The Palestinians need a Military.

Good think Lebanon has Hezbollah or Israel would be living there and annexed it as their own.





See you do worship islamonazi terrorist groups and LIE about Israel all the time. If Israel wanted to destroy hezbolla you would know it was coming by the simple fact they would leave the U.N.
 
Good think Lebanon has Hezbollah or Israel would be living there and annexed it as their own.
The 1200 dead Lebanese - thanks hizbollocks- from the '06 war extend their thanks.

Israel's fault. I don't believe a word Israel says. They continuously want some sort of fighting to go on, and if its quiet they can't stand it and do some sort of false flag or do something to rile someone up. They have lied so much its hard to believe their side of any story.





Only in your warped fantasy world, the reality is that this is the islamonazi's way of operating
 
"Blah blah". I am, of course, impressed by such a stunningly concise argument. Additionally, your use of the " hasbara" slogan is standard islamo-weasel for a failed argument.

Next time, I'll expect to see The Zionists™ peppering your posts.

But all seriousness aside, I just find it curious that you never addressed the unilateral actions of hizbollocks in connection with their war-like actions and the resulting death and destruction suffered by the Lebanese.

And let's be honest, had Israel chosen to let loose with an unlimited war, they could have caused far greater mayhem than what Lebanon suffered. Had that occurred, you and others would be in a perpetual whine-fest about Israel "not playing fair" by using the options available in their arsenal.

You're disappointed that more death and destruction wasn't railed on Lebanon so that you can buttress your insensate Joooooooo hatreds. You want to excuse the actions of your hero Iranian mullocrats for unleashing their hizbollocks dogs as it calms an emotional requirement to dismiss the Lebanese dead as something other than the wages of Islamic terrorism.

Oh, please. Crocodile tears for the victims of Zionist™aggression really doesn't cut it. The Zionists™had smart weapons in 2006 along with bunker busters; they could have taken out Hezbullah with minimum civillian casualties amongst the Lebanese. Instead the IDF launched a policy of collective punishment (war crime) against the Lebanese civillian population, with remarkable similarity to that used by the Nazis in WW2:
High-ranking officer: Halutz ordered retaliation policy
Crocodile tears are in order for your misrepresentation.

There was no aggression by The Zionists™. You're hoping to sidestep the acts of the hizbollocks stooges. They were the aggressors and instigators.

Additionally, your silly reference to bunker busters is nonsensical. They are not used against terrorists in an urban environment. Similarly, smart weapons can be useful against Islamic terrorists waging war from civilian areas, but there are always civilian casualties when cowardly Islamic terrorists were from from populated cities.

Hizbollocks chose to unilaterally wage war even though they held seats in the Lebanese parliament thus acting with disregard to the safety and welfare of the Lebanese people they represented.

But yeah, ultimately hizbollocks and their Iranian mullocrats caused just another pile of dead Arabs. That pin prick to Israel was orgasmic for you and those like you.

Crocodile tears are in order for your misrepresentation.

You are the one misrepresenting the facts, but that's only to be expected from a Hasbara troll. Even the Zionists™disagree with you:

Winograd commission reported, "Israel initiated a long war, which ended without a defined military victory...a semi-military organization of a few thousand men resisted, for a few weeks, the strongest army in the Middle East, which enjoyed full air superiority and size and technology advantages."

Winograd commission, aka "The commission of inquiry into the events of military engagement in Lebanon 2006" was damning in it's assessmet of Zionist Israeli incompetence at all levels,

"The report categorised the 2nd Lebanon war as a serious missed opportunity. The war had ended without clear military victory, a much smaller para-military organization successfully resisted against a much larger force which had complete air superiority among other technological advantages. Lebanese rockets aimed at Israel's civilian population continued throughout the war which Israel could not effectively stop. Life in the affected regions of Israel was seriously disrupted, with many civilians either leaving their homes temporarily or spending time in shelters. When Israel initiated a large scale ground offensive the offensive did not result in military gains and was not completed.

Some of the troubling findings revealed that there were serious failings and shortcomings in the decision-making processes at both the political and military levels, in preparedness, decision-making and performance in the IDF, particularly the army, in strategic thinking and planning, in both the political and the military echelons, and in the defence of the civilian population and in coping with rockets.

The decision to react immediately to the kidnapping limited Israel's range of options to only two, a stand-off war or an invasion. Israel went to war before it had decided which option to use and military and political echelons failed to have a serious discussion of the options or decide between them. Even so, until the first week of August, Israel was unprepared to launch a large-scale ground operation.

As a result, Israel was 'dragged' into a ground operation too late. Despite the fact that it was a limited war initiated by Israel itself, Israel did not use its military force well and effectively. Israel did not gain a political achievement because of military successes.

In the end, the IDF failed to provide an effective military response to the challenges posed. This conclusion must not take away the great willingness of the soldiers, especially reserve soldiers, to serve and fight in the war. There were many instances of heroism, courage, self-sacrifice and devotion of many commanders and soldiers. The air force in particular was superb, however they alone could not prove decisive as the air force was necessarily limited, due to the weaknesses in the overall performance of the IDF." Winograd Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.cfr.org/israel/winograd-commission-final-report/p15385

That was a long cut and paste, convenient when you need to present toothless testimony to prove a worthless point.

The article is critical of Israel for not responding in a much more aggressive war footing to the act of war by hizbollocks. There is that point to be made but an extended air campaign and following ground war was not in Israel's best interest.

I just find it pathetic that you won't even acknowledge the dead A-rabs as a direct consequence of hizbollocks. Instead, your disappointed that huge numbers of Lebanese civilians weren't killed in an extended war against the Islamics represented by hizbollocks and the Iranian mullocrats in exchange for a few Joooooos.

How nice that you will so freely sacrifice the lives of others to appease your Joooooooo hatreds.
Distortion, hypocrisy and ascribing motives; standard Hasbara Troll tactics. Nothing worth responding to here.





Hey rat boy haven't you heard hasbara is no longer a buzz word you have worn it out by constant use
 
Oh, please. Crocodile tears for the victims of Zionist™aggression really doesn't cut it. The Zionists™had smart weapons in 2006 along with bunker busters; they could have taken out Hezbullah with minimum civillian casualties amongst the Lebanese. Instead the IDF launched a policy of collective punishment (war crime) against the Lebanese civillian population, with remarkable similarity to that used by the Nazis in WW2:
High-ranking officer: Halutz ordered retaliation policy
Crocodile tears are in order for your misrepresentation.

There was no aggression by The Zionists™. You're hoping to sidestep the acts of the hizbollocks stooges. They were the aggressors and instigators.

Additionally, your silly reference to bunker busters is nonsensical. They are not used against terrorists in an urban environment. Similarly, smart weapons can be useful against Islamic terrorists waging war from civilian areas, but there are always civilian casualties when cowardly Islamic terrorists were from from populated cities.

Hizbollocks chose to unilaterally wage war even though they held seats in the Lebanese parliament thus acting with disregard to the safety and welfare of the Lebanese people they represented.

But yeah, ultimately hizbollocks and their Iranian mullocrats caused just another pile of dead Arabs. That pin prick to Israel was orgasmic for you and those like you.

Crocodile tears are in order for your misrepresentation.

You are the one misrepresenting the facts, but that's only to be expected from a Hasbara troll. Even the Zionists™disagree with you:

Winograd commission reported, "Israel initiated a long war, which ended without a defined military victory...a semi-military organization of a few thousand men resisted, for a few weeks, the strongest army in the Middle East, which enjoyed full air superiority and size and technology advantages."

Winograd commission, aka "The commission of inquiry into the events of military engagement in Lebanon 2006" was damning in it's assessmet of Zionist Israeli incompetence at all levels,

"The report categorised the 2nd Lebanon war as a serious missed opportunity. The war had ended without clear military victory, a much smaller para-military organization successfully resisted against a much larger force which had complete air superiority among other technological advantages. Lebanese rockets aimed at Israel's civilian population continued throughout the war which Israel could not effectively stop. Life in the affected regions of Israel was seriously disrupted, with many civilians either leaving their homes temporarily or spending time in shelters. When Israel initiated a large scale ground offensive the offensive did not result in military gains and was not completed.

Some of the troubling findings revealed that there were serious failings and shortcomings in the decision-making processes at both the political and military levels, in preparedness, decision-making and performance in the IDF, particularly the army, in strategic thinking and planning, in both the political and the military echelons, and in the defence of the civilian population and in coping with rockets.

The decision to react immediately to the kidnapping limited Israel's range of options to only two, a stand-off war or an invasion. Israel went to war before it had decided which option to use and military and political echelons failed to have a serious discussion of the options or decide between them. Even so, until the first week of August, Israel was unprepared to launch a large-scale ground operation.

As a result, Israel was 'dragged' into a ground operation too late. Despite the fact that it was a limited war initiated by Israel itself, Israel did not use its military force well and effectively. Israel did not gain a political achievement because of military successes.

In the end, the IDF failed to provide an effective military response to the challenges posed. This conclusion must not take away the great willingness of the soldiers, especially reserve soldiers, to serve and fight in the war. There were many instances of heroism, courage, self-sacrifice and devotion of many commanders and soldiers. The air force in particular was superb, however they alone could not prove decisive as the air force was necessarily limited, due to the weaknesses in the overall performance of the IDF." Winograd Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.cfr.org/israel/winograd-commission-final-report/p15385

That was a long cut and paste, convenient when you need to present toothless testimony to prove a worthless point.

The article is critical of Israel for not responding in a much more aggressive war footing to the act of war by hizbollocks. There is that point to be made but an extended air campaign and following ground war was not in Israel's best interest.

I just find it pathetic that you won't even acknowledge the dead A-rabs as a direct consequence of hizbollocks. Instead, your disappointed that huge numbers of Lebanese civilians weren't killed in an extended war against the Islamics represented by hizbollocks and the Iranian mullocrats in exchange for a few Joooooos.

How nice that you will so freely sacrifice the lives of others to appease your Joooooooo hatreds.
Distortion, hypocrisy and ascribing motives; standard Hasbara Troll tactics. Nothing worth responding to here.





Hey rat boy haven't you heard hasbara is no longer a buzz word you have worn it out by constant use
Indeed, it has become meaningless from over use like anti Semite and terrorist
 
Cause we know that Arabs who have militaries are brave fighters and never drop their weapons and run for their lives.

It doesn't seem fair to blame The Zionists™ for Arab incompetence.

Someone's forgetting the Yom Kippur war of 1973, "This is the end of the third temple (reich)"-- Moshe Dayan to Golda Meir 9th October 1973, or for that matter Hezbollah kicked the IDF out of Lebanon and fought the world's 4th most powerful military to a stalemate, maybe not so incompetent given the right equipment.

Ha right keep jerking yourself of to these mythical Arab victories, Achmed.

Like always Israel will be ten steps ahead. Arabs cannot fight any longer in armies wearing uniforms. The last time they did that successfully was 900 years ago.

So now depraved barbarians resort to Islamic terrorism, targeting of civilians while being into their own civilian population or hiding and shooting from schools, hospitals, mosques, etc. This is what the savages are good at, and it has been documented by Americans and Europeans as well as the UN.

Arabs cannot fight any longer in armies wearing uniforms. The last time they did that successfully was 900 years ago.

Really, the last time Arab armies wore uniforms was in 1115? Prove it.

In 1973 the Zionists were so close to defeat that they were considering using their nuclear weapons, "This is the end of the third temple" was the code phrase for what is now called Operation Samson. Hezbollah is still thriving after two wars against the IDF, which got kicked out of Lebanon; not much of a defeat, is it?
Cause we know that Arabs who have militaries are brave fighters and never drop their weapons and run for their lives.

It doesn't seem fair to blame The Zionists™ for Arab incompetence.

Someone's forgetting the Yom Kippur war of 1973, "This is the end of the third temple (reich)"-- Moshe Dayan to Golda Meir 9th October 1973, or for that matter Hezbollah kicked the IDF out of Lebanon and fought the world's 4th most powerful military to a stalemate, maybe not so incompetent given the right equipment.

Ha right keep jerking yourself of to these mythical Arab victories, Achmed.

Like always Israel will be ten steps ahead. Arabs cannot fight any longer in armies wearing uniforms. The last time they did that successfully was 900 years ago.

So now depraved barbarians resort to Islamic terrorism, targeting of civilians while being into their own civilian population or hiding and shooting from schools, hospitals, mosques, etc. This is what the savages are good at, and it has been documented by Americans and Europeans as well as the UN.

Arabs cannot fight any longer in armies wearing uniforms. The last time they did that successfully was 900 years ago.

Really, the last time Arab armies wore uniforms was in 1115? Prove it.

In 1973 the Zionists were so close to defeat that they were considering using their nuclear weapons, "This is the end of the third temple" was the code phrase for what is now called Operation Samson. Hezbollah is still thriving after two wars against the IDF, which got kicked out of Lebanon; not much of a defeat, is it?

Arab armies were defeated by the Ottomans over 800 years ago, and since then they haven't had a successful military campaign. They're worse than the French.

Really, the last time Arab armies wore uniforms was in 1115? Prove it.

So that's another Rude-ee fail then. Thought as much. FYI uniformed troops were a rarity in Abbasid armies and it was the Mongols who destroyed the Abbasid Caliphate except for remnants in Egypt who were overthrown by the Mameluks. Ottomans never got involved in the region until the 16th century; the Ottoman Empire was originally focused on conquering eastern Europe and the Balkans, not the Middle East. As for the French, they were the most powerful and feared troops from the late 17th century up to the 20th century and have a fine military record. Here's a nice simple run down of French military history. War Nerd: Glory to The French - By Gary Brecher - The eXiled

So you can't show me a victory by an Arab army in the last 800 years then. Ha ha ha.
 
Good think Lebanon has Hezbollah or Israel would be living there and annexed it as their own.

Yeah right. Hezbollah are a bunch of Islamic terrorist thugs sponsored by Iran that have taken the country hostage and killed Harriri its very popular Christian prime minister.
 
Good think Lebanon has Hezbollah or Israel would be living there and annexed it as their own.
The 1200 dead Lebanese - thanks hizbollocks- from the '06 war extend their thanks.

Israel's fault. I don't believe a word Israel says. They continuously want some sort of fighting to go on, and if its quiet they can't stand it and do some sort of false flag or do something to rile someone up. They have lied so much its hard to believe their side of any story.

....because we know how peaceful Muslim Arabs are. Never mind the daily calls for the destruction of Israel and death to the Jews.
 
Last edited:
"Blah blah". I am, of course, impressed by such a stunningly concise argument. Additionally, your use of the " hasbara" slogan is standard islamo-weasel for a failed argument.

Next time, I'll expect to see The Zionists™ peppering your posts.

But all seriousness aside, I just find it curious that you never addressed the unilateral actions of hizbollocks in connection with their war-like actions and the resulting death and destruction suffered by the Lebanese.

And let's be honest, had Israel chosen to let loose with an unlimited war, they could have caused far greater mayhem than what Lebanon suffered. Had that occurred, you and others would be in a perpetual whine-fest about Israel "not playing fair" by using the options available in their arsenal.

You're disappointed that more death and destruction wasn't railed on Lebanon so that you can buttress your insensate Joooooooo hatreds. You want to excuse the actions of your hero Iranian mullocrats for unleashing their hizbollocks dogs as it calms an emotional requirement to dismiss the Lebanese dead as something other than the wages of Islamic terrorism.

Oh, please. Crocodile tears for the victims of Zionist™aggression really doesn't cut it. The Zionists™had smart weapons in 2006 along with bunker busters; they could have taken out Hezbullah with minimum civillian casualties amongst the Lebanese. Instead the IDF launched a policy of collective punishment (war crime) against the Lebanese civillian population, with remarkable similarity to that used by the Nazis in WW2:
High-ranking officer: Halutz ordered retaliation policy
Crocodile tears are in order for your misrepresentation.

There was no aggression by The Zionists™. You're hoping to sidestep the acts of the hizbollocks stooges. They were the aggressors and instigators.

Additionally, your silly reference to bunker busters is nonsensical. They are not used against terrorists in an urban environment. Similarly, smart weapons can be useful against Islamic terrorists waging war from civilian areas, but there are always civilian casualties when cowardly Islamic terrorists were from from populated cities.

Hizbollocks chose to unilaterally wage war even though they held seats in the Lebanese parliament thus acting with disregard to the safety and welfare of the Lebanese people they represented.

But yeah, ultimately hizbollocks and their Iranian mullocrats caused just another pile of dead Arabs. That pin prick to Israel was orgasmic for you and those like you.

Crocodile tears are in order for your misrepresentation.

You are the one misrepresenting the facts, but that's only to be expected from a Hasbara troll. Even the Zionists™disagree with you:

Winograd commission reported, "Israel initiated a long war, which ended without a defined military victory...a semi-military organization of a few thousand men resisted, for a few weeks, the strongest army in the Middle East, which enjoyed full air superiority and size and technology advantages."

Winograd commission, aka "The commission of inquiry into the events of military engagement in Lebanon 2006" was damning in it's assessmet of Zionist Israeli incompetence at all levels,

"The report categorised the 2nd Lebanon war as a serious missed opportunity. The war had ended without clear military victory, a much smaller para-military organization successfully resisted against a much larger force which had complete air superiority among other technological advantages. Lebanese rockets aimed at Israel's civilian population continued throughout the war which Israel could not effectively stop. Life in the affected regions of Israel was seriously disrupted, with many civilians either leaving their homes temporarily or spending time in shelters. When Israel initiated a large scale ground offensive the offensive did not result in military gains and was not completed.

Some of the troubling findings revealed that there were serious failings and shortcomings in the decision-making processes at both the political and military levels, in preparedness, decision-making and performance in the IDF, particularly the army, in strategic thinking and planning, in both the political and the military echelons, and in the defence of the civilian population and in coping with rockets.

The decision to react immediately to the kidnapping limited Israel's range of options to only two, a stand-off war or an invasion. Israel went to war before it had decided which option to use and military and political echelons failed to have a serious discussion of the options or decide between them. Even so, until the first week of August, Israel was unprepared to launch a large-scale ground operation.

As a result, Israel was 'dragged' into a ground operation too late. Despite the fact that it was a limited war initiated by Israel itself, Israel did not use its military force well and effectively. Israel did not gain a political achievement because of military successes.

In the end, the IDF failed to provide an effective military response to the challenges posed. This conclusion must not take away the great willingness of the soldiers, especially reserve soldiers, to serve and fight in the war. There were many instances of heroism, courage, self-sacrifice and devotion of many commanders and soldiers. The air force in particular was superb, however they alone could not prove decisive as the air force was necessarily limited, due to the weaknesses in the overall performance of the IDF." Winograd Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.cfr.org/israel/winograd-commission-final-report/p15385

That was a long cut and paste, convenient when you need to present toothless testimony to prove a worthless point.

The article is critical of Israel for not responding in a much more aggressive war footing to the act of war by hizbollocks. There is that point to be made but an extended air campaign and following ground war was not in Israel's best interest.

I just find it pathetic that you won't even acknowledge the dead A-rabs as a direct consequence of hizbollocks. Instead, your disappointed that huge numbers of Lebanese civilians weren't killed in an extended war against the Islamics represented by hizbollocks and the Iranian mullocrats in exchange for a few Joooooos.

How nice that you will so freely sacrifice the lives of others to appease your Joooooooo hatreds.
Distortion, hypocrisy and ascribing motives; standard Hasbara Troll tactics. Nothing worth responding to here.

Said the IslamoNazi sock troll.
 
The Palestinians need a military like the world needs syphilis.
 
Crocodile tears are in order for your misrepresentation.

There was no aggression by The Zionists™. You're hoping to sidestep the acts of the hizbollocks stooges. They were the aggressors and instigators.

Additionally, your silly reference to bunker busters is nonsensical. They are not used against terrorists in an urban environment. Similarly, smart weapons can be useful against Islamic terrorists waging war from civilian areas, but there are always civilian casualties when cowardly Islamic terrorists were from from populated cities.

Hizbollocks chose to unilaterally wage war even though they held seats in the Lebanese parliament thus acting with disregard to the safety and welfare of the Lebanese people they represented.

But yeah, ultimately hizbollocks and their Iranian mullocrats caused just another pile of dead Arabs. That pin prick to Israel was orgasmic for you and those like you.

Crocodile tears are in order for your misrepresentation.

You are the one misrepresenting the facts, but that's only to be expected from a Hasbara troll. Even the Zionists™disagree with you:

Winograd commission reported, "Israel initiated a long war, which ended without a defined military victory...a semi-military organization of a few thousand men resisted, for a few weeks, the strongest army in the Middle East, which enjoyed full air superiority and size and technology advantages."

Winograd commission, aka "The commission of inquiry into the events of military engagement in Lebanon 2006" was damning in it's assessmet of Zionist Israeli incompetence at all levels,

"The report categorised the 2nd Lebanon war as a serious missed opportunity. The war had ended without clear military victory, a much smaller para-military organization successfully resisted against a much larger force which had complete air superiority among other technological advantages. Lebanese rockets aimed at Israel's civilian population continued throughout the war which Israel could not effectively stop. Life in the affected regions of Israel was seriously disrupted, with many civilians either leaving their homes temporarily or spending time in shelters. When Israel initiated a large scale ground offensive the offensive did not result in military gains and was not completed.

Some of the troubling findings revealed that there were serious failings and shortcomings in the decision-making processes at both the political and military levels, in preparedness, decision-making and performance in the IDF, particularly the army, in strategic thinking and planning, in both the political and the military echelons, and in the defence of the civilian population and in coping with rockets.

The decision to react immediately to the kidnapping limited Israel's range of options to only two, a stand-off war or an invasion. Israel went to war before it had decided which option to use and military and political echelons failed to have a serious discussion of the options or decide between them. Even so, until the first week of August, Israel was unprepared to launch a large-scale ground operation.

As a result, Israel was 'dragged' into a ground operation too late. Despite the fact that it was a limited war initiated by Israel itself, Israel did not use its military force well and effectively. Israel did not gain a political achievement because of military successes.

In the end, the IDF failed to provide an effective military response to the challenges posed. This conclusion must not take away the great willingness of the soldiers, especially reserve soldiers, to serve and fight in the war. There were many instances of heroism, courage, self-sacrifice and devotion of many commanders and soldiers. The air force in particular was superb, however they alone could not prove decisive as the air force was necessarily limited, due to the weaknesses in the overall performance of the IDF." Winograd Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.cfr.org/israel/winograd-commission-final-report/p15385

That was a long cut and paste, convenient when you need to present toothless testimony to prove a worthless point.

The article is critical of Israel for not responding in a much more aggressive war footing to the act of war by hizbollocks. There is that point to be made but an extended air campaign and following ground war was not in Israel's best interest.

I just find it pathetic that you won't even acknowledge the dead A-rabs as a direct consequence of hizbollocks. Instead, your disappointed that huge numbers of Lebanese civilians weren't killed in an extended war against the Islamics represented by hizbollocks and the Iranian mullocrats in exchange for a few Joooooos.

How nice that you will so freely sacrifice the lives of others to appease your Joooooooo hatreds.
Distortion, hypocrisy and ascribing motives; standard Hasbara Troll tactics. Nothing worth responding to here.





Hey rat boy haven't you heard hasbara is no longer a buzz word you have worn it out by constant use
Indeed, it has become meaningless from over use like anti Semite and terrorist


Indeed, no. Indeed it is not.

The koran (the hate and war manual inspired by muhammud (swish),and the hadith, which are still interpreted literally, are a virulent manifesto of God-given Islamosupremacy, and they are the blueprint for the Religion of Peace's agenda. It's just easier to lay the blame on a discrete group of islamo-savages with a name, rather than the politico-religious ideology that inspires them.

The holy warrior dregs of al-Qaeda, ISIS, Hamas and all other jihad groups are simply pious Moslems who know their koranology and sunnah, and who are following the books to the letter. They are back in those, halcyon days of virtueless conquest and murder for muhammed (swish) when these books were written—the days when they enjoyed so much success at fighting, killing, beheading, raping, taking sex slaves, etc., etc. exactly as events are unfolding across the islamist Middle East.

As then, now.
 
Crocodile tears are in order for your misrepresentation.

There was no aggression by The Zionists™. You're hoping to sidestep the acts of the hizbollocks stooges. They were the aggressors and instigators.

Additionally, your silly reference to bunker busters is nonsensical. They are not used against terrorists in an urban environment. Similarly, smart weapons can be useful against Islamic terrorists waging war from civilian areas, but there are always civilian casualties when cowardly Islamic terrorists were from from populated cities.

Hizbollocks chose to unilaterally wage war even though they held seats in the Lebanese parliament thus acting with disregard to the safety and welfare of the Lebanese people they represented.

But yeah, ultimately hizbollocks and their Iranian mullocrats caused just another pile of dead Arabs. That pin prick to Israel was orgasmic for you and those like you.

Crocodile tears are in order for your misrepresentation.

You are the one misrepresenting the facts, but that's only to be expected from a Hasbara troll. Even the Zionists™disagree with you:

Winograd commission reported, "Israel initiated a long war, which ended without a defined military victory...a semi-military organization of a few thousand men resisted, for a few weeks, the strongest army in the Middle East, which enjoyed full air superiority and size and technology advantages."

Winograd commission, aka "The commission of inquiry into the events of military engagement in Lebanon 2006" was damning in it's assessmet of Zionist Israeli incompetence at all levels,

"The report categorised the 2nd Lebanon war as a serious missed opportunity. The war had ended without clear military victory, a much smaller para-military organization successfully resisted against a much larger force which had complete air superiority among other technological advantages. Lebanese rockets aimed at Israel's civilian population continued throughout the war which Israel could not effectively stop. Life in the affected regions of Israel was seriously disrupted, with many civilians either leaving their homes temporarily or spending time in shelters. When Israel initiated a large scale ground offensive the offensive did not result in military gains and was not completed.

Some of the troubling findings revealed that there were serious failings and shortcomings in the decision-making processes at both the political and military levels, in preparedness, decision-making and performance in the IDF, particularly the army, in strategic thinking and planning, in both the political and the military echelons, and in the defence of the civilian population and in coping with rockets.

The decision to react immediately to the kidnapping limited Israel's range of options to only two, a stand-off war or an invasion. Israel went to war before it had decided which option to use and military and political echelons failed to have a serious discussion of the options or decide between them. Even so, until the first week of August, Israel was unprepared to launch a large-scale ground operation.

As a result, Israel was 'dragged' into a ground operation too late. Despite the fact that it was a limited war initiated by Israel itself, Israel did not use its military force well and effectively. Israel did not gain a political achievement because of military successes.

In the end, the IDF failed to provide an effective military response to the challenges posed. This conclusion must not take away the great willingness of the soldiers, especially reserve soldiers, to serve and fight in the war. There were many instances of heroism, courage, self-sacrifice and devotion of many commanders and soldiers. The air force in particular was superb, however they alone could not prove decisive as the air force was necessarily limited, due to the weaknesses in the overall performance of the IDF." Winograd Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.cfr.org/israel/winograd-commission-final-report/p15385

That was a long cut and paste, convenient when you need to present toothless testimony to prove a worthless point.

The article is critical of Israel for not responding in a much more aggressive war footing to the act of war by hizbollocks. There is that point to be made but an extended air campaign and following ground war was not in Israel's best interest.

I just find it pathetic that you won't even acknowledge the dead A-rabs as a direct consequence of hizbollocks. Instead, your disappointed that huge numbers of Lebanese civilians weren't killed in an extended war against the Islamics represented by hizbollocks and the Iranian mullocrats in exchange for a few Joooooos.

How nice that you will so freely sacrifice the lives of others to appease your Joooooooo hatreds.
Distortion, hypocrisy and ascribing motives; standard Hasbara Troll tactics. Nothing worth responding to here.





Hey rat boy haven't you heard hasbara is no longer a buzz word you have worn it out by constant use
Indeed, it has become meaningless from over use like anti Semite and terrorist





No those are still relevant because they are only used to describe anti semitic acts and proscribed terrorists. In this case it amounts to the same group the Palestinians.
 
Good think Lebanon has Hezbollah or Israel would be living there and annexed it as their own.

Yeah right. Hezbollah are a bunch of Islamic terrorist thugs sponsored by Iran that have taken the country hostage and killed Harriri its very popular Christian prime minister.




Another non muslim nation overrun by force and changed to an Islamic state by violent means. Under the LoN treaty Lebanon was a Christian nation and the muslims have shown what to expect to happen to Isreal.
 
You are the one misrepresenting the facts, but that's only to be expected from a Hasbara troll. Even the Zionists™disagree with you:

Winograd commission, aka "The commission of inquiry into the events of military engagement in Lebanon 2006" was damning in it's assessmet of Zionist Israeli incompetence at all levels,

"The report categorised the 2nd Lebanon war as a serious missed opportunity. The war had ended without clear military victory, a much smaller para-military organization successfully resisted against a much larger force which had complete air superiority among other technological advantages. Lebanese rockets aimed at Israel's civilian population continued throughout the war which Israel could not effectively stop. Life in the affected regions of Israel was seriously disrupted, with many civilians either leaving their homes temporarily or spending time in shelters. When Israel initiated a large scale ground offensive the offensive did not result in military gains and was not completed.

Some of the troubling findings revealed that there were serious failings and shortcomings in the decision-making processes at both the political and military levels, in preparedness, decision-making and performance in the IDF, particularly the army, in strategic thinking and planning, in both the political and the military echelons, and in the defence of the civilian population and in coping with rockets.

The decision to react immediately to the kidnapping limited Israel's range of options to only two, a stand-off war or an invasion. Israel went to war before it had decided which option to use and military and political echelons failed to have a serious discussion of the options or decide between them. Even so, until the first week of August, Israel was unprepared to launch a large-scale ground operation.

As a result, Israel was 'dragged' into a ground operation too late. Despite the fact that it was a limited war initiated by Israel itself, Israel did not use its military force well and effectively. Israel did not gain a political achievement because of military successes.

In the end, the IDF failed to provide an effective military response to the challenges posed. This conclusion must not take away the great willingness of the soldiers, especially reserve soldiers, to serve and fight in the war. There were many instances of heroism, courage, self-sacrifice and devotion of many commanders and soldiers. The air force in particular was superb, however they alone could not prove decisive as the air force was necessarily limited, due to the weaknesses in the overall performance of the IDF." Winograd Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.cfr.org/israel/winograd-commission-final-report/p15385

That was a long cut and paste, convenient when you need to present toothless testimony to prove a worthless point.

The article is critical of Israel for not responding in a much more aggressive war footing to the act of war by hizbollocks. There is that point to be made but an extended air campaign and following ground war was not in Israel's best interest.

I just find it pathetic that you won't even acknowledge the dead A-rabs as a direct consequence of hizbollocks. Instead, your disappointed that huge numbers of Lebanese civilians weren't killed in an extended war against the Islamics represented by hizbollocks and the Iranian mullocrats in exchange for a few Joooooos.

How nice that you will so freely sacrifice the lives of others to appease your Joooooooo hatreds.
Distortion, hypocrisy and ascribing motives; standard Hasbara Troll tactics. Nothing worth responding to here.





Hey rat boy haven't you heard hasbara is no longer a buzz word you have worn it out by constant use
Indeed, it has become meaningless from over use like anti Semite and terrorist





No those are still relevant because they are only used to describe anti semitic acts and proscribed terrorists. In this case it amounts to the same group the Palestinians.
Indeed, still staples of Israeli bullcrap.
 
That was a long cut and paste, convenient when you need to present toothless testimony to prove a worthless point.

The article is critical of Israel for not responding in a much more aggressive war footing to the act of war by hizbollocks. There is that point to be made but an extended air campaign and following ground war was not in Israel's best interest.

I just find it pathetic that you won't even acknowledge the dead A-rabs as a direct consequence of hizbollocks. Instead, your disappointed that huge numbers of Lebanese civilians weren't killed in an extended war against the Islamics represented by hizbollocks and the Iranian mullocrats in exchange for a few Joooooos.

How nice that you will so freely sacrifice the lives of others to appease your Joooooooo hatreds.
Distortion, hypocrisy and ascribing motives; standard Hasbara Troll tactics. Nothing worth responding to here.





Hey rat boy haven't you heard hasbara is no longer a buzz word you have worn it out by constant use
Indeed, it has become meaningless from over use like anti Semite and terrorist





No those are still relevant because they are only used to describe anti semitic acts and proscribed terrorists. In this case it amounts to the same group the Palestinians.
Indeed, still staples of Israeli bullcrap.
Indeed, no. Palestinian terrorism has a long history and the trail of dead bodies and broken lives that so typically shadows the hate, self-hate and self-destruction that is Islamic terrorism.

Indeed it do.
 
That was a long cut and paste, convenient when you need to present toothless testimony to prove a worthless point.

The article is critical of Israel for not responding in a much more aggressive war footing to the act of war by hizbollocks. There is that point to be made but an extended air campaign and following ground war was not in Israel's best interest.

I just find it pathetic that you won't even acknowledge the dead A-rabs as a direct consequence of hizbollocks. Instead, your disappointed that huge numbers of Lebanese civilians weren't killed in an extended war against the Islamics represented by hizbollocks and the Iranian mullocrats in exchange for a few Joooooos.

How nice that you will so freely sacrifice the lives of others to appease your Joooooooo hatreds.
Distortion, hypocrisy and ascribing motives; standard Hasbara Troll tactics. Nothing worth responding to here.





Hey rat boy haven't you heard hasbara is no longer a buzz word you have worn it out by constant use
Indeed, it has become meaningless from over use like anti Semite and terrorist





No those are still relevant because they are only used to describe anti semitic acts and proscribed terrorists. In this case it amounts to the same group the Palestinians.
Indeed, still staples of Israeli bullcrap.




Not at all they are valid and dwell in reality unlike your common terms for the Jews that you use in a racist manner.
 
Oh, please. Crocodile tears for the victims of Zionist™aggression really doesn't cut it. The Zionists™had smart weapons in 2006 along with bunker busters; they could have taken out Hezbullah with minimum civillian casualties amongst the Lebanese. Instead the IDF launched a policy of collective punishment (war crime) against the Lebanese civillian population, with remarkable similarity to that used by the Nazis in WW2:
High-ranking officer: Halutz ordered retaliation policy
Crocodile tears are in order for your misrepresentation.

There was no aggression by The Zionists™. You're hoping to sidestep the acts of the hizbollocks stooges. They were the aggressors and instigators.

Additionally, your silly reference to bunker busters is nonsensical. They are not used against terrorists in an urban environment. Similarly, smart weapons can be useful against Islamic terrorists waging war from civilian areas, but there are always civilian casualties when cowardly Islamic terrorists were from from populated cities.

Hizbollocks chose to unilaterally wage war even though they held seats in the Lebanese parliament thus acting with disregard to the safety and welfare of the Lebanese people they represented.

But yeah, ultimately hizbollocks and their Iranian mullocrats caused just another pile of dead Arabs. That pin prick to Israel was orgasmic for you and those like you.

Crocodile tears are in order for your misrepresentation.

You are the one misrepresenting the facts, but that's only to be expected from a Hasbara troll. Even the Zionists™disagree with you:

Winograd commission reported, "Israel initiated a long war, which ended without a defined military victory...a semi-military organization of a few thousand men resisted, for a few weeks, the strongest army in the Middle East, which enjoyed full air superiority and size and technology advantages."

Winograd commission, aka "The commission of inquiry into the events of military engagement in Lebanon 2006" was damning in it's assessmet of Zionist Israeli incompetence at all levels,

"The report categorised the 2nd Lebanon war as a serious missed opportunity. The war had ended without clear military victory, a much smaller para-military organization successfully resisted against a much larger force which had complete air superiority among other technological advantages. Lebanese rockets aimed at Israel's civilian population continued throughout the war which Israel could not effectively stop. Life in the affected regions of Israel was seriously disrupted, with many civilians either leaving their homes temporarily or spending time in shelters. When Israel initiated a large scale ground offensive the offensive did not result in military gains and was not completed.

Some of the troubling findings revealed that there were serious failings and shortcomings in the decision-making processes at both the political and military levels, in preparedness, decision-making and performance in the IDF, particularly the army, in strategic thinking and planning, in both the political and the military echelons, and in the defence of the civilian population and in coping with rockets.

The decision to react immediately to the kidnapping limited Israel's range of options to only two, a stand-off war or an invasion. Israel went to war before it had decided which option to use and military and political echelons failed to have a serious discussion of the options or decide between them. Even so, until the first week of August, Israel was unprepared to launch a large-scale ground operation.

As a result, Israel was 'dragged' into a ground operation too late. Despite the fact that it was a limited war initiated by Israel itself, Israel did not use its military force well and effectively. Israel did not gain a political achievement because of military successes.

In the end, the IDF failed to provide an effective military response to the challenges posed. This conclusion must not take away the great willingness of the soldiers, especially reserve soldiers, to serve and fight in the war. There were many instances of heroism, courage, self-sacrifice and devotion of many commanders and soldiers. The air force in particular was superb, however they alone could not prove decisive as the air force was necessarily limited, due to the weaknesses in the overall performance of the IDF." Winograd Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.cfr.org/israel/winograd-commission-final-report/p15385

That was a long cut and paste, convenient when you need to present toothless testimony to prove a worthless point.

The article is critical of Israel for not responding in a much more aggressive war footing to the act of war by hizbollocks. There is that point to be made but an extended air campaign and following ground war was not in Israel's best interest.

I just find it pathetic that you won't even acknowledge the dead A-rabs as a direct consequence of hizbollocks. Instead, your disappointed that huge numbers of Lebanese civilians weren't killed in an extended war against the Islamics represented by hizbollocks and the Iranian mullocrats in exchange for a few Joooooos.

How nice that you will so freely sacrifice the lives of others to appease your Joooooooo hatreds.
Distortion, hypocrisy and ascribing motives; standard Hasbara Troll tactics. Nothing worth responding to here.
I knew you would cower behind your usual goofy slogans.

Well of course you did...another example of your narcissism coming out. Only to be expected.
 
15th post
Good think Lebanon has Hezbollah or Israel would be living there and annexed it as their own.
The 1200 dead Lebanese - thanks hizbollocks- from the '06 war extend their thanks.

Israel's fault. I don't believe a word Israel says. They continuously want some sort of fighting to go on, and if its quiet they can't stand it and do some sort of false flag or do something to rile someone up. They have lied so much its hard to believe their side of any story.
Israel wants to be left alone. Dont bother them they wont retaliate.

Right, they are always terrorizing someone, nightly in the West Bank, if not demolishing homes, they are burning trees and churches. They continually create havoc in the area and if not their proxies acting on their behalf. Its been going on since the day one when the Zionist flocked to Palestine.
Don't build homes on property you don't own clear title on and they won't tear them down.

Oh, yes they will, they determine who has "title" regardless of whose land it is. All part of the big plan to disposess the indigenous population. Heil Greater Israel, from the Euphrates to the Western Sea!
 
Someone's forgetting the Yom Kippur war of 1973, "This is the end of the third temple (reich)"-- Moshe Dayan to Golda Meir 9th October 1973, or for that matter Hezbollah kicked the IDF out of Lebanon and fought the world's 4th most powerful military to a stalemate, maybe not so incompetent given the right equipment.

Ha right keep jerking yourself of to these mythical Arab victories, Achmed.

Like always Israel will be ten steps ahead. Arabs cannot fight any longer in armies wearing uniforms. The last time they did that successfully was 900 years ago.

So now depraved barbarians resort to Islamic terrorism, targeting of civilians while being into their own civilian population or hiding and shooting from schools, hospitals, mosques, etc. This is what the savages are good at, and it has been documented by Americans and Europeans as well as the UN.

Arabs cannot fight any longer in armies wearing uniforms. The last time they did that successfully was 900 years ago.

Really, the last time Arab armies wore uniforms was in 1115? Prove it.

In 1973 the Zionists were so close to defeat that they were considering using their nuclear weapons, "This is the end of the third temple" was the code phrase for what is now called Operation Samson. Hezbollah is still thriving after two wars against the IDF, which got kicked out of Lebanon; not much of a defeat, is it?
Someone's forgetting the Yom Kippur war of 1973, "This is the end of the third temple (reich)"-- Moshe Dayan to Golda Meir 9th October 1973, or for that matter Hezbollah kicked the IDF out of Lebanon and fought the world's 4th most powerful military to a stalemate, maybe not so incompetent given the right equipment.

Ha right keep jerking yourself of to these mythical Arab victories, Achmed.

Like always Israel will be ten steps ahead. Arabs cannot fight any longer in armies wearing uniforms. The last time they did that successfully was 900 years ago.

So now depraved barbarians resort to Islamic terrorism, targeting of civilians while being into their own civilian population or hiding and shooting from schools, hospitals, mosques, etc. This is what the savages are good at, and it has been documented by Americans and Europeans as well as the UN.

Arabs cannot fight any longer in armies wearing uniforms. The last time they did that successfully was 900 years ago.

Really, the last time Arab armies wore uniforms was in 1115? Prove it.

In 1973 the Zionists were so close to defeat that they were considering using their nuclear weapons, "This is the end of the third temple" was the code phrase for what is now called Operation Samson. Hezbollah is still thriving after two wars against the IDF, which got kicked out of Lebanon; not much of a defeat, is it?

Arab armies were defeated by the Ottomans over 800 years ago, and since then they haven't had a successful military campaign. They're worse than the French.

Really, the last time Arab armies wore uniforms was in 1115? Prove it.

So that's another Rude-ee fail then. Thought as much. FYI uniformed troops were a rarity in Abbasid armies and it was the Mongols who destroyed the Abbasid Caliphate except for remnants in Egypt who were overthrown by the Mameluks. Ottomans never got involved in the region until the 16th century; the Ottoman Empire was originally focused on conquering eastern Europe and the Balkans, not the Middle East. As for the French, they were the most powerful and feared troops from the late 17th century up to the 20th century and have a fine military record. Here's a nice simple run down of French military history. War Nerd: Glory to The French - By Gary Brecher - The eXiled

So you can't show me a victory by an Arab army in the last 800 years then. Ha ha ha.

Arab revolt 1916-18
Algeria 1962
 
Last edited:
You are the one misrepresenting the facts, but that's only to be expected from a Hasbara troll. Even the Zionists™disagree with you:

Winograd commission, aka "The commission of inquiry into the events of military engagement in Lebanon 2006" was damning in it's assessmet of Zionist Israeli incompetence at all levels,

"The report categorised the 2nd Lebanon war as a serious missed opportunity. The war had ended without clear military victory, a much smaller para-military organization successfully resisted against a much larger force which had complete air superiority among other technological advantages. Lebanese rockets aimed at Israel's civilian population continued throughout the war which Israel could not effectively stop. Life in the affected regions of Israel was seriously disrupted, with many civilians either leaving their homes temporarily or spending time in shelters. When Israel initiated a large scale ground offensive the offensive did not result in military gains and was not completed.

Some of the troubling findings revealed that there were serious failings and shortcomings in the decision-making processes at both the political and military levels, in preparedness, decision-making and performance in the IDF, particularly the army, in strategic thinking and planning, in both the political and the military echelons, and in the defence of the civilian population and in coping with rockets.

The decision to react immediately to the kidnapping limited Israel's range of options to only two, a stand-off war or an invasion. Israel went to war before it had decided which option to use and military and political echelons failed to have a serious discussion of the options or decide between them. Even so, until the first week of August, Israel was unprepared to launch a large-scale ground operation.

As a result, Israel was 'dragged' into a ground operation too late. Despite the fact that it was a limited war initiated by Israel itself, Israel did not use its military force well and effectively. Israel did not gain a political achievement because of military successes.

In the end, the IDF failed to provide an effective military response to the challenges posed. This conclusion must not take away the great willingness of the soldiers, especially reserve soldiers, to serve and fight in the war. There were many instances of heroism, courage, self-sacrifice and devotion of many commanders and soldiers. The air force in particular was superb, however they alone could not prove decisive as the air force was necessarily limited, due to the weaknesses in the overall performance of the IDF." Winograd Commission - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.cfr.org/israel/winograd-commission-final-report/p15385

That was a long cut and paste, convenient when you need to present toothless testimony to prove a worthless point.

The article is critical of Israel for not responding in a much more aggressive war footing to the act of war by hizbollocks. There is that point to be made but an extended air campaign and following ground war was not in Israel's best interest.

I just find it pathetic that you won't even acknowledge the dead A-rabs as a direct consequence of hizbollocks. Instead, your disappointed that huge numbers of Lebanese civilians weren't killed in an extended war against the Islamics represented by hizbollocks and the Iranian mullocrats in exchange for a few Joooooos.

How nice that you will so freely sacrifice the lives of others to appease your Joooooooo hatreds.
Distortion, hypocrisy and ascribing motives; standard Hasbara Troll tactics. Nothing worth responding to here.





Hey rat boy haven't you heard hasbara is no longer a buzz word you have worn it out by constant use
Indeed, it has become meaningless from over use like anti Semite and terrorist


Indeed, no. Indeed it is not.

The koran (the hate and war manual inspired by muhammud (swish),and the hadith, which are still interpreted literally, are a virulent manifesto of God-given Islamosupremacy, and they are the blueprint for the Religion of Peace's agenda. It's just easier to lay the blame on a discrete group of islamo-savages with a name, rather than the politico-religious ideology that inspires them.

The holy warrior dregs of al-Qaeda, ISIS, Hamas and all other jihad groups are simply pious Moslems who know their koranology and sunnah, and who are following the books to the letter. They are back in those, halcyon days of virtueless conquest and murder for muhammed (swish) when these books were written—the days when they enjoyed so much success at fighting, killing, beheading, raping, taking sex slaves, etc., etc. exactly as events are unfolding across the islamist Middle East.

As then, now.
:bsflag::trolls:
 
Ha right keep jerking yourself of to these mythical Arab victories, Achmed.

Like always Israel will be ten steps ahead. Arabs cannot fight any longer in armies wearing uniforms. The last time they did that successfully was 900 years ago.

So now depraved barbarians resort to Islamic terrorism, targeting of civilians while being into their own civilian population or hiding and shooting from schools, hospitals, mosques, etc. This is what the savages are good at, and it has been documented by Americans and Europeans as well as the UN.

Arabs cannot fight any longer in armies wearing uniforms. The last time they did that successfully was 900 years ago.

Really, the last time Arab armies wore uniforms was in 1115? Prove it.

In 1973 the Zionists were so close to defeat that they were considering using their nuclear weapons, "This is the end of the third temple" was the code phrase for what is now called Operation Samson. Hezbollah is still thriving after two wars against the IDF, which got kicked out of Lebanon; not much of a defeat, is it?
Ha right keep jerking yourself of to these mythical Arab victories, Achmed.

Like always Israel will be ten steps ahead. Arabs cannot fight any longer in armies wearing uniforms. The last time they did that successfully was 900 years ago.

So now depraved barbarians resort to Islamic terrorism, targeting of civilians while being into their own civilian population or hiding and shooting from schools, hospitals, mosques, etc. This is what the savages are good at, and it has been documented by Americans and Europeans as well as the UN.

Arabs cannot fight any longer in armies wearing uniforms. The last time they did that successfully was 900 years ago.

Really, the last time Arab armies wore uniforms was in 1115? Prove it.

In 1973 the Zionists were so close to defeat that they were considering using their nuclear weapons, "This is the end of the third temple" was the code phrase for what is now called Operation Samson. Hezbollah is still thriving after two wars against the IDF, which got kicked out of Lebanon; not much of a defeat, is it?

Arab armies were defeated by the Ottomans over 800 years ago, and since then they haven't had a successful military campaign. They're worse than the French.

Really, the last time Arab armies wore uniforms was in 1115? Prove it.

So that's another Rude-ee fail then. Thought as much. FYI uniformed troops were a rarity in Abbasid armies and it was the Mongols who destroyed the Abbasid Caliphate except for remnants in Egypt who were overthrown by the Mameluks. Ottomans never got involved in the region until the 16th century; the Ottoman Empire was originally focused on conquering eastern Europe and the Balkans, not the Middle East. As for the French, they were the most powerful and feared troops from the late 17th century up to the 20th century and have a fine military record. Here's a nice simple run down of French military history. War Nerd: Glory to The French - By Gary Brecher - The eXiled

So you can't show me a victory by an Arab army in the last 800 years then. Ha ha ha.

Arab revolt 1916-18
Algeria 1962

So, Achmed has nothing to show as far as Arab military victories but a few token bullshit uprisings.

Yup, like I said, Arab armies haven't had a notable victory in the last 900 years.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom