excalibur
Diamond Member
- Mar 19, 2015
- 28,547
- 57,732
- 2,290
What a wonderful summation of Mueller in his role as head of the SCO.
Well-thought-out and indispensable for future reference.
Well-thought-out and indispensable for future reference.
The Mueller Special Counsel's Office brought two indictments that went into great detail about the supposed Russian "interference" in the 2016 election.
Both were long "speaking indictments" laying out the ALLEGATIONS made by the Mueller prosecutors. Those allegations were dutifully reported by the press and Dems as "Facts" -- something they continue to do to this day.
The Mueller SCO those documents publicly, with all the names of Russian defendants there for everyone to see, guaranteeing that none of those people would 1) travel to the US or 2) travel to any country that might extradict them to the U.S. They could have kept them sealed until they had an opportunity to arrest the named defendants -- many of whom had lived in the U.S. at one time or another.
But instead the Mueller SCO had grand press conferences where they treated the ALLEGATIONS as fact.
But then a strange thing happened. One company named in one of the indictments had a US law firm appear on its behalf. With the Law Firm standing in as a Corporate Reprensentative -- as is allowed by law -- the Russian company pled "Not Guilty" and announced "Game On".
The Mueller SCO resisted having to prosecute the case on a variety of grounds -- losing each time.
The Mueller SCO then closed up shop and handed the burning bag of dog poop to the U.S. Attorney for DC.
Within months the U.S. Attorney dismissed the case.
What I typed above is the ENTIRETY of what the Mueller SCO "proved" about Russian "collusion" in the 2016 election -- exactly nothing.
Both were long "speaking indictments" laying out the ALLEGATIONS made by the Mueller prosecutors. Those allegations were dutifully reported by the press and Dems as "Facts" -- something they continue to do to this day.
The Mueller SCO those documents publicly, with all the names of Russian defendants there for everyone to see, guaranteeing that none of those people would 1) travel to the US or 2) travel to any country that might extradict them to the U.S. They could have kept them sealed until they had an opportunity to arrest the named defendants -- many of whom had lived in the U.S. at one time or another.
But instead the Mueller SCO had grand press conferences where they treated the ALLEGATIONS as fact.
But then a strange thing happened. One company named in one of the indictments had a US law firm appear on its behalf. With the Law Firm standing in as a Corporate Reprensentative -- as is allowed by law -- the Russian company pled "Not Guilty" and announced "Game On".
The Mueller SCO resisted having to prosecute the case on a variety of grounds -- losing each time.
The Mueller SCO then closed up shop and handed the burning bag of dog poop to the U.S. Attorney for DC.
Within months the U.S. Attorney dismissed the case.
What I typed above is the ENTIRETY of what the Mueller SCO "proved" about Russian "collusion" in the 2016 election -- exactly nothing.