The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,904
60,284
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1.Having no way to hide the stain of their history the Democrats, doing what they do best, lie about the other side, as an attempt to mitigate and obfuscate the Democrat record.



We’ve all seen the inveterate ersatz liars, here on the board, claim that there was some sort of reversal of the two parties, the Republican Party, created to fight slavery, and the Democrats, assiduously striving to make certain that racism remains in America, switched views. Never happened.


2.Utter fabrication. It is simply…..
“The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’

“Everyone knows that race has long played a decisive role in Southern electoral politics. From the end of Reconstruction until the beginning of the civil rights era, the story goes, the national Democratic Party made room for segregationist members — and as a result dominated the South. But in the 50s and 60s, Democrats embraced the civil rights movement, costing them the white Southern vote. Meanwhile, the Republican Party successfully wooed disaffected white racists with a “Southern strategy” that championed “states’ rights.”

It’s an easy story to believe, but this year two political scientists called it into question.” The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’ The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’




3. Ownership of mandated government schooling has allowed the lie to persist, and be embedded in the minds of the lazy and the gullible. In actuality, there are may sources of research that would show the very opposite, and indict the Democrat Party as it should.

“…the Democratic record is hardly anything to be proud of. The first modern progressive Democrat, Woodrow Wilson, was a horrible racist who did everything in his power to strengthen Jim Crow in the federal government and leave it alone in the states despite his usual preference for expanding federal power.

…the Democratic Party’s approach to racial and ethnic politics has not really changed all that much since the 1830s; it’s just calibrated to a different audience.” The Southern Strategy Myth and the Lost Majority


4. Our Democrat colleagues, government school grads, are unfortunately illiterate. For a laugh, ask any to name a few books that have informed their views.
They are unaware that Orwell identified them in 1984 as simply accepting government propaganda of which entity with whom they are ‘always’ at war.

“…the ongoing war between the three superstates of Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia…
At the start of the book, Oceania is at war with Eurasia. They have always been at war with Eurasia. That's the political consensus, and all historic documents agree. However, Winston Smith (the protagonist) remembers a time five years ago when Oceania was instead at war with Eastasia. Winston Smith struggles with philosophical idea of "truth". Which is more true, what everyone knows and what's in the newspapers, or the memories within his head?”
Errata Security: We've always been at war with Eastasia





The Democrats, since the origin of the nation, have been intensely biased against blacks. Now, an new stratagem designed to accrue votes of other groups....


“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag.
…bashing straight white men, especially of the conservative kind, is very fashionable these days. You seemingly can’t escape it — you switch on cable TV, or "The View", read The Washington Post or The New York Times, and see liberal pundits verbally attack white men for this or that.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/nation-now/2018/10/28/white-male-bashing-trend-dangerous-saritha-prabhu-column/1778385002/





Democrats, the party of full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party….is the party of lies.
 
The Southern Strategy was one of a Republican guy running for president that did not support the Civil Rights act, that republican carried all of the South in the election of 1964. That mans name was Barry Goldwater he got 52 EC votes.. Johnson won and then in 1965 the Voter Rights Act was passed. Repubs lost in their attempts to discredit LBJ.
But! We have our 5th columnist who is spreading her propaganda of hate towards history and the democrats for winning the hearts and minds of the subjugated by giving to them what reconstruction never fulfilled by the GOP.
How can white men be the punching bag when white men hold positions of power in the DNC and the party?
 
The Southern Strategy was one of a Republican guy running for president that did not support the Civil Rights act, that republican carried all of the South in the election of 1964. That mans name was Barry Goldwater he got 52 EC votes.. Johnson won and then in 1965 the Voter Rights Act was passed. Repubs lost in their attempts to discredit LBJ.
But! We have our 5th columnist who is spreading her propaganda of hate towards history and the democrats for winning the hearts and minds of the subjugated by giving to them what reconstruction never fulfilled by the GOP.
How can white men be the punching bag when white men hold positions of power in the DNC and the party?


Why don't you tell the real story on why Barry didn't support it?


.
 
The Southern Strategy was one of a Republican guy running for president that did not support the Civil Rights act, that republican carried all of the South in the election of 1964. That mans name was Barry Goldwater he got 52 EC votes.. Johnson won and then in 1965 the Voter Rights Act was passed. Repubs lost in their attempts to discredit LBJ.
But! We have our 5th columnist who is spreading her propaganda of hate towards history and the democrats for winning the hearts and minds of the subjugated by giving to them what reconstruction never fulfilled by the GOP.
How can white men be the punching bag when white men hold positions of power in the DNC and the party?


Why don't you tell the real story on why Barry didn't support it?


.
I never stated why he did or did not support it, so, there is no story to discredit..Ask the OP to do it.
 
Errata Security as a sources as to why we are always at war with East Asia....:auiqs.jpg:

This site is anti-Trump, anti-republican also...:21:

must have missed "the rest of the story"-as Paul Harvey used to say.
 
The Southern Strategy was one of a Republican guy running for president that did not support the Civil Rights act, that republican carried all of the South in the election of 1964. That mans name was Barry Goldwater he got 52 EC votes.. Johnson won and then in 1965 the Voter Rights Act was passed. Repubs lost in their attempts to discredit LBJ.
But! We have our 5th columnist who is spreading her propaganda of hate towards history and the democrats for winning the hearts and minds of the subjugated by giving to them what reconstruction never fulfilled by the GOP.
How can white men be the punching bag when white men hold positions of power in the DNC and the party?



In the 1964 civil rights act, Republicans in the house voted 138 for and 34 against; Democrats voted 152 for and 96 against. In the Senate, the Republicans voted 27 for and 6 against; the Democrats voted 46 for and 21 against. Clearly, from these numbers, there was no apparent anti-Civil Rights movement in the GOP as Roland Martin, and others, suggest.
 
The Southern Strategy was one of a Republican guy running for president that did not support the Civil Rights act, that republican carried all of the South in the election of 1964. That mans name was Barry Goldwater he got 52 EC votes.. Johnson won and then in 1965 the Voter Rights Act was passed. Repubs lost in their attempts to discredit LBJ.
But! We have our 5th columnist who is spreading her propaganda of hate towards history and the democrats for winning the hearts and minds of the subjugated by giving to them what reconstruction never fulfilled by the GOP.
How can white men be the punching bag when white men hold positions of power in the DNC and the party?


Why don't you tell the real story on why Barry didn't support it?


.
I never stated why he did or did not support it, so, there is no story to discredit..Ask the OP to do it.

Ok...just for the record than.



As a matter of fact, as one of the six voting against the 1964 Civil rights act, Senator Goldwater, on principle, disagreed with the idea of Federal government intervention regarding this matter. “His stance was based on his view that the act was an intrusion of the federal government into the affairs of states and, second, that the Act interfered with the rights of private persons to do business, or not, with whomever they chose.”[3
 
The Southern Strategy was one of a Republican guy running for president that did not support the Civil Rights act, that republican carried all of the South in the election of 1964. That mans name was Barry Goldwater he got 52 EC votes.. Johnson won and then in 1965 the Voter Rights Act was passed. Repubs lost in their attempts to discredit LBJ.
But! We have our 5th columnist who is spreading her propaganda of hate towards history and the democrats for winning the hearts and minds of the subjugated by giving to them what reconstruction never fulfilled by the GOP.
How can white men be the punching bag when white men hold positions of power in the DNC and the party?


Why don't you tell the real story on why Barry didn't support it?


.
I never stated why he did or did not support it, so, there is no story to discredit..Ask the OP to do it.

Ok...just for the record than.



As a matter of fact, as one of the six voting against the 1964 Civil rights act, Senator Goldwater, on principle, disagreed with the idea of Federal government intervention regarding this matter. “His stance was based on his view that the act was an intrusion of the federal government into the affairs of states and, second, that the Act interfered with the rights of private persons to do business, or not, with whomever they chose.”[3
Thanks..
 
The Southern Strategy was one of a Republican guy running for president that did not support the Civil Rights act, that republican carried all of the South in the election of 1964. That mans name was Barry Goldwater he got 52 EC votes.. Johnson won and then in 1965 the Voter Rights Act was passed. Repubs lost in their attempts to discredit LBJ.
But! We have our 5th columnist who is spreading her propaganda of hate towards history and the democrats for winning the hearts and minds of the subjugated by giving to them what reconstruction never fulfilled by the GOP.
How can white men be the punching bag when white men hold positions of power in the DNC and the party?
Easy.......Democrats are hypocrites.
Democrats are the only folks that can be against a group of people while being part of that same group.
What makes this possible?
Simply own the media and let them do your dirty work for you while covering up your flaws.
 
The Southern Strategy was one of a Republican guy running for president that did not support the Civil Rights act, that republican carried all of the South in the election of 1964. That mans name was Barry Goldwater he got 52 EC votes.. Johnson won and then in 1965 the Voter Rights Act was passed. Repubs lost in their attempts to discredit LBJ.
But! We have our 5th columnist who is spreading her propaganda of hate towards history and the democrats for winning the hearts and minds of the subjugated by giving to them what reconstruction never fulfilled by the GOP.
How can white men be the punching bag when white men hold positions of power in the DNC and the party?



In the 1964 civil rights act, Republicans in the house voted 138 for and 34 against; Democrats voted 152 for and 96 against. In the Senate, the Republicans voted 27 for and 6 against; the Democrats voted 46 for and 21 against. Clearly, from these numbers, there was no apparent anti-Civil Rights movement in the GOP as Roland Martin, and others, suggest.
I know it is just the way people observe from their prospective some people can take it as is and some try to make more of it than is necessary much like the OP does..
 
The Southern Strategy was one of a Republican guy running for president that did not support the Civil Rights act, that republican carried all of the South in the election of 1964. That mans name was Barry Goldwater he got 52 EC votes.. Johnson won and then in 1965 the Voter Rights Act was passed. Repubs lost in their attempts to discredit LBJ.
But! We have our 5th columnist who is spreading her propaganda of hate towards history and the democrats for winning the hearts and minds of the subjugated by giving to them what reconstruction never fulfilled by the GOP.
How can white men be the punching bag when white men hold positions of power in the DNC and the party?
Easy.......Democrats are hypocrites.
Democrats are the only folks that can be against a group of people while being part of that same group.
What makes this possible?
Simply own the media and let them do your dirty work for you while covering up your flaws.
Nothing new about human traits...absolutely nothing no matter which party they play with.
 
Errata Security as a sources as to why we are always at war with East Asia....:auiqs.jpg:

This site is anti-Trump, anti-republican also...:21:

must have missed "the rest of the story"-as Paul Harvey used to say.

So you telling us you can't edit Wiki?

And her other link was the New York times

.
 
Errata Security as a sources as to why we are always at war with East Asia....:auiqs.jpg:

This site is anti-Trump, anti-republican also...:21:

must have missed "the rest of the story"-as Paul Harvey used to say.

So you telling us you can't edit Wiki?


.
I have no idea because I have no desire to do as such it is not my creation.


Playing dumb is a trait with you.


.
Now you are just trying to flatter.
 
The Southern Strategy was one of a Republican guy running for president that did not support the Civil Rights act, that republican carried all of the South in the election of 1964. That mans name was Barry Goldwater he got 52 EC votes.. Johnson won and then in 1965 the Voter Rights Act was passed. Repubs lost in their attempts to discredit LBJ.
But! We have our 5th columnist who is spreading her propaganda of hate towards history and the democrats for winning the hearts and minds of the subjugated by giving to them what reconstruction never fulfilled by the GOP.
How can white men be the punching bag when white men hold positions of power in the DNC and the party?



In the 1964 civil rights act, Republicans in the house voted 138 for and 34 against; Democrats voted 152 for and 96 against. In the Senate, the Republicans voted 27 for and 6 against; the Democrats voted 46 for and 21 against. Clearly, from these numbers, there was no apparent anti-Civil Rights movement in the GOP as Roland Martin, and others, suggest.
I know it is just the way people observe from their prospective some people can take it as is and some try to make more of it than is necessary much like the OP does..


I never could understand why you guys belittle a woman who escaped communism and immigrated legally to America and is so enthused


.
 
The Southern Strategy was one of a Republican guy running for president that did not support the Civil Rights act, that republican carried all of the South in the election of 1964. That mans name was Barry Goldwater he got 52 EC votes.. Johnson won and then in 1965 the Voter Rights Act was passed. Repubs lost in their attempts to discredit LBJ.
But! We have our 5th columnist who is spreading her propaganda of hate towards history and the democrats for winning the hearts and minds of the subjugated by giving to them what reconstruction never fulfilled by the GOP.
How can white men be the punching bag when white men hold positions of power in the DNC and the party?

a Republican guy running for president that did not support the Civil Rights act, that republican carried all of the South in the election of 1964.

All of the South? Like all the states of the Confederacy?
South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, North Carolina and Texas? All 11?
 
1.Having no way to hide the stain of their history the Democrats, doing what they do best, lie about the other side, as an attempt to mitigate and obfuscate the Democrat record.



We’ve all seen the inveterate ersatz liars, here on the board, claim that there was some sort of reversal of the two parties, the Republican Party, created to fight slavery, and the Democrats, assiduously striving to make certain that racism remains in America, switched views. Never happened.


2.Utter fabrication. It is simply…..
“The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’

“Everyone knows that race has long played a decisive role in Southern electoral politics. From the end of Reconstruction until the beginning of the civil rights era, the story goes, the national Democratic Party made room for segregationist members — and as a result dominated the South. But in the 50s and 60s, Democrats embraced the civil rights movement, costing them the white Southern vote. Meanwhile, the Republican Party successfully wooed disaffected white racists with a “Southern strategy” that championed “states’ rights.”

It’s an easy story to believe, but this year two political scientists called it into question.” The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’ The Myth of ‘the Southern Strategy’




3. Ownership of mandated government schooling has allowed the lie to persist, and be embedded in the minds of the lazy and the gullible. In actuality, there are may sources of research that would show the very opposite, and indict the Democrat Party as it should.

“…the Democratic record is hardly anything to be proud of. The first modern progressive Democrat, Woodrow Wilson, was a horrible racist who did everything in his power to strengthen Jim Crow in the federal government and leave it alone in the states despite his usual preference for expanding federal power.

…the Democratic Party’s approach to racial and ethnic politics has not really changed all that much since the 1830s; it’s just calibrated to a different audience.” The Southern Strategy Myth and the Lost Majority


4. Our Democrat colleagues, government school grads, are unfortunately illiterate. For a laugh, ask any to name a few books that have informed their views.
They are unaware that Orwell identified them in 1984 as simply accepting government propaganda of which entity with whom they are ‘always’ at war.

“…the ongoing war between the three superstates of Oceania, Eurasia, and Eastasia…
At the start of the book, Oceania is at war with Eurasia. They have always been at war with Eurasia. That's the political consensus, and all historic documents agree. However, Winston Smith (the protagonist) remembers a time five years ago when Oceania was instead at war with Eastasia. Winston Smith struggles with philosophical idea of "truth". Which is more true, what everyone knows and what's in the newspapers, or the memories within his head?”
Errata Security: We've always been at war with Eastasia





The Democrats, since the origin of the nation, have been intensely biased against blacks. Now, an new stratagem designed to accrue votes of other groups....


“White men are now the Democratic Party's punching bag.
…bashing straight white men, especially of the conservative kind, is very fashionable these days. You seemingly can’t escape it — you switch on cable TV, or "The View", read The Washington Post or The New York Times, and see liberal pundits verbally attack white men for this or that.
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/nation-now/2018/10/28/white-male-bashing-trend-dangerous-saritha-prabhu-column/1778385002/





Democrats, the party of full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party….is the party of lies.
If there was no planned out southern strategy, it’s amazing how it just unfolded naturally the way it did, and it reflects even more poorly on the deep south yokels of the country.
 
Errata Security as a sources as to why we are always at war with East Asia....:auiqs.jpg:

This site is anti-Trump, anti-republican also...:21:

must have missed "the rest of the story"-as Paul Harvey used to say.

So you telling us you can't edit Wiki?


.
I have no idea because I have no desire to do as such it is not my creation.


Playing dumb is a trait with you.


.
Now you are just trying to flatter.


I heard through the grapevine a little mistress is fustrated by that.


.
 

Forum List

Back
Top