The "OZONE HOLE" scam was the pre-curser to the Global Warmists movement.

Status
Not open for further replies.

MarathonMike

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
17,654
Reaction score
7,865
Points
430
Location
The Southwestern Desert
The ban on those nasty CFCs back in the 80s which closed "The Hole in the Ozone" (queue woman screaming) was a bunch of Liberal Hooey. But the success of the Ozone scam gave birth the Warmer movement and many of the same scientists that pushed the Ozone scare are the same ones pushing human caused climate change. Don't believe them, they have a reason why they use "science" to push scams just like they did with the Ozone Hole and CFCs.

New Ozone Hole Scare Won't Save the Great Climate Hoax | PSI Intl
 

Rambunctious

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 19, 2010
Messages
32,799
Reaction score
9,549
Points
1,330
Frightening the populous is as old as dirt....governments have been doing this for power and control since the beginning of time...the difference this time is it was pushed into the young minds via public schools...so supposed educated people have sucked it up and believe it....
 

Johnlaw

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
5,795
Reaction score
1,606
Points
280
The idea that the treaty negotiated and enacted by George HW Bush was a precursor to the global warming movement whatever that means is so totally whacked as to defy logic and a rational excuse.
 

Billy_Bob

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
22,007
Reaction score
6,198
Points
1,010
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
The ban on those nasty CFCs back in the 80s which closed "The Hole in the Ozone" (queue woman screaming) was a bunch of Liberal Hooey. But the success of the Ozone scam gave birth the Warmer movement and many of the same scientists that pushed the Ozone scare are the same ones pushing human caused climate change. Don't believe them, they have a reason why they use "science" to push scams just like they did with the Ozone Hole and CFCs.

New Ozone Hole Scare Won't Save the Great Climate Hoax | PSI Intl
And now we know that O-Zone is coupled with solar output.. It comes and goes cyclically like every other system on earth...

Its been a scam and continues to be a scam.... They expanded on it..
 

Billy_Bob

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
22,007
Reaction score
6,198
Points
1,010
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
The deterioration of the conservative mind continues. I think there must be a mind wasting disease that affects only conservatives. It has to be the answer to this plethora of insipid posts and theories.
The deterioration of the liberal hive mind continues. I think there must be a mind wasting disease that affects only liberal hive idiots. It has to be the answer to this plethora of insipid posts and failed theories.


Much better... Corrected the sentence...
 

SSDD

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
16,806
Reaction score
1,893
Points
280
The deterioration of the conservative mind continues. I think there must be a mind wasting disease that affects only conservatives. It has to be the answer to this plethora of insipid posts and theories.
Did you know that the team that "discovered" the ozone hole actually went down there to prove that it existed. They predicted the hole would be there as a result go there being less incoming solar radiation over the south pole? They also predicted a lesser hole over the northern polar region.

Do you have ant idea why the ozone layer is there or why the holes have always been, and will always be there?
 

Johnlaw

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
5,795
Reaction score
1,606
Points
280
The Montreal Protocol worked and that is what truly scares the bejeesus out of conservatives. The Protocol which has been very successful reduced ozone emissions which led to the recovery of the ozone layer. The reason it scares conservatives is because it is a precursor of a frame work that can work to fight climate change.

Given how anti-science and anti-fact the conservative movement has become, the Montreal Protocol would never, or at least be nearly impossible, to implement today to our detriment. At least then there were still rational conservatives like George HW Bush.
 

SSDD

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
16,806
Reaction score
1,893
Points
280
The Montreal Protocol worked and that is what truly scares the bejeesus out of conservatives. The Protocol which has been very successful reduced ozone emissions which led to the recovery of the ozone layer. The reason it scares conservatives is because it is a precursor of a frame work that can work to fight climate change.

Given how anti-science and anti-fact the conservative movement has become, the Montreal Protocol would never, or at least be nearly impossible, to implement today to our detriment. At least then there were still rational conservatives like George HW Bush.
I can't help but notice that you completely dodged the science...this tells that your position on the topic is political...were it scientific, toy would have used the scientific facts rather than a political narrative to defend your position.


By the way..the montreal protocol was aimed at CFC emissions, not O3 emissions as you stated. The whole topic is clearly over yourr head so you are just voicing someone elses opinion and not an informed opinion of your own.
 

Johnlaw

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
5,795
Reaction score
1,606
Points
280
The Montreal Protocol worked and that is what truly scares the bejeesus out of conservatives. The Protocol which has been very successful reduced ozone emissions which led to the recovery of the ozone layer. The reason it scares conservatives is because it is a precursor of a frame work that can work to fight climate change.

Given how anti-science and anti-fact the conservative movement has become, the Montreal Protocol would never, or at least be nearly impossible, to implement today to our detriment. At least then there were still rational conservatives like George HW Bush.
I can't help but notice that you completely dodged the science...this tells that your position on the topic is political...were it scientific, toy would have used the scientific facts rather than a political narrative to defend your position.
With all due respect, the idea of revisiting the science on Chlorofluorocarbons is beyond ludicrous. There is no debate on it anymore except in the minds of anti-science and anti-fact conservatives. The protocol worked as the ozone layer is recovering.

In the American conservative movement today, apparently there are no facts, all science is false and everything is subjective. Gawd, what happened to conservatives is beyond me?
 

SSDD

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
16,806
Reaction score
1,893
Points
280
With all due respect, the idea of revisiting the science on Chlorofluorocarbons is beyond ludicrous. There is no debate on it anymore except in the minds of anti-science and anti-fact conservatives. The protocol worked as the ozone layer is recovering.
Did i mention flourcarbons? I asked if you know why the ozone layer is there or why the holes have always been there? If you can't even speak to the basics regarding the ozone layer, then as i said, you are voicing someone else opinion, not an informed opinion of your own.

You call me anti science, but actually, i am all about the science,,,it is you who doesn't eve have a handle on the basics.
 

Billy_Bob

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
22,007
Reaction score
6,198
Points
1,010
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
The Montreal Protocol worked and that is what truly scares the bejeesus out of conservatives. The Protocol which has been very successful reduced ozone emissions which led to the recovery of the ozone layer. The reason it scares conservatives is because it is a precursor of a frame work that can work to fight climate change.

Given how anti-science and anti-fact the conservative movement has become, the Montreal Protocol would never, or at least be nearly impossible, to implement today to our detriment. At least then there were still rational conservatives like George HW Bush.
I can't help but notice that you completely dodged the science...this tells that your position on the topic is political...were it scientific, toy would have used the scientific facts rather than a political narrative to defend your position.


By the way..the montreal protocol was aimed at CFC emissions, not O3 emissions as you stated. The whole topic is clearly over yourr head so you are just voicing someone elses opinion and not an informed opinion of your own.
He's a NWO/SOCIALIST PARROT. Nothing more..
 

Johnlaw

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
5,795
Reaction score
1,606
Points
280
The Montreal Protocol worked and that is what truly scares the bejeesus out of conservatives. The Protocol which has been very successful reduced ozone emissions which led to the recovery of the ozone layer. The reason it scares conservatives is because it is a precursor of a frame work that can work to fight climate change.

Given how anti-science and anti-fact the conservative movement has become, the Montreal Protocol would never, or at least be nearly impossible, to implement today to our detriment. At least then there were still rational conservatives like George HW Bush.
I can't help but notice that you completely dodged the science...this tells that your position on the topic is political...were it scientific, toy would have used the scientific facts rather than a political narrative to defend your position.


By the way..the montreal protocol was aimed at CFC emissions, not O3 emissions as you stated. The whole topic is clearly over yourr head so you are just voicing someone elses opinion and not an informed opinion of your own.
He's a NWO/SOCIALIST PARROT. Nothing more..
For someone with a no whining avatar, you Billy Boob, are the biggest whiner on this board. Whine and talk trash with no support whatsoever. Your motto should be "Whine, baby, whine", and when that fails, "Lie, baby, lie".

Of course when your ideology, Trumpism, is as bankrupt as your "science", I would expect nothing less from you.
 
Last edited:

SSDD

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
16,806
Reaction score
1,893
Points
280
The Montreal Protocol worked and that is what truly scares the bejeesus out of conservatives. The Protocol which has been very successful reduced ozone emissions which led to the recovery of the ozone layer. The reason it scares conservatives is because it is a precursor of a frame work that can work to fight climate change.

Given how anti-science and anti-fact the conservative movement has become, the Montreal Protocol would never, or at least be nearly impossible, to implement today to our detriment. At least then there were still rational conservatives like George HW Bush.
I can't help but notice that you completely dodged the science...this tells that your position on the topic is political...were it scientific, toy would have used the scientific facts rather than a political narrative to defend your position.


By the way..the montreal protocol was aimed at CFC emissions, not O3 emissions as you stated. The whole topic is clearly over yourr head so you are just voicing someone elses opinion and not an informed opinion of your own.
He's a NWO/SOCIALIST PARROT. Nothing more..
For someone with a no whining avatar, you Billy Boob, are the biggest whiner on this board. Whine and talk trash with no support whatsoever. Your motto should be "Whine, baby, whine".

Of course when your ideology, Trumpism, is as bankrupt as your science, I would expect nothing less.
Still not talking about the science. Do you even know why there is an ozone layer?
 

Billy_Bob

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2014
Messages
22,007
Reaction score
6,198
Points
1,010
Location
Top Of The Great Divide
The Montreal Protocol worked and that is what truly scares the bejeesus out of conservatives. The Protocol which has been very successful reduced ozone emissions which led to the recovery of the ozone layer. The reason it scares conservatives is because it is a precursor of a frame work that can work to fight climate change.

Given how anti-science and anti-fact the conservative movement has become, the Montreal Protocol would never, or at least be nearly impossible, to implement today to our detriment. At least then there were still rational conservatives like George HW Bush.
I can't help but notice that you completely dodged the science...this tells that your position on the topic is political...were it scientific, toy would have used the scientific facts rather than a political narrative to defend your position.


By the way..the montreal protocol was aimed at CFC emissions, not O3 emissions as you stated. The whole topic is clearly over yourr head so you are just voicing someone elses opinion and not an informed opinion of your own.
He's a NWO/SOCIALIST PARROT. Nothing more..
For someone with a no whining avatar, you Billy Boob, are the biggest whiner on this board. Whine and talk trash with no support whatsoever. Your motto should be "Whine, baby, whine", and when that fails, "Lie, baby, lie".

Of course when your ideology, Trumpism, is as bankrupt as your "science", I would expect nothing less from you.
Please tell me why we have an O-Zone layer and then tell me why the sun is what allows it to build or decline... I'll wait...(this ought to be good for a laugh)
 

SSDD

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
16,806
Reaction score
1,893
Points
280
The Montreal Protocol worked and that is what truly scares the bejeesus out of conservatives. The Protocol which has been very successful reduced ozone emissions which led to the recovery of the ozone layer. The reason it scares conservatives is because it is a precursor of a frame work that can work to fight climate change.

Given how anti-science and anti-fact the conservative movement has become, the Montreal Protocol would never, or at least be nearly impossible, to implement today to our detriment. At least then there were still rational conservatives like George HW Bush.
I can't help but notice that you completely dodged the science...this tells that your position on the topic is political...were it scientific, toy would have used the scientific facts rather than a political narrative to defend your position.


By the way..the montreal protocol was aimed at CFC emissions, not O3 emissions as you stated. The whole topic is clearly over yourr head so you are just voicing someone elses opinion and not an informed opinion of your own.
He's a NWO/SOCIALIST PARROT. Nothing more..
For someone with a no whining avatar, you Billy Boob, are the biggest whiner on this board. Whine and talk trash with no support whatsoever. Your motto should be "Whine, baby, whine", and when that fails, "Lie, baby, lie".

Of course when your ideology, Trumpism, is as bankrupt as your "science", I would expect nothing less from you.
Please tell me why we have an O-Zone layer and then tell me why the sun is what allows it to build or decline... I'll wait...(this ought to be good for a laugh)
I always get a chuckle from these guys who decide which side of a scientific debate is correct cased on political philosophy...no science involved in their decision.
 

SSDD

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
16,806
Reaction score
1,893
Points
280
So johnlaw how does that tail feel tucked so firmly between your legs?
 

Johnlaw

Gold Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2012
Messages
5,795
Reaction score
1,606
Points
280
Personally, I will not get bated into a debate with those who pull facts from thin air. Be that as it may, as I said the idea of revisiting the Montreal Protocols and the role of CFCs in damaging the ozone layer is over. It is a waste of time. Like debating flat earthers. No matter how many pictures of the earth you show them, they still insist the earth is flat. BTW what is your opinion? I bet you're a flat earther.
 
Last edited:

SSDD

Gold Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2012
Messages
16,806
Reaction score
1,893
Points
280
Personally, I will not get bated into a debate with those who pull facts from thin air. Be that as it may, as I said the idea of revisiting the Montreal Protocols and the role of CFCs in damaging the ozone layer is over. It is a waste of time. Like debating flat earthers. BTW, what is you opinion? I bet you're a flat earther.
And yre, here you are.

Still no science? Do you know what causes the ozone layer and why the holes have always been there? Or are you content...or perhaps limited to being a useful idiot...spewing someone else's opinion?

Distain is poor camoflage for fear of being shown up...

And by the way, unlike you, I can back up my position with actual science. Maybe it is best for you to tuck that tail and run..and keep running.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Top