Well, at least you're honest enough to admit you're doing exactly what you claim to oppose, even if you're not intelligent enough to know that you did so.
Not really honest. Just stupid enough to accidentally expose what it really means, once in a while.
I'm reminded of a sort of ethics test that a day labor company through which I have sometimes worked, used to use (perhaps still does).
It consists of a bunch of multiple-choice questions, which really get down to just a few questions repeated many times, in different wordings.
Really, there are only three things the test was looking for, that the company regarded as the most basic standards it required anyone to meet in order to work for it.
It wanted to know if a prospective worker was inclined to violent behavior, to stealing, or to using or being under the influence of alcohol or drugs while on the job.
A very low bar, at least form my point of view, and it was amazing to me how many others who applied couldn't meet that standard and were tripped up enough by this test to fail it.
If you just asked them flat out,
“Do you get into fights when you are on a job?”,
“Do you steal from employers or clients?”, or
“Do you use drugs while on the job?”, every one would deny it. But somehow, this test manages to trip them up, just as you've seen
PinktheFloyd88 get tripped up.