The Lancet Republishes Major Autopsy Study Co-Authored by Yale Medical Professor Saying 74% of Sudden Deaths Were Due to COVID Vaccines

[munkle]

For anyone who doesn't know it the Lancet is the highest medical publication in the world. They squashed this study, whose authors include Yale School of Medicine Professor Harvey Risch, as soon as they published it last year, as soon as medical establishment quacks were unleashed by the Pharma Industry. Now the Lancet has republished it, in peer reviewed form.

Upshot: In most comprehensive study yet of sudden, unexpected deaths after COVID vaccination, 324 autopsies, "73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination."


Paper:

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF AUTOPSY FINDINGS IN DEATHS AFTER COVID-19 VACCINATION

ABSTRACT Background: The rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, spike protein-associated...

zenodo.org

Explosive Study Once Removed by Lancet within 24 Hours, Now Peer-Reviewed and Public: Reveals 74% of Deaths Directly Linked to COVID-19 Shot | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

"A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online.

The study, titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination,” analyzed 325 autopsy cases and found that a staggering 73.9% of deaths were either directly due to or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 vaccination.

The paper’s lead author, Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, faced significant opposition in bringing these findings to light. After initially being downloaded over 100,000 times, The Lancet removed the paper within 24 hours, according to Dr. William Makis.


According to The Daily Sceptic, the reason given at the time was, “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”

The news outlet added:

New Deals Now At The Gateway Pundit Discounts Page At MyPillow – Including the $25 Extravaganza!

“Without further detail from the Preprints with the Lancet staff who removed the paper it is hard to know what substance the claim that the conclusions are not supported by the methodology really has. A number of the authors of the paper are at the top of their fields so it is hard to imagine that the methodology of their review was really so poor that it warranted removal at initial screening rather than being subject to full critical appraisal. It smacks instead of raw censorship of a paper that failed to toe the official line. Keep in mind that the CDC has not yet acknowledged a single death being caused by the Covid mRNA vaccines. Autopsy evidence demonstrating otherwise is clearly not what the U.S. public health establishment wants to hear.”

In a post on X Friday, Dr. William Makis shared the exciting news.
“BREAKING NEWS: Our LANCET CENSORED Paper is now peer reviewed and available online!” Makis wrote on X.... "

Bill Gates 2020: “normalcy only returns when we’ve…vaccinated the entire global population.”

 

[mamooth]

"Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death."

Oh, that settles. Three antivaxxer crank doctors agreed that any autopsy report that mentioned "cardiac arrest" meant the death was vaccine-caused.

'Effin morons.

On the plus side, antivaxxism really does thin the herd of the morons.

 

[luiza]

Will not make any difference to the Deniers .

The best way to deal with these useless people is to befriend them and take them cliff walking .
For a different view . Obviously .

 

[munkle]

Will not make any difference to the Deniers .

The best way to deal with these useless people is to befriend them and take them cliff walking .
For a different view . Obviously .

Just tell them to get their "boosters."

 

[PeterPilot]

Will not make any difference to the Deniers .

The best way to deal with these useless people is to befriend them and take them cliff walking .
For a different view . Obviously .

Yes, it's easier to fool a man than it is to explain to him how he has been fooled. Humans in denial cannot be reasoned with.

This story from Lancet shows why the powers that be suppressed autopsies in the beginning. Nor did the Red Cross prevent shot recipients from donating blood into the general population, and so our blood supply is absolutely contaminated.

 

[Independent thinker]

For anyone who doesn't know it the Lancet is the highest medical publication in the world. They squashed this study, whose authors include Yale School of Medicine Professor Harvey Risch, as soon as they published it last year, as soon as medical establishment quacks were unleashed by the Pharma Industry. Now the Lancet has republished it, in peer reviewed form.

Upshot: In most comprehensive study yet of sudden, unexpected deaths after COVID vaccination, 324 autopsies, "73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination."


Paper:

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF AUTOPSY FINDINGS IN DEATHS AFTER COVID-19 VACCINATION

ABSTRACT Background: The rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, spike protein-associated...

zenodo.org

Explosive Study Once Removed by Lancet within 24 Hours, Now Peer-Reviewed and Public: Reveals 74% of Deaths Directly Linked to COVID-19 Shot | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

"A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online.

The study, titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination,” analyzed 325 autopsy cases and found that a staggering 73.9% of deaths were either directly due to or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 vaccination.

The paper’s lead author, Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, faced significant opposition in bringing these findings to light. After initially being downloaded over 100,000 times, The Lancet removed the paper within 24 hours, according to Dr. William Makis.


According to The Daily Sceptic, the reason given at the time was, “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”

The news outlet added:

New Deals Now At The Gateway Pundit Discounts Page At MyPillow – Including the $25 Extravaganza!

In a post on X Friday, Dr. William Makis shared the exciting news.
“BREAKING NEWS: Our LANCET CENSORED Paper is now peer reviewed and available online!” Makis wrote on X.... "

Bill Gates 2020: “normalcy only returns when we’ve…vaccinated the entire global population.”

But we must punish the right for spreading misinformation!

 

[Tommy Tainant]

I might be missing something but the article doessnt seem to match up to the title thread. In fact the first line says this.



Caution: Unverified Contents
Papers are not peer-reviewed by Zenodo, and must be regarded as preliminary until peer-reviewed by multiple experts in the field. Thus it should not be regarded as conclusive, or be reported in news media as established information, as the main claims may not stand the test of scientific scrutiny.

So it isnt peer reveiwed. And it is published by something called Zenoob. I cant see any reference to the Lancet.
Unless you can provide those things this is just internet conspiracy nonsense.
An unpublished "reseaarch" self published and not peer reveiwed.
Why do you anti vax types continue to publish lies that harm innocent people ?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Meritking VIP Oyuncu - Platinyum Seviyeye Özel Masalar - Meritking Giriş

Meritking VIP Platinyum seviye: yüksek limitli özel masalar, kişisel hesap yöneticisi, hızlı para çekimi ve VIP bonuslarla ayrıcalıklı bahis deneyimi.

healthfeedback.org

And it was published on a related website to the Lancet and deleted within 24 hours, Most sites rated it bogus because the methodology was faulty.
These are wicked people.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

For anyone who doesn't know it the Lancet is the highest medical publication in the world. They squashed this study, whose authors include Yale School of Medicine Professor Harvey Risch, as soon as they published it last year, as soon as medical establishment quacks were unleashed by the Pharma Industry. Now the Lancet has republished it, in peer reviewed form.

Upshot: In most comprehensive study yet of sudden, unexpected deaths after COVID vaccination, 324 autopsies, "73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination."


Paper:

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF AUTOPSY FINDINGS IN DEATHS AFTER COVID-19 VACCINATION

ABSTRACT Background: The rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, spike protein-associated...

zenodo.org

Explosive Study Once Removed by Lancet within 24 Hours, Now Peer-Reviewed and Public: Reveals 74% of Deaths Directly Linked to COVID-19 Shot | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

"A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online.

The study, titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination,” analyzed 325 autopsy cases and found that a staggering 73.9% of deaths were either directly due to or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 vaccination.

The paper’s lead author, Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, faced significant opposition in bringing these findings to light. After initially being downloaded over 100,000 times, The Lancet removed the paper within 24 hours, according to Dr. William Makis.


According to The Daily Sceptic, the reason given at the time was, “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”

The news outlet added:

New Deals Now At The Gateway Pundit Discounts Page At MyPillow – Including the $25 Extravaganza!

In a post on X Friday, Dr. William Makis shared the exciting news.
“BREAKING NEWS: Our LANCET CENSORED Paper is now peer reviewed and available online!” Makis wrote on X.... "

Bill Gates 2020: “normalcy only returns when we’ve…vaccinated the entire global population.”

Why do you publish these lies ? Do you get a kick out of it or do you genuinely believe it ? It took me the click of a mouse to rip your shit to shreds.
The fact that you didnt tells me you are in on whatever scam it is. Maybe you just think its funny.
This sort of crap killed people thru covid. Dont you have any thought for their kids or partners ?

 

[Boo Radley]

Meritking VIP Oyuncu - Platinyum Seviyeye Özel Masalar - Meritking Giriş

Meritking VIP Platinyum seviye: yüksek limitli özel masalar, kişisel hesap yöneticisi, hızlı para çekimi ve VIP bonuslarla ayrıcalıklı bahis deneyimi.

healthfeedback.org

And it was published on a related website to the Lancet and deleted within 24 hours, Most sites rated it bogus because the methodology was faulty.
These are wicked people.

"Most sites."

 

[debbiedowner]

For anyone who doesn't know it the Lancet is the highest medical publication in the world. They squashed this study, whose authors include Yale School of Medicine Professor Harvey Risch, as soon as they published it last year, as soon as medical establishment quacks were unleashed by the Pharma Industry. Now the Lancet has republished it, in peer reviewed form.

Upshot: In most comprehensive study yet of sudden, unexpected deaths after COVID vaccination, 324 autopsies, "73.9% of deaths were directly due to or significantly contributed to by COVID-19 vaccination."


Paper:

A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF AUTOPSY FINDINGS IN DEATHS AFTER COVID-19 VACCINATION

ABSTRACT Background: The rapid development and widespread deployment of COVID-19 vaccines, combined with a high number of adverse event reports, have led to concerns over possible mechanisms of injury including systemic lipid nanoparticle (LNP) and mRNA distribution, spike protein-associated...

zenodo.org

Explosive Study Once Removed by Lancet within 24 Hours, Now Peer-Reviewed and Public: Reveals 74% of Deaths Directly Linked to COVID-19 Shot | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft

A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

"A previously censored paper from The Lancet has now undergone peer review and is available online.

The study, titled “A Systematic Review of Autopsy Findings in Deaths After COVID-19 Vaccination,” analyzed 325 autopsy cases and found that a staggering 73.9% of deaths were either directly due to or significantly contributed to by the COVID-19 vaccination.

The paper’s lead author, Dr. Nicolas Hulscher, faced significant opposition in bringing these findings to light. After initially being downloaded over 100,000 times, The Lancet removed the paper within 24 hours, according to Dr. William Makis.


According to The Daily Sceptic, the reason given at the time was, “This preprint has been removed by Preprints with the Lancet because the study’s conclusions are not supported by the study methodology.”

The news outlet added:

New Deals Now At The Gateway Pundit Discounts Page At MyPillow – Including the $25 Extravaganza!

In a post on X Friday, Dr. William Makis shared the exciting news.
“BREAKING NEWS: Our LANCET CENSORED Paper is now peer reviewed and available online!” Makis wrote on X.... "

Bill Gates 2020: “normalcy only returns when we’ve…vaccinated the entire global population.”

I didn't see the disclaimer at the top, why not?

Caution: Unverified Contents

Papers are not peer-reviewed by Zenodo, and must be regarded as preliminary until peer-reviewed by multiple experts in the field. Thus it should not be regarded as conclusive, or be reported in news media as established information, as the main claims may not stand the test of scientific scrutiny.

 

[debbiedowner]

"Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death."

Oh, that settles. Three antivaxxer crank doctors agreed that any autopsy report that mentioned "cardiac arrest" meant the death was vaccine-caused.

'Effin morons.

On the plus side, antivaxxism really does thin the herd of the morons.

That's a lot of dead bodies to examine. This article is nothing but bullshit. Should be in conspiracy.

 

[debbiedowner]

Why do you publish these lies ? Do you get a kick out of it or do you genuinely believe it ? It took me the click of a mouse to rip your shit to shreds.
The fact that you didnt tells me you are in on whatever scam it is. Maybe you just think its funny.
This sort of crap killed people thru covid. Dont you have any thought for their kids or partners ?

He's an habitual liar that's why.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The OP is not what the Lancet posits.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

"Most sites."

You will always find a bogus site pushing this crap. I say most as insurance against that.
Maybe I should say all reputable sites. I note that the op is in hiding now.

 

[PeterPilot]

I might be missing something but the article doessnt seem to match up to the title thread. In fact the first line says this.



Caution: Unverified Contents
Papers are not peer-reviewed by Zenodo, and must be regarded as preliminary until peer-reviewed by multiple experts in the field. Thus it should not be regarded as conclusive, or be reported in news media as established information, as the main claims may not stand the test of scientific scrutiny.

So it isnt peer reveiwed. And it is published by something called Zenoob. I cant see any reference to the Lancet.
Unless you can provide those things this is just internet conspiracy nonsense.
An unpublished "reseaarch" self published and not peer reveiwed.
Why do you anti vax types continue to publish lies that harm innocent people ?

Have you figured out yet that the "peers" you refer to are mostly paid individuals, paid to write BS that supports Pharma?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Have you figured out yet that the "peers" you refer to are mostly paid individuals, paid to write BS that supports Pharma?

Well I do know that the anti vax group are lying to us like this story. Come back with some facts and I will listen

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Yes, it's easier to fool a man than it is to explain to him how he has been fooled. Humans in denial cannot be reasoned with.

This story from Lancet shows why the powers that be suppressed autopsies in the beginning. Nor did the Red Cross prevent shot recipients from donating blood into the general population, and so our blood supply is absolutely contaminated.

The red cross do npt operate the blood transfusion service. More lies.

 

[Tommy Tainant]

But we must punish the right for spreading misinformation!

Indeed we should.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

"Three physicians independently reviewed all deaths and determined whether COVID-19 vaccination was the direct cause or contributed significantly to death."

Oh, that settles. Three antivaxxer crank doctors agreed that any autopsy report that mentioned "cardiac arrest" meant the death was vaccine-caused.

'Effin morons.

On the plus side, antivaxxism really does thin the herd of the morons.

Seriously... these people are so goddamn gullible...