The Official Discussion Thread for who is considered indiginous to Palestine?

Who are the indiginous people(s) of the Palestine region?


  • Total voters
    58
Status
Not open for further replies.

"The Official Discussion Thread for who is considered indiginous to Palestine?"

"Not you!"


....and certainly Not terrorists !



2873.jpg
 

"The Official Discussion Thread for who is considered indiginous to Palestine?"

"Not you!"


....and certainly Not terrorists !



2873.jpg
Ooooo, that old terrorist canard again.
Oooooo, that old worthless sentence you insist in using when some Muslims are called for what they really are recognized for in the sane world.

Back to the discussion

:)
 
Oooooo, that old worthless sentence you insist in using when some Muslims are called for what they really are recognized for in the sane world.

Back to the discussion

:)
Well I'm calling you what you are, a selfish, piece of shit, narcissist, who spreads Zionist lies then acts like you just said something of substance.

Palestinians were the ones living here when you fuckers moved in from Europe. Now go **** yourself, you little dishrag whore.
 
Oooooo, that old worthless sentence you insist in using when some Muslims are called for what they really are recognized for in the sane world.

Back to the discussion

:)
Well I'm calling you what you are, a selfish, piece of shit, narcissist, who spreads Zionist lies then acts like you just said something of substance.

Palestinians were the ones living here when you fuckers moved in from Europe. Now go **** yourself, you little dishrag whore.

Palestinian Jews were the group that spoke the least amount of foreign languages.
Muslims and Christians in Palestine came from a much wider variety of European countries.
 
What is Zionism?

Zionism is the belief that the Jewish people have the right to self-determination in their homeland of Israel. Basically, Zionism is about the legitimacy of the existence of the State of Israel as the state of the Jewish people. It is that simple.

Anti-Zionism is the idea that Israel has no right to exist. That the Jewish people have no right to a land of their own in their acnestral homeland.

Anti-Zionism is not a criticism of Israel, it’s the negation of Israel.

Anti-Zionism is the movement to use political, economic and moral pressure to wipe the one and only Jewish state off the map. Instead, it strives to replace Israel with an Arab majority country called “palestine”.

(vide video online)

Anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, and you’ll never again question why
 
What is Zionism?

Zionism is the belief that the Jewish people have the right to self-determination in their homeland of Israel. Basically, Zionism is about the legitimacy of the existence of the State of Israel as the state of the Jewish people. It is that simple.

Anti-Zionism is the idea that Israel has no right to exist. That the Jewish people have no right to a land of their own in their acnestral homeland.

Anti-Zionism is not a criticism of Israel, it’s the negation of Israel.

Anti-Zionism is the movement to use political, economic and moral pressure to wipe the one and only Jewish state off the map. Instead, it strives to replace Israel with an Arab majority country called “palestine”.

(vide video online)

Anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, and you’ll never again question why
Load of hooey. Israel was created and is maintained by massive violations of human rights and international law.
 
What is Zionism?

Zionism is the belief that the Jewish people have the right to self-determination in their homeland of Israel. Basically, Zionism is about the legitimacy of the existence of the State of Israel as the state of the Jewish people. It is that simple.

Anti-Zionism is the idea that Israel has no right to exist. That the Jewish people have no right to a land of their own in their acnestral homeland.

Anti-Zionism is not a criticism of Israel, it’s the negation of Israel.

Anti-Zionism is the movement to use political, economic and moral pressure to wipe the one and only Jewish state off the map. Instead, it strives to replace Israel with an Arab majority country called “palestine”.

(vide video online)

Anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, and you’ll never again question why
Load of hooey. Israel was created and is maintained by massive violations of human rights and international law.
It is all in your head, and all other Jew haters like yourself.
Take care of your brain....it is a very important part of your body.
 
What is Zionism?

Zionism is the belief that the Jewish people have the right to self-determination in their homeland of Israel. Basically, Zionism is about the legitimacy of the existence of the State of Israel as the state of the Jewish people. It is that simple.

Anti-Zionism is the idea that Israel has no right to exist. That the Jewish people have no right to a land of their own in their acnestral homeland.

Anti-Zionism is not a criticism of Israel, it’s the negation of Israel.

Anti-Zionism is the movement to use political, economic and moral pressure to wipe the one and only Jewish state off the map. Instead, it strives to replace Israel with an Arab majority country called “palestine”.

(vide video online)

Anti-Zionism is anti-Semitism, and you’ll never again question why
Load of hooey. Israel was created and is maintained by massive violations of human rights and international law.

You guys keep saying that, while demanding another Jew-free state.
It's a massive violation of human rights and to act as if no one sees that, is a violation of human intelligence.
 
Load of hooey. Israel was created and is maintained by massive violations of human rights and international law.

The idea that a State for the Jewish people in their homeland is a "massive violation of human rights and international law" is ridiculous. In fact, the norm in international law is for States to form around identifiable ethnic and cultural groups seeking self-determination. There are dozens of examples: India, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Korea, Sudan, Cyprus. Palestine itself has already been partitioned once.
 
RE: The Official Discussion Thread for who is considered indiginous to Palestine?
※→ Shusha, P F Tinmore, et al,

Our friend "Shusha" is correct...

Load of hooey. Israel was created and is maintained by massive violations of human rights and international law.

The idea that a State for the Jewish people in their homeland is a "massive violation of human rights and international law" is ridiculous. In fact, the norm in international law is for States to form around identifiable ethnic and cultural groups seeking self-determination. There are dozens of examples: India, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Korea, Sudan, Cyprus. Palestine itself has already been partitioned once.
(COMMENT)

The Allied Powers authored the "Rule of Law" for that era → and were directly responsible for the legal mandate in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish people.

You cannot twist, stretch and reinterpret the Customary and International Humanitarian Law of the early 20th Century to make a case for the early 21st Century.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: The Official Discussion Thread for who is considered indiginous to Palestine?
※→ Shusha, P F Tinmore, et al,

Our friend "Shusha" is correct...

Load of hooey. Israel was created and is maintained by massive violations of human rights and international law.

The idea that a State for the Jewish people in their homeland is a "massive violation of human rights and international law" is ridiculous. In fact, the norm in international law is for States to form around identifiable ethnic and cultural groups seeking self-determination. There are dozens of examples: India, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Korea, Sudan, Cyprus. Palestine itself has already been partitioned once.
(COMMENT)

The Allied Powers authored the "Rule of Law" for that era → and were directly responsible for the legal mandate in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish people.

You cannot twist, stretch and reinterpret the Customary and International Humanitarian Law of the early 20th Century to make a case for the early 21st Century.

Most Respectfully,
R
The Jewish National Home as envisioned by the Mandate and the state of Israel are two separate and unrelated things.
 
RE: The Official Discussion Thread for who is considered indiginous to Palestine?
※→ Shusha, P F Tinmore, et al,

Our friend "Shusha" is correct...

Load of hooey. Israel was created and is maintained by massive violations of human rights and international law.

The idea that a State for the Jewish people in their homeland is a "massive violation of human rights and international law" is ridiculous. In fact, the norm in international law is for States to form around identifiable ethnic and cultural groups seeking self-determination. There are dozens of examples: India, Yugoslavia, Czechoslovakia, Korea, Sudan, Cyprus. Palestine itself has already been partitioned once.
(COMMENT)

The Allied Powers authored the "Rule of Law" for that era → and were directly responsible for the legal mandate in favor of the establishment in Palestine of a National Home for the Jewish people.

You cannot twist, stretch and reinterpret the Customary and International Humanitarian Law of the early 20th Century to make a case for the early 21st Century.

Most Respectfully,
R
The Jewish National Home as envisioned by the Mandate and the state of Israel are two separate and unrelated things.
You are an endless joke.
You could not prove that if you stood on your head for a whole week.
But it will be fun to see you try :)
 
RE: The Official Discussion Thread for who is considered indiginous to Palestine?
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Here you are, trying to reinterpret and spread disinformation.

The Jewish National Home as envisioned by the Mandate and the state of Israel are two separate and unrelated things.
(COMMENT)

The phrase "Jewish National Home" (JNH) (which today is Israel) and the phrase "National Home for the Jewish people," (as articulated by the Allied Powers) have a slightly different meaning. But it is totally misleading to say or imply that they are "two separate and unrelated things."

This is an example of a deparate grasping at straws; by raising an objections about a trivial matter. You'll have to explain to me what adjective is modifying what noun that results in what difference.

Most Respectfully,
R
 
RE: The Official Discussion Thread for who is considered indiginous to Palestine?
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Here you are, trying to reinterpret and spread disinformation.

The Jewish National Home as envisioned by the Mandate and the state of Israel are two separate and unrelated things.
(COMMENT)

The phrase "Jewish National Home" (JNH) (which today is Israel) and the phrase "National Home for the Jewish people," (as articulated by the Allied Powers) have a slightly different meaning. But it is totally misleading to say or imply that they are "two separate and unrelated things."

This is an example of a deparate grasping at straws; by raising an objections about a trivial matter. You'll have to explain to me what adjective is modifying what noun that results in what difference.

Most Respectfully,
R
The Mandate version of a Jewish national home was for Palestinians to have Palestinian citizenship and for immigrant Jews to obtain Palestinian citizenship. Then there wound be a single shared state. Britain fucked that up big time and left their mess for others to clean up. Of course that never happened.

The creation of Israel was a unilateral move that had nothing to do with the Mandate that had already left. The Mandate created nothing. It was unconnected from the creation of Israel.
 
15th post
RE: The Official Discussion Thread for who is considered indiginous to Palestine?
※→ P F Tinmore, et al,

Here you are, trying to reinterpret and spread disinformation.

The Jewish National Home as envisioned by the Mandate and the state of Israel are two separate and unrelated things.
(COMMENT)

The phrase "Jewish National Home" (JNH) (which today is Israel) and the phrase "National Home for the Jewish people," (as articulated by the Allied Powers) have a slightly different meaning. But it is totally misleading to say or imply that they are "two separate and unrelated things."

This is an example of a deparate grasping at straws; by raising an objections about a trivial matter. You'll have to explain to me what adjective is modifying what noun that results in what difference.

Most Respectfully,
R
The Mandate version of a Jewish national home was for Palestinians to have Palestinian citizenship and for immigrant Jews to obtain Palestinian citizenship. Then there wound be a single shared state. Britain fucked that up big time and left their mess for others to clean up. Of course that never happened.

The creation of Israel was a unilateral move that had nothing to do with the Mandate that had already left. The Mandate created nothing. It was unconnected from the creation of Israel.
The Mandate for Palestine was for a future country called Israel. Except that the British hated the Jews and chose to humiliate them as the Romans had done. So, like the Romans, they called the region "Palestine".

The Muslims became violent. The British caved in.
Caved not only 78% of the Mandate to the Arab Muslim Hashemites, but caved in about unlimited immigration for the indigenous Jewish people.

Jews were to become a majority on their own ancient homeland, what was left of it. The Muslims would not have it.

Muslims did not call themselves Palestinians, nor did they actively go for the Palestinian passports offered by the British during their Mandate. The Muslims wanted to be part of Greater Syria.

In your world, immigrant Arab/Muslims were called Palestinians and the indigenous immigrant Jews were called "foreigners".

We know all about your alternate reality.
 
The Mandate version of a Jewish national home was for Palestinians to have Palestinian citizenship and for immigrant Jews to obtain Palestinian citizenship. Then there wound be a single shared state. Britain fucked that up big time and left their mess for others to clean up. Of course that never happened.

The creation of Israel was a unilateral move that had nothing to do with the Mandate that had already left. The Mandate created nothing. It was unconnected from the creation of Israel.

The Mandate version of a Jewish National Home was for Jewish Palestinians, Jewish immigrants and Arab Palestinians to have citizenship in a single shared state under Jewish self-government. What "fucked that up" was (and is) Arab hostility to the very idea.

None of this, of course, actually prohibits the Jewish people (just like every other people) from building and holding a State in their historical homeland based on their ethnic and cultural self-determination. None of this, of course, prohibits the territory of Palestine from being partitioned (again) into a two state solution. Oh wait, except for that Arab hostility.
 
The land knows who are her true children:

Judean Date Palm – links the past to the present through agriculture and archeology. One of the world's most ancient species, it is being revived after 2,000 years at the Center for Sustainable Agriculture in Israel.

 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom