighters to Kerrville until very late into the event (so today!), with the exception of only 3 AFD rescue swimmers who helped staff helo teams (which still were NOT deployed until the afternoon of the 4th).

"The Austin Firefighter Special Operations teams are specially trained for Hill Country swift water rescue and are some of the best, if not the best, swift water boat teams in the State of Texas.

"It is absolutely outrageous that the Austin Fire Chief, Joel G. Baker, would not allow highly trained firefighters from Austin to respond to Kerrville. Because of this egregious dereliction of duty, LIVES WERE VERY LIKELY LOST BECAUSE OF CHIEF BAKER’S DECISION!

"Deployment orders came down from the State of Texas on July 2. We would've been pre-deployed before the waters even began to rise!

"It is unforgivable that a fire chief would NOT allow his firefighters to answer the call to save lives.

"Why would Fire Chief Joel G. Baker do this, you may ask? It was a misguided attempt to save money. I say "misguided" because the fire department is fully reimbursed by the state to deploy. I explained the reimbursement process to Chief Baker last week, and he failed to understand this very simple concept.

"We are disgusted with our fire chief. He needs to be held accountable and fired for his disgraceful dereliction of duty.

"The Austin Firefighters are starting a vote of no confidence on Tuesday on the fire chief.

"As disgusted as we are at our Austin Fire Department leadership, the Austin Firefighters Association made a decision to not air our dirty laundry while victims and bodies were still being recovered. But it's now July 7, and it's time that we hold accountable our disgraced fire chief, AND anybody else in his leadership circle who are responsible for this horrendous act.

"The Austin Firefighters commit to being transparent to the community about this process to remove our fire chief and hold all of those accountable who were part of this atrocity.

"The firefighters hope we have your support, because it's going to get ugly.

"I can't possibly express to you how outraged and sickened the firefighters are that we were not allowed to do the job—the job that we have trained so hard and long to do—during the historic floods that just occurred in Kerrville. We could've made a difference, and we were forced to stand down and lives were lost.

"The community deserves a fire chief who cares about the community as much as our firefighters, and that is simply not the case. Joel G. Baker must go!"

What's next:
AFA is expected to hold a press conference at 11 a.m. on July 8 about the vote.

AFD response
The other side:
The Austin Fire Department responded to the accusation with a statement, saying:

"The weather this weekend devastated the entire region, and the Austin Fire Department is proud to be part of the response effort.

"The decision about how to allocate resources to help our fellow Texans is not a simple one. It requires communication from public safety partners on the ground to ensure we are providing resources and personnel when, where and how they are most needed.

"The Austin Fire Department must also prioritize having sufficient resources in our own community given the unpredictability of this weekend's storms and the risk for catastrophic flooding in our immediate area.

"In an effort to strike that balance, AFD deployed three rescue swimmers on Friday, July 4 to serve with the Texas Task Force 1 helicopter search and rescue team (HSART) to perform water rescues in San Angelo, Kerrville and Seguin. On Saturday and Sunday, July 5 and 6, two crews, eight total fire personnel, and an AFD boat, were assigned to assist ESD 1 with search efforts at Cow Creek and Big Sandy Creek.

"An additional six personnel were deployed today, at approximately 9 a.m., to augment Texas Task Force 1 search and rescue efforts in the area.

"AFD is a strong public safety partner in our region. We will continue to live up to that reputation while maintaining adequate resources for those we serve in our City and neighboring communities."

Source: Texas flooding: Austin fire chief accused of denying deployment of firefighters to Kerrville
 
You can cite interagency agreements, but even they are not the end of who can be sent to assist.

NWS/NOAA did their part, notifying state officials who then made the request to Austin's Fire Chief. But to deny life saving action is far beyond the pale.

Had just a few of these swift water rescue crews been sent out, many people would not be dead today. These crews would have warned people in the most at risk areas.

This doesn't preclude personal responsibility by the individuals or Camps. NOAA/NWS use 162.555MHz high power transmitters nation wide to issue watches and warnings. NOAA/NWS did their part flawlessly. They issued these warnings. A simple fifty dollar hand held emergency radio can be bought at your local walmart/target or online. These radios trigger an alarm then open up so you can hear the warnings. This high power transmission will go where cell phones fail.
 

Austin fire chief accused by firefighters association of delaying flood response​

Jul 8, 2025
 
Texas allowed cabins to be built on a flood plain. 27 girls and counselors died in the flood.
 
Texas allowed cabins to be built on a flood plain. 27 girls and counselors died in the flood.
This camp was 100 years old and that building was there PRIOR to any building codes. Your assessment isn't so clear cut as this building wasn't affected by previous flooding.

The issue here is early warning systems that look for anomalies not being employed. Had the County placed the siren and water level systems in 2017, these people would most likely not have died. Bad decisions come with high costs.
 
Back
Top Bottom