The Kirk “Shooter”

They off Charlie Kirk because they do not want 107 "conspiracy theories" and Charlie is on record giving one that is completely irrefutable, nobody even tried to deny any of it...

Kirk was extremely influential...especially with young people. And it appears that his views were starting to shift. He was definitely bringing up some very controversial topics that the powers-that-be don't want people thinking about or questioning.










Look at the date of this tweet. It was about a month ago...

 
I have no available resources available to argue, debate, or reason with a CRAZY nut job, which you are.


Me:

Antifa.......LOOLLOLLOL
GOP.......**** no.


So tell us, was this a 757 airplane???




Inconclusive Video.

Was there a flight that initiated?
What happened to that flight?
What about ALL the family members of this flight?

Was it ALL faked and how did they get everyone involved to agree to stay quiet?


You have answers?
**** NO you don't.



You are a JEW SUPREMACIST ZIONIST FASCIST TRAITOR. It doesn't matter which party you ID as, because that's not what is important to you. You would vote for Spanberger in VA and Raffensparger in GA... because the only thing that matters to you is Jew...
 
Two types of people...

People who parrot, and never think....

People who think, and never parrot....

The latter category isn't buying this trans as the sole shooter BS, not at all...
How many times was Charlie Kirk struck?

Do you think that there was more than just one shot?

How many wounds in Charlie’s neck?

Where on his neck was the wound of entry?

The answer is that no evidence shows any reason to believe that there was a “second shooter.”

The shooter wasn’t the tranny,, by the way. The tranny was the shooter’s roommate.
But the shooter (allegedly Tyler Robinson) was facing in towards Mr. Kirk, up high, within 200 yards or so and used a scoped, bolt-action rifle: so the wound of entry could only have been to the front of the victim’s neck.

Again: what second “shooter?”
 
The answer is that no evidence shows any reason to believe that there was a “second shooter.”


Moot issue since EMH has not claimed a second shooter here. Butler, yeah, here, no evidence yet...

That you are forcing that doctrine here is evidence there was a second shooter, since your credibility as a Mossad mouthpiece here is well documented as absolute zero on these type of issues. I have real doubts this trans did any of the shooting.

"Her daddy taught her how to shoot."

Really, any old videos of the trans kid being an ace marksman?
 
Kirk was extremely influential...especially with young people. And it appears that his views were starting to shift. He was definitely bringing up some very controversial topics that the powers-that-be don't want people thinking about or questioning.


View attachment 1162088







Look at the date of this tweet. It was about a month ago...






Thank you for more truth the "parrot class" of human doesn't want to hear...
 
The answer is that no evidence shows any reason to believe that there was a “second shooter.”
Second shooter is a misnomer.

But the shooter (allegedly Tyler Robinson) was facing in towards Mr. Kirk, up high, within 200 yards or so and used a scoped, bolt-action rifle: so the wound of entry could only have been to the front of the victim’s neck.

There are many that have observed there is no good evidence that the shot came from Tyler on the roof.

Maybe I am wrong, could you post a ballistics report, or a video of him actually shooting? Being on the roof isn't proof.




Even the guy in custody denies that he did the deed.

“He [Robinson] has not confessed to authorities. He is not cooperating, but all the people around him are cooperating. And I think that’s very important,” Cox told ABC News’ “This Week” on Sunday.
 
“He [Robinson] has not confessed to authorities. He is not cooperating, but all the people around him are cooperating. And I think that’s very important,” Cox



Spencer Cox, "Spanberger Republican."
 
The Administration especially Trump and Kash are sticking with the Official narrative, otherwise the FBI threatened to put kiddie porn on their computer
No. . . no, don't say that, It isn't true. :aargh:

They would never do that to Kash Pateleson.

a63vng.jpg
 
It is quite telling how "supporters of Israel" from "both sides" are furiously demanding we accept the "official narrative" of the Kirk Assassination....

The same group crowing for us to get the Covid Vax...
 
Moot issue since EMH has not claimed a second shooter here. Butler, yeah, here, no evidence yet...

That you are forcing that doctrine here is evidence there was a second shooter, since your credibility as a Mossad mouthpiece here is well documented as absolute zero on these type of issues. I have real doubts this trans did any of the shooting.

"Her daddy taught her how to shoot."

Really, any old videos of the trans kid being an ace marksman?
This thread isn’t about Butler, stupid.

It’s about the Kirk shooter.

So when you rambled on about a second shooter, it would seem to be a conspiracy theory about the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
 
This thread isn’t about Butler, stupid.

It’s about the Kirk shooter.

So when you rambled on about a second shooter, it would seem to be a conspiracy theory about the assassination of Charlie Kirk.


WHERE??

WHERE did EMH "ramble on about a second shooter" in Utah???
 
Second shooter is a misnomer.



There are many that have observed there is no good evidence that the shot came from Tyler on the roof.

Maybe I am wrong, could you post a ballistics report, or a video of him actually shooting? Being on the roof isn't proof.




Even the guy in custody denies that he did the deed.

“He [Robinson] has not confessed to authorities. He is not cooperating, but all the people around him are cooperating. And I think that’s very important,” Cox told ABC News’ “This Week” on Sunday.
Of course the suspect isn’t cooperating! Any lawyer with any ethics would tell his client (even that creature) to exercise his guaranteed right to stfu.
 
Of course the suspect isn’t cooperating! Any lawyer with any ethics would tell his client (even that creature) to exercise his guaranteed right to stfu.
So you are ready and willing to pronounce him guilty without a full review of the evidence?

Interesting. :eusa_think:
 
WHERE??

WHERE did EMH "ramble on about a second shooter" in Utah???
You’ve got to be kidding.

🙄


(It’s ok to talk about yourself in the first person, too.)
 
15th post
I don’t recall saying any such thing.

I didn’t imply any such thing, either.
This is a conspiracy thread.

In conspiracy threads, folks usually point out inconsistencies in the "official," narrative.

If you believe the official narrative, your job is to "debunk," the so-called, "inconsistencies," rather than just parrot what everyone has already heard a zillion times from the establishment about the event.

No one gives a damn about the official propaganda in threads like this.
(Well, maybe those who want their 50th COVID jab do? 🤪 )

Don't you understand the concept of, "conspiracy?"

Are you so indoctrinated into left/right statist politics that you are unable to exercise any critical thinking of your own?






1757903931810.webp




Some folks don't even think Charlie is dead. They believe the whole thing was a staged production, and no one was killed.

I'm not sure I would believe that without more compelling evidence, but it is certainly interesting.
But these same folks said the same about James Foley, and I have never heard of him being spotted anywhere since his death.
 
I haven't been on x much today, because I've been busy with other things... but I was just there, and a lot of questions are being asked....


 
I haven't been on x much today, because I've been busy with other things... but I was just there, and a lot of questions are being asked....

I'm never on X. BTW, the camera behind Kirk recorded very little because the attack came from the other side. And removing a camera does not alter any video on it, nor the actual crime scene, of which it wasn't really a part of. If so, then so were those 3,000 attendees who were all allowed to leave. Anyway, 50 other cameras recorded everything that went on.
 
You’ve got to be kidding.

🙄


(It’s ok to talk about yourself in the first person, too.)


Not very good at English, are you?

Two types of people... does not mean TWO SHOOTERS.... it means....


1. people who parrot BS from the media
2. people who think, never parrot

You like 1, hate 2....
 
Back
Top Bottom