The mistrust of Science

How is climate changing?

Warming of the climate system now is unequivocal, according to many different kinds of evidence. Observations show increases in globally averaged air and ocean temperatures, as well as widespread melting of snow and ice and rising globally averaged sea level. Surface temperature data for Earth as a whole, including readings over both land and ocean, show an increase of about 0.8°C (1.4°F) over the period 1901?2010 and about 0.5°C (0.9°F) over the period 1979–2010 (the era for which satellite-based temperature data are routinely available). Due to natural variability, not every year is warmer than the preceding year globally. Nevertheless, all of the 10 warmest years in the global temperature records up to 2011 have occurred since 1997, with 2005 and 2010 being the warmest two years in more than a century of global records. The warming trend is greatest in northern high latitudes and over land. In the U.S., most of the observed warming has occurred in the West and in Alaska; for the nation as a whole, there have been twice as many record daily high temperatures as record daily low temperatures in the first decade of the 21st century.

The effects of this warming are especially evident in the planet’s polar regions. Arctic sea ice extent and volume have been decreasing for the past several decades. Both the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have lost significant amounts of ice. Most of the world’s glaciers are in retreat.

Other changes, globally and in the U.S., are also occurring at the same time. The amount of rain falling in very heavy precipitation events (the heaviest 1% of all precipitation events) has increased over the last 50 years throughout the U.S. Freezing levels are rising in elevation, with rain occurring more frequently instead of snow at mid-elevations of western mountains. Spring maximum snowpack is decreasing, snowmelt occurs earlier, and the spring runoff that supplies over two-thirds of western U.S. streamflow is reduced. Evidence for warming is also observed in seasonal changes across many areas, including earlier springs, longer frost-free periods, longer growing seasons, and shifts in natural habitats and in migratory patterns of birds and insects.

Climate Change - American Meteorological Society

The American Meteological Society
 
Published in the journalEnvironmental Research Letters, the study found that nearly 92% of biophysical scientists surveyed believe that human activity has contributed to global warming. Nearly 94% said they believe global temperatures are rising. Researchers surveyed 2,000 scientists at universities in the Big 10 Conference and received 698 responses. The survey included fields like biology, chemistry and physics.

The study’s design specifically addresses the belief that scientists who are skeptical of climate change come from fields outside of climate science. The new research weakens that argument.

Most Non-Climate Scientists Agree on Global Warming Too

And, of course, one can find numerous other studies showing exactly the same thing. Yes, there is a scientific consensus that AGW is real, and a clear and present danger.
 
Human-induced climate change requires urgent action.

Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes.

“Human activities are changing Earth’s climate. At the global level, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases have increased sharply since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuel burning dominates this increase. Human-caused increases in greenhouse gases are responsible for most of the observed global average surface warming of roughly 0.8°C (1.5°F) over the past 140 years. Because natural processes cannot quickly remove some of these gases (notably carbon dioxide) from the atmosphere, our past, present, and future emissions will influence the climate system for millennia.

Extensive, independent observations confirm the reality of global warming. These observations show large-scale increases in air and sea temperatures, sea level, and atmospheric water vapor; they document decreases in the extent of mountain glaciers, snow cover, permafrost, and Arctic sea ice. These changes are broadly consistent with long-understood physics and predictions of how the climate system is expected to respond to human-caused increases in greenhouse gases. The changes are inconsistent with explanations of climate change that rely on known natural influences.

AGU Statement on Climate Change: Update | Environment

The American Geophysical Union's statement on climate change.







Yada, yada, yada. Political statements by political organizations that get their money by perpetuating the fraud is called a Appeal to Authority and is a logic fail on an epic scale. Only a moron like you would ignore the very real corruption within science all in the name of the almighty dollar. Poll the actual membership of those organizations and the reality is the overwhelming majority of the membership doesn't agree with the position statements.
 
What a liar you are, Mr. Westwall. The vast majority of scientists accept the evidence that has been presented.





Bullshit. All you can do is provide the various POLITICAL POSITIONS promulgated by the various POLITICAL BOARDS of the various organizations. The overwhelming majority of the scientists who are members of those organizations disapprove of those POLITICAL STATEMENTS.

You know it. And I know it. You're the only proven liar in this thread. And that many times over.
 
You have to ignore the Climate Change deniers. They are a cult, like the Heaven's Gate cult or the Flat Earthers. They cannot accept facts that are too scary. Leave them behind.

The science was settled 15 years ago and is undisputed among scientists around the world.
 
You have to ignore the Climate Change deniers. They are a cult, like the Heaven's Gate cult or the Flat Earthers. They cannot accept facts that are too scary. Leave them behind.

The science was settled 15 years ago and is undisputed among scientists around the world.

So was flat earth, for centuries.
 
Human-induced climate change requires urgent action.

Humanity is the major influence on the global climate change observed over the past 50 years. Rapid societal responses can significantly lessen negative outcomes.

“Human activities are changing Earth’s climate. At the global level, atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases have increased sharply since the Industrial Revolution. Fossil fuel burning dominates this increase. Human-caused increases in greenhouse gases are responsible for most of the observed global average surface warming of roughly 0.8°C (1.5°F) over the past 140 years. Because natural processes cannot quickly remove some of these gases (notably carbon dioxide) from the atmosphere, our past, present, and future emissions will influence the climate system for millennia.

Extensive, independent observations confirm the reality of global warming. These observations show large-scale increases in air and sea temperatures, sea level, and atmospheric water vapor; they document decreases in the extent of mountain glaciers, snow cover, permafrost, and Arctic sea ice. These changes are broadly consistent with long-understood physics and predictions of how the climate system is expected to respond to human-caused increases in greenhouse gases. The changes are inconsistent with explanations of climate change that rely on known natural influences.

AGU Statement on Climate Change: Update | Environment

The American Geophysical Union's statement on climate change.







Yada, yada, yada. Political statements by political organizations that get their money by perpetuating the fraud is called a Appeal to Authority and is a logic fail on an epic scale. Only a moron like you would ignore the very real corruption within science all in the name of the almighty dollar. Poll the actual membership of those organizations and the reality is the overwhelming majority of the membership doesn't agree with the position statements.
No, Mr. Westwall, you do not get to speak for most scientists. They speak for themselves. And the boards of these Scientific Societies are chosen by the votes of the members. I know because I get a vote every year. As do you, provided in have membership in any of the said organizations. And the boards that approve the statements get voted in.
 
No, Mr. Westwall, you do not get to speak for most scientists. They speak for themselves. And the boards of these Scientific Societies are chosen by the votes of the members.

Members who receive government grants so long as they tow the proper political line.
 
You have to ignore the Climate Change deniers. They are a cult, like the Heaven's Gate cult or the Flat Earthers. They cannot accept facts that are too scary. Leave them behind.

The science was settled 15 years ago and is undisputed among scientists around the world.

So was flat earth, for centuries.

The first person to record the Earth was round was in 240 b.c. There were skeptics since that time moving forward.

Your cult is one of ignorance. And you are to be ignored, just as we ignore the Birthers, like trump.
 
You have to ignore the Climate Change deniers. They are a cult, like the Heaven's Gate cult or the Flat Earthers. They cannot accept facts that are too scary. Leave them behind.

The science was settled 15 years ago and is undisputed among scientists around the world.

So was flat earth, for centuries.

The first person to record the Earth was round was in 240 b.c. There were skeptics since that time moving forward.

That does not render my statement inaccurate.

Your cult is one of ignorance.

My "cult"? Perhaps from certain skewed viewpoints, but you are a singular example of same.
 
Care to provide some proof of your asinine lies?

Are you saying members don't receive government grants for towing the political line?
That is exactly what I am saying. You do not receive a research grant to get a certain result, you receive a research grant to investigate a physical phenomenon. If you take such a grant to measure the retreat or expansion of a glacier, and you report that it is retreating, altering evidence to make it look that way, and the next two researchers report that it is expanding, and present evidence that proves their case, you just as well take a job as janitor, because you are done in the scientific field.
 
"People are prone to resist scientific claims when they clash with intuitive beliefs. They don’t see measles or mumps around anymore. They do see children with autism. And they see a mom who says, “My child was perfectly fine until he got a vaccine and became autistic.”

Now, you can tell them that correlation is not causation. You can say that children get a vaccine every two to three months for the first couple years of their life, so the onset of any illness is bound to follow vaccination for many kids. You can say that the science shows no connection. But once an idea has got embedded and become widespread, it becomes very difficult to dig it out of people’s brains—especially when they do not trust scientific authorities. And we are experiencing a significant decline in trust in scientific authorities.


Deeply alarming trends. Despite increasing education levels, the public’s trust in the scientific community has been decreasing. This is particularly true among conservatives, even educated conservatives. In 1974, conservatives with college degrees had the highest level of trust in science and the scientific community. Today, they have the lowest."


Since the bible thumpers and uneducated seized control of the republican party and magical thinking is paramount to them and education and science is their enemy


The effect of conservative media. It is designed to appeal to the ignorant and to dumb them down even farther. It instills in them the thought "well everyone just has an 'opinion' and your opinion is just as valid as anyone else's' ". It is a sly lie that 'feels good' to these people. It makes them feel smart even when they have virtually no facts to support what they believe.

Unfortunately the Darwin rule will have to take care of these people who don't want to vaccinate their children because their minds are so easily manipulated. It is a similar strain as the utlra religious who don't ever take their children to see a doctor because if the child dies they believe 'it's god's will'. Whackjobbery is alive and well.
Morons with IQ of 50-60 are mostly uneducated welfare hand outs voting Obama and democrat which includes ghettos, trailer park, illegals, baby mamas, thugs, fall under uneducated.
And which states are the biggest welfare states? Easy to find them, most are red in election maps. Kind of blows your nonsense right out of the water.
your state has a lot of people on food stamps rocks,so dont get too cocky....
 
Some guys wouldn't know a real scientist if she kicked him in the balls with a fucking lifetime's worth of logical reasoning.
 
"People are prone to resist scientific claims when they clash with intuitive beliefs. They don’t see measles or mumps around anymore. They do see children with autism. And they see a mom who says, “My child was perfectly fine until he got a vaccine and became autistic.”

Now, you can tell them that correlation is not causation. You can say that children get a vaccine every two to three months for the first couple years of their life, so the onset of any illness is bound to follow vaccination for many kids. You can say that the science shows no connection. But once an idea has got embedded and become widespread, it becomes very difficult to dig it out of people’s brains—especially when they do not trust scientific authorities. And we are experiencing a significant decline in trust in scientific authorities.


Deeply alarming trends. Despite increasing education levels, the public’s trust in the scientific community has been decreasing. This is particularly true among conservatives, even educated conservatives. In 1974, conservatives with college degrees had the highest level of trust in science and the scientific community. Today, they have the lowest."


Since the bible thumpers and uneducated seized control of the republican party and magical thinking is paramount to them and education and science is their enemy

So, who is scientifically claiming that men who eat hormones and have their weenie hacked off are now women.

HINT: Starts with "D".
So who's having a major meltdown over it?
Hint :starts with an "R".

Irrelevant deflection. Having a meltdown over that has nothing to do with science.
 
"People are prone to resist scientific claims when they clash with intuitive beliefs. They don’t see measles or mumps around anymore. They do see children with autism. And they see a mom who says, “My child was perfectly fine until he got a vaccine and became autistic.”

Now, you can tell them that correlation is not causation. You can say that children get a vaccine every two to three months for the first couple years of their life, so the onset of any illness is bound to follow vaccination for many kids. You can say that the science shows no connection. But once an idea has got embedded and become widespread, it becomes very difficult to dig it out of people’s brains—especially when they do not trust scientific authorities. And we are experiencing a significant decline in trust in scientific authorities.


Deeply alarming trends. Despite increasing education levels, the public’s trust in the scientific community has been decreasing. This is particularly true among conservatives, even educated conservatives. In 1974, conservatives with college degrees had the highest level of trust in science and the scientific community. Today, they have the lowest."


Since the bible thumpers and uneducated seized control of the republican party and magical thinking is paramount to them and education and science is their enemy

Missed that connection by a mile SuperTroller. The vaccination skeptics are more likely leftist HolyWoody types than "bible thumpers". In fact --- leftists have their own well-known litany of anti-science memes. Like the fear of nuclear plants or the fear of genetic engineering or nanotechnology or food preservation with radiation. Not to mention that they are vast repository of astrology reading, crystal worshipping, homeopathic potion drinking , embryonic stem cell pushing Luddites. :banana:
 

Forum List

Back
Top