Dear
Lastamender cc
colfax_m
All we need to acknowledge is the problem of UNNOTARIZED mailin ballots which can never be proven valid or invalid.
The Parties supporting this change in election process, rules and standards WITHOUT official voting through State Legislatures failed to follow publicly agreed rules established through Constitutional laws.
This departure from esrablished rules and standards caused multiple problems:
1. Rendering the votes and election results "faith based" since there is no Notarization under Penalty of Perjury to prove millions of Mailin ballots per state were legit or not, by legal Court standards as with Notarized absentee ballots, especially when dealing with mass volumes that exceed narrow margins and decide close races in swing states.
2. Unethically placing the Burden to Prove Fraud on complainants who never agreed to these unconstitutional rule changes that REMOVED the ability to prove fraud by not requiring Notarization but soliciting and counting millions of mailin ballots without any such proof of validity by sworn Notarization.
3. Fraudulently misreprenting the rule changes, election process and results as Constitutional, when in fact the process and votes being "faith based" due to lack of legal proof means Govt cannot establish such beliefs without violating Constitutional standards, ethics and protections.
We do not need to argue or agree on any fraudulent votes, but it is enough to argue the change in rules rendered millions of votes and the election results as faith based.
The best we can ask for, since both sides believe their candidates won, is hold a Convention by States and by Party, and AGREE on what policies each Party and their leaders/members will support and pay for, and what policies the entire public agree to follow and pay for through Govt.
Since the election results remain faith based and voluntary to follow, all concerns objections and decisions regarding the election should be treated equally as up to individuals and groups to decide, with respect to their beliefs.
We need to use this situation to defend equal rights and representation by Party, separate Partisan beliefs from Govt, and only recognize common principles and process as public policy through Govt. Minus all the political and personal beliefs that cannot be established through govt without CONSENT of the people with rights to their own "faith based beliefs," or this abuse of govt and political authority violates Constitutional standards and ethics protecting all people equally, regardless of creed.