The me first prez.

The average investor is up 9% in 2026, so I don't understand how this is a con. Could you explain?
Putting aside that only about 60% of Americans own stock, skewing heavily towards people with above average income, of those many actively manage their portfolios so may not be up 9%, and the reason for market gains have more to do with tax policy that is mortgaging the future of the country than his acumen as prez..................

The con mostly centers around the idea he gives a shit about the average American, that he's an astute businessman, that he's a competent prez, that what he says can be trusted, and the products he's always hawking for personal gain like.....

Trump purchased tens of thousands of dollars’ worth of stock in UFC’s parent company while promoting the event, according to a May financial disclosure. He’s holding a $1 million-per-plate fundraiser for his top super PAC the night before the cage match. And Trump “officially designed” a line of “Trump x UFC Freedom 250” medallions, which are selling for $250 to $12,000.
 
Putting aside that only about 60% of Americans own stock, skewing heavily towards people with above average income, of those many actively manage their portfolios so may not be up 9%, and the reason for market gains have more to do with tax policy that is mortgaging the future of the country than his acumen as prez..................

The con mostly centers around the idea he gives a shit about the average American, that he's an astute businessman, that he's a competent prez, that what he says can be trusted, and the products he's always hawking for personal gain like.....

Trump purchased tens of thousands of dollars’ worth of stock in UFC’s parent company while promoting the event, according to a May financial disclosure. He’s holding a $1 million-per-plate fundraiser for his top super PAC the night before the cage match. And Trump “officially designed” a line of “Trump x UFC Freedom 250” medallions, which are selling for $250 to $12,000.
Only 60%? Actually 62%. That’s the majority doing very well under this great man. So your term “con” is a lie.
 
pssst....

Just between you and me, I think you're posting to either Eric, Baron or Junior.
You haven't answered. You claim to be a financial expert. Tell me again how 62% of Americans averaging a 9% gain in 5.5 months is anything remotely resembling a con.
 
You haven't answered. You claim to be a financial expert. Tell me again how 62% of Americans averaging a 9% gain in 5.5 months is anything remotely resembling a con.
There is more, much more, to this than the current condition of the stock market. And as a reminder, most Presidents see all time stock market highs, including Clinton, Dubya, Obama and Biden.

I wouldn't try to convince someone like you of anything. You're just too intelligent and accurately-informed for me. Have a great day.
 
Last edited:
Only 60%? Actually 62%. That’s the majority doing very well under this great man. So your term “con” is a lie.
In your book do great men steal from charities, break the law, commit fraud, and get tax policy legislation passed that largely helps the wealthy while ballooning the deficit?
 
You haven't answered. You claim to be a financial expert. Tell me again how 62% of Americans averaging a 9% gain in 5.5 months is anything remotely resembling a con.
The market gain does not necessarily reflect the gain of everyone invested in the market. But if you want to play this game, does Biden deserve credit for the roughly 57% gain in the S&P during his presidency?
 
Case in point. Now did you say the same about this?

Nope

Cause you’re a welfare lib hypocrite
View attachment 1269041
Now what?

The White House strongly condemned the action, releasing a statement that called the behavior "inappropriate and disrespectful". Officials stated that it did not reflect the hosted event and announced that the individuals involved would not be invited to future White House functions.

Can we agree you suck at googling and at whataboutism? This White House cant hold a candle to the prior one on decorum.
 
Now what?

The White House strongly condemned the action, releasing a statement that called the behavior "inappropriate and disrespectful". Officials stated that it did not reflect the hosted event and announced that the individuals involved would not be invited to future White House functions.

Can we agree you suck at googling and at whataboutism? This White House cant hold a candle to the prior one on decorum.
The WH can post? Who posted this? Hmmm?

Who lit up the WH in LGTBQ colors?

UFC is as American as it gets!

Celebrate, biatch!

You leftist welfare wimp
 
Last edited:
I'm happy you and your cult have found a new God - Epstein.
LMAO5.gif
 
The WH can post? Who posted this? Hmmm?

Who lit up the WH in LGTBQ colors?

UFC is as American as it gets!

Celebrate, biatch!

You leftist welfare wimp
The release was from the White House condemning that action. Still Trumps obscene desecration of the grounds continues.
 
15th post
The WH can post? Who posted this? Hmmm?

Who lit up the WH in LGTBQ colors?

UFC is as American as it gets!

Celebrate, biatch!

You leftist welfare wimp
The release was from the White House condemning that action. Still Trumps obscene desecration of the grounds continues.

Meanwhile the pool is green and the Budweiser signs are up on the white house.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom