The leak is far worse than the resignation, obama's people really screwed up, jail may await them...

[Steve_McGarrett]

They were compromised due to Obama Loyalists.

They were compromised by THEIR OWN ACTIONS. Your orange faced ass-clown knew that Mattis broke the law and DID NOTHING, and his Administration was lying to cover it up. So people in the CIA leaked the information, which they obtained from a LEGAL wiretap on the Russian Ambassador.

You were all gleeful when illegal hacking of the DNC leaked information favourable to tRump, but now you're butt hurt when your guys do something illegal and get caught.

What law did Mattis break?

Sorry, I meant to say Flynn. Flynn discussed Obama's sanctions and expulsions with the Ambassador, telling him the Trump Administration would lift them, and that was illegal.

You seem to think that Russia is your close ally, instead of a country which hacked your elections, and wanted Trump to win. Your President is colluding with the enemy. That constitutes treason in my books.

Flynn was a civilian at the time. Who gave the order to monitor him?

He was talking to the Russians you stupid shit. We were monitoring the Russians.
'

So!

 

[Roudy]

The idiots in obama's intelligence agencies leaked the Flynn information....and since they have to protect the identity of Americans when they are surveilling foreign assets........there are very few people who would have had access to the Flynn recordings......and they all belong to obama.....and now, they can go and get them ......

Catherine Herridge has high level sources......

We are talking jail time for the leakers when they are caught.......

Top House Republican wants FBI 'assessment' on Trump-related leaks

But the release of information from the Flynn phone calls also appears especially problematic, because when the intelligence community captures phone calls of an American inside the U.S., even if the discussion involves a foreign national (in this case an ambassador), steps must be taken to shield the American caller's identity.

"If [the conversation] was picked up inadvertently, then that would have had to been approved by someone in the last administration to actually unmask his name so that the FBI or intelligence officials knew who it was on the other end of the phone talking to the Russian ambassador," Nunes explained.

"If in fact the press reports are right, someone made the decision to deliberately listen to General Flynn's phone calls and that is, I think, unprecedented, unwarranted, and flat-out wrong."

Former NSA analyst and whistleblower Bill Binney confirmed to Fox News that surveillance programs that touch on leadership are highly restricted.

"I think it is compartmentalized, meaning a small circle, less than 100 [people would have access to the intelligence]," Binney said. "They are supposed to minimize the American side. ... All presumed U.S. citizens have rights under the Fourth Amendment."

Nunes said the timing may be significant because the authorization to unmask Flynn was likely taken under the Obama administration, as the phone calls occurred in December.

The committee chairman said the issue goes beyond politics because it is also undermining the relationship between a president and world leaders.

"I think all foreign leaders now are going to be worried that this is going to somehow leak out. I think it has done tremendous damage to [America's] reputation around the world, and no one's talking about it -- and this is because someone in the national security apparatus decided to leak this out. It's very, very serious," he said.

Simply revealing the contents of the calls can have the effect of what the intelligence community calls "burning the source," because the parties involved know beyond a doubt the U.S. government has the ability to track the conversations.

The leaking of information about the investigation into Russian interference in the U.S. race points to the possible compromise of even more sensitive collection sources.

I said it from the beginning. This was a trap coordinated between Obama and the previous CIA leader and his underlings, as payback for losing the election, and Flynn, a career officer with decades of experience, stepped right into it. There should definitely be some heads rolling in the CIA now.

The last time I looked, there were no CIA agents selling out the American people to the Putin and the Russians. That would be members of the Trump Administration. It's THEIR heads which are starting to roll.

This doesn't end here. Congress is talking about appointing a Special Prosecutor for this one.

CIA isn't supposed to spy on civilians, and then release top secret information to the public, dumbass. Unless you prefer living in a police state where phone conversations are listened to and recorded, with nobody to answer to. Because that's exactly what happened here. Remember, just like the Senate nuclear option, this knife cuts both ways. This is not a party issue.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

Rube news, too funny two statue bowers jerking each other off

Just like you and JohnnyApplejacks-off.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

That's a debunked lie you stupid ****.

No, it is the truth. dick Cheney outed Valerie Plame because her husband was sent to investigate a yellow cake story where Bush had lied.

Plame had been a covert agent. By outing her, Cheney put every current covert agent that ever worked with Plame at rtsk.
No lie.

You are a stupid **** it was Richard Armitage not acting on anyones orders, Plame outted herself, her CIA status was an open secret on the beltway so educate yourself before you flap your fucktarded gums.

Cheney did it too.

Your buddy Cheney put CIA agents at risk. What a low life POS you are to defend that action.

Eat a dick ******, you have no evidence whatsoever for your claim, this bullshit was debunked over a decade ago, kill yourself.

Lets ask Scooter.

Scooter was illegally convicted of perjury not outing Plume. Keep up dumb ass.

 

[Call Sign Chaos]

They were compromised due to Obama Loyalists.

They were compromised by THEIR OWN ACTIONS. Your orange faced ass-clown knew that Mattis broke the law and DID NOTHING, and his Administration was lying to cover it up. So people in the CIA leaked the information, which they obtained from a LEGAL wiretap on the Russian Ambassador.

You were all gleeful when illegal hacking of the DNC leaked information favourable to tRump, but now you're butt hurt when your guys do something illegal and get caught.

What law did Mattis break?

Sorry, I meant to say Flynn. Flynn discussed Obama's sanctions and expulsions with the Ambassador, telling him the Trump Administration would lift them, and that was illegal.

You seem to think that Russia is your close ally, instead of a country which hacked your elections, and wanted Trump to win. Your President is colluding with the enemy. That constitutes treason in my books.

Flynn was a civilian at the time. Who gave the order to monitor him?

He was talking to the Russians you stupid shit. We were monitoring the Russians.
'

They were compromised due to Obama Loyalists.

They were compromised by THEIR OWN ACTIONS. Your orange faced ass-clown knew that Mattis broke the law and DID NOTHING, and his Administration was lying to cover it up. So people in the CIA leaked the information, which they obtained from a LEGAL wiretap on the Russian Ambassador.

You were all gleeful when illegal hacking of the DNC leaked information favourable to tRump, but now you're butt hurt when your guys do something illegal and get caught.

What law did Mattis break?

Sorry, I meant to say Flynn. Flynn discussed Obama's sanctions and expulsions with the Ambassador, telling him the Trump Administration would lift them, and that was illegal.

You seem to think that Russia is your close ally, instead of a country which hacked your elections, and wanted Trump to win. Your President is colluding with the enemy. That constitutes treason in my books.

Flynn was a civilian at the time. Who gave the order to monitor him?

He was talking to the Russians you stupid shit. We were monitoring the Russians.
'

Prove it you ******* lying piece of shit, there is no evidence either way but what is known is that whoever leaked the partial transcript of a phone call that contained zero evidence of wrongdoing belongs in prison.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

The idiots in obama's intelligence agencies leaked the Flynn information....and since they have to protect the identity of Americans when they are surveilling foreign assets........there are very few people who would have had access to the Flynn recordings......and they all belong to obama.....and now, they can go and get them ......

Catherine Herridge has high level sources......

We are talking jail time for the leakers when they are caught.......

Top House Republican wants FBI 'assessment' on Trump-related leaks

But the release of information from the Flynn phone calls also appears especially problematic, because when the intelligence community captures phone calls of an American inside the U.S., even if the discussion involves a foreign national (in this case an ambassador), steps must be taken to shield the American caller's identity.

"If [the conversation] was picked up inadvertently, then that would have had to been approved by someone in the last administration to actually unmask his name so that the FBI or intelligence officials knew who it was on the other end of the phone talking to the Russian ambassador," Nunes explained.

"If in fact the press reports are right, someone made the decision to deliberately listen to General Flynn's phone calls and that is, I think, unprecedented, unwarranted, and flat-out wrong."

Former NSA analyst and whistleblower Bill Binney confirmed to Fox News that surveillance programs that touch on leadership are highly restricted.

"I think it is compartmentalized, meaning a small circle, less than 100 [people would have access to the intelligence]," Binney said. "They are supposed to minimize the American side. ... All presumed U.S. citizens have rights under the Fourth Amendment."

Nunes said the timing may be significant because the authorization to unmask Flynn was likely taken under the Obama administration, as the phone calls occurred in December.

The committee chairman said the issue goes beyond politics because it is also undermining the relationship between a president and world leaders.

"I think all foreign leaders now are going to be worried that this is going to somehow leak out. I think it has done tremendous damage to [America's] reputation around the world, and no one's talking about it -- and this is because someone in the national security apparatus decided to leak this out. It's very, very serious," he said.

Simply revealing the contents of the calls can have the effect of what the intelligence community calls "burning the source," because the parties involved know beyond a doubt the U.S. government has the ability to track the conversations.

The leaking of information about the investigation into Russian interference in the U.S. race points to the possible compromise of even more sensitive collection sources.

Funny chit coming from the party that outed a CIA agent for political revenge.

That's a debunked lie you stupid ****.

No, it is the truth. dick Cheney outed Valerie Plame because her husband was sent to investigate a yellow cake story where Bush had lied.

Plame had been a covert agent. By outing her, Cheney put every current covert agent that ever worked with Plame at rtsk.
No lie.

Been proven wrong repeatedly. Armatige accidentally "outed" her and was given a pass by the investigation and the prosecutor in the case. Learn some facts instead of idiotic talking points proven wrong years ago.

And then Cheney did too. You act like when Armitage said it that everyone on the planet knew. Cheney put CIA agents at risk. For what?

Look you ******* loon no such thing happened. there is Zero evidence of it. Scooter was prosecuted for perjury on an unrelated matter. Perhaps if you had any brains you would know all this since it happened years ago.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

What law did Mattis break?

Sorry, I meant to say Flynn. Flynn discussed Obama's sanctions and expulsions with the Ambassador, telling him the Trump Administration would lift them, and that was illegal.

You seem to think that Russia is your close ally, instead of a country which hacked your elections, and wanted Trump to win. Your President is colluding with the enemy. That constitutes treason in my books.

Flynn was a civilian at the time. Who gave the order to monitor him?

He was talking to the Russians you stupid shit. We were monitoring the Russians.
'

What law did Mattis break?

Sorry, I meant to say Flynn. Flynn discussed Obama's sanctions and expulsions with the Ambassador, telling him the Trump Administration would lift them, and that was illegal.

You seem to think that Russia is your close ally, instead of a country which hacked your elections, and wanted Trump to win. Your President is colluding with the enemy. That constitutes treason in my books.

Flynn was a civilian at the time. Who gave the order to monitor him?

He was talking to the Russians you stupid shit. We were monitoring the Russians.
'

Prove it you ******* lying piece of shit, there is no evidence either way but what is known is that whoever leaked the partial transcript of a phone call that contained zero evidence of wrongdoing belongs in prison.

Are you off your meds, trash boy?

You support members of our Government leaking classified and secure information illegally and you ask that?

 

[2aguy]

The idiots in obama's intelligence agencies leaked the Flynn information....and since they have to protect the identity of Americans when they are surveilling foreign assets........there are very few people who would have had access to the Flynn recordings......and they all belong to obama.....and now, they can go and get them ......

Catherine Herridge has high level sources......

We are talking jail time for the leakers when they are caught.......

Top House Republican wants FBI 'assessment' on Trump-related leaks

But the release of information from the Flynn phone calls also appears especially problematic, because when the intelligence community captures phone calls of an American inside the U.S., even if the discussion involves a foreign national (in this case an ambassador), steps must be taken to shield the American caller's identity.

"If [the conversation] was picked up inadvertently, then that would have had to been approved by someone in the last administration to actually unmask his name so that the FBI or intelligence officials knew who it was on the other end of the phone talking to the Russian ambassador," Nunes explained.

"If in fact the press reports are right, someone made the decision to deliberately listen to General Flynn's phone calls and that is, I think, unprecedented, unwarranted, and flat-out wrong."

Former NSA analyst and whistleblower Bill Binney confirmed to Fox News that surveillance programs that touch on leadership are highly restricted.

"I think it is compartmentalized, meaning a small circle, less than 100 [people would have access to the intelligence]," Binney said. "They are supposed to minimize the American side. ... All presumed U.S. citizens have rights under the Fourth Amendment."

Nunes said the timing may be significant because the authorization to unmask Flynn was likely taken under the Obama administration, as the phone calls occurred in December.

The committee chairman said the issue goes beyond politics because it is also undermining the relationship between a president and world leaders.

"I think all foreign leaders now are going to be worried that this is going to somehow leak out. I think it has done tremendous damage to [America's] reputation around the world, and no one's talking about it -- and this is because someone in the national security apparatus decided to leak this out. It's very, very serious," he said.

Simply revealing the contents of the calls can have the effect of what the intelligence community calls "burning the source," because the parties involved know beyond a doubt the U.S. government has the ability to track the conversations.

The leaking of information about the investigation into Russian interference in the U.S. race points to the possible compromise of even more sensitive collection sources.

The leaks aren't the problem.
What a hack you are

Yes...the leaks are.....he did nothing illegal in talking to the Russian Ambassador.......nothing. The leaks.....they are a major problem because the CIA is not supposed to do any intelligence work inside the United States.....so if they did it.....they broke the law ......and if anyone else did it, they needed a FISA court warrant to do it.......and then, only the highest level of the intelligence community would have had access to those recordings...since an American Citizen was involved and they have to take measures to actually protect that citizen.....

So yes....laws were broken...by obama minions still in the government since this took place while he was still President....


What did obama know and when did he know it?

 

[2aguy]

You're a certified nutcase. If Russia hacked the election then why did Hillary get the popular vote?

They didn't hack the voting machines, the leaked selected emails from one side, but failed to reveal the infighting among Republicans over Trump's candidacy. You think the RNC, which tried to change the convention rules to a brokered convention to stop Trump, doesn't have a lot of compromising emails out there?

They also kept pumping out false news reports that Hillary was dying, had Parkinsons, and other fake news. You don't just steal elections at the ballot box. You steal it by convincing people there is no good or honest candidate.

You do realize that the democrat national committee actually acted to keep Bernie from winning...right? That the DNC hired thugs through bob craemer and scott foval to incite violence at Trump rallies and engage in massive voter fraud..right? And that the DNC email showed that Podesta actually had real dealings with the Russians....business dealings that he pushed off onto his daughter...right?

 

[2aguy]

The obama minions were having discussions with Iran and hamas during the 2008 election campaign....so they had better watch out...odds are they actually did violate the Logan Act.....

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

The obama minions were having discussions with Iran and hamas during the 2008 election campaign....so they had better watch out...odds are they actually did violate the Logan Act.....

That's exactly right. This will backfire on them.

 

[2aguy]

Someone on Hannity's radio show said they may not have had a warrant to record Flynn........that is a big deal.....and is a reason for jail time....

 

[RealDave]

The idiots in obama's intelligence agencies leaked the Flynn information....and since they have to protect the identity of Americans when they are surveilling foreign assets........there are very few people who would have had access to the Flynn recordings......and they all belong to obama.....and now, they can go and get them ......

Catherine Herridge has high level sources......

We are talking jail time for the leakers when they are caught.......

Top House Republican wants FBI 'assessment' on Trump-related leaks

But the release of information from the Flynn phone calls also appears especially problematic, because when the intelligence community captures phone calls of an American inside the U.S., even if the discussion involves a foreign national (in this case an ambassador), steps must be taken to shield the American caller's identity.

"If [the conversation] was picked up inadvertently, then that would have had to been approved by someone in the last administration to actually unmask his name so that the FBI or intelligence officials knew who it was on the other end of the phone talking to the Russian ambassador," Nunes explained.

"If in fact the press reports are right, someone made the decision to deliberately listen to General Flynn's phone calls and that is, I think, unprecedented, unwarranted, and flat-out wrong."

Former NSA analyst and whistleblower Bill Binney confirmed to Fox News that surveillance programs that touch on leadership are highly restricted.

"I think it is compartmentalized, meaning a small circle, less than 100 [people would have access to the intelligence]," Binney said. "They are supposed to minimize the American side. ... All presumed U.S. citizens have rights under the Fourth Amendment."

Nunes said the timing may be significant because the authorization to unmask Flynn was likely taken under the Obama administration, as the phone calls occurred in December.

The committee chairman said the issue goes beyond politics because it is also undermining the relationship between a president and world leaders.

"I think all foreign leaders now are going to be worried that this is going to somehow leak out. I think it has done tremendous damage to [America's] reputation around the world, and no one's talking about it -- and this is because someone in the national security apparatus decided to leak this out. It's very, very serious," he said.

Simply revealing the contents of the calls can have the effect of what the intelligence community calls "burning the source," because the parties involved know beyond a doubt the U.S. government has the ability to track the conversations.

The leaking of information about the investigation into Russian interference in the U.S. race points to the possible compromise of even more sensitive collection sources.

I said it from the beginning. This was a trap coordinated between Obama and the previous CIA leader and his underlings, as payback for losing the election, and Flynn, a career officer with decades of experience, stepped right into it. There should definitely be some heads rolling in the CIA now.

The last time I looked, there were no CIA agents selling out the American people to the Putin and the Russians. That would be members of the Trump Administration. It's THEIR heads which are starting to roll.

This doesn't end here. Congress is talking about appointing a Special Prosecutor for this one.

CIA isn't supposed to spy on civilians, and then release top secret information to the public, dumbass. Unless you prefer living in a police state where phone conversations are listened to and recorded, with nobody to answer to. Because that's exactly what happened here. Remember, just like the Senate nuclear option, this knife cuts both ways. This is not a party issue.

Jesus you are a moron. They were monitoring the Russians.

And guess who calls? Flynn!!!.

If the FBI has a warrant to wire tap the local crime boss and you call, you get recorded.

 

[RealDave]

Someone on Hannity's radio show said they may not have had a warrant to record Flynn........that is a big deal.....and is a reason for jail time....

So, you think the CIA needs a warrant to tap a phone in Russia?

 

[RealDave]

No, it is the truth. dick Cheney outed Valerie Plame because her husband was sent to investigate a yellow cake story where Bush had lied.

Plame had been a covert agent. By outing her, Cheney put every current covert agent that ever worked with Plame at rtsk.
No lie.

You are a stupid **** it was Richard Armitage not acting on anyones orders, Plame outted herself, her CIA status was an open secret on the beltway so educate yourself before you flap your fucktarded gums.

Cheney did it too.

Your buddy Cheney put CIA agents at risk. What a low life POS you are to defend that action.

Eat a dick ******, you have no evidence whatsoever for your claim, this bullshit was debunked over a decade ago, kill yourself.

Lets ask Scooter.

Scooter was illegally convicted of perjury not outing Plume. Keep up dumb ass.

Ask Scooter because he went to jail to protect Cheney. Try to keep up.

 

[RealDave]

They were compromised by THEIR OWN ACTIONS. Your orange faced ass-clown knew that Mattis broke the law and DID NOTHING, and his Administration was lying to cover it up. So people in the CIA leaked the information, which they obtained from a LEGAL wiretap on the Russian Ambassador.

You were all gleeful when illegal hacking of the DNC leaked information favourable to tRump, but now you're butt hurt when your guys do something illegal and get caught.

What law did Mattis break?

Sorry, I meant to say Flynn. Flynn discussed Obama's sanctions and expulsions with the Ambassador, telling him the Trump Administration would lift them, and that was illegal.

You seem to think that Russia is your close ally, instead of a country which hacked your elections, and wanted Trump to win. Your President is colluding with the enemy. That constitutes treason in my books.

Flynn was a civilian at the time. Who gave the order to monitor him?

He was talking to the Russians you stupid shit. We were monitoring the Russians.
'

They were compromised by THEIR OWN ACTIONS. Your orange faced ass-clown knew that Mattis broke the law and DID NOTHING, and his Administration was lying to cover it up. So people in the CIA leaked the information, which they obtained from a LEGAL wiretap on the Russian Ambassador.

You were all gleeful when illegal hacking of the DNC leaked information favourable to tRump, but now you're butt hurt when your guys do something illegal and get caught.

What law did Mattis break?

Sorry, I meant to say Flynn. Flynn discussed Obama's sanctions and expulsions with the Ambassador, telling him the Trump Administration would lift them, and that was illegal.

You seem to think that Russia is your close ally, instead of a country which hacked your elections, and wanted Trump to win. Your President is colluding with the enemy. That constitutes treason in my books.

Flynn was a civilian at the time. Who gave the order to monitor him?

He was talking to the Russians you stupid shit. We were monitoring the Russians.
'

Prove it you ******* lying piece of shit, there is no evidence either way but what is known is that whoever leaked the partial transcript of a phone call that contained zero evidence of wrongdoing belongs in prison.

My God, you don't even know they were tapping Russian phones. Will you asshats ever get informed.

 

[RealDave]

You're a certified nutcase. If Russia hacked the election then why did Hillary get the popular vote?

They didn't hack the voting machines, the leaked selected emails from one side, but failed to reveal the infighting among Republicans over Trump's candidacy. You think the RNC, which tried to change the convention rules to a brokered convention to stop Trump, doesn't have a lot of compromising emails out there?

They also kept pumping out false news reports that Hillary was dying, had Parkinsons, and other fake news. You don't just steal elections at the ballot box. You steal it by convincing people there is no good or honest candidate.

You do realize that the democrat national committee actually acted to keep Bernie from winning...right? That the DNC hired thugs through bob craemer and scott foval to incite violence at Trump rallies and engage in massive voter fraud..right? And that the DNC email showed that Podesta actually had real dealings with the Russians....business dealings that he pushed off onto his daughter...right?

More lies from the trumpette.

Trump incited his alt right followers to violence. He even offered to pay their legal fees.

And hear you are blaming Democrats?

 

[Steve_McGarrett]

What law did Mattis break?

Sorry, I meant to say Flynn. Flynn discussed Obama's sanctions and expulsions with the Ambassador, telling him the Trump Administration would lift them, and that was illegal.

You seem to think that Russia is your close ally, instead of a country which hacked your elections, and wanted Trump to win. Your President is colluding with the enemy. That constitutes treason in my books.

Flynn was a civilian at the time. Who gave the order to monitor him?

He was talking to the Russians you stupid shit. We were monitoring the Russians.
'

What law did Mattis break?

Sorry, I meant to say Flynn. Flynn discussed Obama's sanctions and expulsions with the Ambassador, telling him the Trump Administration would lift them, and that was illegal.

You seem to think that Russia is your close ally, instead of a country which hacked your elections, and wanted Trump to win. Your President is colluding with the enemy. That constitutes treason in my books.

Flynn was a civilian at the time. Who gave the order to monitor him?

He was talking to the Russians you stupid shit. We were monitoring the Russians.
'

Prove it you ******* lying piece of shit, there is no evidence either way but what is known is that whoever leaked the partial transcript of a phone call that contained zero evidence of wrongdoing belongs in prison.

My God, you don't even know they were tapping Russian phones. Will you asshats ever get informed.

Who authorized the leak?

 

[Yarddog]

Standard fascist behavior. "Waaa! The treasonous conduct of our party was revealed! Jail whatever patriot did that! All must put party before country!"

So, JimBowie, 2aguy, AnCap'n and Death Angel aren't even pretending to be loyal Americans any more. That's probably for the best, as they never could pull off the charade. The party gives orders, they obey, and they don't care how that harms the USA. Their boy sold us out to the Russians, and since anything their side does is good by definition, they now think selling the USA out to the Russians is a good thing.

Selling out was giving hundreds of billions to Iran. How does that harm the USA when they are still developing ICBMs and its a forgone conclusion they will eventually have nuclear weapons?

The FBI's investigation of the so called Russian Hack relied on an independent contractor operating off a grant from Google Corp to do the investigation on the DNC server. The FBI wasn't even allowed to access the server, yet we have the DNC continuosly regurgitating the same crap.

Flynn did nothing wrong but making a phone call. that hardly constitutes selling out our country. If theres any hacking and selling out it's coming from the DNC, who just threw a decorated member of our armed forces under the bus because he once dared to criticize Obama's policy publicly. The DNC is a putrid resevour that needs to be drained before the infection turns into gangrene.

 

[2aguy]

You're a certified nutcase. If Russia hacked the election then why did Hillary get the popular vote?

They didn't hack the voting machines, the leaked selected emails from one side, but failed to reveal the infighting among Republicans over Trump's candidacy. You think the RNC, which tried to change the convention rules to a brokered convention to stop Trump, doesn't have a lot of compromising emails out there?

They also kept pumping out false news reports that Hillary was dying, had Parkinsons, and other fake news. You don't just steal elections at the ballot box. You steal it by convincing people there is no good or honest candidate.

You do realize that the democrat national committee actually acted to keep Bernie from winning...right? That the DNC hired thugs through bob craemer and scott foval to incite violence at Trump rallies and engage in massive voter fraud..right? And that the DNC email showed that Podesta actually had real dealings with the Russians....business dealings that he pushed off onto his daughter...right?

More lies from the trumpette.

Trump incited his alt right followers to violence. He even offered to pay their legal fees.

And hear you are blaming Democrats?

Moron....they have it on video...bob craemer and scott foval stated they hired people to incite violence.....it is on ******* video......the DNC and hilary as well as obama sactioned the activity....