The judge who tried Trump in NY had conflicts.

Slyhunter

Gold Member
Joined
Jun 4, 2014
Messages
12,159
Reaction score
2,260
Points
290
Location
Florida
The judge should've recused himself. He has refused to respond to Jordan's subpoenas. So ...

"During Ms. Merchan’s employment with the Harris campaign, Authentic Campaigns received over $7 million in compensation for its services. You also worked for then-presidential candidate Harris and it appears you continue to do so. Authentic Campaigns conducted work for the 2020 Biden-Harris campaign and, according to public records, was paid just over $2 million in a one-month period for its work," he wrote.

The subpoena is narrower in scope than Jordan's previous request for information. His Aug. 1 letter demanded Loren Merchan hand over documents related to any work for Biden and Harris, in addition to any work that refers to Trump's prosecution or indictment.

Jordan https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jim-jordan-subpoenas-company-led-daughter-ny-v-trump-judgeis giving Nellis until Sept. 13 to comply, according to the subpoena viewed by Fox News Digital.
 
Are the so-called mass media reporting this?
 
Thomas's conflicts didn't seem to matter one bit to Trump supporters.
 
The judge should've recused himself. He has refused to respond to Jordan's subpoenas. So ...



Jordan https://www.foxnews.com/politics/jim-jordan-subpoenas-company-led-daughter-ny-v-trump-judgeis giving Nellis until Sept. 13 to comply, according to the subpoena viewed by Fox News Digital.
Looks like your link went down. But point taken, that ugly little fuckmutt spawned by that fake, foreign judge has grifted millions off this sham. Congress aint gonna do shit, but if they can make the grifters spend millions to stay out of prison, mission accomplished.
 
Are the so-called mass media reporting this?
If you could dispute the evidence against Trump, you would.

You can't. No Trump cultist can, because the case was airtight.

The Trump cultists all know they can't defend Trump based on the evidence, so they try to deflect with weirdass kook conspiracy theories.
 
If you could dispute the evidence against Trump, you would.

You can't. No Trump cultist can, because the case was airtight.

The Trump cultists all know they can't defend Trump based on the evidence, so they try to deflect with weirdass kook conspiracy theories.
First, you have to get past the corrupt judge and the illegal trial.
 
If you could dispute the evidence against Trump, you would.

You can't. No Trump cultist can, because the case was airtight.

Bwahahahahahaha!

:laughing0301: :rofl: :auiqs.jpg: :rofl: :laughing0301: :auiqs.jpg: :rofl: :auiqs.jpg: :laughing0301: :auiqs.jpg: :rofl: :laughing0301:


It was so “airtight” that the persecution refused to ever name the precise hypothetical underlying crime.

You goobers always run away from the legal issues in that disgraceful miscarriage of justice case.
 
It was so “airtight” that
... 37 felony convictions were obtained.

The prosecution had no trouble explaining the crimes to the jury. That's because the jury wasn't composed of piss-guzzling cult imbeciles, and because the prosecution had an airtight case.

Try to understand that just because you're a moron, unable to grasp even the simplest facts and legal concepts, it doesn't mean that everyone else is as stupid as you are.
 
... 37 felony convictions were obtained
Nope. You absolute asshole. There weren’t ever 37 felony charges.

Your ignorance is a monument to your retardation.

Also, there is still no conviction. Why? Because he hasn’t been sentenced yet and therefore there is no entry of judgment yet.

Can you ever get anything right?
The prosecution had no trouble explaining the crimes to the jury.

They sure didn’t want to commit to one theory of the case.
That's because the jury wasn't composed of piss-guzzling cult imbeciles
We don’t know that. It was after all a very liberal part of a deep blue city cesspool. The odds are they were all imbeciles. Like you.
and because the prosecution had an airtight case.

Repeating your false claim doesn’t support your false claim, you fucktard.
 
The Jury heard things they didn't because the judge ignored the defenses objections. And they didn't hear things they should've, because the judge upheld almost every single prosecutor's objections.
 
Back
Top Bottom