The Mueller Special Counsel's Office brought two indictments that went into great detail about the supposed Russian "interference" in the 2016 ...

excalibur

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2015
Messages
28,547
Reaction score
57,732
Points
2,290
What a wonderful summation of Mueller in his role as head of the SCO.

Well-thought-out and indispensable for future reference.


The Mueller Special Counsel's Office brought two indictments that went into great detail about the supposed Russian "interference" in the 2016 election.

Both were long "speaking indictments" laying out the ALLEGATIONS made by the Mueller prosecutors. Those allegations were dutifully reported by the press and Dems as "Facts" -- something they continue to do to this day.

The Mueller SCO those documents publicly, with all the names of Russian defendants there for everyone to see, guaranteeing that none of those people would 1) travel to the US or 2) travel to any country that might extradict them to the U.S. They could have kept them sealed until they had an opportunity to arrest the named defendants -- many of whom had lived in the U.S. at one time or another.

But instead the Mueller SCO had grand press conferences where they treated the ALLEGATIONS as fact.

But then a strange thing happened. One company named in one of the indictments had a US law firm appear on its behalf. With the Law Firm standing in as a Corporate Reprensentative -- as is allowed by law -- the Russian company pled "Not Guilty" and announced "Game On".

The Mueller SCO resisted having to prosecute the case on a variety of grounds -- losing each time.

The Mueller SCO then closed up shop and handed the burning bag of dog poop to the U.S. Attorney for DC.

Within months the U.S. Attorney dismissed the case.

What I typed above is the ENTIRETY of what the Mueller SCO "proved" about Russian "collusion" in the 2016 election -- exactly nothing.


 
Have we fore gotten [sic] the the Mueller SCO went after Trump, his family, friends, business associates, political allies, etc, all in search of a person who would cooperate and link Trump to Russia.

The lawfare tends to get overshadowed by Jack Smith.

But Mueller had 20 prosecutors and caused dozens of people to incur millions in legal fees all based on a hoax that they knew was a hoax 3 months after taking over.

Good riddance.


 
Mueller could not conclude what lib loons wanted so they lied and said he did.
 
What a wonderful summation of Mueller in his role as head of the SCO.

Well-thought-out and indispensable for future reference.


The Mueller Special Counsel's Office brought two indictments that went into great detail about the supposed Russian "interference" in the 2016 election.​
Both were long "speaking indictments" laying out the ALLEGATIONS made by the Mueller prosecutors. Those allegations were dutifully reported by the press and Dems as "Facts" -- something they continue to do to this day.​
The Mueller SCO those documents publicly, with all the names of Russian defendants there for everyone to see, guaranteeing that none of those people would 1) travel to the US or 2) travel to any country that might extradict them to the U.S. They could have kept them sealed until they had an opportunity to arrest the named defendants -- many of whom had lived in the U.S. at one time or another.​
But instead the Mueller SCO had grand press conferences where they treated the ALLEGATIONS as fact.
But then a strange thing happened. One company named in one of the indictments had a US law firm appear on its behalf. With the Law Firm standing in as a Corporate Reprensentative -- as is allowed by law -- the Russian company pled "Not Guilty" and announced "Game On".
The Mueller SCO resisted having to prosecute the case on a variety of grounds -- losing each time.
The Mueller SCO then closed up shop and handed the burning bag of dog poop to the U.S. Attorney for DC.
Within months the U.S. Attorney dismissed the case.
What I typed above is the ENTIRETY of what the Mueller SCO "proved" about Russian "collusion" in the 2016 election -- exactly nothing.




and now for a reality check:
Here Are All of the Indictments, Guilty Pleas and Convictions From Robert Mueller’s Investigation

November 15, 2019:
Since his appointment in May of 2017, Special Counsel Robert Mueller racked up a lengthy record of court wins, but none of them answered some of the central questions the public had about his investigation into potential collusion between President Donald Trump or his campaign and Russia.

Along with a team of experienced prosecutors and attorneys, the former FBI director has indicted, convicted or gotten guilty pleas from 34 people and three companies, including top advisers to President Trump, Russian spies and hackers with ties to the Kremlin. The charges, which Mueller referenced during his opening statement to the House Judiciary Committee on July 24, range from interfering with the 2016 election and hacking emails to lying to investigators and tampering with witnesses.
 
A true traitor .
Can such a liar and corrupt individual still be sane in the legal sense of the term ?
Traitor? The man did what no Trump in the male line (4 Generations) in America ever did: Robert Swan Mueller III, served in uniform .. and with distinction

In 1968, not many men with blue blood were signing up to shed it in Vietnam. But after a close friend and lacrosse teammate at Princeton died in battle, Mr. Mueller joined the Marine Corps. After Officer Candidate School and the Army’s Ranger School — Marines trained as Rangers often led long-range reconnaissance patrols, hunt-and-kill missions with a high mortality rate — he shipped out to the Dong Ha combat base, on the northern edge of South Vietnam, near enemy territory.

“You were scared to death of the unknown,” he told Mr. Graff 40 years later. “More afraid in some ways of failure than death, more afraid of being found wanting.” That species of intense fear, he said, “animates your unconscious.”

TRE45ON
 
Back
Top Bottom