- Moderator
- #21
Ugh, all of it, your footer provoked the response to point out your hypocrisy. Typical regressive, do as I say, not as I do. LOL
.
The Lavrentiy Beria States of America
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
Ugh, all of it, your footer provoked the response to point out your hypocrisy. Typical regressive, do as I say, not as I do. LOL
.
Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #22
Had I used the term "probative", you might have been even more wrong. I did try to dumb it down for you (I use "you" in place of the many supporters of Trump and those who believe PoliticalChic has anything to offer other than "ain' it awful".
Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #23
Thanks so much for sharing.
DustyInfinity
Platinum Member
Come to think of it, I have never seen a democrat condemn a communist dictator. They loved Vietnam, Cuba, the soviets, ect. My favorite will always be Ted Kennedy and the Soviets.
DustyInfinity
Platinum Member
Who can forget their collective orgasm over Venezuela. That was sweet. Dictators and their disposable peons. Livin the life.
- Thread starter
- #26
Let's begin with the observation that you make habit of using words you can't define.
Conservative.
I can help.
These are the beliefs associated with conservatism....and with the Founders of this nation:
a. individualism, free markets, and limited constitutional government.
These are what you, Liberals, Socialists, Progressives, dolts of all varieties, support.....consciously or otherwise:
b. the collective, command and control regulation of private industry, and overarching government that can order every aspect of the private citizen's life....right down to control of his thoughts and speech.
Don't make the same mistake again.
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #27
And, most recently, the 7th century savages who rule Iran.....and they want these savages to have nuclear weapons.
- Thread starter
- #28
Yet the fool in post #20 hasn't rushed off to Maduro-land, where he could feel right at home.....
Go figure.
- Thread starter
- #29
Liberals (another name for commie lite) have never meet a socialist / communist dictator they wouldn't support; no matter how brutally he treats his citizens. ...
The above message is brought to you by Bigots r Us, an organization which prides itself on the duality of moral corruption and hateful rhetoric. Please donate a pork chop to today's author, so that he(?) can remain diligent in his(?) hateful endeavors.
Did the Democrats support the homicidal regime of the Soviet Union???
Hence....Sunni is totally correct.
From this:
Roosevelt: "I would rather lose New Zealand, Australia or anything else than have the Russian front collapse."
Robert Dallek, "Franklin D. Roosevelt and American Foreign Policy, 1932-1945," p. 338.
Yup!
'Russia Uber Alles'
Through this:
Ted Kennedy appealing to the Kremlin to work together against the American President.
The American Left: not on our side during the Cold War, or the VietNam War, Ted Kennedy plotted with the Soviet Union against the American President, they’re with Hezbollah, with Iran
Sooo....which t-shirt are you sporting today....Che or Beria?
You're really stupid if you believe FDR's quote will convince anyone with any knowledge of WW II to mean anything more than what it meant, i.e, more Germans on the Western Front.
This might have changed the course of history (though given your hate for progressive and liberal policies I suppose you would have been pleased if Germany had repelled the Normandy Invasion and controlled all of Europe).
You should stick to posting about topics on which you were informed.....but then you'd be mute.
Roosevelt did all he could to make certain that his BFF Stalin, and communism, would survive the war.
As in this:
To trick the American public into support for the Russian tyrant....Roosevelt swore to the American public the exact opposite: he declared that Stalin fought for the same ideals! FDR was lying!
September 30, 1941, FDR claimed that there was freedom of religion in the USSR.
"The claim that Stalin's Russia allowed religious freedom was the first step in a massive pro-Soviet campaign that the White House coordinated for the duration of the war."
"Caught between Roosevelt and Stalin: America's Ambassadors to Moscow," by Dennis J. Dunn, p. 137
Seems you avoid books as though they would impart some disease......they don't.
Hanson Baldwin, military critic of the New York Times, declares in his book, "Great Mistakes of the War:" 'There is no doubt whatsoever that it would have been to the interest of Britain, the United States, and the world to have allowed and indeed to have encouraged-the world's two great dictatorships to fight each other to a frazzle.'
Baldwin writes that the United States put itself "in the role-at times a disgraceful role-of fearful suppliant and propitiating ally, anxious at nearly any cost to keep Russia fighting. In retrospect, how stupid!"
Were it not for Democrats/Liberals love of communism, this is would have transpired.
And today, we see the satire of the Left trying to blame the Republicans for colluding with Russia.....
- Thread starter
- #30
"Justice Dept. Granted Immunity to Specialist Who Deleted Hillary Clinton’s Emails
By Adam Goldman and Michael S. Schmidt
Republicans have called for the department to investigate the deletions, but the immunity deal with the specialist, Paul Combetta, ...."
Justice Dept. Granted Immunity to Specialist Who Deleted Hillary Clinton’s Emails
By Adam Goldman and Michael S. Schmidt
- WASHINGTON — A computer specialist who deleted Hillary Clinton’s emails despite orders from Congress to preserve them was given immunity by the Justice Department during its investigation into her personal email account, according to a law enforcement official and others briefed on the investigation.
Republicans have called for the department to investigate the deletions, but the immunity deal with the specialist, Paul Combetta, ...."
Justice Dept. Granted Immunity to Specialist Who Deleted Hillary Clinton’s Emails
Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #31
The more the narcissist above posts, the more desperate she becomes; she demands that her explanation of history be accepted as the one and only truth and in doing so distorts every Democrat - elected or appointed or a citizen - as one seeking a dystopian future for mankind.
Using loaded words, i.e., "the Collective", and equating Communism as the Democratic hidden agenda is a conspiracy theory on steroids. My parody on her two mentors - Rand and Coulter - of conservatism is no more valid than her continued drum beat that Democrats want everything free, and that the D's (all of them) support criminals and other's whose color or lifestyle or ethnicity are dangerous and a threat to our country.
The hypocrisy of the current iteration of conservatism is manifest, from their clamor of the national debt under the Democrats to their total silence to the addition of trillions of dollars added to our children and grandchildren's future, by unfunded wars and passing the recent tax fraud bill.
Let's not forget the clamor from the right on personal responsibility, once again silenced when the PPACA (Obamacare) required us to pay for health insurance.
The only fools are those who read PC's numerous threads, all with the same theme ("Ain't Democrats Awful") and find her credible. She's not, she is dishonest and deplorable and divisive; a more toxic poster may not exist.
Using loaded words, i.e., "the Collective", and equating Communism as the Democratic hidden agenda is a conspiracy theory on steroids. My parody on her two mentors - Rand and Coulter - of conservatism is no more valid than her continued drum beat that Democrats want everything free, and that the D's (all of them) support criminals and other's whose color or lifestyle or ethnicity are dangerous and a threat to our country.
The hypocrisy of the current iteration of conservatism is manifest, from their clamor of the national debt under the Democrats to their total silence to the addition of trillions of dollars added to our children and grandchildren's future, by unfunded wars and passing the recent tax fraud bill.
Let's not forget the clamor from the right on personal responsibility, once again silenced when the PPACA (Obamacare) required us to pay for health insurance.
The only fools are those who read PC's numerous threads, all with the same theme ("Ain't Democrats Awful") and find her credible. She's not, she is dishonest and deplorable and divisive; a more toxic poster may not exist.
- Thread starter
- #32
Earlier in the thread you were given a chance to reveal some dollop of incipient honesty....in fact, given two opportunities.
Should an individual under investigation expect, and be entitled to, impartiality by the investigating agencies?
im·par·ti·al·i·ty
imˌpärSHēˈalədē/
noun
1. equal treatment of all rivals or disputants; fairness.
Either answer or make known what a cur you really are.
But....instead, you proved what many have known all along....
Now, I probably own apologies to curs.
Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #33
Q. Should an individual under investigation expect, and be entitled to, impartiality by the investigating agencies
A. Yes, and I have completed several hundred criminal investigations and was trained and employed the following advice:
Don't make a judgment until you have interviewed or interrogated every person, witness and victim and the possible perp. - TWICE. And every piece of physical evidence for its probative value.
Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #35
Goebbels was correct, and that is exactly what the current Trump&Co does everyday.
My comment was a parody of Ann Coulter, to wit:
"People are most conservative on issues that they know most about"
Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #37
Really? What do I do to "hurt this country"? In fact it is my country, and the country of my sons and their children. It is assholes like you who are divisive and can't see how toxic the current conservative movement has become.
I don't care what you hope for, you're one of the deplorable, ignorant and likely somewhat mentally retarded losers.
- Thread starter
- #39
Q. Should an individual under investigation expect, and be entitled to, impartiality by the investigating agencies
A. Yes, and I have completed several hundred criminal investigations and was trained and employed the following advice:
Well, now that I've force that declaration.....explain the attack on Trump as per:
1.The Hillary campaign paid for an anti-Trump Russian creation called the dossier: they used law firm Perkins Coie to funnel money to GPS Fusion and Christopher Steele
2. The Hillary campaign screamed that they had been hacked, but refused to allow any government agencies to inspect the supposedly hacked servers
3. The FBI admitted that they knew the dossier was fake from the start, but used it to get a FISA warrant to surveil Trump and associates
4. A secret cabal at the highest levels of the FBI and the DoJ worked with GPS Fusion to undermine the Trump campaign...before and after the election.
5. FBI found classified data on Huma and Anthony Weiner’s laptop….so they gave them a pass
6. The FBI decided no charges against Hillary before they interviewed her…..with no record kept of the interview, and not under oath.
7. Both Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills were found to be lying to the FBI….but given a pass ...and allowed to keep their laptops, and destroy any evidence on same
8. FBI agents Strzok and Page and McCabe talked over a plan to overturn the election….an ‘insurance policy’
9. Loretta Lynch with Comey’s acquiescence, worked to benefit Hillary’s campaign
10. Obama knew about Hillary’s use of unsecured emails, as he conversed with her on same…kept his name out of the reports.
11. BTW…..Mueller, Comey and Rosenstein were all government officials when Hillary received the $145 million bribe for the sale of our uranium.
....Robert Mueller was the FBI Director during the time of the Russian uranium probe, and so was his successor James Comey who took over in 2013 as the FBI was still developing the case. Rod Rosenstein, then-U.S. Attorney....
12. The FBI offered to pay Christopher Steele if he could corroborate the dossier….so he told Yahoo New’s Michael Isikoff about the dossier, had him print the information….then told the FBI that Isikoff independently discovered the “facts”…
Steele admitted, in a British court, that he leaked the material to Yahoo. September 23 Yahoo ran the story.
The FBI took the Isikoff Yahoo story to the FISA court to get the warrant….then fired Steele for sharing it with news outlets.
13. After the FBI fired Steele, he continued to confer with Bruce Ohr and the DoJ…and Rod Rosestein and Sally Yates.
In September of 2016, this was Steele’s statement to Bruce Ohr that he “was desperate that Donald Trump not get elected and was passionate about him not being president.”
14. And in another stunning revelation, the memo asserts that Justice Department official Bruce Ohr was used to pass information from the author of the dossier, Christopher Steele, to the DOJ.
Ohr’s wife, Nellie Ohr, worked at the time for Fusion GPS, the opposition research firm research firm that commissioned the dossier. Bruce Ohr, who worked closely with Deputy Attorney Generals Sally Yates and Rod Rosenstein, passed his wife’s opposition research on Trump to the FBI, the memo says.
15. Fired by the FBI as untrustworthy, Steele is maintained by the DoJ as a contact, and all the while, Bruce Ohr’s wife is drawing a salary from the group Hillary hired to produce the dossier….GPS Fusion.
Bruce Ohr’s wife’s connections to Hillary’s paid dossier-producers, GPS Fusion, was never disclosed to the FISA court.
16. Not Hillary Clinton’s Campaign, nor the DNC, nor Christopher Steel, nor Fusion GPS, nor Bruce Ohr’s wife, the roles of none of these participants in the creation of the dossier….not a one was revealed to the FISA court.
17. The memo also says that the FBI’s deputy director, Andrew McCabe, told Congress that a FISA warrant against the campaign adviser, Carter Page, would not have been granted without use of the dossier. That despite the FBI later determining that very little of the Democrat-funded document was corroborated
18. Let’s compare the zealous and very aggressive action by Mueller against Flynn, Manafort, Papadopoulos, and Carter Page with the immunity and passes given above…..
19..The memo notes that the Papadopoulos information “triggered” the FBI investigation into possible Trump campaign collusion.
It says that there is no evidence that Page and Papadopoulos engaged in a conspiracy. “
Spy Warrant Granted Based On Dossier And News Stories Planted By Fusion GPS
…and lots of evidence of associations of Democrats with the Kremlin….
…completely different treatment.
20. And all of the players in on the fix were demanding the Memo not be released….and lied about why it should not be released.
Last edited:
- Thread starter
- #40
"Using loaded words, i.e., "the Collective", and equating Communism as the Democratic ....."
Actually, I've used 'collective' correctly, as it applies to Liberalism, Progressivism, Socialism, Communism, Nazism, and Fascism.
Don't blame me if you are embarrassed by your associations.....
" Franklin Roosevelt had pictured a place where citizens were joined in a collective enterprise ... Reagan pictured a more individualistic America where everyone would flourish once freed from the shackles of the state, and so the watchwords became self-reliance and small government."
The Liberal Crackup
Last edited:
Similar threads
