The Left keeps losing credibility

[kiwiman127]

Oh the irony of this thread.
The Little Trumpsters have credibility as they walk in a goose-step following a proven pathological liar.
Oh and yeah, Jeong shouldn’t have ever been given any pass.

 

[Some Guy]

WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSESHIT ^^^^^^^^^^^^

He made 3, count them, 3 specific points, that if you disagreed with, you could have challenged.


Instead you just expressed disagreement, but unable to verbalize why or how.


As libs go, you did very well.


You did not make a personal attack, nor did you accuse him of racism.


Grading on the lib curve, you are nearly Socrates.

THE DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT OPEN BORDERS

VOTER FRAUD IS NEXT TO NON EXISTENT

RW'S CONTINUE TO ***** AND WHINE ABOUT SMALLER GOVERNMENT YET THEY WANT TO CREATE A LARGER GOVERNMENT TO ENFORCE THEIR BULLSHIT TALKING POINTS


feel free to stfu ...

Well, i'm convinced.

 

[Siete]

Trumpdrones carping about credibility - the hypocritic irony of the century

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Left keeps losing credibility.

The Democrats have just too many double standards on their most important issues of tolerance, civil rights and voting rights to maintain any credibility.
Sarah Jeong’s proud racism and bigotry was given a pass by the SJW because the Left regards white folks to be the big problem in America and to be the world’s oppressors.
The Democratic Party’s enthusiasm for open borders is based on making Anglo voters the minority ASAP.
The truth is that they are against Voter ID laws because that would stop non-citizens from canceling-out the votes of American citizens.

Sarah Jeong is a warning sign of something wrong with the left

Picking one data point out to ten's of millions and proclaiming that singular example the rule statistically, as you've done with an opinion hit piece from a partisan rag such as HotAir.Com has proven to be, is beyond abject stupidity! Reality is much, much broader than the small area in which you wish to confine it. But a useful idiot can't be expected to think for itself!

Sooo are you attempting to say that Sarah Jeong is not a racist and that the NYT is not endorsing her racism by hiring her?

 

[Thinker101]

WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSESHIT ^^^^^^^^^^^^

He made 3, count them, 3 specific points, that if you disagreed with, you could have challenged.


Instead you just expressed disagreement, but unable to verbalize why or how.


As libs go, you did very well.


You did not make a personal attack, nor did you accuse him of racism.


Grading on the lib curve, you are nearly Socrates.

THE DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT OPEN BORDERS

VOTER FRAUD IS NEXT TO NON EXISTENT

RW'S CONTINUE TO ***** AND WHINE ABOUT SMALLER GOVERNMENT YET THEY WANT TO CREATE A LARGER GOVERNMENT TO ENFORCE THEIR BULLSHIT TALKING POINTS


feel free to stfu ...

Well....so much for the voter fraud....dumbass.
Peter Fonda tells liberals to steal ballots from millennials and commit voter fraud

As far as open borders, evidently you didn't get that email.
The Left Goes All In On Open Borders

 

[ThoughtCrimes]

The Left keeps losing credibility.

The Democrats have just too many double standards on their most important issues of tolerance, civil rights and voting rights to maintain any credibility.
Sarah Jeong’s proud racism and bigotry was given a pass by the SJW because the Left regards white folks to be the big problem in America and to be the world’s oppressors.
The Democratic Party’s enthusiasm for open borders is based on making Anglo voters the minority ASAP.
The truth is that they are against Voter ID laws because that would stop non-citizens from canceling-out the votes of American citizens.

Sarah Jeong is a warning sign of something wrong with the left

Picking one data point out to ten's of millions and proclaiming that singular example the rule statistically, as you've done with an opinion hit piece from a partisan rag such as HotAir.Com has proven to be, is beyond abject stupidity! Reality is much, much broader than the small area in which you wish to confine it. But a useful idiot can't be expected to think for itself!

Sooo are you attempting to say that Sarah Jeong is not a racist and that the NYT is not endorsing her racism by hiring her?

Sooo are you attempting to say that Sarah Jeong is not a racist and that the NYT is not endorsing her racism by hiring her?

No, that's not all all true and you know it, or at least should!

I don't dwell on the limited horizons of tribal propaganda like yourself and other nattering fools. Keep guessing my intent and like a good monkey and you might get lucky.

Given critical thinking in analytical methods of statistics, E.g. sample size determination was EXACTLY to which I was pointing, seems to be foreign to you, I won't even bother to dive into the topic to explain it further to your ignorant ass and waste more of my time. You obviously still believe that a single data point outweighs the totality of 10's of millions of others, so you are simply unteachable.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

The Left keeps losing credibility.

The Democrats have just too many double standards on their most important issues of tolerance, civil rights and voting rights to maintain any credibility.
Sarah Jeong’s proud racism and bigotry was given a pass by the SJW because the Left regards white folks to be the big problem in America and to be the world’s oppressors.
The Democratic Party’s enthusiasm for open borders is based on making Anglo voters the minority ASAP.
The truth is that they are against Voter ID laws because that would stop non-citizens from canceling-out the votes of American citizens.

Sarah Jeong is a warning sign of something wrong with the left

Picking one data point out to ten's of millions and proclaiming that singular example the rule statistically, as you've done with an opinion hit piece from a partisan rag such as HotAir.Com has proven to be, is beyond abject stupidity! Reality is much, much broader than the small area in which you wish to confine it. But a useful idiot can't be expected to think for itself!

Sooo are you attempting to say that Sarah Jeong is not a racist and that the NYT is not endorsing her racism by hiring her?

Sooo are you attempting to say that Sarah Jeong is not a racist and that the NYT is not endorsing her racism by hiring her?

No, that's not all all true and you know it, or at least should!

I don't dwell on the limited horizons of tribal propaganda like yourself and other nattering fools. Keep guessing my intent and like a good monkey and you might get lucky.

Given critical thinking in analytical methods of statistics, E.g. sample size determination was EXACTLY to which I was pointing, seems to be foreign to you, I won't even bother to dive into the topic to explain it further to your ignorant ass and waste more of my time. You obviously still believe that a single data point outweighs the totality of 10's of millions of others, so you are simply unteachable.

Actually if Sarah Jeong was just an isolated example it would not be a big deal.
But she is a great example of the racist attitude of millions of Democrat Voters.
The Democrats have a huge problem with hate based politics: Klan, Nation of Islam, La Raza, Black Panthers, Muslim Brotherhood, racist Aztlán Nationalist, racist BLM separatist, Brown Berets, race riots, anti-american bigots, anti-Christian bigots, anti-wasp bigots, anti-heartland American bigots....
The irony is that Democrats pride themselves as being the tolerant side

 

[Kosh]

Can not lose something that you never had..

 

[WaitingFor2020]

The Left keeps losing credibility.

The Democrats have just too many double standards on their most important issues of tolerance, civil rights and voting rights to maintain any credibility.
Sarah Jeong’s proud racism and bigotry was given a pass by the SJW because the Left regards white folks to be the big problem in America and to be the world’s oppressors.
The Democratic Party’s enthusiasm for open borders is based on making Anglo voters the minority ASAP.
The truth is that they are against Voter ID laws because that would stop non-citizens from canceling-out the votes of American citizens.

Sarah Jeong is a warning sign of something wrong with the left

WhoTF is Sarah Jeong? And who cares?
Even the author of your link doesn't care: "The more I think about it, the less I care about Sarah Jeong."
The comments you posted are your opinion.
Stupidest thread this month so far.

 

[iceberg]

WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSESHIT ^^^^^^^^^^^^

He made 3, count them, 3 specific points, that if you disagreed with, you could have challenged.


Instead you just expressed disagreement, but unable to verbalize why or how.


As libs go, you did very well.


You did not make a personal attack, nor did you accuse him of racism.


Grading on the lib curve, you are nearly Socrates.

THE DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT OPEN BORDERS

VOTER FRAUD IS NEXT TO NON EXISTENT

RW'S CONTINUE TO ***** AND WHINE ABOUT SMALLER GOVERNMENT YET THEY WANT TO CREATE A LARGER GOVERNMENT TO ENFORCE THEIR BULLSHIT TALKING POINTS


feel free to stfu ...

democrats also refuse to put "illegal" in front of immigrants when discussing the issue. hell they have to be told that "illegal" means yes in fact they are breaking the law.

as for double standards, a black lady took Jeongs tweets and removed "white" and put in "black" or "jew" and twitter had her banned pretty damn quick.

if that isn't a double standard, then what is?

 

[WaitingFor2020]

The Left keeps losing credibility.

The Democrats have just too many double standards on their most important issues of tolerance, civil rights and voting rights to maintain any credibility.
Sarah Jeong’s proud racism and bigotry was given a pass by the SJW because the Left regards white folks to be the big problem in America and to be the world’s oppressors.
The Democratic Party’s enthusiasm for open borders is based on making Anglo voters the minority ASAP.
The truth is that they are against Voter ID laws because that would stop non-citizens from canceling-out the votes of American citizens.

Sarah Jeong is a warning sign of something wrong with the left

Picking one data point out to ten's of millions and proclaiming that singular example the rule statistically, as you've done with an opinion hit piece from a partisan rag such as HotAir.Com has proven to be, is beyond abject stupidity! Reality is much, much broader than the small area in which you wish to confine it. But a useful idiot can't be expected to think for itself!

Sooo are you attempting to say that Sarah Jeong is not a racist and that the NYT is not endorsing her racism by hiring her?

Sooo are you attempting to say that Sarah Jeong is not a racist and that the NYT is not endorsing her racism by hiring her?

No, that's not all all true and you know it, or at least should!

I don't dwell on the limited horizons of tribal propaganda like yourself and other nattering fools. Keep guessing my intent and like a good monkey and you might get lucky.

Given critical thinking in analytical methods of statistics, E.g. sample size determination was EXACTLY to which I was pointing, seems to be foreign to you, I won't even bother to dive into the topic to explain it further to your ignorant ass and waste more of my time. You obviously still believe that a single data point outweighs the totality of 10's of millions of others, so you are simply unteachable.

Actually if Sarah Jeong was just an isolated example it would not be a big deal.
But she is a great example of the racist attitude of millions of Democrat Voters.
The Democrats have a huge problem with hate based politics: Klan, Nation of Islam, La Raza, Black Panthers, Muslim Brotherhood, racist Aztlán Nationalist, racist BLM separatist, Brown Berets, race riots, anti-american bigots, anti-Christian bigots, anti-wasp bigots, anti-heartland American bigots....
The irony is that Democrats pride themselves as being the tolerant side

More of your opinion.
You take some obscure person nobody's ever heard of and you use it to spread you bi-asss.
You're fake news!

 

[WaitingFor2020]

WHAT A BUNCH OF HORSESHIT ^^^^^^^^^^^^

He made 3, count them, 3 specific points, that if you disagreed with, you could have challenged.


Instead you just expressed disagreement, but unable to verbalize why or how.


As libs go, you did very well.


You did not make a personal attack, nor did you accuse him of racism.


Grading on the lib curve, you are nearly Socrates.

THE DEMOCRATS DO NOT WANT OPEN BORDERS

VOTER FRAUD IS NEXT TO NON EXISTENT

RW'S CONTINUE TO ***** AND WHINE ABOUT SMALLER GOVERNMENT YET THEY WANT TO CREATE A LARGER GOVERNMENT TO ENFORCE THEIR BULLSHIT TALKING POINTS


feel free to stfu ...

RACIST!!!

RUSSIAN ^^^^^^^ !!!!!

A Putin lover. A Kim Jong Un fan.

 

[Norman]

The Left keeps losing credibility.

The Democrats have just too many double standards on their most important issues of tolerance, civil rights and voting rights to maintain any credibility.
Sarah Jeong’s proud racism and bigotry was given a pass by the SJW because the Left regards white folks to be the big problem in America and to be the world’s oppressors.
The Democratic Party’s enthusiasm for open borders is based on making Anglo voters the minority ASAP.
The truth is that they are against Voter ID laws because that would stop non-citizens from canceling-out the votes of American citizens.

Sarah Jeong is a warning sign of something wrong with the left

Picking one data point out to ten's of millions and proclaiming that singular example the rule statistically, as you've done with an opinion hit piece from a partisan rag such as HotAir.Com has proven to be, is beyond abject stupidity! Reality is much, much broader than the small area in which you wish to confine it. But a useful idiot can't be expected to think for itself!

Sooo are you attempting to say that Sarah Jeong is not a racist and that the NYT is not endorsing her racism by hiring her?

It's weird how quickly his opinion changes when it comes to Florida school shootings, then guns are bad everywhere. After a single incident of a racist cop, every cop is racist.

Weird how that works. Of course, it's rather clear that NYT in fact is filled with reporters like her, and this is just "one example" among many.

 

[Clementine]

What are they running on? Free shit. Blaming others for everything.

 

[initforme]

Anyone who ascribes to a party has lost all credibility with me. Independent is the most patriotic stance. Judge by the person. Call it being smarter than most.

 

[busybee01]

Sarah Jeong is a non-issue. A way for the alt-right to keep everyone angry.

 

[skye]

MSM ...(Main Stream Media,,, CNN and all those) and Operation Mockingbird



"Operation Mockingbird [was] is a domestic propaganda campaign aimed at promoting the views of the CIA within the media. Reporters shared their notebooks with the CIA. Editors shared their staffs. Some of the journalists were Pulitzer Prize winners, distinguished reporters who considered themselves ambassadors without portfolio for their country."

Operation Mockingbird



Wakey wakey everybody!!!!!! Time to smell the coffee !!!!!! Way past the time .....way way past.....

Wake up America!

 

[iceberg]

Sarah Jeong is a non-issue. A way for the alt-right to keep everyone angry.

bullshit.

she represents the hypocrisy going on today. how come she can say 10x worse than others and be hired while those just making a comment or 2 are fired? this is exactly the core of the issue and for you to blow if ott as nothing is like the cherry on top of stupid arrogance.

right and wrong needs to apply to us all and we need to stop this micro-slicing of why person a isn't wrong but person b is for the same thing in the end.

 

[jknowgood]

Sarah Jeong is a non-issue. A way for the alt-right to keep everyone angry.

She is a racist, representing democrats being employed by the NYT, and you are fine with that.