2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,977
- 52,256
- 2,290
The left lies...they lie about muslim terrorists and they lie about mass shootings and guns....
When Omar Mateen Said He Killed 49 People for ISIS, He Meant It
It only took 21 months, but now the Huffington Post is finally catching up with the rest of us who actually took Mateen at his word. In a piece titled "Everyone Got The Pulse Massacre Story Completely Wrong" -- which isn't true, because plenty of us got it completely right -- Melissa Jeltsen writes:
[Mateen's wife Noor] Salman’s trial cast doubt on everything we thought we knew about Mateen. There was no evidence he was a closeted gay man, no evidence that he was ever on Grindr. He looked at porn involving older women, but investigators who scoured Mateen’s electronic devices couldn’t find any internet history related to homosexuality. (There were daily, obsessive searches about ISIS, however.) Mateen had extramarital affairs with women, two of whom testified during the trial about his duplicitous ways.
Mateen may very well have been homophobic. He supported ISIS, after all, and his father, an FBI informant currently under criminal investigation, told NBC that his son once got angry after seeing two men kissing. But whatever his personal feelings, the overwhelming evidence suggests his attack was not motivated by it.
I encourage you to read the whole thing. But if you don't have time, here's the short version: As usual, the media ignored all the glaring evidence that contradicted their driving narrative. Once they decided on their angle, nothing that the rest of us did or said made a difference. Their minds were made up. That was it. End of story.
Forty-nine people were butchered that night because an Islamic terrorist thought Allah wanted it. It's a disrespect to their memory to deny that. If you really want to mourn those people, stop lying about why they were murdered.
When Omar Mateen Said He Killed 49 People for ISIS, He Meant It
It only took 21 months, but now the Huffington Post is finally catching up with the rest of us who actually took Mateen at his word. In a piece titled "Everyone Got The Pulse Massacre Story Completely Wrong" -- which isn't true, because plenty of us got it completely right -- Melissa Jeltsen writes:
[Mateen's wife Noor] Salman’s trial cast doubt on everything we thought we knew about Mateen. There was no evidence he was a closeted gay man, no evidence that he was ever on Grindr. He looked at porn involving older women, but investigators who scoured Mateen’s electronic devices couldn’t find any internet history related to homosexuality. (There were daily, obsessive searches about ISIS, however.) Mateen had extramarital affairs with women, two of whom testified during the trial about his duplicitous ways.
Mateen may very well have been homophobic. He supported ISIS, after all, and his father, an FBI informant currently under criminal investigation, told NBC that his son once got angry after seeing two men kissing. But whatever his personal feelings, the overwhelming evidence suggests his attack was not motivated by it.
I encourage you to read the whole thing. But if you don't have time, here's the short version: As usual, the media ignored all the glaring evidence that contradicted their driving narrative. Once they decided on their angle, nothing that the rest of us did or said made a difference. Their minds were made up. That was it. End of story.
Forty-nine people were butchered that night because an Islamic terrorist thought Allah wanted it. It's a disrespect to their memory to deny that. If you really want to mourn those people, stop lying about why they were murdered.
