In a way it saddens me that places like Disneyland, Disneyworld, Mall of America, Vegas and other man made places get loads more visitors than natural attractions (i.e. Yellowstone. Yosemite, Niagra Falls, etc to name a few examples). But on the other hand, I guess it might be better for the preservation of flora and fauna at those natural attractions to not have as many visitors. I guess this is an upside of commercialization and man made attractions.
The trees and widerness don't do anything.
You look at the trees, water, falls etc, and a short time looking is probably enough for most people.
Camping these days seems to not be for the majority.
And, there's no Mickey Mouse!
Mickey the Mouse only lives at Disney.
No slot machines, booze, dancing girls, and gaming tables in nature.
In the old NY Times forums [before they closed them] there was a poster who was a ranger in one of those big nature parks.
He quoted to us some of the comments left in the suggestion box by visitors.
Three classics;
. People wanted to know how they could get reimbursed for their food a wild critter ate.
. Complaining that the terrain was too steep, people requested that escalators be installed.
. Complaining about all the bugs etc, people wrote "Please spray the wilderness".
In Australia, a girl rang the radio and said that her 15 yr old girl friend, ...when it was announced that their school class was going to visit Uluru [monolith in central Australia]...was horrified to discover that there was no shopping mall atop/in it.