The Israeli Criminals Bombed A Funeral Today.

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Talking about Olmert which was rejected

He explicitly said it about Gaza.

And his plans for West Bank are to keep taking more and more of their land, first cuttinh it in half, then proceed to settle them out of West Bank.

 

[Kruska]

Talking about Olmert which was rejected.In the Meantime they wanted Israeli land.They wanted a pathway to connect Gaza and the W. Bank for families, Commerce, etc. Israel obviously is not under ANY obligation to give it to them

Nice try but neither do you. Israel was going to leave roughly 94% of the territory

See, you are even too dumb to read - accepting the Olmert plan would have placed 90% of the available water into Israels hands.
Aka whatever % of the West-bank territory would be at the mercy of the Zionists - just like Gaza before Oct. 2023.

Upon Israel having attacked Lebanon again in 2006, Olmert stated that the "plan" will not be further negotiated.

Since Palestinians ain't as dumb as you - they will never accept whatever foul proposal the Zionist will forward them.
The first and only step, is for Israel to draw out ALL illegal Jewish settlers and their illegal settlements out of the West-Bank.
As such this topic encompasses meanwhile large swaths of illegally occupied territory and approx. 800.000 illegal Jewish settlers.

And Israel actions in regards to the West-bank, brought down a moderate PLO, being replaced with hardliners like Hamas.

You factually believe or intent to pedal the idea of Israel wanting peace, whilst refusing to recognize the 1948 green line, - aka the borders of June 4th 1967 ?

 

[USAF 2023]

See, you are even too dumb to read - accepting the Olmert plan would have placed 90% of the available water into Israels hands.
Aka whatever % of the West-bank territory would be at the mercy of the Zionists - just like Gaza before Oct. 2023.

Upon Israel having attacked Lebanon again in 2006, Olmert stated that the "plan" will not be further negotiated.

Since Palestinians ain't as dumb as you - they will never accept whatever foul proposal the Zionist will forward them.
The first and only step, is for Israel to draw out ALL illegal Jewish settlers and their illegal settlements out of the West-Bank.
As such this topic encompasses meanwhile large swaths of illegally occupied territory and approx. 800.000 illegal Jewish settlers.

And Israel actions in regards to the West-bank, brought down a moderate PLO, being replaced with hardliners like Hamas.

You factually believe or intent to pedal the idea of Israel wanting peace, whilst refusing to recognize the 1948 green line, - aka the borders of June 4th 1967 ?

Gee.. please tell us how Israel survived without these “ water rights” or why they would be held back? They will NEVER leave E Jerusalem for one reason What ‘s to stop them from doing what Jordan did? You are the dumb one

 

[Kruska]

Gee.. please tell us how Israel survived without these “ water rights” or why they would be held back? They will NEVER leave E Jerusalem for one reason What ‘s to stop them from doing what Jordan did? You are the dumb one

Israel has been enforcing these water rights, since they occupied the entire West-Bank in 1967 - you fool.
The Olmert proposal would have legalized this tool to control 90% of the West-Banks water - you fool.

Palestinians ain't as stupid as you - face it.

 

[Shusha]

You factually believe or intent to pedal the idea of Israel wanting peace, whilst refusing to recognize the 1948 green line, - aka the borders of June 4th 1967 ?

Why should Israel recognize an Armistice Line which was explicitly, in the treaty agreement, not to delineate permanent boundaries? Why is territory by conquest acceptable when Arabs do it? (Well, attempt to do it, anyway?)

 

[Shusha]

Israel has been enforcing these water rights, since they occupied the entire West-Bank in 1967 - you fool.
The Olmert proposal would have legalized this tool to control 90% of the West-Banks water - you fool.

Palestinians ain't as stupid as you - face it.

Oh, please. Water agreements between States is completely normal. There is nothing inherently evil in having a water agreement with a neighboring country.

 

[Kruska]

Oh, please. Water agreements between States is completely normal. There is nothing inherently evil in having a water agreement with a neighboring country.

There is no sovereign state of Palestine - therefore there is no such water-agreement, nor any water-agreement.
Israel controls the entire West-bank by military force, illegal settlers and via the control of water distribution - travel to the West-Bank and see for yourself, instead of posting irrelevant nonsense.

 

[westwall]

The Genocidal maniacs continue with their crimes while the World watches, bombing a funeral gathering, there are also reports of IDF demolition teams entering houses in Rafah and blowing them up, same tactic SS General Jurgen Stroop used in Warsaw, he ended swinging from a rope after the war when justice caught up with him.

Darn. Israel eliminated a whole bunch of suicide bombers in that strike.

Good plan.

 

[Kruska]

Why should Israel recognize an Armistice Line which was explicitly, in the treaty agreement, not to delineate permanent boundaries? Why is territory by conquest acceptable when Arabs do it? (Well, attempt to do it, anyway?)

Yitzhak Rabin had stated officially during the 1995 peace talks with the PLO, that Israel is not going to withdraw to the 4th June 1967 border. (which is nothing else but the (Green-line) armistice line).

As I had stated already - as long as Israel is not willing to recognize the 4th June 1967 Border - the ENTIRE West-Bank that was under the control of Jordan, there will never be a peaceful solution to the Palestinian issue. Israel just keeps evading that matter to gain time to eventually annex the entire West-bank and Gaza.

And keep in mind - it was Israel who attacked in 1967, not the Arabs nor Egypt.
So don't give me this Israel preemptive story, since every learned person is aware about the policy and goal of Zionism.

Furthermore Israel is purposely spreading the false narrative, that Arab interests would be those of the Palestinians.
The Arabs nor Egypt never gave a shit about the Palestinians, their rights and demands.

 

[Shusha]

There is no sovereign state of Palestine - therefore there is no such water-agreement, nor any water-agreement.
Israel controls the entire West-bank by military force, illegal settlers and via the control of water distribution - travel to the West-Bank and see for yourself, instead of posting irrelevant nonsense.

Sigh. There ARE water agreements between Israel and the PA. Should there ever be a State of Palestine there will also be a water agreement. There can't help but be. Water agreements between States is entirely normal and not at all inherently evil.

And yep, I see you "fake news" my post about the 1949 Armistice Line which is NOT a legal boundary.

Article II​

With a specific view to the implementation of the resolution of the Security Council of 16 November 1948, the following principles and purposes are affirmed:

1. The principle that no military or political advantage should be gained under the truce ordered by the Security Council is recognized;

2. It is also recognized that no provision of this Agreement shall in any way prejudice the rights, claims and positions of either Party hereto in the ultimate peaceful settlement of the Palestine question, the provisions of this Agreement being dictated exclusively by military considerations.

Further, the 1994 Peace Treaty between the Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Israel establishes the legal boundary between these two States. An Armistice Line has no bearing whatsoever on any relationship between Israel and an emergent State of Palestine. Israel is under absolutely no legal obligation to accept the Armistice Line as a boundary.

 

[Shusha]

As I had stated already - as long as Israel is not willing to recognize the 4th June 1967 Border -

Of course not. Why should she? It's not a border. There is no legal requirement for her to do so.

the ENTIRE West-Bank that was under the control of Jordan

You mean territory illegally captured by Jordan in an act of belligerent aggression against another sovereign State that Jordan absolutely no right to claim?

, there will never be a peaceful solution to the Palestinian issue. Israel just keeps evading that matter to gain time to eventually annex the entire West-bank and Gaza.

A State can not annex territory that it already has a legal and sovereign claim to. The only way through for the Palestinians is to negotiate a secession. Which Israel has already agreed to since 1937.

 

[Jarlaxle]

Yitzhak Rabin had stated officially during the 1995 peace talks with the PLO, that Israel is not going to withdraw to the 4th June 1967 border. (which is nothing else but the (Green-line) armistice line).

As I had stated already - as long as Israel is not willing to recognize the 4th June 1967 Border - the ENTIRE West-Bank that was under the control of Jordan, there will never be a peaceful solution to the Palestinian issue. Israel just keeps evading that matter to gain time to eventually annex the entire West-bank and Gaza.

And keep in mind - it was Israel who attacked in 1967, not the Arabs nor Egypt.
So don't give me this Israel preemptive story, since every learned person is aware about the policy and goal of Zionism.

Furthermore Israel is purposely spreading the false narrative, that Arab interests would be those of the Palestinians.
The Arabs nor Egypt never gave a shit about the Palestinians, their rights and demands.

More bullshit. Egypt committed the first act of war.

 

[USAF 2023]

Israel has been enforcing these water rights, since they occupied the entire West-Bank in 1967 - you fool.
The Olmert proposal would have legalized this tool to control 90% of the West-Banks water - you fool.

Palestinians ain't as stupid as you - face it.

Naturally…. If I had rockets aimed at me I might do the same thing. Too bad Abbas didn’t bring this up in “ negotiations “ Oh… So this way the Palestinians will control the Water just like they want to forbid Jews from coming into E Jerusalem? You are the Foolish one.

 

[Kruska]

More bullshit. Egypt committed the first act of war.

More bullshit form a person who doesn't know shit.

According to UNCLOS 1958 - the Strait of Tiran, was sovereign Egyptian and Saudi territory. And no Arab state nor Egypt had recognized Israel. And Israel until today is not a member nor a signatory of UNLCOS.

Therefore the blockade of Israeli ships was not in breach of UNCLOS - no matter what L.B.Johnson claimed.

You just don't know anything

 

[Kruska]

Naturally…. If I had rockets aimed at me I might do the same thing. Too bad Abbas didn’t bring this up in “ negotiations “ Oh… So this way the Palestinians will control the Water just like they want to forbid Jews from coming into E Jerusalem? You are the Foolish one.

If Israel doesn't control/annex the West-Bank - then why would they need the West-banks water? - you fool.
Israel and it's population and agriculture, died of thirst and drought before 1967 according to you - you really are a fool

If you steal and occupy other peoples land and additionally suppress and kill them - you might indeed face rockets - you naive fool.

 

[Jarlaxle]

If Israel doesn't control/annex the West-Bank - then why would they need the West-banks water? - you fool.
Israel and it's population and agriculture, died of thirst and drought before 1967 according to you - you really are a fool

If you steal and occupy other peoples land and additionally suppress and kill them - you might indeed face rockets - you naive fool.

You're just making shit up.

 

[Meathead]

Did you realize Zionist settlers had been colonizing Arab lands from 1948 at gun point?

So what? You whinging poms colonized half of the world.

More if we hadn't kicked your whingy arses.

 

[USAF 2023]

Fort Fun Indiana

Go back to school and L E A R N about history and the available content of it's related books.

The Wehrmacht, SS and affiliated security organizations were used to suppress any peaceful opposition or armed resistance in occupied territories as well as in Germany.
The IDF and affiliated security organizations are used to oppress any peaceful opposition, or armed resistance in occupied territories as well as in Israel.

Both suppressed peaceful opposition - out of which armed resistance emerges. Once armed resistance emerges and starts killing and assassinating occupiers, the occupiers retaliate.

What Israel is doing in the West-bank is what the Germans did in Norway or e.g. Holland. Suppress peaceful resistance with arrests - take away their property, combat and execute armed resistance. (Had a relative in the Wehrmacht stationed in Norway)

What Israel is doing in Gaza - is what the Germans did to the Polish Resistance of Warsaw in 1944 - Indiscriminate mass killing and erasing all buildings and any infrastructure. (Had a Wehrmacht relative that was in Warsaw August 1944).

And I have been a dozen times plus, in Israel and to the West-bank.

Go back to School. Hitler started to build those camps in the early 39’3 for one reason only. Let’s talk about the way Jews
were treated prior to the actual Holocaust
In the W Bank “ peaceful resistance with arrests “? LOL

 

[Failzero]

Meanwhile an Islamist Immigrant threw a hand grenade into a Paris Hair Salon injuring eight people .

 

[Deadstick]

So what? You whinging poms colonized half of the world.

More if we hadn't kicked your whingy arses.

Are you Australian because you continue to use their slang for Brits? maybe just a old fashioned Colonial boy who tried to wipe out the indigenous people of Australia and that explains your support for the Zionist Colonialists, and what gives you the ridiculous idea i have ever been a fan of British Colonialism?