Again, we find deniers with no science education and, in this case, one spouting absolutely insane interpretations of fundamental physical laws, who believe they know better than PhD scientists who've spent their professional lives learning, studying and researching these very topics. And what has Same Shit actually done that would make him so much more knowledgeable than the actual scientists? He claims to have looked at some textbooks. Review SSDD posts on this thread and see how many of them contain science and how many of them are simply filled with invective. The ratio will be extreme. And the reason for that is that Same Shit isn't looking to have a scientific debate. He is looking to entertain himself by agitating others. There is a name for one who exhibits such behavior. It is
TROLL
So that is a no..you can't provide any paper in which the natural factors effecting O3 production and depletion were seriously considered for their own sake...and you can produce no alarmist paper which references any of those papers in which O3 was studied for its own sake.
Like I said, there was never, nor has there ever been a serious scientific look into the ozone hole, or ozone depletion..it has all been alarmist hysteria....if real science, the first order of business is to rule out natural factors and that simply has never been done...every paper you provided jumped straight into the alarmist narrative....that is not science...that is propaganda.
And the only person being agitated here is you skid mark...and your agitation arises from not being able to support your claims and being called out on it...