The optics are really bad

[P@triot]

First of all, it's really irrational to have a shareholder - who was invited to speak - removed and arrested.

After the mention of Epstein, Buffett waved for Flaherty’s mic to be cut off. After that, Flaherty was arrested for trespassing and was taken that day to a police station. But the trespassing charge was dropped later.

Second, Bill Gates is Warren's best-friend and he had a passion for funding the Gates Foundation.

Buffett has donated more than $43 billion to the Gates Foundation, The Associated Press reported. However, last summer, he said after his death, his children would be in charge of philanthropy, and no more money would go to the Gates Foundation.

It sure seems like Warren Buffet knows something. How does he know his children wouldn't continue to fund the Gates Foundation? Why wouldn't he make them promise to keep funding it? Why wouldn't he just set up his estate so that a large portion goes to the Gates Foundation? It comes across like he knows and he's really trying to distance himself - which is what any normal person would do as a normal person would be horrified by the trafficking of women and/or children.

Investor Arrested After Bringing Up Epstein, Ratchets Up Lawsuit Against Berkshire Hathaway

The National and Legal Policy Center filed an appeal in its case with Berkshire Hathaway stemming from a shareholder meeting arrest.

www.dailysignal.com

 

[1srelluc]

Maybe Buffet is as sick of all things Epstein as everyone else is.....Good toss for meeting derail.

 

[P@triot]

Maybe Buffet is as sick of all things Epstein as everyone else is.....Good toss for meeting derail.

Eww. Gross. You sound like a seriously disturbed ******* if you call "good toss" when an investor wants to stop a corporation from being involved with those who patronized Epstein.

Care to tell everyone why you don't want more about the Epstein situation exposed?

 

[1srelluc]

Eww. Gross. You sound like a seriously disturbed ******* if you call "good toss" when an investor wants to stop a corporation from being involved with those who patronized Epstein.

Care to tell everyone why you don't want more about the Epstein situation exposed?

There is a time and place for everything, even for the Epstein-Bots. A corporate shareholder meeting is not one of them....Good toss.

 

[P@triot]

A corporate shareholder meeting is not one of them....Good toss.

Says who? Where is that written? Especially when a corporation is directly tied to that scandal.

It's so disturbing how you're "tired" of Epstein and want it to go away. Says a lot and it's very disturbing.

 

[1srelluc]

Says who? Where is that written? Especially when a corporation is directly tied to that scandal.

It's so disturbing how you're "tired" of Epstein and want it to go away. Says a lot and it's very disturbing.

A "disturbed" Epstein-Bot. Well that's fitting.

 

[Independent thinker]

First of all, it's really irrational to have a shareholder - who was invited to speak - removed and arrested.

Second, Bill Gates is Warren's best-friend and he had a passion for funding the Gates Foundation.

It sure seems like Warren Buffet knows something. How does he know his children wouldn't continue to fund the Gates Foundation? Why wouldn't he make them promise to keep funding it? Why wouldn't he just set up his estate so that a large portion goes to the Gates Foundation? It comes across like he knows and he's really trying to distance himself - which is what any normal person would do as a normal person would be horrified by the trafficking of women and/or children.

Investor Arrested After Bringing Up Epstein, Ratchets Up Lawsuit Against Berkshire Hathaway

The National and Legal Policy Center filed an appeal in its case with Berkshire Hathaway stemming from a shareholder meeting arrest.

www.dailysignal.com

Doesn't matter how many lefties were involved with Epstein, and Bill Gates certainly was, the left only want to know about Trump. In fact, the Epstein connection was at least partly responsible for Bill Gates' divorce. But but Trump and the Epstein files.

 

[P@triot]

A "disturbed" Epstein-Bot. Well that's fitting.

So you couldn’t answer? Exactly. Back a leftist into the corner with their own words and they will inevitably resort to sarcasm to deflect.

 

[1srelluc]

So you couldn’t answer? Exactly. Back a leftist into the corner with their own words and they will inevitably resort to sarcasm to deflect.

Negative, I just don't suffer fools gladly.

 

[Seymour Flops]

I assume this is the same Warren Buffett that one of our "new posters" keeps bringing up as an example, we should follow.

When I remember the name, I'll post it here to get her comments.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Oh, yeah.

Roshambo

 

[P@triot]

Negative, I just don't suffer fools gladly.

You seemed to have no problem “suffering” on your first couple of posts. Until they backed you into a corner and showed you as someone hoping Epstein goes away

 

[Roshambo]

Oh, yeah.

Roshambo