easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,190
- 2,645
So how were the liberals at fault for the many attacks on embassies & consulates under Bush?
Dave, we are talking about 1 (ONE) attack where Hillary and Barry had MONTHS of warning this was coming. They had a MASSIVE number of signs, signals, and warnings this was coming - which they acknowledged! THEY KNEW THIS ATTACK WAS COMING!
Stephens BEGGED for additional security - over 60 times.
- Hillary testified that she thought all of it was part of his 'humorous personality' and that he was 'joking'.
In his e-mail he wrote that if he did not have additional security and there was a 3rd coordinated attack HE WOULD DIE. Hillary ignored the warnings, ignored him, rejected every one of his requests...and as warned the Ambassador was murdered.
With all the warnings, even after 2 terrorist attacks on the compound - after every nation had already taken their people out - Hillary and Barry stripped Stephens of 14 members of his security and left him there to f8ing DIE...which IS what happened...as Stephens himself wrote would happen.
Libs have attacked Bush for not preventing 9/11/01 despite hardly any warning off of which to work......the ONLY thing Al Qaeida did NOT do before 9/11/12 was to go on world-wide TV and declare, 'To Hillary and Barry, on 9/11/12 we will storm th4e compound in Benghazi and kill your ambassador!'
...and IF they had done that I have no doubt saying I believe 4 Americans would still be dead today because Barry was more worried about his re-election, and both he and Hillary were worried more about their political futures than about the lives of Americans in harm's way.