The new leader of the free world

[BlackFlag]

2 radical tyrants are currently locked in a nuclear dance. Kim Jong Un and Donald Jong Trump. Which one is crazier? Who will be the one to light the fuse? There's actually no way to tell. That's how insane the 2 are.

At stake is the entirety of North and South Korea's populations, maybe millions of innocents in the region surrounding the Koreas (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about), maybe millions of innocents in U.S. cities (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about).

And so we look to the current opening for the position of so-called "leader of the free world." Will anyone step up to stop the madness? Putin seems to have made some overtures by having his people call for restraint today. Will he pick up the mantle in the post-American world? Can it be someone in Europe, despite the continent having lost the U.S. as an ally? China could, but depending on how the winds blow, they might side with North Korea, and Putin with them. There are no other candidates.

Will it be one of those to rein in the nutjobs? Or will we have to wait until the dust (potentially nuclear) settles to find out?

 

[HappyJoy]

This is a Putin wet dream.

 

[MisterBeale]

Who will be the new leader of the free world?

 

[gipper]

2 radical tyrants are currently locked in a nuclear dance. Kim Jong Un and Donald Jong Trump. Which one is crazier? Who will be the one to light the fuse? There's actually no way to tell. That's how insane the 2 are.

At stake is the entirety of North and South Korea's populations, maybe millions of innocents in the region surrounding the Koreas (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about), maybe millions of innocents in U.S. cities (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about).

And so we look to the current opening for the position of so-called "leader of the free world." Will anyone step up to stop the madness? Putin seems to have made some overtures by having his people call for restraint today. Will he pick up the mantle in the post-American world? Can it be someone in Europe, despite the continent having lost the U.S. as an ally? China could, but depending on how the winds blow, they might side with North Korea, and Putin with them. There are no other candidates.

Will it be one of those to rein in the nutjobs? Or will we have to wait until the dust (potentially nuclear) settles to find out?

If you think Trump is as bad as Kim, you are nuts.

 

[BlackFlag]

This is a Putin wet dream.

Agreed. Same with Iraq. Whenever the U.S. goes off on a neo-con adventure, our competitors are the biggest winners.

 

[BlackFlag]

2 radical tyrants are currently locked in a nuclear dance. Kim Jong Un and Donald Jong Trump. Which one is crazier? Who will be the one to light the fuse? There's actually no way to tell. That's how insane the 2 are.

At stake is the entirety of North and South Korea's populations, maybe millions of innocents in the region surrounding the Koreas (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about), maybe millions of innocents in U.S. cities (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about).

And so we look to the current opening for the position of so-called "leader of the free world." Will anyone step up to stop the madness? Putin seems to have made some overtures by having his people call for restraint today. Will he pick up the mantle in the post-American world? Can it be someone in Europe, despite the continent having lost the U.S. as an ally? China could, but depending on how the winds blow, they might side with North Korea, and Putin with them. There are no other candidates.

Will it be one of those to rein in the nutjobs? Or will we have to wait until the dust (potentially nuclear) settles to find out?

If you think Trump is as bad as Kim, you are nuts.

As bad? Not yet. But let's see if he goes ahead with another U.S. "pre-emptive" war and millions die because of it.

 

[gipper]

2 radical tyrants are currently locked in a nuclear dance. Kim Jong Un and Donald Jong Trump. Which one is crazier? Who will be the one to light the fuse? There's actually no way to tell. That's how insane the 2 are.

At stake is the entirety of North and South Korea's populations, maybe millions of innocents in the region surrounding the Koreas (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about), maybe millions of innocents in U.S. cities (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about).

And so we look to the current opening for the position of so-called "leader of the free world." Will anyone step up to stop the madness? Putin seems to have made some overtures by having his people call for restraint today. Will he pick up the mantle in the post-American world? Can it be someone in Europe, despite the continent having lost the U.S. as an ally? China could, but depending on how the winds blow, they might side with North Korea, and Putin with them. There are no other candidates.

Will it be one of those to rein in the nutjobs? Or will we have to wait until the dust (potentially nuclear) settles to find out?

If you think Trump is as bad as Kim, you are nuts.

As bad? Not yet. But let's see if he goes ahead with another U.S. "pre-emptive" war and millions die because of it.

Damn....let's hope not...but the Left and Right political classes seem bent on war.

 

[Marion Morrison]

You know what should be done with the Norks, first?

Take out all their artillery on their DMZ side with massive, rapid force; as much as possible.

It would take a very large operation.

Then immediately or simultaneously drop a MOAB on his palace.

We don't want war, though. I hear the AP beating the war drums and see their smoke signal trial balloons for war.

 

[jillian]

This is a Putin wet dream.

this isn't good for anyone... not even Vladimir

 

[gipper]

This is a Putin wet dream.

this isn't good for anyone... not even Vladimir

Silly is here. Oh boy!

 

[Indeependent]

Where's "Blowup" Doll Dennis Rodman when you need him?

 

[BlackFlag]

2 radical tyrants are currently locked in a nuclear dance. Kim Jong Un and Donald Jong Trump. Which one is crazier? Who will be the one to light the fuse? There's actually no way to tell. That's how insane the 2 are.

At stake is the entirety of North and South Korea's populations, maybe millions of innocents in the region surrounding the Koreas (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about), maybe millions of innocents in U.S. cities (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about).

And so we look to the current opening for the position of so-called "leader of the free world." Will anyone step up to stop the madness? Putin seems to have made some overtures by having his people call for restraint today. Will he pick up the mantle in the post-American world? Can it be someone in Europe, despite the continent having lost the U.S. as an ally? China could, but depending on how the winds blow, they might side with North Korea, and Putin with them. There are no other candidates.

Will it be one of those to rein in the nutjobs? Or will we have to wait until the dust (potentially nuclear) settles to find out?

If you think Trump is as bad as Kim, you are nuts.

As bad? Not yet. But let's see if he goes ahead with another U.S. "pre-emptive" war and millions die because of it.

Damn....let's hope not...but the Left and Right political classes seem bent on war.

No. So far it's Trump and the lunatics egging him on pushing us towards war.

 

[BlackFlag]

This is a Putin wet dream.

this isn't good for anyone... not even Vladimir

Why not? To some, chaos is a ladder.

 

[Indeependent]

2 radical tyrants are currently locked in a nuclear dance. Kim Jong Un and Donald Jong Trump. Which one is crazier? Who will be the one to light the fuse? There's actually no way to tell. That's how insane the 2 are.

At stake is the entirety of North and South Korea's populations, maybe millions of innocents in the region surrounding the Koreas (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about), maybe millions of innocents in U.S. cities (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about).

And so we look to the current opening for the position of so-called "leader of the free world." Will anyone step up to stop the madness? Putin seems to have made some overtures by having his people call for restraint today. Will he pick up the mantle in the post-American world? Can it be someone in Europe, despite the continent having lost the U.S. as an ally? China could, but depending on how the winds blow, they might side with North Korea, and Putin with them. There are no other candidates.

Will it be one of those to rein in the nutjobs? Or will we have to wait until the dust (potentially nuclear) settles to find out?

If you think Trump is as bad as Kim, you are nuts.

As bad? Not yet. But let's see if he goes ahead with another U.S. "pre-emptive" war and millions die because of it.

Damn....let's hope not...but the Left and Right political classes seem bent on war.

No. So far it's Trump and the lunatics egging him on pushing us towards war.

So you're OK with Trump ignoring NK?

 

[BlackFlag]

You know what should be done with the Norks, first?

Take out all their artillery on their DMZ side with massive, rapid force; as much as possible.

It would take a very large operation.

Then immediately or simultaneously drop a MOAB on his palace.

We don't want war, though. I hear the AP beating the war drums and see their smoke signal trial balloons for war.

The AP is not beating war drums. You're just clicking on Drudgereport and watching Fox News again.

 

[jillian]

This is a Putin wet dream.

this isn't good for anyone... not even Vladimir

Why not? To some, chaos is a ladder.

there is that....

great episode btw...

 

[BlackFlag]

2 radical tyrants are currently locked in a nuclear dance. Kim Jong Un and Donald Jong Trump. Which one is crazier? Who will be the one to light the fuse? There's actually no way to tell. That's how insane the 2 are.

At stake is the entirety of North and South Korea's populations, maybe millions of innocents in the region surrounding the Koreas (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about), maybe millions of innocents in U.S. cities (which Trump and supporters couldn't care less about).

And so we look to the current opening for the position of so-called "leader of the free world." Will anyone step up to stop the madness? Putin seems to have made some overtures by having his people call for restraint today. Will he pick up the mantle in the post-American world? Can it be someone in Europe, despite the continent having lost the U.S. as an ally? China could, but depending on how the winds blow, they might side with North Korea, and Putin with them. There are no other candidates.

Will it be one of those to rein in the nutjobs? Or will we have to wait until the dust (potentially nuclear) settles to find out?

If you think Trump is as bad as Kim, you are nuts.

As bad? Not yet. But let's see if he goes ahead with another U.S. "pre-emptive" war and millions die because of it.

Damn....let's hope not...but the Left and Right political classes seem bent on war.

No. So far it's Trump and the lunatics egging him on pushing us towards war.

So you're OK with Trump ignoring NK?

^

 

[Marion Morrison]

You know what should be done with the Norks, first?

Take out all their artillery on their DMZ side with massive, rapid force; as much as possible.

It would take a very large operation.

Then immediately or simultaneously drop a MOAB on his palace.

We don't want war, though. I hear the AP beating the war drums and see their smoke signal trial balloons for war.

The AP is not beating war drums. You're just clicking on Drudgereport and watching Fox News again.

No? Why is it their lead story then? Whoops!

Don't you know that AP sets the narrative and all the other major outlets just parrot it and put their little spin on it? No? Well that's how it is, period. That is how it works.

Trump, North Korea trade escalating threats of fire

 

[Indeependent]

If you think Trump is as bad as Kim, you are nuts.

As bad? Not yet. But let's see if he goes ahead with another U.S. "pre-emptive" war and millions die because of it.

Damn....let's hope not...but the Left and Right political classes seem bent on war.

No. So far it's Trump and the lunatics egging him on pushing us towards war.

So you're OK with Trump ignoring NK?

^

Try answering the question.
You know...try.

 

[BlackFlag]

You know what should be done with the Norks, first?

Take out all their artillery on their DMZ side with massive, rapid force; as much as possible.

It would take a very large operation.

Then immediately or simultaneously drop a MOAB on his palace.

We don't want war, though. I hear the AP beating the war drums and see their smoke signal trial balloons for war.

The AP is not beating war drums. You're just clicking on Drudgereport and watching Fox News again.

No? Why is it their lead story then? Whoops!

Don't you know that AP sets the narrative and all the other major outlets just parrot it and put their little spin on it? No? Well that's how it is, period. That is how it works.

Trump, North Korea trade escalating threats of fire

That's one article with no spin. Go to Drudgereport. We're going to wake up in the morning with Guam, Alaska, and Hawaii nuked according to that site.