There can be huge consequences for getting the vaccinations. They always warn you when you take your child in. I remember sitting there for the required 20 minutes after my children got shots and hoped none of the horrible side effects would present themselves.
I don't trust many of the newer vaccinations or meds. We always see commercials for the latest pill and a year later, we see the lawyer ads for the class action lawsuits because people died or suffered some horrible side effects. I prefer to only trust things that have been tried and true over many years.
My family is lucky because we never experienced any difficulties from vaccinations, at least that we know of.
For those whose children died or suffered, I understand their anti-vaccination stance. It might be helpful if they can figure out a way to know who might be at risk.
If your children is immunized, then don't worry about other children infecting them. That is the whole point of the vaccination, so whoever suggested people keep their unvaccinated children at home is not thinking. The ones at risk for catching different illnesses are the unvaccinated ones.
If it could possibly be determined that some children would likely have fatal consequences from being vaccinated, should the government still force them to get the shots? Since we don't know now which children are at risk, do we still insist on vaccinating them and say it's worth some dying to satisfy those who think everyone should have one? Vaccinate your own child, if you wish, and realize that once they get their shots, you needn't worry about them catching anything.
Sad part is that there is only one way to know if the vaccination will harm or kill your child and that is to give them the shots. If parents know others in their family had bad reactions, have some understanding if they are reticent to take the gamble with their own child.