The Obama Approved (Nazi)TSA sexual assault of former Miss USA
- Thread starter Quantum Windbag
- Start date
Robert
Really nice Guy
- Mar 21, 2011
- 1,496
- 193
- 48
No of course not Reasonable search always means having your genitals fondled....Forgive me I forgot that's the standard for Responsible Search
Valerie
Platinum Member
- Sep 17, 2008
- 31,521
- 7,392
- 1,170
Valerie
Platinum Member
- Sep 17, 2008
- 31,521
- 7,392
- 1,170
I really have to wonder if people are just being deliberately dense on this.
xsited1
Agent P
I doubt they will be deemed as illegal because individuals are not required to submit to them. They'll just need to choose another form of transportation. (I usually just fly private unless the distance is 2000 miles or more.) But what I find disturbing is that many of the people who complained about, say, the Patriot Act (which includes myself) are not complaining about this. WTH? That is inconsistent and very disheartening. The only explanation that I can come up with is that some of these people hated Bush, but love Obama which makes it okay.
Whatever. Anyway, I will never allow a TSA agent to molest my child. That's just sick.
Ravi
Diamond Member
Next week she might sue them for not fondling her.
Robert
Really nice Guy
- Mar 21, 2011
- 1,496
- 193
- 48
Really? You know that for a fact do you or is it that she has a problem with Illegal Unreasonable searches that you find yourself defending the indefensible. Just wondering
- Moderator
- #128
That these tactics employed by the TSA continue despite the outcry of many people around the country is just more proof that Republicans don't believe in limited government and Democrats don't really believe in civil liberties.
Ernie S.
Diamond Member
Apparently, you enjoy being groped. I do not
No, if you fly often you would see for yourself what i am saying. There is no telling you or explaining it to you, as you don't want to listen.
They pick women to search because they look attractive. They let people who i would consider dicey walk right though.
Robert
Really nice Guy
- Mar 21, 2011
- 1,496
- 193
- 48
I doubt they will be deemed as illegal because individuals are not required to submit to them. They'll just need to choose another form of transportation. (I usually just fly private unless the distance is 2000 miles or more.) But what I find disturbing is that many of the people who complained about, say, the Patriot Act (which includes myself) are not complaining about this. WTH? That is inconsistent and very disheartening. The only explanation that I can come up with is that some of these people hated Bush, but love Obama which makes it okay.
No they didn't and won't I did and will but then I believe we have rights and will support those right irregardless who is in the WH.
There is not a snowballs chance in hell that any TSA will touch my Children or Grandchildren.
These sick idiots supporting this brown shirt crap have lost any standing to complain about the loss of rights as far as I am concerned.
Ernie S.
Diamond Member
Sure it is! Fighting theatrics with theatrics seems fair. TSA procedure is all about making us feel safe while boarding an aircraft.
Careful scrutinization of those that fit the profile of a terrorist rather than groping little girls might just accomplish the goal of providing safety but it would piss off CAIR.
No we dare not offend a group of people responsible for 99% of all terrorist acts. It might incite them to blow up airplanes or something.
Valerie
Platinum Member
- Sep 17, 2008
- 31,521
- 7,392
- 1,170
Really? You know that for a fact do you or is it that she has a problem with Illegal Unreasonable searches that you find yourself defending the indefensible. Just wondering
This woman CHOSE to be pat-down just so she could make a YouTube vid to cry how violated she was... So simple for any drama queen to cry wolf and you people buy into it hook line and sinker.
Why do you defend wasting security screeners' time and resources on bogus claims as if there was anything sexual going on?
Defending the indefensible! Groping, molesting, fondling... Please.
IF an individual screener actually did something unreasonable during the search then she is free to try and make that claim. Get back to me when and IF it is ever proven that this agent searched this woman in an unreasonable manner.
Ernie S.
Diamond Member
Is it reasonable to grope a 7 year old blond haired blue eyed girl and then let a 27 year old Muslim man through security only walking through the standard metal detector? NO! It's politically correctness taken to the absurd.
Ernie S.
Diamond Member
Perhaps you are. I can think of no other explanation.
Robert
Really nice Guy
- Mar 21, 2011
- 1,496
- 193
- 48
Except she wasn't really fondled...She's a not too bright drama queen.
Really? You know that for a fact do you or is it that she has a problem with Illegal Unreasonable searches that you find yourself defending the indefensible. Just wondering
This woman CHOSE to be pat-down just so she could make a YouTube vid to cry how violated she was... So simple for any drama queen to cry wolf and you people buy into it hook line and sinker.
Why do you defend wasting security screeners' time and resources on bogus claims as if there was anything sexual going on?
Defending the indefensible! Groping, molesting, fondling... Please.
IF an individual screener actually did something unreasonable during the search then she is free to try and make that claim. Get back to me when and IF it is ever proven that this agent searched this woman in an unreasonable manner.
Again you know this for a fact? I'm simply amazed how you can make an accusation against this individual with absolutely no evidence to support the contention.
The Simple fact of the matter is the TSA have proven themselves to be nothing more the thugs dressed in blue shirts there are far to many instances where inappropriate actions have taken place against private citizens and children who's only Guilt is that of needing to fly someplace.
How a person can make the statements you've made is completely and utterly beyond me. I would have thought that some protection against these brown shirts who do not seem to have any control would be in order instead we see an Federal organization who hired people off the street with absolutely no background or training in security matters let alone people who have the slightest idea how to deal with the public. This I do know for a fact as I do know several individuals that work for the TSA whom I wouldn't hire to clean my toilet let alone grope my children.
Perhaps you can show us some other Nation who uses these Tactics against its own population, Does Israel if anyone would have a need it would be that nation but No not there.
Russia ...again no not there
Britain... well crap stuck out three times now Nope not there.
rightwinger
Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
- Aug 4, 2009
- 309,189
- 266,068
- 3,615
Maybe she shouldn't fly
She had a choice of the scanner or the pat down and chose the pat down. Millions go through it every year ....save us the tears
She had a choice of the scanner or the pat down and chose the pat down. Millions go through it every year ....save us the tears
Valerie
Platinum Member
- Sep 17, 2008
- 31,521
- 7,392
- 1,170
This woman CHOSE to be pat-down just so she could make a YouTube vid to cry how violated she was... So simple for any drama queen to cry wolf and you people buy into it hook line and sinker.
Why do you defend wasting security screeners' time and resources on bogus claims as if there was anything sexual going on?
Defending the indefensible! Groping, molesting, fondling... Please.
IF an individual screener actually did something unreasonable during the search then she is free to try and make that claim. Get back to me when and IF it is ever proven that this agent searched this woman in an unreasonable manner.
Again you know this for a fact? I'm simply amazed how you can make an accusation against this individual with absolutely no evidence to support the contention.
The Simple fact of the matter is the TSA have proven themselves to be nothing more the thugs dressed in blue shirts there are far to many instances where inappropriate actions have taken place against private citizens and children who's only Guilt is that of needing to fly someplace.
How a person can make the statements you've made is completely and utterly beyond me. I would have thought that some protection against these brown shirts who do not seem to have any control would be in order instead we see an Federal organization who hired people off the street with absolutely no background or training in security matters let alone people who have the slightest idea how to deal with the public. This I do know for a fact as I do know several individuals that work for the TSA whom I wouldn't hire to clean my toilet let alone grope my children.
Perhaps you can show us some other Nation who uses these Tactics against its own population, Does Israel if anyone would have a need it would be that nation but No not there.
Russia ...again no not there
Britain... well crap stuck out three times now Nope not there.
Yes, it is a fact that she opted for the pat-down and then whipped out her camera!
Drama queen!
Last edited:
xsited1
Agent P
I doubt they will be deemed as illegal because individuals are not required to submit to them. They'll just need to choose another form of transportation. (I usually just fly private unless the distance is 2000 miles or more.) But what I find disturbing is that many of the people who complained about, say, the Patriot Act (which includes myself) are not complaining about this. WTH? That is inconsistent and very disheartening. The only explanation that I can come up with is that some of these people hated Bush, but love Obama which makes it okay.
No they didn't and won't I did and will but then I believe we have rights and will support those right irregardless who is in the WH.
There is not a snowballs chance in hell that any TSA will touch my Children or Grandchildren.
These sick idiots supporting this brown shirt crap have lost any standing to complain about the loss of rights as far as I am concerned.
Agreed. This is just another Big Brother tactic used to condition the populace. Those who choose to ignore it are, well, sheep. And I have nothing against sheep. I love lamb chops.
- Moderator
- #140
There is no "right" to fly on a commercial airliner.
"A citizen of the United States has a public right of transit through the navigable airspace."
49 U.S.C. § 40103 : US Code - Section 40103: Sovereignty and use of airspace
Similar threads
New Topics
-
-
Which Jewish Temple should be constructed first? The Ezekiel 40 to 48 Temple Complex or the Gihon Spring Temple?
- Started by DennisPTate
- Replies: 0
-
Media Fails to Ask Trump, If US Has "Air Superiority," Why Are US Planes Getting Shot Down?- Started by munkle
- Replies: 7
-
US National Archives puts NSDAP membership data online – genealogy becomes easier- Started by Mortimer
- Replies: 0
-
Zone1 Is Romans nine, ten and eleven further explanation of 2 Corinthians 12 verses one to five?
- Started by DennisPTate
- Replies: 0
