The mountain of evidence gets a little higher.

Pure BS spin in this one:

Signature Verification Process
The Committee was made aware of claims that election workers at the TCF Center in downtown Detroit were instructed to not match signatures on envelopes and furthermore were instructed to “pre-date” the received date of absentee ballots. To the contrary, these processing steps — signature matching and verification of the date received — occurred at another location and were completed by other employees prior to the time the ballots were sent to the TCF Center for counting. Workers at the AVCBs are to check for the clerk’s signature and time stamp as well as making sure the voter signature is present. However, the validation of the voter signature by the clerk’s office is indicated by the clerk’s signature and stamp. As for the “pre-dating” allegation, Detroit Senior Election Advisor Chris Thomas explained this date field is necessary for processing the ballot. Without the voter present, there is no way to have that date, which was recorded into the QVF by the official who took the same day registration at another location. Since the poll books at the AVCB are not connected to the QVF during Election Day, there is no way to check what was entered at the site where the voter registered. Therefore, a “placeholder” date is entered, and the poll worker assumes the official accepting the registration did their due diligence.
Kent County Clerk Lisa Lyons, and Ingham County Clerk Barb Byrum, both testified regarding the possible requirement of a “real time” signature when applying for an absentee ballot, indicating it would be highly preferred rather than performing the application process online. In addition to the preferences of election officials, the Michigan Court of Claims struck down Secretary of State Benson’s guidance on signature matching, which required workers to presume the validity of signatures, ruling that the required presumption of validity is found nowhere in state law and mandating such was a direct violation of the Administrative Procedures Act.
After reviewing these facts and receiving the testimony of experts and clerks, it is abundantly clear that the signature verification process is one of significant importance. With new policies in place due to the adoption of Proposal 18-3, current election procedures do not require a new voter to, potentially, ever make face-to-face contact with an election official or staff throughout the process of registration, requesting an absentee ballot application, or completing and submitting their ballot. Therefore, requiring a voter to confirm their identity at some point during the process is imperative. Whether providing a “real time” signature, a government-issued photo identification card, or other unique personally identifying information, like a driver’s license number or a state identification number, requesting that a voter provide one of these easily-accessible identifiers will go a long way to strengthen the integrity of our system, while supporting the new, more efficient way of administering our elections.
Therefore, the Committee recommends that the secretary of state begin the process of establishing actual rules for examining and validating signatures consistent with a ruling of the Michigan Court of Claims. The Committee also recommends that statewide measures be put in place to ensure eligible voters are not unreasonably denied access to vote if there is an issue with their signature. Finally, the Committee recommends that reasonable measures be put in place to ensure voters can easily and properly identify themselves when exercising their right to vote.

****so now they recommended they do signature review? You can register online with nothing?

Where's your source?
 
Cant produce record of 147,000 signature scans in Court because they didn’t do them? They said machine was not “used” or not working? Did they do other? Uh…ill look into it. When? Where is it now?


Probably explains the 140,000 unfolded mail in ballots dumped in late. Sworn affidavat in Court. Which box# identified. Yet any look into even those boxes denied by corrupted courts? WTH?
 
Cant produce record of 147,000 signature scans in Court because they didn’t do them? They said machine was not “used” or not working? Did they do other? Uh…ill look into it. When? Where is it now?
Who cares? None of that is evidence of the idiotic lies you mindlessly regurgitate.
 
Cant produce record of 147,000 signature scans in Court because they didn’t do them? They said machine was not “used” or not working? Did they do other? Uh…ill look into it. When? Where is it now?


Probably explains the 140,000 unfolded mail in ballots dumped in late. Sworn affidavat in Court. Which box# identified. Yet any look into even those boxes denied by corrupted courts? WTH?

Do you have any sources?
 
Where's your source?


Look it up mr. LSD. I certainly didn’t write that “book”. If I had pasted the source you would have went to #2 “oh thats a RW source”. Get outa here and take thst pusssseee fuan along with you. You clog my boards..
 
Look it up mr. LSD. I certainly didn’t write that “book”. If I had pasted the source you would have went to #2 “oh thats a RW source”. Get outa here and take thst pusssseee fuan along with you. You clog my boards..
Lots of weirdos said lots of false things about the election. It’s all hearsay or confusion on their part.
 
Look it up mr. LSD. I certainly didn’t write that “book”. If I had pasted the source you would have went to #2 “oh thats a RW source”. Get outa here and take thst pusssseee fuan along with you. You clog my boards..
So basically all you have are unevidenced claims. And your source is just another moron making the same, unevidenced claims.

That tracks.
 
Who cares? None of that is evidence of the idiotic lies you mindlessly regurgitate.

Got it. Its OK not to folow the law per FartFACE. If you don’t do the scan you can’t do the Signature comparison the planned method. Need to keep for two years for audit.

Fart says “anything filled out by anyone into a midnight drop box is a legal vote”. You stink and kids cry when you hold them you POS.
 
Fulton county arsewipe. Not GA. Signature scan not done on 147,000 mail in ballots. They were not scanned you lying POS.

Fulton County, Qultist...

Screenshot_20240713_130204_Samsung Internet.webp

Stop it now or be the first since 1999 sports boards to go to ignore status.

Run and hide if that brings you comfort, Qultist. I'll still debunk all the bullshit you post. Trump lost a free and fair election. **** your feelings.
 
Look at Tom and Jerry up above. One thing “bad sources? Unsourced?” posted is from a GA Court hearing for Christs sake! No hope for these mental STAIN midgets. Get off me you dirty POS’s.
 
Got it. Its OK not to folow the law per FartFACE
Educated people call this a non sequitur.

Uneducated peole call it "what falls out of their idiot mouths every 8 seconds".

Here is the topic: widespread election fraud that altered the results

You are too stupid to understand that you have never presented a shred of evidence of this and never will. Because you are a gullible moron that believes anything he wants, so actually convincing someone with evidence and argument is something of which you are incapable and for which you have never had any use, anyway.

So you honestly sit there in disbelief that normal people laugh at your idiotic lies. Which is funny.
 
Last edited:
15th post
Fulton County, Qultist...

View attachment 976317



Run and hide if that brings you comfort, Qultist. I'll still debunk all the bullshit you post. Trump lost a free and fair election. **** your feelings.


Then the State should be able to produce the scans EH? Cletus? But the couldn’t. Why not? They didnt know in Court. They knew the scan machine was not used. Why is that Einstien? One guy lying on a memo is not a Court hearing. Dismissed till you proved scanned envelope images as proof.


Again, see the Court hearing.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom