Stalking is never charged when there's someone arrested for murder. Stalking is something that would be charged by itself when there's no killing.
I'll admit that saying he was stalking is a little bit of a stretch, but since no one has come up with a better word to describe it, I use it. He was ALMOST stalking, so close to it as to be indecipherable. Well you get the idea.
It was almost stalking. It was kind of like stalking. I can call it stalking if I want to and you can't stop me, nyah nyah.
You're a psycho knob muffin.
I'm a psycho because I never fully agreed it was pure stalking?
That shows I have values.
I use the word "stalking" because like many who believe GZ is guilty, I'm sure, use it because it's expedient to do so and just merely to say he followed is terribly lacking. He followed
with a gun, which is begging for a disaster, like just what happened. Furthermore, he knew very well that there was a very high chance of a confrontation to occur, when he followed someone. You'd have to be a moron to think there wouldn't be.
BTW Muffin is the name of my dog. Don't abuse it ******.
This! You have to ask yourself why a person in possession of overwhelming force took the beating that he did. All of the physical and forensic evidence corroborates his story. There is no evil here. Two people had an encounter, one of them, Martin, went physical and the other defended himself, legally, with deadly force. It's tragic but had Martin not died, he would have been the criminal. He initiated the violence.
] and had missed that decision by the judge.
