The political spectrum

[TNHarley]

It is the very definition of anarchism.

Yeah, maybe the one you like. Not what the theory itself actually is.

 

[Blues Man]

Thats fine. Call it what you want. You should still at least know a little bit about it before arguing against it.
You are looking at the theory like its chaos or something. It isnt.

In theory it isn't in reality it is.
No one can make any laws or codes of conduct that can be enforced in any way.

The second any laws are codified you no longer have an anarchy.

 

[Blues Man]

Yeah, maybe the one you like. Not what the theory itself actually is.

The theory is utopian fantasy.

Tell you what you try to start an anarchistic society and get back to me after it fails.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Rules dont make a community. People do.

People make a community with rules. Without some type of legislative body and the means to enforce that legislation, there is no community order. Only chaos. A mob. You have no property rights, including usage rights, without a government to protect those rights. Anyone can take your land or home, or do whatever they want, at the expense of your happiness, health, and even your life, if there are no rules in your community. Your neighbor can party every day, up to 4 am, and not let you sleep. When you tell him to quiet down, he tells you to F-OFF. Without a government, you can't call the police. There are no rules in your community or authorities to protect you, your family, and your property.

 

[TNHarley]

In theory it isn't in reality it is.
No one can make any laws or codes of conduct that can be enforced in any way.

The second any laws are codified you no longer have an anarchy.

ok

 

[TNHarley]

The theory is utopian fantasy.

Tell you what you try to start an anarchistic society and get back to me after it fails.

Yeah, I totally see how that is an option

 

[TNHarley]

People make a community with rules. Without some type of legislative body and the means to enforce that legislation, there is no community order. Only chaos. A mob. You have no property rights, including usage rights, without a government to protect those rights. Anyone can take your land or home, or do whatever they want, at the expense of your happiness, health, and even your life, if there are no rules in your community. Your neighbor can party every day, up to 4 am, and not let you sleep. When you tell him to quiet down, he tells you to F-OFF. Without a government, you can't call the police. There are no rules in your community or authorities to protect you, your family, and your property.

Well, you certainly cant be an anarchist and a sniveling *****. Thats for sure.

 

[TruthNotBS]

Well, you certainly cant be an anarchist and a sniveling *****. Thats for sure.

I don't want to be a lawless, confused person like you.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

That isnt how it works

In reality that is how it works.

In your pie in the sky theory that has no basis whatsoever with reality it may not work that way.

 

[TNHarley]

I don't want to be a lawless, confused person like you.

Im not lawless or confused. It would seem you are the confused one.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Well, you certainly cant be an anarchist and a sniveling *****. Thats for sure.

So, you cannot be an anarchist, thanks for clarifying.

 

[TNHarley]

In reality that is how it works.

In your pie in the sky theory that has no basis whatsoever with reality it may not work that way.

In your reality, perhaps. And you have already shown how fucked up that place is.

 

[TNHarley]

So, you cannot be an anarchist, thanks for clarifying.

I bet you patted yourself on the back for that whopper of wit, didnt ya?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

In your reality, perhaps. And you have already shown how fucked up that place is.

You still have not shown a single example of actual anarchy working in all of human history.

 

[TNHarley]

You still have not shown a single example of actual anarchy working in all of human history.

Yes I did. All you did was laugh at it. Wonder why that is..

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes I did. All you did was laugh at it. Wonder why that is..

Because it was not an example of anarchy.

 

[TNHarley]

Because it was not an example of anarchy.

It was. It just didnt fit the ignorant image in your head

 

[Harpy Eagle]

It was. It just didnt fit the ignorant image in your head

True, it does fit your made up definition that you and only you think is the true definition.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

What's to attack about inherited wealth?

Sperm Bingo

 

[BackAgain]

What's to attack about inherited wealth?

Sometimes (by which I mean “often”), the sage isn’t very sagacious.